Poll: Is 9/11 Closed Or Do You Support A New Investigation?

The corporate media wants us to believe that demanding a new 9/11 investigation is crazy and unpatriotic. The mere suggestion that the government’s theory of “19 Arab hijackers” might not be entirely true is akin to desecrating the dead. And even those who accept the mainstream explanation but question the hijackers’ motives are portrayed as radicals. Do we really know everything about the events of that fateful day? Is 9/11 closed or do you support a new investigation?

Is 9/11 Closed?

  • No, much of our current foreign and domestic policy is based on a flawed interpretation of 9/11, therefore we should reopen the investigation immediately. (59%, 525 Votes)
  • Yes, 9/11 is closed, but the foreign and domestic policies created in its aftermath are flawed and should be investigated. (13%, 117 Votes)
  • Yes, 9/11 is closed. To the best of our knowledge, the official explanation is true. We should move on. (8%, 70 Votes)
  • No, even though 9/11 has nothing to do with today's policy decisions, we should still find out what really happened in the interest of historical truth. (6%, 52 Votes)
  • A new investigation would be a waste of time because it would probably just deepen the coverup. Everyone should draw his or her own conclusions and act accordingly. (6%, 52 Votes)
  • Maybe. There are valid questions about 9/11. In the future, when we have more time and when the topic is less controversial, we will call for a new investigation. (4%, 33 Votes)
  • Other (explain in the comments) (2%, 22 Votes)
  • Yes, 9/11 is closed. Even if we weren't told the entire truth, we shouldn't reopen old wounds and we should choose our fights carefully. (2%, 18 Votes)

Total Voters: 889

Loading ... Loading ...

P.S. Thanks for the feedback. The poll was reset to include the option of “Yes, 9/11 is closed, but we should still investigate the policies created in its aftermath”. As mentioned previously, the purpose of this poll is simply to get a clear picture on where we as Ron Paul supporters really stand on this issue.

  • Share/Bookmark
RonPaul.com Store Audit the Federal Reserve Bumper Sticker Ron Paul for President 2012 Bumper Sticker Ron Paul Revolution Bumper Sticker Ron Paul 2012 T-Shirt Audit the Fed T-Shirt Ron Paul Revolution T-Shirt
Print This Post Print This Post

About the Author

tmartin

tmartin

Subscribe to RonPaul.com

Enter your email address to receive important updates and action alerts:



47 Comments

  1. hclombs says:

    Correction last entry: Intelligence op principles used against

    the public 911:

    Spin doctors, No forensic evidence, Government denies knowledge ,

    Encourage the debate, Divide and conquer, Timed releases.

    911 intent had by both CIA/ FBI Va US {Noting Intelligence

    timeline

    bombings pre 911 incident}.

    Social enginering re 911 being “Surveillance society”, Exposion of

    technology {NOTING ABUSES HIGH TECH CRIMES AT PUBLIC EXPENSE}

    stripping YOUR FREEDOM..

    Govt Corruption/ Fraud/ Negligence not limited to investigation

    both 911 and Tapes re CIA at taxpayer expense.

    Documentary evidence 911 Fraud {documents as withheld from public}

    Seeking publication information to recover lost expense due to

    Fraud. Charlie Sheen contact email address desired for exposure

    hclombs@gmail.com

  2. hclombs says:

    Intelligence op principles used against the public 911:

    Spin doctots, No forensic evidence, Governemnt denies knowldege,

    Spin doctors, Encourage the debate, Divide and conquer, Timed

    releases.

    911 intent had by both CIA/ FBI Va US [Noting Intel timeline

    bombings pre 911 incident}.

    Social enginering re 911 being “Surveillance society”, stripping

    Your Freedom.

    Govt Corruption/ Fraud/ Negligence not limited to investigation

    both 911 and Tape re CIA at taxpayer expense.

    Documentary evidence 911 Fraud {documents as withheld from public}

    Seeking publication information to recover lost expense due to

    Fraud. Charlie Sheen contact email address desired

  3. hclombs says:

    Inside information re I.C. contact foriegn intel source CIA pre 911.

