Ron Paul: Why I Voted Against Giving Subpoena Power to Obama’s BP Commission

Ron Paul explains why he was the only Congressman to vote against giving subpoena power to Obama’s BP Commission.

Channel: Fox News
Host: Stuart Varney
Date: 06/24/2010


Stuart Varney: The White House is digging in as the president’s drilling ban gets drilled, again, in court. But the White House today is not giving up despite this latest legal setback.

Ken Salazar: We want to keep the moratorium in place until we get to a level where we can provide a sense of safety to the American people that drilling can, in fact, continue.

Stuart Varney: Well, the president wants his oil spill commission to have a final say on when, or if, drilling can continue. That commission, by the way, is chock full of environmentalists. And now that commission has subpoena power. My next guest, the only one to vote against that move, is Texas Republican Ron Paul. Congressman, as always, welcome to the program.

Ron Paul: Thank you, nice to be with you.

Stuart Varney: Now, you voted against giving subpoena power to this commission. But, as you know, in the past, the commission that looked into Three Mile Island, and the commission that looked into the assassination of President Kennedy, did have that subpoena power. Don’t you think that this oil spill rises to the level of requiring teeth; subpoena power?

Ron Paul: Are you sure those commissions were set up by executive order, or could they have been set up by the Congress? Usually these commissions are set up by the Congress. My objection is to the process. I am very concerned about giving the executive branch too much power. If the Congress had set up the commission, that would have been a different story. But this was done by executive order and it is a blank check, and I just do not think that is the process. We should be very, very cautious of giving subpoena power to Congress or to a commission.

Stuart Varney: I know you’re also concerned of the people who are on that commission. Because as you can see – we’re scrolling it up on the screen right now – most of them are environmentalist. I don’t believe there is a driller up or a serious oil person on that commission. But, again, to return to your point about executive power, overreach maybe. Again, doesn’t this rise to the level of such a disaster, that maybe the federal government really has to just get in there and do it?

Ron Paul: Well, that’s generally the case in this city; whenever there is a crisis, it’s always so great that you have everybody rise to such a level, that you can put aside the Constitution. This is a time when you should be particularly protective of the Constitution, whether it’s 9/11 or whatever. Just look at what we did after 9/11 with the PATRIOT Act and other things. I think we go to fast. Sometimes we even go to war because it rises to a certain level. We went to war against Iraq and Afghanistan without a declaration of war, because people say, “It’s an emergency, weapons of mass destruction”. So we should be very cautious. We can work this through, but to reject our rules and reject the process I think is a very dangerous precedent to set.

Stuart Varney: It is going to happen, obviously. I mean, we can have views on whether it’s constitutional or a breach of executive power, but it is going to happen. Do you think there is any doubt that this commission will rule that you’ve got to delay a long time before you return to drilling, if at all? Any doubt?

Ron Paul: Well, it’s hard to say because if the environmentalists had their way, that would be one thing. But there is also the fact that the large corporations and governments aren’t always against each other. I think sometimes they work together. And, you know, BP is all for Cap and Trade and they get a lot of benefits from our military protection in the Persian Gulf. So who knows what will come of it? So we definitely need to find out, and you know my position has been that they are 100% responsible for all those who are injured and we do need to know. But we don’t want to just keep giving more power to the president and say, “Oh, executive order”. You know, “neat little deal.”

Stuart Varney: Congressman Ron Paul, always a pleasure. Thanks for joining us again, sir. Appreciate it.

Ron Paul: Thank you.

  • evramos70

    Ron Paul is a prophet!


  • truthislibertyus

    Not a big fan of Stuart. But the fact he has Ron Paul on regularly is a BIG PLUS! He needs to be commended!

  • multidimensionalman

    Ron Paul Is Right Again. Where are you folks that KNOW the President Already has 2 MUCH POWER already? – I know there are MILLIONS of you!

  • throwingshit
  • Aracuru

    I’m going to “Become” a Republican so I can VOTE RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012!!!! In the chance the “elites” block Dr. Ron Paul, I’ll STILL VOTE FOR HIM LIKE I DID IN 2008!!!!

    • Eric

      I’ve said the same and will say again. I will change my affiliation to ‘R’ again to vote for Ron in the primaries!

      • B.D.Harper

        The more people that do, the better. He needs to get on the ticket to win.

  • deathmarch5

    Obama should have picked his peeps from ACORN because from what I see the Americans will roll over and play dead until its 18 dollar a gallon gas and the middleclass workers are @ working class level living in trailer parks eating caned goods for dinner while the Grubermint grabs the nuts of the working class and squeezes them so hard the take off like a rocket ship into Mexico for relief that includes whites and blacks.

  • bertly71

    A commission of environmentalists hand picked by the President. What? We already know the outcome of this.

  • Aracuru



  • Krupification

    Ron is such an intelligent and steadfast man. One of the very few politicians I respect.

  • Noize666

    couldn’t of been said any better. interview guy was baiting him at the beginning, and ron flipped it on him.

  • BeadStallcup

    On man standing up for the people! One fearless man who always votes his conscious, never his party, never with the crowd. One courageous man named Ron Paul, who shines like a beacon of light in a vast, dark sea of corruption and treachery against the American people. God help us, I wish we had 500 just like him. How the liberty bell would ring again in this country. Our braveheart, Ron Paul. Our own Mahatma Ghandi. LONG LIVE, RON PAUL! Ron Paul for US President in 2012! LONG LIVE, RON PAUL!

  • CortoMaltese86

    Its amazing how one man can see through it all and keep defending liberty and the constitution as he does. He knows like 3 steps in the future what will come out of executive orders like this.

  • loafie79

    well life in the the gulf is [email protected] there is a new world order or whatever making money off of this. how come we as a country can’t putt are foot down and do the right thing, i’ll never know :(….

  • benzaintarental

    dude there are more lies coming from the fed than oil into the gulf

    vote in the primaries guys…its the only real choice you get!

  • mtklaric

    only Ron voted no? incredible…out of 535 congressman….usa has been sold out decades ago….

  • ExhibitMan

    Ron Paul! For! President!

  • continuityofliberty

    I’m getting a little tired of the Executive Orders…

  • rahmega7

    Seriously, how is it possible that Ron Paul is the only man in congress who get’s ”it”?

  • cmack28351

    RON PAUL for PRESIDENT 2012 !!!

  • karategirl96

    Why are there no oil people on this commission? And what is a former Senator from Florida going to do about this mess? This commission should have been appointed by Congress and not by Executive Order…in this manner, Obama gets to hand-pick whoever he wants to continue to lie about what is actually going on, and rein in anyone on that commission whose views are not in line with his. Blank check is right, Dr. Paul

    • Libertarian777

      notice how this administration has been using the term ‘czar’ more and more, for presidential appointments.

      I relate ‘czar’ to ‘dictator’. One could argue its just semantics