Ron Paul: Why Sacrifice our Liberties for the Illusion of Perfect Safety?

Ron Paul returned to CNN to debate Homeland Security advisor Fran Townsend on TSA’s abusive pat-downs and body scans.

Date: 11/23/2010


News Anchor: Well, between body scans and frisking, airport screeners have touched a nerve among the travelling public. The result an uproar over pat-downs. Joining me here is CNN’s national security contributor, Frances Townsend. She was the Homeland Security advisor to President George Bush, and serves on the Homeland Security Advisory Board. And from Texas, via Skype, Republican Congressman, Ron Paul. Thank you so much, both of you, for joining us here in the situation room.

I want to start off with you, congressman. The TSA has put an announcement out for travelers who are traveling over the holiday weekend, saying if you have to have one of those enhanced pat-downs, it would take place in a private area and that they could be accompanied by somebody to watch what was actually happening, what was taking place. Does that give you any comfort in thinking that perhaps people would not feel as violated, as disturbed, by that intimate process?

Ron Paul: Well, I think they should feel violated, all you have to do is look at some of those pictures. And the people are outraged over it, and they’re not feeling safer because of it, they just feel like the government has overstepped their bounds. They don’t want to be x-rayed, there are still some questions about those x-rays, there are questions about malfunctions of the x-rays. And there’s no evidence that this is going to make anybody any safer. And actually, there have been some pretty good bomb experts that actually testified that the bomb from the underwear bomber, the material he had, he had a long way to go before he would have ever been able to explode something. And yet I would say – and this is understatement – that we have overreacted to what happened over a year ago.

News Anchor: Fran, you understand security intimately from the ground up. But tell us, does this make a difference here? Is the congressman right when he says this really doesn’t matter?

Frances Townsend: No, I mean let’s be clear. The same bomb-maker who made the Christmas day Detroit attempted bomb, the guy with the bomb in his underwear was the same one who was behind these most recent packages coming out of Yemen. He’s a sophisticated bomb-maker, and the government is rightly worried because if he adapts, they may not be able to catch him. And so while there have been many problems with the way the government’s gone about explaining what they’re doing and training their employees to do it properly, let’s be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. That is, we do have to be very careful during periods of increased threats to make sure that we’re appropriately screening. Now I think the government understands they haven’t gone about this very well, and John Pistole went out on Sunday and issued a statement saying they’re going to be mindful to try to be as least intrusive as possible. I think they have a long way to go to convince the American people this is right. But what we don’t want to do is intimidate them into not doing it at all.

News Anchor: Congressman, you’re shaking your head. Why?

Ron Paul: Well, you know, we’re dealing with a created problem, it’s a manufactured problem. I mean, we got to look at it with the proper perspective. First, you can’t have perfect safety. And another thing is, the odds of any person in this country getting killed by a terrorist is less than getting struck by lightning. I mean, just think in the last ten years things have done pretty well because they put a gun in the cockpit and they locked the door. But to destroy our liberties, throw away the constitution, don’t care about the Fourth Amendment and cavelierly say, “Oh well, the people want to be safe, it’s good to sacrifice our liberties”, and on and on. But, you know, there’s no going back on this. The government gets away with a lot. They won’t pay attention to all the killing going on overseas, they get confused about the financial crisis. But I’ll tell you what, this prodding … the people have had it and they’re not going to put up with it. I think it’s a great issue to call the attention to the American people how abusive our government is. They’re supposed to protect our liberties; they’re not supposed to be engaged in destroying our liberties.

News Anchor: Frances, those are pretty serious accusations.

Frances Townsend: Well, Susan, let’s be clear. The congressman says that this is a manufactured problem. It’s a problem manufactured by our enemies and Al-Qaida who have been trying to blow up the airplanes, whether it’s in the cargo or in the passenger department.

Ron Paul: Why? Why do they want to come after us?

Frances Townsend: I don’t really care. If I’m flying on a plane I want to be safe.

Ron Paul: Ha ha ha, you got to ask that, and that’s why we’re not getting anywhere. You got to find out why. You know we’re over there fighting a war against the Taliban. The Taliban are not even part of the Al-Qaida, but we’re spending trillion dollars trying to kill Taliban creating more Al-Qaida. If you don’t ask that question, you can’t solve this problem.

