59 responses to “Ron Paul’s Bill To Audit The Federal Reserve Now Has 226 Co-Sponsors”

  1. Todd

    I want to thank everyone here for partnering together with those present leaders who are working in the same spirit as those who hammered out one of the greatest documents in the history of the world. (The United States Constitution). And fighting against its domestic enemy’s

    Long live the Republic

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Joan Halgren

    Wow, longshotlouie, giving the Federal Reserve increased powers to guard against the types of risks that could bring down the entire system is really more scary than our present reality! Thanks for the tip regarding Shelby, my note has been sent to him! Onward we go in this fight for economic justice.

    »crosslinked«

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. longshotlouie

    HR 1207’s Senate version, S. 896, has been severely watered down, according to Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley. Grassley named the top Republican on the Banking Committee, Richard Shelby, Sen. from Alabama, as the man pouring the water.

    Let’s let Mr. Shelby know what we think.
    http://shelby.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorShelby.EmailSenatorShelby

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. longshotlouie

    The Other Foot

    The Obama administration says it is committed to overhauling the country’s financial rule book by giving the Federal Reserve increased powers to guard against the types of risks that could bring down the entire system.

    All large institutions whose failure could threaten the stability of the financial system will be subjected to regulation by the Fed, administration officials said.
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/31365066

    WTF?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Joan Halgren

    Kevin’s news is so sad–to think we are so scared, secretive in our country and apparently cannot conduct business in an honest fashion. Indeed, transparency is needed! Although hundreds of international banks are members of the Federal Reserve albeit I don’t see how this equates to a national security problem! Kevin, I suggest that you ask Hinojosa for a clarification and share it with us! Thanks!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Kevin

    I wrote my congressman Ruben Hinojosa and he wrote me back. The letter he sent me was very strange, citing National Security as his reason for not co-sponsering the bill. This is his letter back to me with his explanation.

    Dear Kevin:

    I appreciate receiving your comments regarding H.R. 1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act of
    2009 introduced by Rep. Ron Paul. I am always eager to hear from my constituents because it allows me
    to better represent your views.

    H.R. 1207 repeals the authority of the Comptroller General to carry out onsite examinations of open
    insured banks or bank holding companies when the federal regulatory agency has consented in writing.
    The bill mandates that before the end of 2010 the Comptroller General must complete an audit of the
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sytem and the federal reserve banks. I would like to assure
    you that I am closely monitoring this bill’s progress. There are still many questions to be answered
    regarding the methodology of the audit and any UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES THE PUBLIC RELEASE OF EXTREMELY SENSITIVE AND PROTECTED DATA MAY HAVE ON THE UNITED STATES’ SECURITY. H.R. 1207 has been referred to the
    Committee on Financial Services of which I am a member. I will keep your thoughts in mind as this bill
    advances through the legislative process.

    Thank you for contacting me and I hope to hear from you again. Please, continue to have an active
    interest in your government.

    Sincerely,
    Ruben Hinojosa

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Ron Paul’s Bill To Audit The Federal Reserve Now Has 224 Co-Sponsors and Growing! | Romanian National Vanguard News Agency

    [...] Source [...]

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Tim

    Who has audited the Fed? Perhaps, you can tell me where I can get a copy of the Fed’s Annual Financial Report, 10k and 10Q like every other private corporation is required to complete and file? Perhaps, you can explain to me why M3 (The Money Supply) is longer reported to Congress?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Joan Halgren

      So what’s missing from this information that is not satisfactory from an accounting perspective? Then, I’ll take it from here: (directly from Fed’s Web site):

      Federal Reserve System financial statements
      The Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Banks annually prepare financial statements reflecting balances (as of December 31) and income and expenses for the year then ended. The Federal Reserve Bank financial statements also include the accounts and results of operations of several limited liability companies (LLCs) that have been consolidated with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “consolidated LLCs”).

