Americans being in Afganastan and Iraq is creating more extremists 10 years you been in their country now you'll be fightning the angry children of their dead parents and kids that grew up hating the U.S for fightning in their country and now war is all they know. Do Americans now think they made ground on the war on terror they just made it worse. Occupation is the reason for all this violance towards Americans. Americans have to stop attacking out of fear & incase crap happens way of thinking!
Like or Dislike: 0 0
For the cost in dollars and lives, Lincoln could had freed most slaves by buying them. JFK talked to the Soviets who had thousands of nukes, then he was killed and Johnson pumped up Keynesian economics for the military industrial complex and lied about Viet Nam. Obama kept all of Bush's chief cronies in power from DEA chief to the FED to expanding the MI Complex
Like or Dislike: 1 1
Like or Dislike: 0 1
If they hated us for our freedom, then they are certainly winning with all of the cowards in the United States who are afraid of their own liberty and their own shadows. Peace and liberty is difficult for the only country in the industrial world who had to kill their own people to free the slaves, when Lincoln could have bought and freed most of them peacefully. Are we really just war mongers who hate liberty?
Like or Dislike: 1 0
You notice he said the motive behinf the "bombing"? probably mixed words, but there were bombs in WTC...
Do you expect to get the truth from a doctor that has learned to diagnose?
Do you expect to get the truth from a lawyer that has learned to bend words?
Why not stop electing leaders who lies to make you feel good about yourself...
"Soviet-style communism failed, not because it was intrinsically evil but because it was flawed. It allowed too few people to usurp too much power. Twenty-first century market-capitalism, American-style, will fail for the same reasons. Both are edifices constructed by human intelligence, undone by human nature." - Arundhati Roy
ricks pretty much saying that the us is attacked because there jealous of america....:S:S
lol...I completely support Ron Paul's run for the Presidency....
and I know it is much easier to sit back here anonymously than to answer all of those "gotcha" questions that the media likes to ask. Nevertheless, I must say, Ron Paul came up a bit short with the answer to whether we should let that 30 year old man die who refused to take responsibility for himself? The answer ... the Ayn Rand, Objectivist, libertarian answer is that the use of the word WE is immoral. Speaking in the collective is immoral --- (please read Anthem)
His answer should be that I will do whatever I can do to help him, but I would NEVER place a MANDATE on anyone else in society to help him. To do so would be to coerce others into acting...and all coercion is immoral.
In fact, his answer can be more succinct...Are you asking me whether the governement should FORCE at gunpoint others into helping him? The easy answer to this is NO.
Ron Paul 2012...you are either for FREEDOM or you are not.....
Santorum is a war-mongering imbecile.
"They want to kill us for who we are and what we stand for...."
Pure, unmitigated horseshit. If anyone in their sane mind believes that pile of rubbish, you desperately require a schooling in the history department.
French inspectors, approved by the U.N. of which this country claims to be a member, found that there were no WMD's. So when we tell another member country they lack compelling cause for war, we expect them to listen. However, when the U.N. told Bush he lacked a compelling enough reason for war, he disregarded and violated U.N. membership, broke ranks, and declared an illegal war.
The U.N. was completely dead-on. There never were WMD's. And even Bush admitted that. So deny what you will.
ronpaul2012. com donate his campaign now
1 - Google Ron Paul in 60 minutes petition
2 - Petition - CBS News 60 minutes - Get Ron Paul go to change.org
3 - sign the petition
Only Ron Paul actually had the balls to state the truth without fear of rejection of his own country.
very correct, ron is the only candidate who worths to be the president
Ron Paul is the man.
After these people got so fed up with these guys they started working with us. now if we remove troops over there(mid-east) I think they will not care what we do. What Dr Paul says is absolutely correct, I know I will get allot of flak for this but If we leave the mid east and stop funding the Israel military they will not f%$# with us. You can talk smack to me but if you are not an OIF vet I dont wanna hear it.
Here is some hard truth for people, most of the people we fought in OIF after 05 were not Iraqi's. They were fighters from all over the world, Iraq became the battlefield for USA vs Islamist fundamentalists. That is why the 07 troop increase was successful, Iraqi citizens were so sick of these foreign fighters in their neighborhoods killing innocent people. Most Iraqis just wanna work and provide for their families, yet here you have this foreign invasion of fundamentalists killing people.
Ron Paul speaks truth- he is not speaking Popularity
Listen up and Vote for Truth
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
+ 3 = ten
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Yes, send me email updates and action alerts from RonPaul.com
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
RonPaul.com is maintained by independent grassroots supporters of Ron Paul. Neither this website nor the articles, posts, videos or photos appearing on it are paid for, approved, endorsed or reviewed by Ron Paul or his staff.