Thank You, Dr. Ron Paul

By Chuck Baldwin

Yesterday, September 22, Congressman Ron Paul publicly gave me his endorsement for the office of President of the United States. In his blog at the Campaign for Liberty web site, he said, “I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.” (See the complete statement here.)

Obviously, I could not be more delighted and honored to have Dr. Paul’s endorsement. I called him last evening and thanked him personally. And now I want to thank him publicly.

I am fully aware that Dr. Paul was under considerable pressure from various groups that were actively soliciting his support. I can honestly say that I never lobbied Dr. Paul for his endorsement. He knew I would be thrilled to have it, but I have too much respect for Ron Paul to be so presumptuous as to expect him to endorse me. I completely understood his neutrality. He has strong ties to both the Libertarian and Constitution parties–not to mention the obvious fact that he is a ten-term Republican Congressman with much support from the Republican Party in his home district.

I was happy to support Ron Paul during the Republican primaries, because I believe in the same principles. I personally campaigned for him in several states and in this column. And I asked (or expected) nothing in return. In fact, I have stated this publicly, time and again: if Ron Paul had won the Republican nomination for President, I would not be running. I would still be supporting Ron Paul.

I am running for President because the Republican Party rejected Ron’s Paul’s message of constitutional government, fiscal responsibility, and non-interventionism. Therefore, someone had to pick up the mantle and carry this message into the general election. The Constitution Party asked me to be their standard-bearer in order to bring this message to the American people in November. So, here I am. And now, Ron Paul’s endorsement is further substantiation that the message of constitutional government will not die in 2008. The American people still have a real choice instead of the big-government, globalist, interventionist, “big box” party candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama.

Ron Paul’s message is my message; Ron Paul’s fight is my fight.

I want to return America to constitutional government. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Amendment X) I believe that, and will govern the Executive branch of the federal government accordingly.

My sworn oath to the Tenth Amendment means I would dismantle the Patriot Act and restore law enforcement to the states and local governments, where it rightly belongs. Yes, this includes the so-called “war on drugs” and the so-called “war on terror.” No more warrantless searches and seizures. No more eavesdropping on Americans’ phone calls, or collecting Americans’ emails, or spying on American citizens without court order and oversight. No more stripping Americans of their constitutional rights in the name of “national security.” In addition, I would use every power and authority vested to my office to preserve and protect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. And, yes, I will immediately restore Posse Comitatus. As President, I want to protect America from Washington, D.C., as much I want to protect it from foreign powers.

I will also take the words of the Declaration of Independence seriously, where it states, “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States.” This means the day I am sworn in as President of the United States, the New World Order comes crashing down! The NAFTA superhighway is dead. The North American Union is dead. I will work to eliminate NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, and the WTO. The FTAA is DOA. I will not expend tax dollars for the support of the United Nations.

Furthermore, I will take my oath to the Constitution seriously, when it states that one of the express purposes of the federal government is to “repel Invasions.” This means we will secure America’s borders, because the illegal immigration crisis is more than mere immigration: it is an invasion, and I will stop it! Even if I have to send the U.S. Army to the borders, we will put a stop to this invasion of illegal aliens. I will also aggressively prosecute those employers who knowingly hire illegals. And did I mention that my first day in office is Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean’s last day in prison? I will personally open the prison doors and restore to these men their freedom. I will also give them their jobs back (with pay), if they want them. And one more item on this point: my first day of office is also U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton’s last day on the job.

I also share Ron Paul’s concerns for the way the two major parties have allowed the United States to become a meddlesome, interventionist, nation-building empire for the sake of satisfying the greedy machinations of international bankers and power-hungry politicians. I will not only bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan, but also from most of the other 130 nations that currently house U.S. forces. I will end foreign aid. I will get the U.S. out of NATO. It is past time for the European states to defend themselves. It is time for us to stop sticking our nose in every other nation’s business and start taking care of the United States. The Warfare State will kill us. Global empires are not sustainable. I repeat: global empires are not sustainable. If history teaches anything, it teaches that.

Furthermore, the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war is over, when I become President. Because I will take my oath to the Constitution seriously, I would never send troops to invade and occupy a foreign country without a Declaration of War by Congress. In dealing with rogue terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda, I will seek letters of Marque and Reprisal from Congress, which would give me the authority to use whatever special and/or private forces are necessary to seek out and destroy those who desire our hurt.

And even though I am a born again Christian (as is Ron Paul), I would take my responsibility to protect the religious liberty of every American seriously. People have the right to worship God (or not worship God) according to the dictates of their own conscience. Whether one is Baptist, Catholic, Mormon, or agnostic, people have the right to practice their faith as they see fit. I am absolutely dedicated to preserving religious liberty. Religious tyranny is as evil as political or social tyranny. And, as I will be no man’s slave, neither will I be any man’s master.

I also share Ron Paul’s commitment to the sanctity of life. When I become President, I will use the bully pulpit of the White House to press Congress to pass Dr. Paul’s Sanctity of Life Act, which would overturn Roe v. Wade and end abortion-on-demand. On this topic, the GOP is especially hypocritical. The Republican Party controlled the entire federal government for six years and did nothing to save the life of a single unborn child. Saving unborn babies from the abortionists’ scalpel is more than rhetoric with me, however.