      The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the consolidated LLCs are all subject to several levels of audit and review. The Reserve Banks’ financial statements and those of the consolidated LLC entities are audited annually by an independent audit firm retained by the Board of Governors. To ensure auditor independence, the Board requires that the external auditor be independent in all matters relating to the audit. Specifically, the external auditor may not perform services for the Reserve Banks or others that would place it in a position of auditing its own work, making management decisions on behalf of the Reserve Banks, or in any other way impairing its audit independence. In addition, the Reserve Banks, including the consolidated LLCs, are subject to oversight by the Board.

      The Board of Governors’ financial statements are audited annually by an independent audit firm retained by the Board’s Office of Inspector General. The audit firm also provides a report on compliance and on internal control over financial reporting in accordance with government auditing standards. The Office of Inspector General also conducts audits, reviews, and investigations relating to the Board’s programs and operations as well as of Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks.

      Financial statements of the Federal Reserve System
      (as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, and 2007)
      Combined Federal Reserve Banks (3.3 MB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (2.0 MB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (663 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2.0 MB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (856 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (667 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (711 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (734 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of New York (1.0 MB PDF)
      LLCs Consolidated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
      Commercial Paper Funding Facility LLC (325 KB PDF)
      Maiden Lane LLC (432 KB PDF)
      Maiden Lane II LLC (348 KB PDF)
      Maiden Lane III LLC (364 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (645 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (687 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (834 KB PDF)
      Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (686 KB PDF)
      Board of Governors (612 KB PDF)
      The financial statements of the Board of Governors and the consolidated LLC entities are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”); those of the Federal Reserve Banks are prepared in accordance with the Financial Accounting Manual for Federal Reserve Banks (“Financial Accounting Manual”). Accounting principles for entities with the unique powers and responsibilities of the nation’s central bank have not been formulated by accounting standard-setting bodies. The Board of Governors has developed specialized accounting principles and practices that it considers to be appropriate for the nature and function of a central bank, which differ from those of the private sector. These accounting principles and practices are documented in the Financial Accounting Manual, which is issued by the Board of Governors. The primary difference between the accounting principles and practices in the Financial Accounting Manual and GAAP is the presentation of all System Open Market Account (SOMA) securities holdings at amortized cost, rather than using the fair value presentation required by GAAP. U.S. government securities and investments denominated in foreign currencies comprising the System Open Market Account are recorded at cost, on a settlement-date basis, and adjusted for amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts on a straight-line basis. Amortized cost more appropriately reflects the Reserve Banks’ securities holdings given the System’s unique responsibility to conduct monetary policy. In addition, the Reserve Banks have elected not to present a Statement of Cash Flows because the liquidity and cash positions of the Reserve Banks are not a primary concern given their unique powers and responsibilities. Other information regarding the Reserve Banks’ activities is provided in, or may be derived from, the Combined Statements of Condition, Income and Comprehensive Income, and Changes in Capital.
      Financial Accounting Manual for Federal Reserve Banks (3.1 MB PDF)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      1. Tim

        Thank you for your information. Now do you see anything wrong with publically auditing their books?

        For example, how much has M3 increased relative to GDP and therefore, to what extent will inflation reduce the purchasing power of my IRA savings?

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        1. Sean

          The M3 is like 14 trillion i think.. The point is, when the public doesn’t borrow money the money supply contracts so the federal reserve and government has to step in and borrow money. It doesn’t matter if the federal reserve borrowed 3 trillion dollars because the money supply probably contracted 3 trillion dollars during the past two years and next year combined with the lack of public borrowers.

          Money contraction = Deflation
          Money contraction = job loss

          http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/06/wheres-the-money-coming-from/

          As you can see, the money borrowed from the government and federal reserve will replace the amount of money created by the public during this recession. There will be no out of ordinary money expansion in our country.

          Report this comment

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          1. Sean

            the public borrows around 1.8 trillion dollars a year. When public borrowing stops which it has, the money supply contracts causing a recession. Jobs become lost and the government must step in and inflate the dollar or job creation wont take place. Inflating the dollar creates jobs. Vice versa, deflating the dollar decreases jobs.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          2. Nate Y

            Well then I guess you’ll be buying government bonds and holding onto all your dollars.

