Comments on: Ron Paul Questions Hillary Clinton on $1 Billion London “Fortress” http://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/ Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-American foreign policy. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:04:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Yvonnehttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-100227 Yvonne Fri, 28 May 2010 15:54:28 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-100227 Ron Paul is brilliant because he is honest and he is right. Did you notice how he reacted when hillary tried to divert attention to the bush administration. she started to praise her actions from earlier years and to make it sound like she agrees with the congressmen. His response was brilliant. he politely brought the discussion back to the present. He basically asked her ''what about what you are doing today'' What a decent way he responded to someone whose manipulative double-talk inspires anger. I just love him. he's more than a leader. i think he is a good role model. i would be proud of all american children especially my own if they would behave like him. Ron Paul is brilliant because he is honest and he is right.
Did you notice how he reacted when hillary tried to divert attention to the bush administration. she started to praise her actions from earlier years and to make it sound like she agrees with the congressmen.
His response was brilliant. he politely brought the discussion back to the present.
He basically asked her ”what about what you are doing today”
What a decent way he responded to someone whose manipulative double-talk inspires anger.
I just love him.
he’s more than a leader. i think he is a good role model. i would be proud of all american children especially my own if they would behave like him.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Yvonnehttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-100223 Yvonne Fri, 28 May 2010 15:41:27 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-100223 Hillary Clinton is justifying the 1,000,000,000 dollar purchase by saying ''we sold some other things so we have the money''. Why couldn't they sell those other things and give the proceeds BACK to the tax payers. If i were given a choice i would want her to sell anything and everything we have overseas. She is saying we can do that. she is saying we have buildings or things we can sell. so do it! sell more buildings. sell everything. Then give americans the money. use it to create jobs. build things in our country with the money and hire our citizens. it's our tax money after all. She may as well be Marie Antoinette. People are jobless and she says ''well we had the money. we got it by selling some of our other valuables. we're just juggling our own wealth'' But it really isn't theirs because it belongs to american tax payers. Hillary Clinton is justifying the 1,000,000,000 dollar purchase by saying ”we sold some other things so we have the money”.
Why couldn’t they sell those other things and give the proceeds BACK to the tax payers.
If i were given a choice i would want her to sell anything and everything we have overseas.
She is saying we can do that. she is saying we have buildings or things we can sell. so do it! sell more buildings. sell everything.
Then give americans the money. use it to create jobs. build things in our country with the money and hire our citizens. it’s our tax money after all.
She may as well be Marie Antoinette.
People are jobless and she says ”well we had the money. we got it by selling some of our other valuables. we’re just juggling our own wealth”
But it really isn’t theirs because it belongs to american tax payers.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Kilohttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-75394 Kilo Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-75394 Ms. Clinton says "The reason we need a platform like that embassy in London is because we do so much work in every department of our government through London. It's not just our diplomats, but obviously every other part of the American government is represented there." Really? Exactly which government departments are operating in London and why is that necessary. I would like a list of them and an explaination of the work they are doing.This situation certainly has not been disclosed to the American public. I was under the misconception that an embassy was "the offical residence or offices of an ambassador in a foreign country" and the ambassador's job was to be "the highest ranking diplomatic representative appointed by one country or government to represent it in another." Atleast that is what Webster's dictionary says.It did not state that departments of our government should or would be operating out of an embassy. This is very disturbing.The government group thinks they can do any thing they want, where ever they want. This is not government by and for the people.I feel the government really believes these things are none of our business. How wrong they are. Ms. Clinton says “The reason we need a platform like that embassy in London is because we do so much work in every department of our government through London. It’s not just our diplomats, but obviously every other part of the American government is represented there.” Really? Exactly which government departments are operating in London and why is that necessary. I would like a list of them and an explaination of the work they are doing.This situation certainly has not been disclosed to the American public. I was under the misconception that an embassy was “the offical residence or offices of an ambassador in a foreign country” and the ambassador’s job was to be “the highest ranking diplomatic representative appointed by one country or government to represent it in another.” Atleast that is what Webster’s dictionary says.It did not state that departments of our government should or would be operating out of an embassy. This is very disturbing.The government group thinks they can do any thing they want, where ever they want. This is not government by and for the people.I feel the government really believes these things are none of our business. How wrong they are.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

]]> By: hytwqhttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-75242 hytwq Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:09:22 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-75242 How do you sell rented facilities?? I wish I could sell the places I've RENTED How does that work?? How do you sell rented facilities??
I wish I could sell the places I’ve RENTED
How does that work??