Another area of agreement with Ron Paul is my philosophy of economics. Dr. Paul has been predicting the current financial meltdown in this country for years. And when all is done, the current bailout being proposed will do more harm than good. The problem is, America’s leaders have rejected sound money policies for years, and the chickens are coming home to roost.

As President, I would seek to overturn the 16th Amendment, eliminate the Internal Revenue Service, and disband the Federal Reserve. I would lead the charge to return America to sound money principles. I would seek to reduce federal spending to constitutional levels by eliminating those same federal departments that Newt Gingrich promised to eliminate in his Contract with America back in 1994 (and then failed to do). I would seek to eliminate the Departments of Education, Commerce, Energy, etc. I would demand that Congress pass a balanced budget and that we stop deficit spending.

Neither John McCain nor Barack Obama will do any of the above. If he were President, Dr. Paul would do it, however, and so would I.

Needless to say, I am both humbled and honored that Ron Paul would place enough faith in me that he would endorse me for President. I can think of no higher compliment to my candidacy. I here and now publicly thank him for this vote of confidence. I know my Vice Presidential running mate, Darrell Castle (a former Marine Corps officer and Vietnam veteran), joins me in inviting all of Dr. Paul’s supporters to help us take the message of constitutional government into the general election on November 4. Thank you.

If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php

Disclaimer: I am currently a candidate for President of the United States on the Constitution Party ticket. My official campaign web site is located at: http://www.baldwin08.com/

  • Pingback: howard miller clock()

  • Pingback: Fast Cars for Sale()

  • Pingback: nespresso aeroccino 3()

  • Pingback: blackheads()

  • Pingback: Potato And Leek Soup()

  • Pingback: Memory Foam Mattress Reviews()

  • Pingback: Final Countdown()

  • Pingback: rewfarasfvmsdr()

  • http://homemadewindgenerators.tumblr.com/ home made wind generators

    Engaging content: will definitely come back soon:D

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Dan

    almost forgot…Ron didnt exactly say he endorsed Buddy Baldwin as much as say Baldwin was running with the intention of eliminating the fed and getting back our civil liberties back….Damn shame about the religious baggage…truely a shame…kinda took the wind out of the sails. RUN RON RUN

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Dan

    Yeah the religious platform is a serious issue…anytime religion is involved theres a 100% chance for mischief.Baldwin and his buddy scare me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Dan

    A week ago, Warren Buffett rescued Goldman Sachs by injecting $5 billion in capital. Did Buffett bargain for warrants that can be exchanged at an unknown later date for nonvoting shares? No: He is not a fool. Buffett gave Goldman Sachs $5 billion in return for senior preferred stock, the kind that votes and also is more valuable than ordinary shares. That is to say, he used his money to buy something. Goldman can now employ the cash to fix its liquidity problems. The United States Congress and the White House should use the public’s $700 billion to buy something, namely senior preferred shares. Why are Congress and George W. Bush not simply following the road map laid out on this problem by the smartest investor of our era? Either Congress and the president are a bunch of blithering fools — or what they actually want is to insure the public’s money is never seen by the public again.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • I want my country back

    “This method of thinking is like your views on religious freedom. Granted I know there is a major difference between practicing religion and butchering the unborn. I just don’t believe it is a topic for our government to to regulate.”

    I could not have said it better, Over turning Roe v Wade lends itself to religious tyranny rather than freedom of choice.

    You will not win this election by by pretending to support individual freedoms and injecting your religious beliefs upon the citizenry.

    I’m a bit confused now about who to cast a vote for since Ronbo is no longer a candidate. He is probably the only person that could possibly be elected by popular vote even if we have to write him in.

    I could stand a little counseling here. Your thoughts here will be appreciated.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Cassandra Bachrach

    How can you people be so cavalier? You’re rushing to a decision to “vote for Baldwin” simply because Dr. Paul has endorsed him. PLEASE READ ABOUT BALDWIN AND THE CONSTITUTION PARTY before jumping in. That party is undergirded by more than simply the tenents of our constitution. It is not “purely” constitutional by any means.

    Wake up, people! I like Dr. Paul, too. But I will not vote for a candidate that rests on RELIGIOUS laurels rather than SPIRITUAL reason and wisdom.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Ben Burns

    I congratulate you Mr. Baldwin on your endorsement from a very respected individual. This will be my first year voting for a third party candidate. I wish you the best of luck!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Jonathan

    I also disagree with the issue of abortion. Even though unmoral, the government cannot take away the right for a woman to decide. In an interview, Dr. Paul said this is an issue that should be left up to the local State Governments. To finalize, multiple studies show legalizing abortion reduces crime rates in the long run.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Alaskan

    Abortion is murder(period)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Texan

    Chuck I agree with everything you stand for except the issue of abortion. I have always viewed a government “of the people” to be much like a friend. A friend has the right to tell another that having an abortion is bad for both the future of the child and puts the woman’s body through a lot of stress, but has no right to force the woman to not have a choice.

    This method of thinking is like your views on religious freedom. Granted I know there is a major difference between practicing religion and butchering the unborn. I just don’t believe it is a topic for our government to to regulate.

    Also, this subject is a divisor of our nation. It is what the duopoly use to keep the voters voting one way or the other without the voter considering many of the other issues. Basically, issues such as abortion have become the main debate of the big politicians so that we remain ignorant to all the important issues that they do not want to talk about.

    If you actually read this I appreciate your time.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0