Ron Paul Didn’t Expect This Response From Hillary Clinton

Date: 4/22/2009
Venue: House Foreign Affairs Committee
Channel: C-SPAN 3

Transcript:

Howard Berman: The gentleman from Texas, Mr. Paul, is recognized for five minutes.

Ron Paul: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And welcome, Madame Secretary.

I have a general question I want to ask about foreign policy, but leading up to that question I would like to mention first that the election had something to do with bringing about change in tone with our foreign policy. And I think there have been some very positive changes in tone and many of us have argued for more diplomacy rather than more threats, so many of us are pleased with that. It goes back to the old saying of, “Speaking softly and still be willing to carry a big stick”. But sometimes I wonder whether that big stick doesn’t get wielded a little too often.

But I do want to caution all of us that what we say is very important and can be very beneficial, but what we do is also very important. So that may cancel out the benefits of speaking more softly and being willing to talk and negotiate. Some people say that we shouldn’t talk to our enemies, but I remember the cold war rather well, and we did talk to kruchev and Mao Tse Tung when they were great threats to us. So, sometimes I think that when we look at how we stood up to tens of thousands of nuclear weapons, that we should be cautious as far as what we might do in Pakistan and put it into a proper perspective.

But my big concern is whether or not we can reverse the empire mentality that I think we have adopted over these many, many decades, and also the relationship of this to our financial burden. Though we are speaking more softly and would like to get some troops home, the first thing that was done was that our DOD budget was increased by 9% in a time when our national debt in the last 12 months went up 2 trillion dollars.

All great nations have been brought to their knees for economic reasons. We didn’t have to fight the Soviets. The Afghanistan adventure that the Soviets were involved with was very significant and I don’t know how we can ignore that.

So, I would like to ask the question about whether or not you can give me some signs or indications or some encouragement that maybe we shifted policies in the slightest manner. Have we brought any troops home? Are we less involved in Iraq? Will that war ever end? Or we really going in the opposite direction because we’re seeing Pakistan as so necessary, we need more troops, more expansion, more money, more DOD funds.

So, coming from my perspective I can’t see the difference even though, like I said, I am pleased that there is a willingness to talk and try to work things out and I think that is very positive. I always think that people who aren’t willing to talk are insecure. This whole idea that we are so strong, to me, it seems that we lack confidence if we can’t talk to people. And we are strong enough. Nobody is going to attack us militarily.

So, I see it as very important that we change our tone. I think it’s good that you got rid of the term “war on terrorism”. How can you have a war against a tactic? It doesn’t make any sense. But I am not sure “overseas contingency operation” is more specific. So could you address that and maybe give me some answers that maybe we may be seeing actually some shift in our policy.

Hillary Clinton: Well, thank you, Congressman. I think that the president’s actions in these nearly 100 days do match actions with words, although I admit there is a lot more to be done. We are still sorting out everything we’ve inherited and trying to make sense of it. We want to protect America’s national security, but we think there are better and more effective ways of doing that. So we are ending the war in Iraq. There is a definite end date for our troops to be there. The president did close Guantanamo. The president is looking for ways to engage with those who nobody wanted us to talk to, which is a sea shift in how we are proceeding.

Words and actions both matter. I mean, at the end of the day actions count more. But you have to begin by at least articulating a new approach. In our budget we have asked for more money for diplomacy and development. And the budget committee, in both the house and the senate, cut back the president’s request. It’s kind of old thinking, in my view. I mean, the secretary of defense has said that there are fewer foreign Service diplomats posted oversees than there are sailors and marines on one aircraft carrier. There are more musicians in the military bands than there are diplomats across the board. So, we are trying to shift this gigantic ship of state, Mr. Paul. And we are looking for your help to do so.

And at the risk of going over our time, I just want to say having campaigned during the last presidential election, you had the most enthusiastic supporters of anybody I ever saw.

Ron Paul: I love to hear that.

Hillary Clinton: Well, I mean, my goodness! Everywhere I went they were literally running down highways holding your signs. So, I’ve never had a chance to tell you that, but your message obviously resonated with a lot of people.

Ron Paul: Thank you.

Howard Berman: You’re going to encourage him.

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=TacomaPaul TacomaPaul

    Wait wait wait….
    at 4:02 she says, “The President DID close Guantanamo…”
    Really ??? When did that happen ?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=algebratooCalculustutor algebratoo Calculustutor

    I guess what I am really asking is – do you believe keynesian economics works as time moves into infinity; in a world with multiple currencies?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=algebratooCalculustutor algebratoo Calculustutor

    I will agree – there is much empirical evidence that keynsian economics works in the short run. Do you think it works as time moves into infinity?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=javaman1891 javaman1891

    Really. And not a single word about the “General Theory” being a totally unreadable piece of shit that other people made sense of later? Hard to believe. You must have read the condensed version.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=javaman1891 javaman1891

    Very kind of you to read my back-posts. Really. The truth is that I am schooled in the neo-classical model which is an attempt to reconcile all economic thought and empirical evidence into in a holistic model which reasonably reflects reality. Neither Keynes nor Friedman, nor in fact Ron Paul are given more credence than is their empirically-verifiable due. I hear you – I just don’t agree with you. Reality rules.

    »crosslinked«

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=pauldb707 pauldb707

    if only that concussion was real…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=zimtes zimtes

    Nice:) It is clear that she is defending the democrats but opening up for Ron as a future partner in politics,

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=zimtes zimtes

    Nice:) It is clear that she is defending the democrats but opening up for Ron as a future partner in politics,

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=gdizzlepotts gdizzlepotts

    yes still open.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=gdizzlepotts gdizzlepotts

    Im listening please explain.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=heterosectional heterosectional

    Ron Paul is a scammer.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Coleostro Coleostro

    isnt guantanamo still open?
    and wtf is she talkin about at the end? she rly knows how to talk pure shit!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=zanzibarjacob zanzibarjacob

    No, she learned it as a lawyer when she was laundering Bill’s drug running money and helping silence witnesses to his various pre-presidential crimes. There is a docco on it that was pretty convincing. I would wager they have taken part in satanic rituals and human sacrifice too. Evil knows no bounds!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=sthnwatch sthnwatch

    She’s so convincing! NOT! She’s a liar.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=manueliny67 manueliny67

    Huh????…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=JZarter JZarter

    She left people behind in the Benghazi mission. She has no regard for human life.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://youtu.be/Q0IbmpsRz1g earn free gift cards

    These are truly wonderful ideas in about blogging.
    You have touched some pleasant factors here. Any way keep up wrinting.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=spareaxe spareaxe

    But he’s not and the US is not sleeping….you are.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB7FzGAs_T8 gift card free now

    May I simply just say what a relief to uncover an individual who really understands what they are talking about online.
    You certainly realize how to bring an issue to light and make it
    important. More people ought to look at this and understand this side of your story.

    It’s surprising you’re not more popular since you most certainly have the gift.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=cakesofdeath cakesofdeath

    He could have been president. But America is still sleeping.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0