Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Can you help us out and proofread the transcript while you watch the video? Go to our writeboard (password: warpowers). Then click the “Edit this page” button to make changes. We check all writeboards daily and will update this post with your proofread transcript ASAP. Thanks!
Ron Paul: I ask unanimous consent to revise and extend my remarks. Mr. Speaker, later this morning, we will be debating and voting on two resolutions dealing with Libya. The first one, H.J. RES. 68, has been said to be one that literally endorses exactly what the President has being doing, and I agree with that. Even though it excludes ground troops, it doesn’t talk about Special Forces, CIA, contractors, and unlimited bombing, which is really what we have to restrict. But the second one, HR2278, has been said to be more strongly worded in restraint on the President, and this is where I disagree. I believe the wording is different and it says no funds for ground troops, but then it has exceptions, and the exceptions are for all the things that we’re already doing. So I believe if we vote and pass the second one, it will be the first time this Congress has given authority to the president for what he is doing right now. So I urge my colleagues to look at both of these resolutions carefully. I have concluded that not only should the first one be voted down, but it’s very important that the second one be voted down as well.
Mr. Speaker: The gentleman’s time has expired.
Ron Paul: I thank the Gentleman for yielding. I rise in support of this rule, although I have a lot of complaints about how we deal with the issue of war. This is a debate that should have gone on 4 months ago before the war was started, and if we would have done this properly, we wouldn’t be bringing this up quickly – no committee work, no discussion, no chance for an amendment. But, nevertheless, I will support the rule, because at least we get a chance to talk a little bit about what’s going on in Libya with two resolutions that will come up under this rule. I generally understand that most individuals aren’t too keen on the first resolution because it’s a literal endorsement, it’s a rather explicit endorsement of the war, and I obviously would be opposed to H. J. RES. 68. But my greatest concern is about HR2278, because the way I read this resolution is that it essentially grants the same authority that we grant in the first one, because we say that no funds can be used, deny the use of funds, but how can you deny the use of appropriated funds when they’re using funds that weren’t appropriated. It’s so redundant. If the funds were never appropriated, so yes, it’s a good statement. You don’t continue to be illegal, is what we’re saying. But what I’m concerned about are the exceptions. All the exceptions are the things that they’re doing, like search and rescue, intelligence gathering, renaissance, surveillance, re-fueling, operations planning, and doing everything except pulling the trigger. So we’re legalizing that. I believe that HR2278 is the first time that we in the Congress are making a statement that we are granting authority to the president to pursue this particular war. So I am in strong opposition to that resolution as well, although I understand the other side of the argument because it says denial of funds. But the author of the resolution said that the main reason why we had the exception was to protect the integrity of our contractor agreement with NATO. Well, in the resolution, the resolution says we have to stop the funding because we don’t want to support NATO’s war. So it’s totally inconsistent, it makes no sense whatsoever, but it reminds me of the War Powers Resolution. You know, after the Vietnam War we didn’t want to get into that kind of war anymore, so the Congress comes along with infinite wisdom and with great good intentions, designs the War Power Resolution which legalized war for 90 days. That’s part of the reason why we’re here, we’re worrying about 90 days, but here we’re going into the 4th month dealing with the War Powers Resolution. There’s a simple solution to all of this, and that is, obey the constitution, don’t allow our presidents to go to war without a declaration of war, and we wouldn’t be facing this problem of this debate, that actually gets a little bit silly, on restraining the president. Yes, we should, we should exert ourselves, we have the prerogatives, we have the obligations, and we have avoided it. It’s time to stand up for the rule of law.
Mr. Speaker: The gentleman’s time has expired.
Processing your request, Please wait....









I have been reading out many of your posts and i can state nice stuff. I will surely bookmark your blog.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything. Nevertheless just imagine if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and videos, this blog could certainly be one of the greatest in its niche. Terrific blog!
lingual braces
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Thanks for sharing. I’m really going to try to apply this considered approach to my own site regarding poor credit advice.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
When I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with exactly the same comment. Is there any manner you possibly can take away me from that service? Thanks!
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It is indeed my belief that mesothelioma is actually the most fatal cancer. It’s got unusual attributes. The more I look at it a lot more I am persuaded it does not react like a real solid flesh cancer. In case mesothelioma is really a rogue viral infection, hence there is the chance for developing a vaccine and also offering vaccination to asbestos uncovered people who are really at high risk of developing future asbestos related malignancies. Thanks for revealing your ideas for this important ailment.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Random Google results can occasionally lead to great blogs such as this. You are doing a good job, and we share plenty of opinions.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I am not sure where you’re getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this information for my mission.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
In contrast to the mainstream ideas, I’ve to disagree with you, as there are simply so many other components to consider. Well if you’re open for link trade, maybe we must always keep in touch with each other, so that we can construct a greater blog together. What do you suppose?
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hi there are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and set up my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Absolutely indited written content, Really enjoyed looking through.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
free thesaurus and dictionary
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Little enemies and little wounds must not be despised.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I’ve said that least 2087036 times. SCK was here
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Already switched parties
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Already switched parties
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
He is truly courageous, you can tell he’s angry and nervous about being all alone in congress. He is the conscience.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
He is truly courageous, you can tell he’s angry and nervous about being all alone in congress. He is the conscience.
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0
IF YOU’RE SWITCHING PARTIES TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL:
You need to switch parties 3 months ahead of the primary OR YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE.
If you want to vote for Ron Paul in the primary, YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED AS A REPUBLICAN or you will not be allowed to vote.
PLEASE DO NOT WAIT ANOTHER SECOND
Switch now if you are a democrat or independent or you will not be allowed to vote in the primary. IF DR PAUL LOSES PRIMARY, NO ELECTION.
Let’s get moving NOW people. THANK YOU and spread
Report this comment
Like or Dislike:
0
0