            The artificial boom is the problem. The inevitable bust (recession) is the solution.

            Destroying the purchasing power of the dollar (inflating the dollar) does not create jobs in any meaningful sense. It only transfers wealth from one sector of the economy (destroying jobs there) to some new government favored sector (creating jobs there). Being government sponsored/regulated, these new jobs/industries are less efficient than those that would have emerged via the free market. Hence, we get a less productive economy.

            Full employment is not the goal of economies.
            Full/efficient production is the goal.

            You still gotta read Economics in One Lesson dude. You constantly fall victim to all the common fallacies.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          3. Sean

            My grandfather taught insurance and made policies for 40 years. He has always had his money invested into bonds. The wealthiest men alive have all their money invested into bonds. Warren Buffet has 100% of his money invested in securities.. It’s not a bad idea, they do profit. They even have inflation bonds you can invest in. Check out that website ^

            your correct that booms cause busts and money contractions do cause unemployment to rise but inflating the dollar in general does create jobs in a macrolevl sense. More money = more spending = more jobs= inflation. too much money chasing too few of goods.. Deflation is the opposite. Less money = less spending = less jobs = deflation. Not enough money chasing too many goods. That’s what we’ve been experiencing, deflation. That’s why we needed a stimulus. Our money supply depends on us to borrow money because all of our money is created thru debt from loans. When people stop borrowing and as loans become paid back, the money supply shrinks and causes deflation, or lost jobs.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          4. Sean

            full employment is not the goal of the economy because it causes too much inflation. That’s why monetarist manipulate interest rates to keep unemployment around 3%.

            Production is the goal, but that has to do with trade policy, not monetary.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          5. Nate Y

            If they stay have all their money tied up in treasuries and dollars, they’ll eventually be much much poorer.

            Your definitions of inflation and deflation are still incorrect. Fix them asap.

            Printing money will never solve the problems. It can only delay and magnify them.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          6. Sean

            no, because they make money off of them. Thats what our tax dollars go towards.

            here. this will explain it better.
            http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/deflation.asp

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          7. Nate Y

            Meh we’ll see. Give it some time. US dollars and US bonds will be worth much less in 10 years time if the government does what it intends to do.

            If our tax dollars go to those who invest in government bonds, how can you not see how blatantly corrupt and inefficeint that is?

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          8. Sean

            Our government is 11 trillion dollars in debt. 7 trillion dollars of that money is owned by the public, by people like my grandfather.. Most of our spending comes from our own savings.

            The government isn’t planning massive inflation. That link up there shows you that government borrowing replaced consumer borrowing so there won’t be any drastic inflation.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          9. Nate Y

            We’ll see…let’s see if we don’t see the consequences of all this inflation a few years down the road.

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      2. Alan Avery

        Mr. Hedge Unleashed

        Market-stabilizing regulations, which protected companies’ stock from an inevitable international “leveraged” feeding frenzy were jettisoned. A hedge fund can now buy unlimited “insurance” on shares of any stock (for pennies on the dollar) and control its price through the buying and selling of the insurance (derivative put options) without ever investing in the company.

        Buying covered “put” stock options is like paying an insurance premium to cover an unexpected decline in ones stock’s price and is a conservative and healthy risk management practice when effectively regulated.

        If Mr. Hedge owned 1 million shares of XX stock @ an average of $40.00 a share (forty million dollars), he could “hedge” his bets under the former regulations by paying a “put-premium” for a kind of insurance protecting him against a decline in the price of XX. A large holding company such as AIG or Bear Sterns would sell the stock insurance coverage and collect the premium from Mr. Hedge.

        This is called “writing” a put option for those buying them. They collect premiums for a “derivative” income stream. (Derived from premium income.)
        Like other insurance products, the shorter the period for which Mr. Hedge buys the “insurance” (along with the low statistical probability of extreme loss occurring) the cheaper the insurance premium will be.