    Information has as to intent. Both by CIA/ FBI Va US. Documenatry evidence Govt corruption/ Fraud/ Negligence; Social engineering as to “Surveillance “society.

    Expense Personal/ Public/ Business, E Commerce/ Cyber/ Network/ Homeland security; Information assurance.

    Seeking C Sheen email address for contact. hclombs@gmail.com

  4. VR says:

    From The Open Chemical Physics Journal
    Volume 2

    Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
    http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

  5. kjell Olsen [Jerry] says:

    911 report was a complete lie. Every aspect was fraudulently reported and too much real evidence purposely left out. To believe that the airspace was allowed to remain undefended was my first clue as to who was responsible. Pres Bush and particularly VP Chaney and associates arranged the dispersion of American Air Force to distant locations in order to prevent interdiction of allegedly high jacked commercial aircraft. Footage from the event clearly shows gray 757s without windows impacting the towers. Further examination reveals these planes to be drones (remotely controlled). The collapse of the Towers and WTC 7 were undeniably controlled demolitions. Many firemen and police at the scene reported hearing explosions before the collapse. There testimony was not included in the report.

    • David Bernard Daniels says:

      Have you ever heard of a talk show host named David Brudnoy from Boston? He was my hero and I live in the section of Boston known as Hyde Park myself. He’s gone now but he had often made the same point you make. David was brilliant and of course supported Congressman Paul.

  6. longshotlouie says:

    9/11 Victims Family Member, Manny Badillo, Schools France 24 News

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjBVFjEuVY&feature=player_embedded

  7. dog reflections says:

    Charlie Sheen it seems,is the only actor on the popular media to have the guts to state the truth.The other invertebrates in the popular media and journalists think that crawling under a rock and closing their eyes will make it all go away.

    Evil triumphs when good men do nothing.

  8. sean says:

    Osama Bin Ladin’s new message for America…

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/09/14/binladen.message/index.html

    This is why we should keep religion out of politics.

    “To the American people, this is my message to you: a reminder of the reasons behind 9/11 and the wars and the repercussions that followed and the way to resolve it,” the message said.

    “From the beginning, we have stated many times … that the cause of our disagreement with you is your support of your allies, the Israelis, who are occupying our land in Palestine. Your stance along with some other grievances are what led us to carry out the events of 9/11.”

    - Bin Ladin

    • Jayhawk says:

      Osama is dead. You fell for propaganda.

    • Lindsey says:

      Sean: Should we pass a law making it illegal for politicians to practice religion? Our Bill of Rights states “Freedom of Religion” and not “Freedom from Religion”. Ron Paul believes this and so do I!

      • Sean says:

        I’m pretty sure that Ron Paul believes that we don’t need to help support Israel. That’s what he calls “blow back.”

        If you watch his newest video, he explains how religion should stay out of politics. The government is supposed to protect our freedom to worship whom we please. The government is not supposed to make foreign policy based of religious beliefs.

        • Sean says:

          “I am concerned that the weapons currently being used by Israel against the Palestinians in Gaza are made in America and paid for by American taxpayers. What will adopting this resolution do to the perception of the United States in the Muslim and Arab world? What kind of blowback might we see from this? What moral responsibility do we have for the violence in Israel and Gaza after having provided so much military support to one side?”

          -Ron Paul

        • Lindsey says:

          Sean: I don’t think that we make our decisions about Israel based on our religious beliefs. We make them based on the fact that they have a form of government similar to ours rather than a king or dictatorship like most of the Middle East. Having said that, I don’t think we need to support them as much as we do but we certainly don’t need to support the Saudis etc. at all. Remember, Freedom of Religion and not Freedom from Religion.

          • Sean says:

            There is no doubt that our relationship with Israel came from religious beliefs. In 1922 we made a joint resolution to protect the Jewish people in Palestine. Britain and the US helped push the political Zionist movement 20 years later after the fact.. There is no other military in the world that we support in the same fashion.

            The Saudis support us, they provide us with fossil fuel to run our country..

            Freedom of religion is a freedom of the people, not the government. The government doesn’t have the freedom to dictate religious policies.

  9. Freemenright! says:

    The web of deceit is surely catching up with those who have spun a pack of misleading words and worse. Many people are now beginning to see through this fictitious web are waking up and we should ensure that no stone is left unturned. It is important that the Fed is audited thoroughly and those who have had benefit named for all to see!! I am thinking that the USA has been looted of its wealth and most of all its principles of which it was founded!

  10. dog reflections says:

    The web of deceit is now rapidly unravelling.The knowledge growth of 911/debt slavery is now expodential.Panic is now setting in and that is dangerous for all humanity.

    The Fed is feeling cornered,so we need a pressure valve.ie We give amnesty to all involved,with the exception of those at the top of the food chain.

    An empire based on cowards will fall on it’s own sword.

  11. longshotlouie says:

    Has Osama Bin Laden been dead for seven years – and are the U.S. and Britain covering it up to continue war on terror?

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212851/Has-Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-seven-years–U-S-Britain-covering-continue-war-terror.html#ixzz0R1thK3JG

  12. VR says:

    Just don’t get to loud with those protests:

    “Long-range acoustic devices [LRADs] for crowd control can be extremely dangerous. These are used in Iraq to control insurgents. They can cause serious and lasting harm to humans…We want to know WHY our Sheriff Dept has this weapon,” Sal Magallanez of San Diego-based Liberty One Radio said in an e-mail sent to East County Magazine, prompting a joint investigation.

    The device was stationed by San Diego County Sheriff deputies at a recent town hall forum hosted by Congresswoman Susan Davis (D-San Diego) in Spring Valley and at a subsequent town hall with Congressman Darrell Issa (R-San Diego).

    An article from Atomic Scientists describes the device’s “ear-piercing siren” and confirms it has been used by U.S. Marines in Fallujah. The device has also been used by New York City Police for crowd control during the Republican National Convention. A technology article at GovPro.com states that the LRAD system “transmits powerful deterrent tones, by which piercing sound can cause pain, nausea, disorientation and possibly even hearing damage.”

  13. TJ says:

    Doing an re-investigation really would be moot point if the investigation is administered by the same people / group. However, if the taxpayers, or even better yet, the survivors of 9/11 could solely choose without ANY interference from Congress or special interests, I would have more confidence in the outcome of re-investigation. Otherwise, another investigation gets us the same result at taxpayer expense.

    • Sherman Handberg says:

      How does this look? http://www.nyccan.org/

      “City of New York Concedes 9/11 Coalition Has 30,000 Valid Signatures To Put Referendum For 9/11 Investigation on November Ballot”

      If the referendum passes in November, it would lead to the creation of a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks. No White House screwing up the results.

    • David Bernard Daniels says:

      Well put!

  14. Jack says:

    The new evidence about 911 is overwhelming.There should be a new investigation.This was shown on Danish TV but will not be allowed to be shown in the USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

    See also, http://www.youtube.com/watchv=kLr1VmN1SVI&feature=related

    If you want to see the truth see http://www.ae911truth.org/

    • David Bernard Daniels says:

      Exposing the government is a definite longshot. You have to keep in mind that the media is owned by the energy companies (Sid Richardson Bass and others) and the government is nothing but a puppet regime for the energy companies. This is why there is not much reporting on the suspicions that the government did 9/11 other than the token stuff they are forced to report so they don’t look like they are covering it up. It is my beleif that those who speak out effectively about 9/11 who cannot be smeared as ‘kooks’ and have power risk dying of ‘cancer’ or ‘heart attack’ or an accident prematurly. You need to keep in mind that tommy gun rubbouts are a thing of the past!

  15. Warren says:

    Why is this poll here on a Ron Paul site? At the very least it should be here not to petition the “corporate media” but instead petition Ron Paul himself!

    I support Paul’s no nonsense views, but he exhibits quite a bit of indecision regarding 911.
    When asked in the 2008 presidential candidacy debate about his supporters who are “911 truthers”, he states “I’ve abandoned those viewpoints (re: the non-official theories) and I don’t believe that, and that’s all, thats the only thing that’s important”.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhQ8xi312l8&feature=related

    He stated directly that he does NOT endorse any 911 truthers or their plight to re-open 911.

    So why do his supporters here still cling to him as being a beacon for 911 truth? He admitted to being exactly the same government/media shrill we are hoping to be some day rid of.

    Can anyone enlighten me on RP’s real point of view on 911?

    • Sam says:

      Here’s a hint – “because I can’t handle the controversy”

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88×6JdfjwCY

      No matter what Ron Paul really believes, it would be a balancing act of gigantic proportions for a Congressman to call for a new 9/11 investigation while at the same time trying to build a broad coalition to audit the Fed.

    • Jack says:

      Warren you do not understand the tactics.For Ron Paul to go out on a limb even if he suspects that 911 was false flag event,he then gets trashed along with many other conspiracy theory theorists who believe in other really outrageous stuff.You have to wait until the time is right.

      It is a game and you have to understand the game that the lunatics have invented and play by their rules since they have the referees whistle.

      • Warren says:

        I entirely agree Jack that he shouldn’t be lumped in with the ridiculous views of various Truthers.
        Yet Paul agrees with someone like Alex Jones on auditting the Fed, and thats OK. Jones also believes secret FEMA internment camps are currently in existance on US soil (as well as various other absurdities) but nobody links RP with those views. And Jones supports 911 truth, but on this issue RP quickly distances himself.

        Doesn’t many of RP’s platforms stem from corruption in government, with 911 being the biggest most blatant example? Wouldn’t many of his views fall into place consequently/more easily if 911 truth became exposed? Isn’t one of the primary stumbling blocks about 911 truth the complete lack of any elected government official to back a new investigation?

        Sorry, but I thought RP would be beyond “games”, cut the bull, and speak his mind honestly and flat out. I’m not interested in flip-flops either now nor after if he was to ever become president.

        If he plays chess in politics like this, then when and what are we to believe from him then? You’ve attempted to give him an excuse for capitulating, but there is no justification for acting like a p*ssy.

        • Jack says:

          Warren,Ron Paul is no fool.When you don’t have the power of the US Fed,you have to play the Chess game by their rules until such time that a fairer game is invented and that does not make Ron Paul a dishonourable person.

          Have you read Zbigniew Bzezinski’s “The Grand Chess Board”? 1998 “What we need is a truely masssive and widely perceived direct external threat.”Zbig was talking in context of expanding USA imperial influence.Hence the invention of Osama Bin Laden.The war on terror and Osama is never mentioned these days.Can you explain why?

          • Warren says:

            Respectfully Jack, I think you spoke too soon about the invented Osama no longer gaining attention, as “he” released another video taunting the US and Obama in the past several hours. Its timing and antagonism have a reason, and as pawns, we must sit and wait while our kings manipulate the field. Is it a cause to escalate Afganistan? Divert attention from shriviling health reform? Or to re-install a bit of fear in the public? We will see.

            But aside from this, we are getting off point. For all practical purposes, RP does not aid any form of 911 truth by denying it, and I only questioned why his supporters continue to believe he does. If there was one slogan of sobering depth from the 60s to be remembered, which would universally encompass this and every other mess we are now immersed in, it is “if you aren’t part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.”
            Sorry to point this out, but regarding 911 truth, the whopper of all lies, RP is currently NOT part of solution, so therefore…

          • Jayhawk says:

            Osama is Dead

  16. Herewe Goagain says:

    Will those of us that voted before the poll was reset get to re-vote?

    Highly improbable that only supporters will vote in the poll.

  17. Tyler says:

    The link posted goes to a quote from Giulietto Chiesa. A quick wikipedia search shows, not surprisingly, he is an informal spokesman for 9/11 conspiracy theories.
    Also, mostly unrelated but still worth posting, he is a member of the Party of European Socialists, and was a member of the Italian Communist Party before it dissolved.



Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>