Future Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner failed his way to the top and is part of the problem, says Ron Paul.
Channel: Bloomberg Television
Date: 1/21/2009
Transcript:
Reporter: Now in less than half an hour the confirmation hearing for Timothy Geithner, the President Obama’s choice for secretary of treasury, will begin at the Senate. To give us a preview, Congressman Ron Paul, Republican representative from Texas, joins us from Washington DC. Congressman Paul is a ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee. Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. Let me first get your take, it seems like the Republicans are going to put on the kid gloves here for Timothy Geithner.
Ron Paul: Yeah, it sure looks like it that he’ll get confirmed. I imagine they’ll ask him a couple of questions to make it look like they are really scrutinizing him, but it looks like he’ll get confirmed.
Reporter: Now we know that your take on the entire treasury department is not so positive, but what is your take on Geithner if someone’s going to lead the treasury department as the leader?
Ron Paul: Well, he’s bright. He’s a technician, he knows the system, he’s part of the establishment, but it’s the system that is so rotten and he can’t bail it out. Management, it’s not a lack of management, it’s the lack of a system that works, and so I don’t think he can be successful and besides, he’s part of the problem. He was basically in charge of the first part of the TARP funds. So, somebody takes 350 billion dollars, they mess it up so we promote him. And he’s generally has been able to do that over his career. I mean, things don’t go well, he usually gets promoted, and it looks like that’s going to happen again.
Reporter: Is this, I mean, we’re looking for a platform of change from President Obama. Does this give you a little bit less hope than maybe you would’ve had?
Ron Paul: Yeah, I had very little hope but if you can get less hope I would say so. I mean whether it’s foreign policy, or monetary policy, fiscal policy, regulatory policy, it’s all the same. There are no changes because basically, the leadership, philosophically speaking and politically speaking, of the Democrats and the Republicans are interventionist. Whether it’s intervention overseas or military, or in the financial segment, and they both endorse the monetary system. They don’t really challenge the Federal Reserve. But what has to be challenged is this principal of fractional reserve banking where debt is pyramided. That’s the problem and it has to be unwound and a new system has to be devised. This system has ended just as Bretton Woods ended in 1971. The post Bretton Woods system has ended too; that’s why the financial system doesn’t work. So if we pretend that all we have to do is create money and credit out of thin air, which is part of the Geithner’s theory, it won’t work. All you can end up with is the destruction of the dollar, so look for the dollar crisis, it has to come. You just can’t create trillions of dollars out of thin air for every bailout and expect the dollar to maintain its value.
Reporter: Congressman Paul, what would you like to see, I mean if we wanted to change the status quo? What kind of change would you like to make?
Ron Paul: Well you would have to address the subject to the Federal Reserve. I mean, really the Federal Reserve doesn’t deserve to exist, but if you couldn’t get rid of it which is the likely scenario, we should limit the power of the Federal Reserve. They should have surveillance. We should have all the information we want from the Federal Reserve. They should be audited. They should be susceptible to all the inquiries of the Congress. And eventually, as soon as possible though, the privilege of creating money out of thin air through monetized debt has to end. This whole idea that you can do central economic planning by manipulating interest rate is a fallacy. We have depended on this for too long. We believe the Federal Reserve, by creating credit and giving us artificially low interest rates is the road to great wealth – but it isn’t. It’s the road to a disaster.
Reporter: Congressman, only about 10 seconds left. Let me just ask you, do you have, is there any optimism for more transparency under this administration?
Ron Paul: Slightly. Because I talked a lot with Chairman Frank and he and I share the view that there should be more surveillance and we are going to have a hearing in February on this subject. So, in the Senate and the Congresses that yes, they want more surveillance. But when push comes to shove, I’m afraid the establishment will win the fight.
Reporter: Alright, Congressman Ron Paul, Republican representative from Texas. Thank you for joining us.
- Ron Paul Questions Timothy Geithner Venue: House Financial Services Committee Topic: Systemic Regulation, Prudential Matters, Resolution Authority and Securitization...
- Ron Paul on Russia Today: Crisis could last for a decade Ron Paul was interviewed by Russia Today about Obama’s foreign policy and his desperate attempts...
- Ron Paul on Fox Business: Geithner and AIG Channel: Fox Business Date: 1/27/2010 Transcript: News Anchor: Well folks, we are joined right...















Recent Comments
2:08 am: "Christine, You yourself have said repeatedly that we do not need insurance companies. I have pointed out how..." - dan
12:05 am: "Health care insurance is NOT health care services. Health care insurance does not guarantee that..." - Christine
2:04 am: "Fred, It’s obvious that you haven’t a clue whats going on here, and i’d suggest that..." - David
12:14 am: "Pinhead. #7, first item. Barium: The Poison No One Talks About http://www.bariumblues.com/ 1...." - Christine
7:17 pm: "Sean, I know this is late but how did the debate go?" - Fluidly Unsure
5:34 pm: "OK, Maybe I am a conspiracy theorist, but I am certainly not a draft dodger! Oh well. Go collect your food..." - Berg
4:47 pm: "“The barium content in the chemtrails is meant to make you sick and spray chemicals..." - Fred the Protectionist
4:45 pm: "“uh huh huh. GET OUT!” *flushes armchair toilet*" - Fred the Protectionist
4:45 pm: "Global warming is a farce. The CRU leaked emails are absolute proof of that fact. Catastrophy Bonds are the..." - me
4:42 pm: "Awe don’t play dumb…….uh…never mind." - Fred the Protectionist
9:19 pm: "Dfens your theories about RP are nonsense and untrue! & he’s poision? I don’t get..." - Bottomline
4:59 pm: "I told you. Libertarian ideology has usurped the Republican Party about 20 years ago...." - Fred the Protectionist
4:56 pm: "Your cognitive abilities are limited." - Fred the Protectionist
9:14 pm: "Eh! Sorry we don’t speak Pig-Latin Forest, Fled, and Defens on how these rediculous accusations..." - Bottomline
9:09 pm: "RP has been a staunch opponent to job killing free trade agreements that Clinton and Bush endorsed!" - Bottomline
9:05 pm: "& Fled can’t you realize that the Feds are playing monopoly and russian roulette with our..." - Bottomline
4:53 pm: "“If you supported Perot and now support Ron Paul…” They have no idea..." - Fred the Protectionist
4:51 pm: "“The devalued dollar is domestic as well and wages have never kept pace with..." - Fred the Protectionist
8:59 pm: "We were in Iraq for one reason and that was for OIL! Not to give the Iraqi people freedom. I think..." - Bottomline
5:43 pm: "I’m sorry to hear that your parents are scared, but that is not uncommon. The rift between..." - Fluidly Unsure