        A purchase of this insurance on speculation that a quality company like XX falls in price from $40.00 to $20.00 in only 90 days given no other rogue factors would be historically, highly improbable. (in a sane trading environment) Thusly, the “premium” would be dirt-cheap.
        Coverage against such a rapid decline in XX price might cost as little as $2.00 per contract (protecting 100 shares). A purchase of 10 thousand contracts would help to insure 1 million shares or, 40 million dollars on XX for a premium of $20,000.00. If there is no decline within 90 days, the insurance contracts expire.

        This is known as hedging, a facet of “risk management” and is normally a principal conservation practice, used by all financial institutions.
        Now, let us de-regulate this otherwise conservative practice so that anything goes.

        With essentially no regulation or oversight, Mr. Hedge now sets out on a creative financial journey. He buys 1 million more 90 day put contracts at $2.00. without buying any more XX stock. Total premium outlay: 2 million dollars.

        These are called “naked or Bear put options because Mr. Hedge has not “covered” his insurance purchase with an actual purchase of the equivalent amount of xx stock. Why?

        If the price of XX falls to around $20.00 in the next 30-90 days, he can exercise his 10 thousand contracts of insurance on his XX holdings effectively offsetting his loss. It is absurdly unlikely that natural market forces will so quickly drive XX’s price down to the levels projected. However, he owns so many shares of XX that he may be able to help things along.
        “Why would Mr. Hedge want to drive down the price of his own shares?”

        The REAL Agenda:
        Unregulated and insured to the hilt, Mr. Hedge begins short selling XX (another way of betting against the stock) – while selling off /dumping large amounts his actual XX stock holdings, causing market panic selling-momentum. Amazingly, there are no regulations to stop him. As expected, XX begins falling.

        Next, Mr. Hedge begins collecting on his some of his put insurance contracts for his stock losses. He continues unloading shares at a terrific rate. The markets notice his purchase of 1 million naked put contracts and it spreads like wildfire. The price decline continues while other traders, panicking, pile in and sell their shares, buying puts, just like Mr. Hedge.

        News and speculation enter the mix. No one knows why prices were falling, not even the bewildered, under-suspect executives at XX.

        Investors flock to insurers, buying up put options on XX to insure against further losses. Supply and demand cause the premium price on XX put options to skyrocket, and Mr. Hedge just so happens to own…1 million contracts.

        Here’s Where The Money Is Made Hand Over Fist!
        Now, Mr. Hedge begins “re-selling” on the open market the excessive 1 million put contracts he purchased at $0.02 per share/$2.00 per 100 share contract. They now sell for $4.00 or 400 DOLLARS PER CONTRACT.
        Over the next 40-60 days, as XX crashes, Mr. Hedge unloads 1,000,000 XX put contracts in worldwide markets at an average of $400.00 per contract.

        His profit: 400 MILLION. He is now in A FAR MORE PROFITABLE unregulated insurance-reseller business, and could care less about investing in actual stocks.

        Mr. Hedges of Wall Street are now buying and selling the World’s Economy, freely, through the unrestricted leveraging of insurance contracts.
        XX Corp was not an ailing company. Finding an ailing company to abuse using such unmitigated tactics is no longer necessary. Any good company will do.

        No Questions Asked.
        After the collapse, from writing too much of the put insurance, our government now helps Mr. Hedge collect insurance benefits owed him from defunct companies, buy using our tax dollars. We are throwing billions through the doors of giant insuring companies and all those institutions who suddenly thought it wise to start selling unlimited insurance coverage to Wall Street hedge fund companies.

        It was and is -going straight out their back door, to pay Mr. Hedge his profits. They continue, even today, to operate unregulated.

        For the Mr. Hedges to have had their way with America completely, the Uptick rule and Margin Limits and Oversight all had to go. Curiously and quietly, they did….as the markets went into the inevitable tailspin.