Frances Townsend: The Taliban is very closely aligned to the Al-Qaida and to their methods in terms of attacking and targeting the United States. Look, when I say that I don’t care, the fact of the matter is that we have to be clear that Al-Qaida is obsessed with aviation, they want to target it, and they want to kill Americans. And so the government has an obligation to act against that.

News Anchor: Congressman, you were talking about the constitution ..

Ron Paul: Why should we get watched without our clothes on then? That’s what you’re doing. The kids are having to take their clothes off. Why does a woman have to remove her breast implant in order for somebody to be guaranteed that she’s not a bomber? This is insanity, this is not logic.

News Anchor: Congressman, let Frances respond, please. Frances, go ahead.

Frances Townsend: I agree with the congressman, Susan, that those examples that he sights are egregious, and what we hope is that those are the exceptions. And TSA has got a responsibly to ensure those are the exceptions, and that actions are taken against the most egregious violations that are not consistent with their own policies. They’ve got to be sure that people are appropriately trained and that these searches are not an opportunity for abuse. So he and I are in agreement on that; the government has a very severe responsibly to ensure that.

News Anchor: I’m going to have to leave it at that. Congressman Ron Paul, I appreciate your time as well as Frances Townsend’s. And we want to let our viewers know that we will be able to speak with the head of the TSA, John Pistole, very shortly after this break.

  • rzimberg

    Ron Paul is so blinded by his belief in Liberty that he thinks they actually want to solve this problem. LOL


  • campaign4liberty

    Ron Paul 2012!
    Down With Fascist NWO Tyranny!
    visit LibertyPoet

  • iancucornel

    Ron Paul, at least i see an intelligent american

  • JoeyPencils

    he laughs in her face!…you go Ron!

  • ConqueringStorms

    ron is a little troll

  • Fem

    The question about why there are terrorists is very important, it’s very discouraging to have leaders thinking with that frame of mind. Please lady, clear up the fog in your brain, we need as many people as possible with clear thinking, it does not matter which side you are on.

    Your comment is not helpful at all, so go and try figuring out why so many, ah, it’s useless!

  • Paul2012

    Hahaha, that was awesome:

    “Who cares why they attack us!?!”

    The truth finally comes out. I’m surprised Dr. Paul didn’t have a stroke right then and there.

  • Vebinz

    I would like to thank Fran for openly admitting that the causes and reason of terrorism are not important, all that is important is using it to scare people.

  • 2xtream

    But don’t be fooled… The TSA has NEVER STOP ONE terrorist EVER !!!!! This is only to do with training you SHEEPLE to bow down to GOVERNMENTS and to give up your rights… If your willing to let the Government Sexual Molest YOU then we are truly lost… this is a CRIME and you have been fooled to think now it’s ok to watch YOUR wife get SEXUALLY MOLESTED…. What a bunch of yellow bellied sap suckers………..


  • David

    “Those who would sacrifice freedom for the sake of security, deserve neither freedom nor security”.

    Ben Franklin

  • DanNinjaMan

    Look at Fran’s shit eating grin when the anchor gives her the last word.

  • DanNinjaMan

    What’s it like being the mouth piece for an overbearing government Fran? Does it feel good?

  • Bluebull4753

    Notice how they used like a wide angled lense on Ron Paul to make him look crazy.

  • siweltnek

    Keep talking Ron, we are waking up all across the country. Thank you.

  • Carla

    This woman is spitting out ridiculous oxymorons. In order to keep us safe, the government is “obligated” to look at us naked, expose us to radiation, and sexually assault us? You’re telling me that assaulting me is keeping me safe? Did you take drugs right before this interview?

  • toophatpoyo

    The anchorwoman should just shut up herself. If blondie had a strong case, she would not have a problem defending herself. Ron exposed her and went in for the kill. Bravo Ron. You’re a good man.

  • mmyr123

    If we get rid of the bullshit government taking care of our security then she would not have a job anymore. lameass homeland security peeping toms

  • LibertiesDefender

    Benjamin Franklin would bitch slap this whore right out of America.

  • leafwatch

    Fran is totally out of her depth. She knows zero about foreign policy, zero about civil rights. She makes it just a superficial matter of “training” the public and the TSA goons.

  • toophatpoyo

    Bravo, Dr. Paul. You’re a good man.