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Techhttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-75226 Tech Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:38:40 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-75226 The American revolution was basically against the Bank of England but since 1913 when the FED/IRs scam was foisted on us we have gone down hill. First of all this "money" the private bankers pay us loses value constantly through inflation and all our Federal Taxes are yes collected by an agency of the "government" but the money is always deposited into their private banks. The bankers then take that and lend out maybe 40 times that and charge everyone interest on it creating money out of thin air. We were promised by the bankers a more stable system if they took over control of ALL our money? Well sorry to say I think they lied and have used this power to create booms and busts, control business and the "government" and now it has led to a disaster. They are so used to their power they thumb their noses at Congress and the people while passing out BILLIONS to themselves in bonus money. BONUS MONEY??? for what? Now most folks I know think to heck with these bums bullets are cheaper than bailouts but I'm reasonable and think we just need to end the FED/IRS scam, the fraud, lobbying, the CIA boys and restore the rule of law and our constitution and rebuild this country. The first folks who should be bailed out should always be the people not some banksters. Seems they just got too big for their britches as the saying goes. If we had let them go bankrupt they might have had to get real jobs instead of stealing from honest folks. Where's the sherriff? And we don't need to spend a billion dollars in England to kiss up to the Queen of England. One million tops should take care of anything. If not let them come over here to do business! The American revolution was basically against the Bank of England but since 1913 when the FED/IRs scam was foisted on us we have gone down hill. First of all this “money” the private bankers pay us loses value constantly through inflation and all our Federal Taxes are yes collected by an agency of the “government” but the money is always deposited into their private banks. The bankers then take that and lend out maybe 40 times that and charge everyone interest on it creating money out of thin air. We were promised by the bankers a more stable system if they took over control of ALL our money? Well sorry to say I think they lied and have used this power to create booms and busts, control business and the “government” and now it has led to a disaster. They are so used to their power they thumb their noses at Congress and the people while passing out BILLIONS to themselves in bonus money. BONUS MONEY??? for what? Now most folks I know think to heck with these bums bullets are cheaper than bailouts but I’m reasonable and think we just need to end the FED/IRS scam, the fraud, lobbying, the CIA boys and restore the rule of law and our constitution and rebuild this country. The first folks who should be bailed out should always be the people not some banksters. Seems they just got too big for their britches as the saying goes. If we had let them go bankrupt they might have had to get real jobs instead of stealing from honest folks. Where’s the sherriff? And we don’t need to spend a billion dollars in England to kiss up to the Queen of England. One million tops should take care of anything. If not let them come over here to do business!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Bottomlinehttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-72098 Bottomline Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:18:25 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-72098 I just hope that when we do kick the bums out! That the new people we elect don't act like them! I just hope that when we do kick the bums out! That the new people we elect don’t act like them!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Susan Harkinshttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-72076 Susan Harkins Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:52:49 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-72076 If you guys really do want to control costs -- vote out these guys. It's not the London embassy (or any building for that matter) that is the root of the cost -- its the people (politicians) that are endorsing these costly projects at your expense. Did Hillary and company ever call YOU up and ask if you would be ok with another $420 tax hike to pay for the London Fortress? No -- they think that you have nothing to say about it. Just pay for it and shut up, is their motto. Don't you love feeling needed? If you guys really do want to control costs — vote out these guys. It’s not the London embassy (or any building for that matter) that is the root of the cost — its the people (politicians) that are endorsing these costly projects at your expense. Did Hillary and company ever call YOU up and ask if you would be ok with another $420 tax hike to pay for the London Fortress? No — they think that you have nothing to say about it. Just pay for it and shut up, is their motto. Don’t you love feeling needed?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Susan Harkinshttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-72073 Susan Harkins Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:46:57 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-72073 As usual, Hillary is already trying to spend U.S. taxpayer money (in other countries again) on the justification that savings created AFTER THE FACT, will pay for the expense. Once again, the cart is before the horse, since the astronomical costs will come BEFORE other sites are closed down. Do not believe what she tells you -- these other sites WILL NOT be closed down, after the new embassy is 'open for business'. In the end, we will be paying for ALL sites. Rule #1 for these sorts of corrupt liberal polititians: THEY NEVER SHRINK GOVT -- it is against their better interest. As usual, Hillary is already trying to spend U.S. taxpayer money (in other countries again) on the justification that savings created AFTER THE FACT, will pay for the expense. Once again, the cart is before the horse, since the astronomical costs will come BEFORE other sites are closed down. Do not believe what she tells you — these other sites WILL NOT be closed down, after the new embassy is ‘open for business’. In the end, we will be paying for ALL sites. Rule #1 for these sorts of corrupt liberal polititians: THEY NEVER SHRINK GOVT — it is against their better interest.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Bottomlinehttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-71431 Bottomline Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:36:51 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-71431 Hillary is more effective than Condi! Because she has more accurate information! & I don't dislike her because she's a woman! It's something else that she said when she was running for president! Hillary is more effective than Condi! Because she has more accurate information! & I don’t dislike her because she’s a woman! It’s something else that she said when she was running for president!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4

]]> By: Bottomlinehttp://www.ronpaul.com/2010-02-25/ron-paul-questions-hillary-clinton-on-1-billion-london-fortress/comment-page-1/#comment-71429 Bottomline Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:33:14 +0000 http://www.ronpaul.com/?p=4939#comment-71429 I meant when her hubby Billy passed that crappy NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT! (CRAFTA #1) & THAT IDIOT BUSH PASSED THE CENTRAL AMERICAN FREETRADE AGREEMENT(CRAPTA)! AS I LIKED TO CALL IT! Which both sent our jobs overseas! Looks like there will be more job killing free trade agreements that Obama may pass! I meant when her hubby Billy passed that crappy NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT! (CRAFTA #1) & THAT IDIOT BUSH PASSED THE CENTRAL AMERICAN FREETRADE AGREEMENT(CRAPTA)! AS I LIKED TO CALL IT! Which both sent our jobs overseas! Looks like there will be more job killing free trade agreements that Obama may pass!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

]]>