        The task it seems is conveying the immense destructive power that unlimited naked put option trading (leveraging through insurance) can wield when focused on any one public company. Especially when equity sell offs are executed by several corrupt fund managers in concert. In our current regulatory environment, they can literally gang up and program the demise of a company like writing a musical score.

        For those who think there are sufficient regulations in place, only needing enforcement, please consider the fact that part of the rules that were jettisoned, were the ones that allow any right to investigation or oversight at all.

        Consider this: All of a sudden in the morning paper, you see life insurance regulations dropped in favor of freeing up markets.

        The next day your cousin calls you and schedules a physical exam which by law you now must comply with. At the exam, he buys a million dollars of life insurance on your life with money he borrowed on his home, and he is the beneficiary. The underwriting rules governing whether or not he has any legitimate insurable interest on your life are no longer on the books.

        He now owns a million on your life. At first, he is willing for you to live out your years, but as time goes on, the possibility of a million in cash in his hands changes the way he thinks and the power of that much money literally propels him to think of ways to shorten the waiting period.

        It is insidious at first, which helps buy time for his moral senses to slowly become enveloped in a shell of denial regarding the new twists in his consciousness. Publicized

        Three months later, you are being followed and people are in your yard late at night and your food tastes funny. Now here is the real clincher. You call the authorities and the phone has been disconnected. There is no longer a department to investigate activity, which might lead to your life being shortened.

        With insurance, (which is the ultimate leverage) when someone can buy coverage on you or your company and in unlimited amounts, without your permission, the potential for corruption and greed increases in direct proportion the amount the beneficiary stands to gain.

        Furthermore, If the beneficiary cannot afford to carry out the necessary detrimental acts to facilitate the collection of insurance benefits, he can use the insurance he has purchased as collateral. This amounts to compounded leveraging.

        But wait! There’s more!
        After cousin collects on your life, he will have enough cash to buy one hundred more million dollar policies on one hundred more people.
        The inevitable: The world’s largest insurance company and a slew of holding companies go broke from unregulated insurance underwriting and everybody is left holding a bag of rocks.

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Tim

    Forget political parties. Any member of Congress that does not support auditing the Fed (i.e. telling the people where their money is going) should be thrown out of office.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Joan Halgren

      Okay, but the Federal Reserve is audited. So what are you saying? I need clarification. Want the facts.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      1. Nate Y.

        Have you read HR1207? It clearly explains what it would change about the audit. Give it a read.

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Joan Halgren

    Okay, now I’m confused about this legislation. According to the Federal Reserve System’s Web site, “The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review.” And done by an outside auditor. Are you saying it should be done by someone within the ‘actual’ government and what makes you think this will be more truthful than an outside auditor?

    And how will this legislation change anything? Please clarify. (I’ve asked the Fed to direct me to a copy of their annual report, a listing of their quasi-governmental agency stockholders, and it will be interesting how they answer these requests.) Meanwhile, however, what good is HR 2012 even if passed when so much manipulation is going on?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Nate Y

      Have you read HR1207? It clearly explains what it would change about the audit. Give it a read.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Bunnysbuzz

    [...] If your representative doesn’t support Ron Paul’s bill yet (list of co-sponsors), [...]

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Leon Moe

    I am a retired disabled Vietnam veteran that has more time than money and I have strong feeligns about standing up for principles!!I have sent 6 different faxes to all members of the Finance Committee and will do another shortly. I have also sent a round of faxes to all members of congress that are not listed as co-sponsors on this website. I will send another fax in a day or two. I am learning that if we put enough heat on our elected public tyrants, they will eventually wake up and do what is right!! I encourage everyone to turn up the heat. Make some calls, send some emails or faxes!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. john

    John E. Rachal- Its called “Controlled Opposition”.

    Imagine if aliens landed on earth and the government had to cover it up. People heard about it and were wondering the truth about extra-terrestrials.

    The way the government would cover it up, would be to deny it and to hire people to create fake crop circles and get caught doing it so that people would think their all fake.

