8 responses to “Bonus Outrage is Politically Driven”

  1. wine delivery brooklyn

    Hey there! Wonderful stuff, please do tell us when you post again something comparable!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Buy Targeted Fb Fan

    Related.. Trackback...

    [...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]...

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Chase

    Why the hell should I have to submit an e-mail address? Anyway, going back to at least 1990, members of governments overseeing AIG allowed it to get away with defaulting on its debts. The selfishness of members of Congress taking bribes from banking corporations is such that, not only do they allow the companies to defaults on their debts, they even steal money from taxpayers to give it to them; and rationalize and lie by saying they didn't know waht they were doing; or, that it's the best thing to do for the national economy.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Fluidly Unsure

    Ron Paul's concern are valid, but there are other questions:

    Was this a "bonus" or a deferred payment of past work?

    Why would 1/1000th of the bailout be such a big deal? (http://xkcd.com/558/)

    Wasn't the bailout an attempt to stop bankruptcy so they could keep their past contracts?

    Didn't AIG's reckless activities escalate when it succumbed to political pressure and fired it's CEO?

    About the 90% tax. Didn't the US income tax start as a temporary tax to get the ridiculously rich to pay for the debts of the civil war?

    But then maybe Obama is simply stimulating the physical security industry.
    (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29802167/)

    Some other good points:
    (http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/19/news/economy/bonus_tax_policy/index.htm)

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. carol

    Dr. Paul is right about this issue. Congress agreed to all these big handouts without even reading the bills they have passed. They have handed over their power to the executive branch and pass any bill handed down to them.

    Now they want to try to undo some of the damage by using this unconstitutional 90% tax. Taxpayer money should never have been given in the first place for all of these failed businesses. By giving this money to prop up poorly run businesses, other businesses are prevented from taking their place and doing a better job.

    This 90% tax is just grand standing by congress in an attempt to cover their incompetence, and to distract people from the real issue of all the tax payer money in the trillions given to prop up banks and the super rich.

    Wealth is being redistributed, and the rich are getting richer while the middle class tax payer is becoming extinct. Everyone is excited about a few hundred million and OVERLOOK the trillions that have been handed out to banks. How easily the American public is distracted by this trivial bonus issue, while their future children will be enslaved to pay off these big bailouts in the TRILLIONS.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Wayne Shaw

      I agree with the above but even a bigger issue not surfaced yet is the Oil. We have over 200 years of Oil and Gas in Alaska and over 40 years in North Dakota. ALL CAPPED OFF. We will never use our own Oil because if we do the price will go to below $3.00 a barrel and .61 gas at the pumps and the World Bank would not let us not to mention the Maffia and the bought and paid for Congress. Right now all looks Ok at $50.00 a barrel but by the summer it will be $75.00-$80.00 and we will be back up to $4.00 Gas. the $781 Trillion will get dwafted by $75 Trillion a month leaving every month for the mid east. This is the BIGGEST TRANFER OF WEALTH EVER..and this will kill us. Not to mention China receiving a special letter of Iminent Domain as security for our loans. This should have been our Number 1 concern but it will never be addressed. You will only hear about the public complaining about the gas prices. Not knowing every Barrel of Oil bought, a portion of the cost goes to pay our National Debt. Kissinger saw to that and sold us down the river as did Nixon removing us from the Gold Standard. Unless we use our Own Oil (there is no Oil Shortage in the US) Our Auto Industry and Export Industry of OIL....we can sell our own OIL of $35.00 a barrel and make $32.00 a barrel and get some of our Money back! We should Not import one Drop of Oil ! We can then replace the Trillions Printed with no Value! Why are we not talking about this....because Congress is bought and Paid for by the Oil Companies and we haven't built a NEW Oil Refinary in 40years.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      1. Sean

        You are dead wrong. The United states has been running out of oil since the sixties and alaska has been running out since before the 90's... There are 3.5 billion barrels of oil in north dakota and there are only so many billion barrels of oil in alaska... We consume 20 million barrels a day. IF there were actually 10 billion barrels of oil left in the united states, it would only last 150 days, or a 1/3rd of a year. Its a general consensus across the scope that we will run out sooner than later.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Dan D

    GO RON! Very well said, please keep speaking up for us Constitutionalists like you have been! Everything that comes out of your mouth makes total and complete sense. I can't find the reason more Americans don't believe in what you're saying.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply