Break the Monopoly! Ron Paul Introduces HR 4248, the Free Competition in Currency Act

Statement of Congressman Ron Paul
United States House of Representatives

Statement Introducing the Free Competition in Currency Act

December 9, 2009

Madame Speaker, I rise to introduce the Free Competition in Currency Act of 2009 (HR 4248). Currency, or money, is what allows civilization to flourish. In the absence of money, barter is the name of the game; if the farmer needs shoes, he must trade his eggs and milk to the cobbler and hope that the cobbler needs eggs and milk. Money makes the transaction process far easier. Rather than having to search for someone with reciprocal wants, the farmer can exchange his milk and eggs for an agreed-upon medium of exchange with which he can then purchase shoes.

This medium of exchange should satisfy certain properties: it should be durable, that is to say, it does not wear out easily; it should be portable, that is, easily carried; it should be divisible into units usable for every-day transactions; it should be recognizable and uniform, so that one unit of money has the same properties as every other unit; it should be scarce, in the economic sense, so that the extant supply does not satisfy the wants of everyone demanding it; it should be stable, so that the value of its purchasing power does not fluctuate wildly; and it should be reproducible, so that enough units of money can be created to satisfy the needs of exchange.

Over millennia of human history, gold and silver have been the two metals that have most often satisfied these conditions, survived the market process, and gained the trust of billions of people. Gold and silver are difficult to counterfeit, a property which ensures they will always be accepted in commerce. It is precisely for this reason that gold and silver are anathema to governments. A supply of gold and silver that is limited in supply by nature cannot be inflated, and thus serves as a check on the growth of government. Without the ability to inflate the currency, governments find themselves constrained in their actions, unable to carry on wars of aggression or to appease their overtaxed citizens with bread and circuses.

At this country’s founding, there was no government controlled national currency. While the Constitution established the Congressional power of minting coins, it was not until 1792 that the US Mint was formally established. In the meantime, Americans made do with foreign silver and gold coins. Even after the Mint’s operations got underway, foreign coins continued to circulate within the United States, and did so for several decades.

On the desk in my office I have a sign that says: “Don’t steal – the government hates competition.” Indeed, any power a government arrogates to itself, it is loathe to give back to the people. Just as we have gone from a constitutionally-instituted national defense consisting of a limited army and navy bolstered by militias and letters of marque and reprisal, we have moved from a system of competing currencies to a government-instituted banking cartel that monopolizes the issuance of currency. In order to reintroduce a system of competing currencies, there are three steps that must be taken to produce a legal climate favorable to competition.

The first step consists of eliminating legal tender laws. Article I Section 10 of the Constitution forbids the States from making anything but gold and silver a legal tender in payment of debts. States are not required to enact legal tender laws, but should they choose to, the only acceptable legal tender is gold and silver, the two precious metals that individuals throughout history and across cultures have used as currency. However, there is nothing in the Constitution that grants the Congress the power to enact legal tender laws. We, the Congress, have the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, but not to declare a legal tender. Yet, there is a section of US Code, 31 USC 5103, that purports to establish US coins and currency, including Federal Reserve notes, as legal tender.

Historically, legal tender laws have been used by governments to force their citizens to accept debased and devalued currency. Gresham’s Law describes this phenomenon, which can be summed up in one phrase: bad money drives out good money. An emperor, a king, or a dictator might mint coins with half an ounce of gold and force merchants, under pain of death, to accept them as though they contained one ounce of gold. Each ounce of the king’s gold could now be minted into two coins instead of one, so the king now had twice as much “money” to spend on building castles and raising armies. As these legally overvalued coins circulated, the coins containing the full ounce of gold would be pulled out of circulation and hoarded. We saw this same phenomenon happen in the mid-1960s when the US government began to mint subsidiary coinage out of copper and nickel rather than silver. The copper and nickel coins were legally overvalued, the silver coins undervalued in relation, and silver coins vanished from circulation.

These actions also give rise to the most pernicious effects of inflation. Most of the merchants and peasants who received this devalued currency felt the full effects of inflation, the rise in prices and the lowered standard of living, before they received any of the new currency. By the time they received the new currency, prices had long since doubled, and the new currency they received would give them no benefit.

In the absence of legal tender laws, Gresham’s Law no longer holds. If people are free to reject debased currency, and instead demand sound money, sound money will gradually return to use in society. Merchants would have been free to reject the king’s coin and accept only coins containing full metal weight.

The second step to reestablishing competing currencies is to eliminate laws that prohibit the operation of private mints. One private enterprise which attempted to popularize the use of precious metal coins was Liberty Services, the creators of the Liberty Dollar. Evidently the government felt threatened, as Liberty Dollars had all their precious metal coins seized by the FBI and Secret Service in November of 2007. Of course, not all of these coins were owned by Liberty Services, as many were held in trust as backing for silver and gold certificates which Liberty Services issued. None of this matters, of course, to the government, which hates competition. The responsibility to protect contracts is of no interest to the government.

The sections of US Code which Liberty Services is accused of violating are erroneously considered to be anti-counterfeiting statutes, when in fact their purpose was to shut down private mints that had been operating in California. California was awash in gold in the aftermath of the 1849 gold rush, yet had no US Mint to mint coinage. There was not enough foreign coinage circulating in California either, so private mints stepped into the breech to provide their own coins. As was to become the case in other industries during the Progressive era, the private mints were eventually accused of circulating debased (substandard) coinage, and with the supposed aim of providing government-sanctioned regulation and a government guarantee of purity, the 1864 Coinage Act was passed, which banned private mints from producing their own coins for circulation as currency.

The final step to ensuring competing currencies is to eliminate capital gains and sales taxes on gold and silver coins. Under current federal law, coins are considered collectibles, and are liable for capital gains taxes. Short-term capital gains rates are at income tax levels, up to 35 percent, while long-term capital gains taxes are assessed at the collectibles rate of 28 percent. Furthermore, these taxes actually tax monetary debasement. As the dollar weakens, the nominal dollar value of gold increases. The purchasing power of gold may remain relatively constant, but as the nominal dollar value increases, the federal government considers this an increase in wealth, and taxes accordingly. Thus, the more the dollar is debased, the more capital gains taxes must be paid on holdings of gold and other precious metals.

Just as pernicious are the sales and use taxes which are assessed on gold and silver at the state level in many states. Imagine having to pay sales tax at the bank every time you change a $10 bill for a roll of quarters to do laundry. Inflation is a pernicious tax on the value of money, but even the official numbers, which are massaged downwards, are only on the order of 4% per year. Sales taxes in many states can take away 8% or more on every single transaction in which consumers wish to convert their Federal Reserve Notes into gold or silver.

In conclusion, Madame Speaker, allowing for competing currencies will allow market participants to choose a currency that suits their needs, rather than the needs of the government. The prospect of American citizens turning away from the dollar towards alternate currencies will provide the necessary impetus to the US government to regain control of the dollar and halt its downward spiral. Restoring soundness to the dollar will remove the government’s ability and incentive to inflate the currency, and keep us from launching unconstitutional wars that burden our economy to excess. With a sound currency, everyone is better off, not just those who control the monetary system. I urge my colleagues to consider the redevelopment of a system of competing currencies and cosponsor the Free Competition in Currency Act.


H.R. 4248


December 9, 2009

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 12/9/2009


To repeal the legal tender laws, to prohibit taxation on certain coins and bullion, and to repeal superfluous sections related to coinage.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


This Act may be cited as the “Free Competition in Currency Act of 2009”.


(a) IN GENERAL. — Section 5103 of title 31, United States Code, (relating to legal tender) is hereby repealed.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT. — The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 51 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 5103 and inserting the following new item: “5103. [Repealed]”.


(a) IN GENERAL. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law —

(1) no tax may be imposed on (or with respect to the sale, exchange, or other disposition of) any coin, medal, token, or gold, silver, platinum, palladium, or rhodium bullion, whether issued by a State, the United States, a foreign government, or any other person; and

(2) no State may assess any tax or fee on any currency, or any other monetary instrument, which is used in the transaction of interstate commerce or commerce with a foreign country, and which is subject to the enjoyment of legal tender status under article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on December 31, 2009, but shall not apply to taxes or fees imposed before such date.


(a) IN GENERAL. — Title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking sections 486 (relating to uttering coins of gold, silver, or other metal) and 489 (making or possessing likeness of coins).

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF SECTIONS. — The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 25 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to the sections stricken by subsection (a).

(c) SPECIAL RULE CONCERNING RETROACTIVE EFFECT. — Any prosecution under the sections stricken by subsection (a) shall abate upon the taking effect of this section. Any previous conviction under those sections shall be null and void.

  • Sondra Locke Nude

    Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed!
    Very helpful information specifically the last part :) I care for such information much.

    I was looking for this certain information for a very long time.

    Thank you and best of luck.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Jynx Maze

    I read this piece of writing completely regarding the difference of
    most up-to-date and previous technologies, it’s amazing article.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Lionel

    I pay a visit every day a few blogs and information sites to read articles, buut this web site presents feature based writing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • where to buy homeopathic hcg in canada

    Hey there! I understand this is kind of off-topic but I needed to ask.
    Does operating a well-established blog like yours require a massive amount work?
    I’m brand new to operating a blog however I do write in my journal daily. I’d like to start a blog so I will be able to share my experience and feelings online. Please let me know if you have any recommendations or tips for brand new aspiring blog owners. Appreciate it!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • xenical

    In my opinion, it is actual, I will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • diflucan

    I think, that you are mistaken. Let’s discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • compra amoxil

    I can speak much on this theme.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • keflex

    It is very a pity to me, that I can help nothing to you. I hope, to you here will help.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • wesele

    This is atrocious filmaking. A huge embarassment to Africans. There was nothing to like about this movie..excessive music, bad acting? and cinematograhy.. Watch the pros and take note.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Martinpnc,

    It could be a bank or financial company or some community credit unions too. auto loan during bankruptcy Nonetheless, it is important to get a preferred lender checked out ahead of chasing an agreement on car loans in spite of poor credit. car note calculator payment Go for independent financer With independent loan company, you will get far more flexibility for the loan and lower rates when compared with financing rates, you get from the car seller.Nowadays, a lot of self employed folks are making by using internet to apply for such varieties of loans to save equally money and also efforts.Secondly, once you find a company that will does truly handle refinancing applications, you will want to know how many people share the information you have with the creditors they have arrangements with.Well, it’s a really easy program with a several different methods.Why You Need to Seek out Low Interest Car LoansVery quickly you will have re-established a superb credit score, a good re-payment record and perhaps you will be able to obtain that Lamborghini in the end.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • strattera

    I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. I suggest it to discuss.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • samsung 1080p hdtv

    The ideas presented in this article are fresh and exciting. I had been bored with the same old articles with the same old clich?’s. It is very good to see something new for a change.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Krankenzusatzversicherung Lead

    I am extremely impressed together with your writing skills and also with the format to your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it your self? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it’s uncommon to look a great blog like this one today..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • cursos a distancia gratis

    It’s actually a great and useful piece of info. I’m happy that you simply shared this helpful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Shawn

    I wonder what Ron’s stance is on the food/agriculture industry and the issues raised by films such as Food Inc and King Corn and the writings of people like Michael Pollan.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • DanS

    SOUND money is the catalyst for both individual and community “TRUST.” Without this TRUST, nothing will work efficiently and the global economies will continue to sink.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • posh

    ending the fed will also put farming , logging , mining, local jobs and freedom back in the black . all the give away social programs that have worked so well to bankrupt the nation will no longer be funded either.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Matt

      I am sorry, maybe I missed it, but how would ending the fed put logging jobs back in the black?

      Or was logging included as some larger and overarching, totally vague statement based upon utopian beliefs rather than a thought-out premises? (i.e. ‘getting rid of the Fed will rid all evil, cause the economy to be perfect and unicorns to appear and crap gold’)


      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • J Lacerenza

    I feel that real money is manditory for a healthy economy,
    credit based on real money is free from the many manipulations inherent to fiat money and manufactured credit, the value of real money ( Gold, Silver) through volitile when metered to fiat money only testifies to it’s solvency as a real asset ,real money’s relationship to labor as compared to a unit of Gold or silver through the centuries continues to provide a stable continuous platform for commerce, confidence in the Economy I feel can only be restored when options other than the federal reserve note can be implimented thereby giving the seller of commodities the security that he has recieved real value for his or her goods and services

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0