    You can basically guess that anyone who gets a high paying salary and lots of air time is just controlled opposition, meaning they are VERY LIMITED in the things they can “report”.

    I mean, Look at what these guys do. Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck basically talk about “some” of the problems all day long, but they NEVER SUGGEST SOLUTIONS (like Ron Paul being president).

    Our media is a joke and will probably soon become like the system in “V for Vendetta”.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. John E. Rachal

      John

      Very well put! By the way, I saw “V for Vendetta”. I
      would highly recommend this movie to everyone! The
      part in the movie that says “Go out and tell the people
      how much they need us (the powers that be)”, is most
      chilling to say the least.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. John E. Rachal

    Has anyone noticed that HR 1207 is never mentioned on TV? I know
    that the 3 main stations (CBS, NBC and ABC) have been on the take
    for over 40 years now, but I have not heard about it on Glenn Beck
    or anywhere else. WHAT GIVES HERE?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Kurt

    I am still pushing Delahunt [MA-10]. I have e-mailed and called his office many times over the past month and have not heard one thing from him. It is most disappointing but I will keep trying.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. khan

    I remember once in 1992 i was a young man driving to Galveston . We (me and my few buddies) stopped on the road side there were some guys who asked to to visit this dude called Ron Paul who was running for election and they said he is a nice guy and he talks to everyone.
    I did not go but for a brown man like me it was quite welcoming and nice.
    This Ron PAul is the best of the best in my eyes.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. Kevin

    I have emailed my Rep. Ruben Hinojosa and he still hasn’t signed on, can’t wait till election day. This tells us whose side u are really on.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. Eric

    Emailed my congressmen John Olver (D-MA District 1) he sounds like he’s board.
    He says I will be in his mind when HR 1207 is being voted on in the house.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. Keri (Kikki)


    BREAKING NEWS: WE DID IT!

    Just moments ago, Dr. Paul’s congressional office issued a press release announcing that HR 1207 had received its 218th cosponsor, and that the list has now grown to 222!

    Read their press release here.

    Since our last update put the number at 207 on Tuesday, here is the list of representatives that have signed on:

    -Rep. David Loebsack
    -Rep. Gary Miller
    -Rep. Frank Wolf
    -Rep. Corrine Brown
    -Rep. Jackie Speier
    -Rep. Bruce Braley
    -Rep. Donna Edwards
    -Rep. Bobby Bright
    -Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao
    -Rep. Jared Polis
    -Rep. Dennis Kucinich
    -Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon
    -Rep. Howard Coble
    -Rep. Jean Schmidt
    -Rep. Heath Shuler

    This is an incredible victory for the freedom movement, but our work to Audit the Fed is only just beginning! Now we must concentrate on seeing the bill through the committee process and getting it to the House floor for a vote.

    For more info
    http://www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php?Ron-Paul-s-Audit-the-Fed-Bill-Passes-218-Cosponsors-1336

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. dawn marie clark

    keri,
    you did not understand my post.
    i need the names and the other info to post it.

    sunny

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Keri (Kikki)

      Under the Financial Committee just click on their names,they are hyperlinked.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. Albert Olofsson

    Fantastic, nothing short of Fantastic!!

    Albert Olofsson

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. dawn marie clark

    hi,
    you do not have 213 listed. who are the last 5 to make it 213?

    sunny

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Keri (Kikki)

      There are 435 Reps in the house. So pick any five on the Financial Service Committee. To get it to a vote it has to go through the Fin. Services committee. I have been emailing all of them. It would be great if everyone else did as well, also you rep. if he is not on the committee, but still has yet to co-sponsor the bill.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. UrbanSurvival » Blog Archive » Mixed Message on Recovery/Inflation

    [...] 213 co-sponsors now on Ron Paul’s bill to audit the Federal Reserve…and if you call your CONgressional office, maybe more will get it… [...]

