Date: 04/25/2011
By RonPaul.com on April 25, 2011
Posted in Ron Paul's Interviews | Tagged The View | 129 Responses
RonPaul.com is maintained by independent grassroots supporters of Ron Paul. Neither this website nor the articles, posts, videos or photos appearing on it are paid for, approved, endorsed or reviewed by Ron Paul or his staff. For Ron Paul's temporary official website go to The-FREE-Foundation.org
Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-American foreign policy. Read more...
Get the latest Ron Paul Bumper Stickers, T-Shirts, Posters, Mugs, Speakers, Mousepads, Shoes, Ties, and other Ron Paul Gear.
Store | Ron Paul T-Shirts | Ron Paul Bumper Stickers | Ron Paul Books | Ron Paul Quotes | YouTube | Facebook
Copyright © 2008 - 2016 RonPaul.com. This website is maintained by independent grassroots supporters. It is not paid for, approved or endorsed by Ron Paul.
3:48 “We ran through a lot of dough before this guy [emphasis on "this guy"] took office. We ran through a lot of money on all these wars.” Golberg assumes because Paul is a Republican his criticism of federal spending is directed specifically at President Obama and his administration. She probably doesn’t even know Dr. Paul’s foreign policy. They clearly don’t know his positions, his voting record, nothing. They asked him what he thought about “The Birthers”. Are you kidding me?
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
He didn’t explain his positions well. Unfortunately, Dr. Paul talks about the issues under the assumption his audience knows what he’s talking about. They don’t. He should have explained his political philosophy. He should have talked about the Constitution and the proper role of government. Then he could have answered Whoopi Golberg’s Planned Parenthood question within that context.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
u mad, bro???
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
you must be burned up and put to death. Now further, your points is ridiculous. the cost of health care must be increased because new medicine and new technology. this makes no sense at all. None, and your ECONOMICS degree does nothing to help in this. you are obviously obscenely retarded. You must be burned up. must. there is no sense in what you’re saying. a broken bone needs to cost more because of new drugs or new tech?? of course not.
»crosslinked«
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
no, not once again. YOu lie. YOu must be killed. Those who fail to kill you will be turned into painful life. i will make them suffer extreme death. you must be killed. I did not miss any point you made, OBVIOUSLY I SEE YOU POINT AND I DISSAGREED WITH IT BECAUSE I KNOW BETTER. you can not say i missed it as i clearly addressed it. You obviously are stupid. YOU MUST BE BURNED.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Once again you miss the point of my argument entirely
When Ron Paul was practicing medicine long ago, many of the advanced medical equipment was not in existence, including many pharmaceutical drugs. Therefore the cost of treatment was relatively low
Nowadays with the increasingly new technology and availability of new pharmaceutical drugs, the cost of treatment has been pushed up.
Many churches simply cannot afford it
I study economics, I know what I am talking about.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
i’m sorry you don’t understand. this is because you are very stupid. the point is, (and you won’t see it because besides being stupid, you are evil, and you will die.) it is obvious. the technology makes it more expensive?? wow. weeewly? weealy? weewly =( weewee =”(
buttlick. it’s ok to take you down notches cause you’re stupid. we have computers. we have cheap foreign labour. Your brain is not there. what are you? a piece of crap.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You just resorted to name calling.
That was an extremely effective way to deconstruct my argument with logic, reason and comprehensive knowledge of the facts.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You just resorted to name calling.
That was an extremely effective way to deconstruct my argument with logic, reason and comprehensive knowledge of the facts.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
essentially, you’re an idiot.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
6:25 When Ron Paul worked at a hospital in the 1950′s and 1960′s, there were no MRI machine or advanced technology and expensive pharmaceutical drugs.
It’s unlikely that charity could fund all the expenses in the modern day.
I agree with Paul on the foreign policy but not on the domestic issues.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Compared to George Bush and Barack Obama, Wilson’s policies worked damn well. We were involved in WW One for NINETEEN MONTHS. It’s certainly plausible we could be in Afghanistan for nineteen years.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Compared to George Bush and Barack Obama, Wilson’s policies worked damn well. We were involved in WW One for NINETEEN MONTHS. It’s certainly plausible we could be in Afghanistan for nineteen years.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I refuse to vote for anyone I do not believe deserve the office of the President of the United States.
For that matter I will never vote for anyone but Ron Paul in the 2012 Presidential Election.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Let me ask you something: if we had been a non-interventionist policy before Iraq would 16 million be dead and 21 million wounded?
WHAT THREAT DID IRAQ POSE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
Fucking neo-con. It’s people like you that are losing the Republican Party credibility every day. We need to have a strong national DEFENSE in missile defense, nuclear deterrence, and a strong navy and air force. THAT DOESN’T MEAN WE NEED TO USE THEM!
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I cannot tell the intent behind your comment, but if you’re serious, I disagree.
However if you were sarcastic I completely agree.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I cannot tell the intent behind your comment, but if you’re serious, I disagree.
However if you were sarcastic I completely agree.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
And given that there was no Presidential Race in 98… (Hint, Joy: It’s once every 4 years). Why does she even pretend to know anything about politics. Sheesh.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
And given that there was no Presidential Race in 98… (Hint, Joy: It’s once every 4 years). Why does she even pretend to know anything about politics. Sheesh.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“You ran for President in ’98 and ’08, yes?”
“1988…”
“’88? I have ’98 here…”
Somehow I think Ron Paul would know a little better than your sheet of paper, Joy.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
… i think ron paul is in this video, you can stop talking about .. whoever elizabeth is
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“the republican party has their head so far stuck up their ass that they won’t endorse him”
Unlike the Democrats, they learned their lesson from two World Wars. Being an isolationist pussy just doesn’t work. Eventually you have to fight the motherfuckers, and the smart man does it sooner, not later. Ask Woodrow WIlson how well that isolationist
policy worked for him.
16 million dead. 21 million wounded.
Nice work, isolationist cocksuckers.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“ron paul is a pussy doctor”
Well, that explains it, then.
As they say … it takes one to know one.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“Typical of the View.”
Just goes to show what a mistake it was to give women the vote.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0