U.S. House of Representatives
July 16, 2002
“Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Free Housing Market Enhancement Act. This legislation restores a free market in housing by repealing special privileges for housing-related government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). These entities are the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie), and the National Home Loan Bank Board (HLBB). According to the Congressional Budget Office, the housing-related GSEs received $13.6 billion worth of indirect federal subsidies in fiscal year 2000 alone.
One of the major government privileges granted these GSEs is a line of credit to the United States Treasury. According to some estimates, the line of credit may be worth over $2 billion. This explicit promise by the Treasury to bail out these GSEs in times of economic difficulty helps them attract investors who are willing to settle for lower yields than they would demand in the absence of the subsidy. Thus, the line of credit distorts the allocation of capital. More importantly, the line of credit is a promise on behalf of the government to engage in a massive unconstitutional and immoral income transfer from working Americans to holders of GSE debt.
The Free Housing Market Enhancement Act also repeals the explicit grant of legal authority given to the Federal Reserve to purchase the debt of housing-related GSEs. GSEs are the only institutions besides the United States Treasury granted explicit statutory authority to monetize their debt through the Federal Reserve. This provision gives the GSEs a source of liquidity unavailable to their competitors.
Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market. This is because the special privileges of Fannie, Freddie, and HLBB have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions. As a result, capital is diverted from its most productive use into housing. This reduces the efficacy of the entire market and thus reduces the standard of living of all Americans.
However, despite the long-term damage to the economy inflicted by the government’s interference in the housing market, the government’s policies of diverting capital to other uses creates a short-term boom in housing. Like all artificially-created bubbles, the boom in housing prices cannot last forever. When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss. These losses will be greater than they would have otherwise been had government policy not actively encouraged over-investment in housing.
Perhaps the Federal Reserve can stave off the day of reckoning by purchasing GSE debt and pumping liquidity into the housing market, but this cannot hold off the inevitable drop in the housing market forever. In fact, postponing the necessary but painful market corrections will only deepen the inevitable fall. The more people invested in the market, the greater the effects across the economy when the bubble bursts.
No less an authority than Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has expressed concern that government subsidies provided to the GSEs make investors underestimate the risk of investing in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Mr. Speaker, it is time for Congress to act to remove taxpayer support from the housing GSEs before the bubble bursts and taxpayers are once again forced to bail out investors misled by foolish government interference in the market. I therefore hope my colleagues will stand up for American taxpayers and investors by cosponsoring the Free Housing Market Enhancement Act.”
Processing your request, Please wait....
[...] and Freddie’s role in a growing “housing bubble” in each of the years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. The controversy over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — Government Sponsored [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] the major candidates for President, only Texas Congressman Ron Paul accurately described the housing bubble repeatedly and specifically for years before the burst, with at least one [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] 2002: Ron Paul predicts the housing bubble will burst and wipe out home [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] early as September 2001, and repeatedly throughout subsequent years, Ron Paul was accurately predicting that the housing bubble and financial collapse would occur in [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] contrary evidence), Ron Paul warned of the housing bubble even more eloquently in 2001,2002, 2003, and in 2007 when Gingrich was telling conservatives to “embrace” the Freddie [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Paul, July 16, 2002, before the House of [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] The Fed gets a great deal of credit in some circles for reducing the severity of the 2007-2009 recession. The Fed printed and loaned trillions of new dollars to institutions with bad assets on their books (AIG, Bear Stearns, Citi, Fannie Mae, etc.), preventing those institutions’ outright failure. Austrian economic theory says the Fed will ‘pay’ for printing that extra money with price inflation or another major bubble. The gist of the Austrian theory is simple: there’s no such thing as a free lunch; the Fed’s actions guarantee another, more painful recession down the line. We now have the initial data points on the path to proving the Austrians right (once again). [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] From the 11/18/11 edition of The Neal Boortz Show. Read Ron Paul’s complete statement predicting the housing bubble and exactly how it would happen here: http://www.ronpaul.com/2008-09-26/ron-paul-on-the-housing-bubble-july-2002/ [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If Ron Paul were the front runner I would vote for him in a heart beat.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
I believe you have it backwards my friend. Don’t wait until the media anoints him front runner status to support him. Make him a front runner BY supporting him. This is not a horse race.@xxadmin
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Ron Paul really is the front runner, the media just doesn’t want to admit it. He’s poised to win Iowa and is running second in NH. He’s got a strong ground game, tons of money coming in and a strong and growing base, not to mention he’s the GOP’s lone chance of beating Obama because he can draw in Independents and anti-war Dems. None of the other GOP candidates have any real appeal beyond neoconservatives and and so called evangelical “Christians” that put another country (Israel) above our own. @xxadmin
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] • Ron Paul July 16, 2002: “However, despite the long-term damage to the economy inflicted by the government’s [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Ron Paul July 16, 2002: “However, despite the long-term damage to the economy inflicted by the government’s [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] the only guy to even take a position on the issue is Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who thinks the federal government should get out of the housing business and instead just let prices sink until the free market forces kick in. I’m sure homeowners [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] the only guy to even take a position on the issue is Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who thinks the federal government should get out of the housing business and instead just let prices sink until the free market forces kick in. I’m sure homeowners [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] the only guy to even take a position on the issue is Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who thinks the federal government should get out of the housing business and instead just let prices sink until the free market forces kick in. I’m sure homeowners [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] professionals might as well aim their sights on Ron Paul as well. Millions of other Americans have, as far back as 2002. Once folks learn who has been in Washington, warning government about the upcoming financial [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] professionals might as well aim their sights on Ron Paul as well. Millions of other Americans have, as far back as 2002. Once folks learn who has been in Washington, warning government about the upcoming financial [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] professionals might as well aim their sights on Ron Paul as well. Millions of other Americans have, as far back as 2002. Once folks learn who has been in Washington, warning government about the upcoming financial [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] order to ensure financial stability for America. In 2002, Ron Paul was the sole voice in Congress sounding the alarm against monetary debasement and government incentives which led to the housing bubble which has [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] money, and so I’ll let them in on the inside scoop: with increasing difficulty. Thanks to their disastrous economic policies, whereas two or three years ago it took us a mere week to meet our fundraising goal, these days it [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey He knew of this and warned that the housing bubble was unprecedented. Paul Krugman on the housing bubble – YouTube says Paul Krugman was one of the few economists who predicted a housing bubble and correction to prices back in 2006. Ron Paul July 2002 introduced the Free Market Enhancement Act " Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market. This is because the special privileges of Fannie, Freddie, and HLBB have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions. When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss." Ron Paul on the Housing Bubble – July 2002 [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] get our money, and so I’ll let them in on the inside scoop: with increasing difficulty. Thanks to their disastrous economic policies, whereas two or three years ago it took us a mere week to meet our fundraising goal, these days it [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] was titled the “Free Housing Market Enhancement Act”. Here are a few lines from the speech he delivered on the house floor when introducing the bill: “Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Free Housing Market Enhancement [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
we really need to get this in the hands of everyone we can. Ron Paul is a prophet!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] in this entire post, jazzy. Economics isn't hard. from July 2002 The Free Market Enhancement Act Ron Paul on the Housing Bubble – July 2002 | Ron Paul .com It's like I'm in a bad dream where almost everyone is telling me to bet on the Cubs instead of the [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Lien vers la transcription originale sur le site RonPaul.com [...]
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
[...] Paul predicted and understood the financial collapse years before it occurred and tried his best to prevent it, but was overwhelmed by a huge majority in Congress who favored [...]
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
[...] problem is that many people predicted the bubble. Rep. Ron Paul warned of a housing bubble as early as 2002, introducing legislation designed to keep the crash from happening (that of course [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Ron Paul Predicted the Housing Bubble in 2002. Speech from the floor of the house. [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] predicted a severe recession well in advance of Obama’s bad predictions. Representative Ron Paul predicted the housing bubble would result in a crash,writing in 2002 that “like all artificially-created [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] in predicting the financial meltdown as Ezra’s merry band of prophetic liberals. For example, here is Ron Paul calling for the repeal of special privileges from the GSEs back in 2002, and here he is warning of [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Paul correctly predicted our current housing disaster in 2002, and even correctly predicted what our g…, but was virtually laughed out of this year’s presidential race for being too [...]
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
One of the major government privileges granted these GSEs is a line of credit to the United States Treasury. According to some estimates, the line of credit may be worth over $2 billion. This explicit promise by the Treasury to bail out these GSEs in times of economic difficulty helps them attract investors who are willing to settle for lower yields than they would demand in the absence of the subsidy.
——————
williamgeorge
Search Engine Optimization
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Maybe to fix this crisis, we should turn to the ONE person that predicted it…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Subprime is contained. The US economy is sound. It’s a Goldilocks economy. Budget deficits don’t matter. Bail outs are a moral hazard. House prices never go down. But…
“A correction is equal and opposite to the deception that preceded it”.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Too bad, nobody would listened to him. Mr. Ron Paul, you’ve been da man!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0