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Rich

    I just prepared an email that will be sent to ALL my contacts –personal and business alike– over the next few days. Here it is. Feel free to use it as your own:

    ——————–

    There is a bill in the House that intends to give the Gov Accountability Office (GAO) the ability to audit the Federal Reserve. You know, that “FED” bank who calls itself a “Federal” entity…. even though it really isn’t one? Yes, that one.

    The Fed can “print money” and make one of YOUR dollars worth 50 cents in a short period of time. Don’t believe it? It’s called Inflation. Now that you understand how you are being robbed, get motivated and help control it.

    Sound too hard to understand? Sound like too much work? It’s neither. Trust me.

    Everything you need to learn is right here and will take 3 minutes. And I am not doing this for no good reason. This is VERY important AND action-able TOO. So time to act.

    Here is what I, you, we, your friends —every American— need to do: Prepare AND send this email to everyone you know across the nation. PLEASE do it. Sorry for begging but the reason we are in this mess is because we trusted our politicians to do what was wise. Very busy we all are. But you have to act today.

    Here are the tools you need:

    For background info, including a video explaining this, go to the following link. If Internet Explorer doesn’t like it, GET and USE FIREFOX (www.getfirefox.com ).

    You have to see the info and ACT. Take this one step at a time and if you do not understand, come back here and read more. I will make sure this email tells you everything you need to know.

    Look at this FOLLOWING link. Once you are there, use the Edit > Find function in your web browser to type in the abbreviation of your state (KY for Kentucky, for example). Use the “Match Case” option to make it more accurate. For example, if you search for AL (Alabama) it will show you each time “Federal” is written. Bad waste of time. Use the “Match Case” option .

    http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-06-10/ron-pauls-bill-to-audit-the-federal-reserve-now-has-207-co-sponsors/

    Take this one step at a time and if you do not understand, come back here and read more. I will make sure this email tells you everything you need to know.

    SEE IF YOUR REPRESENTATIVES SUPPORT THE BILL. If they don’t, CONTACT THEM TONIGHT/TODAY. The link above has a SAMPLE note you can email or mail to your Reps.

    I offer this following writing to add to the end of every note you send out. It makes it clear just what is at stake for each of the politicians:

    (the following paragraph is my personal persuasion — and should be added to the end of any contact letter to any Washington Rep who does not yet support HR-1207)

    ” I should also add that if we find you did not support this bill we will be sure to make every effort to correct the balance in your office at our next opportunity. As someone who is TODAY using an ability to educate and alert hundreds -if not thousands- of U.S. voters, I thank you in advance for your attention and careful consideration! THANK YOU ”

    (tack this on to the end of the sample letter you can get from the long link above).

    The link BELOW will help to QUICKLY contact each and every one of the politicians in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

    Now, to dig in further and GET POWERED, use this link to DIG UP AND see just how many of the elected future-losers your state has. If they don’t support this bill (see the big link above and use the Edit > Search as I described), MAKE SURE THEY ARE CONTACTED — AND IF THEY VOTE WRONG, MAKE SURE THEY ((LOSE)) AT THE NEXT ELECTION. Make sure ALL YOUR FRIENDS KNOW they have to do this. We MUST remove harmful or useless politicians from office, and PLAN TO DO SO TODAY.

    http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml

    Reference added: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1207 .

    Be sure to see the main link above (the RonPaul website). It’s got more than I detailed in this email.

    Specifically, the Step 2: Financial Services Committee CONTACT .

    Personally I am going to pull out all the stops to make sure I can contact everyone I know. I know multiple people in NJ, Maine, VA, FL, SC, CA, NV, TN, TX, AR, PA and other states.

    If I can lay my reputation and business on the line to do this, you can do it too.

    Good luck to us all.

    IN CLOSING: the most important goal of this is to MAKE SURE ANYONE WHO DOESN’T SUPPORT *us* LOSES THE NEXT ELECTION. READ THAT AGAIN. WASHINGTON IS TO BLAME FOR THIS MESS. There is no accountability and they are just like bad kids… we were not telling them what to do AND WATCHING them for results.

