IDAHO
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2009/HJM004.pdf

WHEREAS, Congress has inappropriately delegated its monetary authority to the private federal reserve bank, thus failing to protect and provide a sound monetary system as defined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States, forcing an unstable currency on us resulting in the past, and the current, economic perils; and

WHEREAS, a number of proposals from past and present Administrations and Congress may violate the Constitution of the United States.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the First Regular Session of the Sixtieth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives and the Senate concurring therein, that the state of Idaho hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States

at the state sovereignty site
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/02/23/state-sovereignty-resolutions/

Not all of the state’s petitions read exactly alike. Check out your state.

This is where this “spend more is good” concept comes from. People spend more which means barrowing more, and as long as energy producers keep on trading their energy products in the currency barrowed on which is a storage vessel, or bank volt rather of IOU’s it can maintain. This ponzi system can maintain because there are two investment avenues for this keep functioning “absorption channel” & “capital account channel” and this is why, so called, “free trade” is such a big deal. You must keep expanding empire to maintain. Thing is the FED is setting the American people up to be Bernie Madoff, and anyone else barrowing Federal Reserve Notes. The Euro among others are also petro ponzi IOU currency systems too.

Just a note here, I have figured out what the filter programs stop, and what grabs the attention of moderators of major media message boards and blogs when I post about such a topic. Anytime “energy producers” or “oil producers” is posted with “FED” or “RFB” “Reserve Notes” exedra and “U.S. Government” within the same content together it seems to be taboo. Oh, and “protection racket” is bad too.

This is not about fait currency dynamics which is only relevant on a micro scale, but without the above macro dynamic currency would have no faith behind it on a day to day bases.

P.S. I am never given an explanation why the posting is so controversial to the point that I am not allowed to ever post such information.

$1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin

$2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris

$3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy

$4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam

$5. Lehman Brothers of NY

$6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (Now Shearson American Express)

$7. Goldman, Sachs of NY

$8. National Bank of Commerce NY/Morgan Guaranty Trust (J. P. Morgan Bank – Equitable Life – Levi P. Morton are principal shareholders)

$9. Hanover Trust of NY (William and David Rockefeller & Chase National Bank NY are principal shareholders). Here & Here

TIME LINE OF THE FOREIGN-OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

1791-1811: Rothschilds’ First Bank of the United States

1816-1836: Rothschilds’ Second Bank of the United States

1837-1862: Free Banking Era – no formal Central Bank through the efforts of President Andrew Jackson

1862-1913: System of National Banks through the efforts of President Andrew Jackson

1913-Current: Federal Reserve Act effects a consortium of privately held Jewish & associated banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank are the Rothschilds of London holding 57% of the stock which is not available for public trading

On May 23 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden brought impeachment charges against the members of the Federal Reserve Bank. A smear campaign against McFadden ensued and he was poisoned 3 years later.