Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy: Peace & Respect – Not Intimidation, Bribes & War

Ron Paul: The Soviet Union detonated its first nuclear bomb on August 29, 1949, leading to the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction, shared by both the USA and the Soviets. The unwritten agreement by the two super powers deterred nuclear war with an implied threat to blow up the world, if need be, to defend each of their interests.

I well remember the Cuban missile crises of October 1962, having been drafted into the military at that time. Mutually Assured Destruction had significant meaning to the whole world during this period. This crisis, along with the escalating ill-advised Vietnam War, made me very much aware of the problems the world faced during the five years I served as a USAF flight surgeon.

It was with great pleasure and hope that I observed the collapse of the Soviet Empire between 1989 and 1991. This breakup verified the early predictions by the free market economists, like Ludwig Von Mises, that communism would self-destruct because of the deeply flawed economic theories embedded in socialism. Our nukes were never needed because ideas are more powerful than the Weapons of War.

Many Americans at the time were boldly hopeful that we would benefit from a generous peace dividend. Sadly, it turned out to be a wonderful opportunity wasted. There was to be no “beating their swords into plowshares,” even though history shows that without weapons and war there’s more food and prosperity for the people. Unfortunately, our leaders decided on another course that served the special interests who benefit from constant wars and the arbitrary rearrangement of national borders for control of national resources.

Instead of a peace dividend from ending the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction, US leaders opted for a foreign policy of American world domination as its sole super power. It was all in the spirit of Woodrow Wilson’s idealistic goal of “making the world safe for democracy” by pursuing a war to end all wars.

The mantra became that American exceptionalism morally required us to spread our dominance world-wide by force. US world dominance, by whatever means, became our new bipartisan foreign policy. There was to be no peace dividend, though our enemies were virtually non-existent.

In many ways America had been “exceptional” but in an opposite manner from the neo-con driven foreign policy of the last 20 years. If America indeed has something good to offer the cause of peace, prosperity, and liberty it must be spread through persuasion and by example; not by intimidation, bribes and war.

Maintaining world domination is based on an intellectually and financially bankrupt idea that generates dependency, war, loss of civil liberties, inflation and debt, all of which contribute to our economic crisis.

Saddest of all, this policy of American domination and exceptionalism has allowed us to become an aggressor nation, supporting pre-emptive war, covert destabilization, foreign occupations, nation building, torture and assassinations. This policy has generated hatred toward Americans and provides the incentive for almost all of the suicide attacks against us and our allies.

To continue to believe the fiction that the militants hate us for our freedoms and wealth may even result in more attacks against us — that is, unless our national bankruptcy brings us to our knees and forces us to bring our troops home.

Expanding our foreign military intervention overseas as a cure for the attacks against us, tragically, only guarantees even more attacks. We must someday wake up, be honest with ourselves, and reject the notion that we’re spreading freedom and America’s goodness around the world. We cannot justify our policy by claiming our mission is to secure American freedoms and protect our Constitution. That is not believable. This policy is doomed to fail on all fronts.

The policy of Mutually Assured Destruction has been gone now for 20 years, and that is good.

The policy of American domination of the world, as nation builder-in-chief and policeman of the world, has failed and must be abandoned—if not as a moral imperative, then certainly out of economic necessity.

My humble suggestion is to replace it with a policy of Mutually Assured Respect. This requires no money and no weapons industry, or other special interests demanding huge war profits or other advantages.

This requires simply tolerance of others cultures and their social and religious values, and the giving up of all use of force to occupy or control other countries and their national resources. Many who disagree choose to grossly distort the basic principles shared by the world’s great religions: the Golden Rule, the Ten Commandments, and the cause of peace. Religions all too often are distorted and used to justify the violence engaged in for arbitrary power.

A policy of Mutually Assured Respect would result in the U.S.:

  • Treating other nations exactly as we expect others to treat us.
  • Offering friendship with all who seek it.
  • Participating in trade with all who are willing.
  • Refusing to threaten, bribe or occupy any other nation.

Seeking an honest system of commodity money that no single country can manipulate for a trade advantage. Without this, currency manipulation becomes a tool of protectionism and prompts retaliation with tariffs and various regulations. This policy, when it persists, is dangerous and frequently leads to real wars.

Mutually Assured Respect offers a policy of respect, trade and friendship and rejects threats, sanctions and occupations.

This is the only practical way to promote peace, harmony and economic well-being to the maximum number of people in the world.

Mutually Assured Respect may not be perfect but far better than Mutually Assured Destruction or unilateral American dominance.


  • frosteddubstep
  • Ksharawy


  • Ksharawy


  • undeadpresident

    Ron Paul is the only person that I’ve seen running for president that is even worth considering.

  • Left2Die4

    I am not a fake account made by Ron Paul, and I love this video!

  • 1brandwag

    revisionist”tolerance” could be the other pole. way to complacent to those ideologies that are seeking to take move forward politically and conquer in the name of peace on one side and violence on the other.Yes amreica need to stay out of internal strives in other contries and firtly look after itself casue many time what tehy do has benefited the more extremist,such as what could result from libya if you listen to some.Rather take more care.then to leave defence completely.

  • 1brandwag

    That is actually a bit worrying rhetoric, all religions go for peace, the Love talked about doesn’t always have exactly the same result and meaning in all religions.So his tolerance is a bit worrying.There is terrorism problem, however as an example in libya, bloeback occurred cause the wars happened in a haste and action wasn’t probably considered.America had a right to respond to 9/11 wheter it responded in the right way is debatable.Terror threat is real it is just what action?

  • pattonftw

    Ron Paul Champion of humanity!

  • Livelifechill

    Attention!!! For those of you that haven’t heard Ron Paul won the GOP straw poll in California!!! He had 44 % of the votes. This is great news cause California is huge. Too bad the media hates Paul or else this would have been all over CNN. You think they’ll mention it at the next debate? No probably not, but we know who the real GOP contender is…GO RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • bossrube53

    ronpaul2012. com donate his campaign now

  • bossrube53

    1 – Google Ron Paul in 60 minutes petition

    2 - Petition - CBS News 60 minutes - Get Ron Paul go to

    3 - sign the petition

  • deadballo

    Add it to your favs

  • SarahsSecretExposed

    Ron Paul can restore our freedom

  • GhostWriterHipHop


    It’s not enough to say “Vote Ron Paul






  • morsea30

    he let his friend die,,,,and thinks no-one deserves help/healthcare…He would not change anything,,,he just talking ish….I wanted to like this man..I heard he had some things to say…..I agree we should not be at war…and he knows nothing about religions,,,,He forgot that “society is judged by how it treats it’s least” yet he thinks that if you get sick ,it not the people’s job to help….WTF…I am not writing this to make people mad..I think we have all gone astray…

    • JFB

      he let his friend die? Are you claiming that Kent Snyder died in the street ot didn’t receive help from doctors? Or that RP could have prevented a man with a pre-existing problem from dying?

  • lordofthemanor25

    It is obvious Ron Paul speaks the truth: The United States, the nation we call home, is no better than the Soviet Union was. We forced democracy on many cultures around the world as the Soviets tried to impose communism around the world. However the Soviets did it through conquest while we Americans did it through infiltration. Although I support Ron Paul, I do not support worldwide republicanism spread around the world. The Soviet Union collapsed and so will America someday.

  • bossrube53

    ronpaul2012. com donate his campaign now

  • bossrube53

    1 – Google Ron Paul in 60 minutes petition

    2 - Petition - CBS News 60 minutes - Get Ron Paul go to

    3 - sign the petition

  • bossrube53

    ronpaul2012. com donate his campaign now

  • bossrube53

    If you are angry at the media, for ignoring Ron Paul and the American people
    let them know

    FOX News room – 212-301-3344
    FOX news radio 212-301-5800
    CNN news desk 404-827-2751
    CNN news desk fax: 404-827-3368
    MSNBC – 212-664-3720
    ABC News – 212-456-7777
    CBS News – 212-975-4321
    CBS News fax – 212-975-1893