    ACT TODAY.

    (btw, I just sent KY’s Ben Chandler my message. He does NOT yet support the Bill. He has hereby been put on notice….)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. Robin Kilgore

    I hope and pray that this Bill gets passed. There must be transparency with the FED. Too many Americans do not understand that this is NOT a government run agency, but rather a PRIVATE enterprise. Mr. Paul…you are the REAL future of the Republican party if it’s going to grow and bring about a new relevance.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. Jean Clancy

    Maybe its time to keep these global pirates honest! It makes allot of sense that the Federal Reserve should be held to the same auditing standards that we are. Lack of transparency usually means secrecy which means another agenda. Many people just do not understand how the Federal Reserve got into power who it really represents…bottom line they cannot get their minds around it, so they wrap themselves in the standard line that the secrets guarantee the Feds “Independence”. The American people deserve to know the answers to questions that have had no answers for years! Write, call and forward information to your friends. Get this bill passed now!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. Jeremy

    I wrote both Idaho reps and they signed on! Now time to badger the Senators to get on board with their version.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. Jane, Mother of the Revolution in NH

    I have badgered Carol Shea Porter for you Ron and she finally did it! Yahoo!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. Dick Abromeit

    HR 1207 is an absolute litmus test for those in congress to openly declare who they represent, the American people or the international banking elite. Those who would weaken HR 1207′s authority through amendments or in any way block a “roll call vote,” will have declared their allegiance.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. Fallon Gordon Sr MD

    Congratulations on your hard work and success! Please keep it up! The USA is by your side, The side of America! The fed must tell all or be eliminated. We need a complete return to only Constitutional government! No marxism,socialism,no fascism, no islam, no illegals, no conspirators, no internatioal bankers running our country no tyranny of any kind! We want the freedom brought by Constitutional government! Let the bankers repay Barry Sotero’s and the socialists debts. The tax payers didn’t create the fed bankers problems.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. brad maynard

    i tell ya, if you americans succeed at this i would really like to know how you guys organized and such so that we could get the same thing here in canada. all central banks should be scrutinized around the world. its funny regarding your constitution in terms of the government responsibility to control money. probably no one in this country realizes just how similar canada’s constitution back in 1860 is to yours in those regards. seems like bankers never had a decent reputation.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. Larry Crawford

    I hope the people of Massachusetts push Barney Frank along.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. Jeanne White

    I just called everyone on the Committee who are not listed as co-sponsors and urged them to not only support, but to co-sponsor and really send a strong armed message from us taxpayers!!! PLEASE call not just your own congress rep, but ALL of them!!!!! Let’s make this a reality!!!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. john

    This bill has to pass at some point. Multiple generations of American’s will be working “real” hours to pay a debt to an entity that creates ficticious money at will. If only American’s could instantly “print” a lifetime of hardwork in the same way, this wouldn’t be such a nightmare.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. Charles

    Just called my Congresscritter, Betsy Markey (D-CO) and the staff said she is still “Studying the issues” so to speak…I guess she is a true CongressCritter or maybe she is a varmin too, who knows ??!!??!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Carol

      Congresscritter..I like that. There would be no reason NOT to vote for this Bill. Keep on her and if she votes no then out she goes next election.
      My only concern…whos going to do the auditing??

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      1. Joan Halgren

        Your on target here! Out they go! And what’s even worse, we gave bankers back the TARP funds without their getting rid of their toxic assets! Americans must get smarter and more aggressive or we’re finished as a great nation.

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    2. Jody

      I have a feeling that since the Federal Reserve and the U.S. government know that they will never pay back this debt they will continue to print money and pay themselves (corporations, self-owned and subsidized) all the while not caring about destroying the currency because once that U.S. Dollar is destroyed they have a new currency to trade. The Amero. Question is…who printed this money and who controls it? Certainly not Canada and not Mexico. When this new money becomes the new currency…I will bet they will be expecting the U.S. dollar to trade straight across for that Amero.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply