by Ron Paul
Congressional hearings, White House damage control, endless op-eds, accusations, and defensive denials. Controversy over the events in Benghazi last September took center stage in Washington and elsewhere last week. However, the whole discussion is again more of a sideshow. Each side seeks to score political points instead of asking the real questions about the attack on the US facility, which resulted in the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Republicans smell a political opportunity over evidence that the Administration heavily edited initial intelligence community talking points about the attack to remove or soften anything that might reflect badly on the president or the State Department.
Are we are supposed to be shocked by such behavior? Are we supposed to forget that this kind of whitewashing of facts is standard operating procedure when it comes to the US government?
Democrats in Congress have offered the even less convincing explanation for Benghazi, that somehow the attack occurred due to Republican sponsored cuts in the security budget at facilities overseas. With a one trillion dollar military budget, it is hard to take this seriously.
It appears that the Administration scrubbed initial intelligence reports of references to extremist Islamist involvement in the attacks, preferring to craft a lie that the demonstrations were a spontaneous response to an anti-Islamic video that developed into a full-out attack on the US outpost.
Who can blame the administration for wanting to shift the focus? The Islamic radicals who attacked Benghazi were the same people let loose by the US-led attack on Libya. They were the rebels on whose behalf the US overthrew the Libyan government. Ambassador Stevens was slain by the same Islamic radicals he personally assisted just over one year earlier.
But the Republicans in Congress also want to shift the blame. They supported the Obama Administration’s policy of bombing Libya and overthrowing its government. They also repeated the same manufactured claims that Gaddafi was “killing his own people” and was about to commit mass genocide if he were not stopped. Republicans want to draw attention to the President’s editing talking points in hopes no one will notice that if the attack on Libya they supported had not taken place, Ambassador Stevens would be alive today.
Neither side wants to talk about the real lesson of Benghazi: interventionism always carries with it unintended consequences. The US attack on Libya led to the unleashing of Islamist radicals in Libya. These radicals have destroyed the country, murdered thousands, and killed the US ambassador. Some of these then turned their attention to Mali which required another intervention by the US and France.
Previously secure weapons in Libya flooded the region after the US attack, with many of them going to Islamist radicals who make up the majority of those fighting to overthrow the government in Syria. The US government has intervened in the Syrian conflict on behalf of the same rebels it assisted in the Libya conflict, likely helping with the weapons transfers. With word out that these rebels are mostly affiliated with al Qaeda, the US is now intervening to persuade some factions of the Syrian rebels to kill other factions before completing the task of ousting the Syrian government. It is the dizzying cycle of interventionism.
The real lesson of Benghazi will not be learned because neither Republicans nor Democrats want to hear it. But it is our interventionist foreign policy and its unintended consequences that have created these problems, including the attack and murder of Ambassador Stevens. The disputed talking points and White House whitewashing are just a sideshow.
Processing your request, Please wait....
















Recent Comments
9:48 am: "I’d much rather prefer the Fed stay private than public. Imagine Frank or Pelosi..." - CapitalismPrevails
9:43 am: "Absolutely." - David IKnowStuff
9:33 am: "I REALLY REALLY hope you americans will be able to overcome your Police + Army. I have my doubts...." - NorritInsane
4:52 am: "i think by then life as we know it will be completely different, seriously. I think Obama is the last..." - aworology
9:28 am: "So confused Hilary. When did the president close “Gitmo”?" - Adele Bonge
9:21 am: "The people should march into DC and not leave until Obama. Holder, and Hillary Clinton are locked up,..." - ReddyB1356
9:18 am: "Its amazing how mainstream media shunned him as a lunatic, but the eduacated know its because his..." - ReddyB1356
8:46 am: "A state should have the right to file for divorce from all ‘not of the State’,..." - William Christopher
8:21 am: "Get a law passed, Initiative and referendum. Good speech!" - William Christopher
8:28 am: "Ron Paul, you are the man. the only man in america that can say “no” when no is a..." - M. Abdigaani
2:09 am: "I guess you have no gold then? And maybe I should have clarified that gold has been the top means..." - 14goldmedals
10:40 pm: "Im very curious if the small stores that say “cash for gold” is a program or a strategy..." - fraink1100
10:40 pm: "Im very curious if the small stores that say “cash for gold” is a program or a strategy..." - fraink1100
4:32 am: "Well, simply he lost because he’s a good guy and was a threat to the powers that be." - aworology
2:42 am: "Ron Paul is in with the Freemasons and their libertarian anarchist ideologies, he does not speak for..." - cranyonrye
12:40 am: "Ron Paul last real American" - onlythewise1
2:05 am: "agreeeeeeed! " - PleaseSeeThis
1:49 am: "so unbelievably sad anyone can support Obama. Most people who have done any research at all know..." - PleaseSeeThis
1:46 am: "agreed, the for the small group of dedicated people to go into action.. Ron Paul has created many..." - PleaseSeeThis
1:42 am: "why do you think his name is do-jack?? cause he does jack all.." - PleaseSeeThis