5 responses to “Third Party Presidential Debate”

  1. VinnarleleNit

    Старый уровень ещё на подвесе, и новый не влезает:)) 1.Отстранение от государственных дел. знакомство с девушками из подольска Просто не сетевую на другой компьютер который не подключен к сети.В ряде регионов из-за чрезмерных антропогенных нагрузок меняются природные ландшафты, обостряется проблема сохранения биоразнообразия животных и растительных сообществ..

    http://forum.vertigo.fm/showthread.php?7946-Videos&p=627752#post627752
    http://www.hetsportforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=174046&p=268867#p268867
    http://forum.cgmovement.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13309&p=16575#p16575
    http://www.555studio.com/forums/index.php/topic,203408.new.html#new
    http://www.chicagopetexpos.com/forum/23-general-off-topic/89608—-isq-60#89608

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. wine accessories

    forty folks that work with all of the services Oasis provides, and he is really a really busy man, he

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. pawowgold

    very good, it’s very useful to me, thank you very much!

    ———————
    runescape gold, http://www.playersaid.com/runescape-gold/

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Targeted Fb Fan

    Websites You Should Visit…

    [...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Skip

    I watched parts of this debate and was disappointed to see Chuck Baldwin bring up his opinion on traditional marriage. The constitution gives no authority to the federal government to define marriage. Furthermore, under the constitution, no state has the right to ignore the civil agreements reached in other states. So if MA and CA decide that it is the civil liberty of homosexuals to marry, every state shall have to abide by this ruling.

    In fact, if you look at his defense for traditional marriage on his website he doesn’t even mention the constitution. Instead he defends his position with cultural and religious platitudes. (see here: http://baldwin08.com/Pro-Traditional-Marriage.cfm)

    In a John Stossel interview Ron Paul stated his reason for not voting for NAFTA even though it promoted free-trade. He said even though he is for promoting free-trade, he does not believe he should compromise with government intervention. I essentially feel the same way with Chuck Baldwin, as I’m sure many others do. He is not a strong candidate because he appears to be placing religious / cultural authority before the constitution.

    Can someone tell me why then I should vote for Chuck Baldwin and not Bob Barr? Bob Barr does not have the best voting record, but he at least apologizes for his past un-constitutional positions.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0