What's up mates, its enormous paragraph on the topic of tutoringand fully defined, keep it up all the time.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
This website online is mostly a stroll-by for all of the data you needed about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and also you’ll definitely discover it.
Right now it sounds like BlogEngine is the top blogging platform available right now. (from what I've read) Is that what you are using on your blog?
Hey there this is a great write-up. I'm going to email this to my buddies. I came on this while browsing on aol I'll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.
ty that brought tears to my eyes
Check out this site http://ronpaulpromise.com/ It is a message to the republican party for and by Ron Paul supporters.
@HimanshuDohroo Inspiring. However, I don't like the "doctored" parts; it cheapens a serious dialog. Let's not stoop!
Phone From Home for RON PAUL!
TO ALL MEMBERS: Invite everyone of your friends to this event and share this link on your wall. This is how RP will take 2012 baby!!!
Also, join the Phone Bankers for Ron Paul FB group to have all of your questions answered:
sparkobuzzard your arguments make no sense...you are all for NAFTA and even Hillary said it needed reform...we have a huge trade deficit with Mexico because of NAFTA....you are all wet
the dems are a evil party while the GOP is full of clowns. and that includes Ron Paul. Who has the guts in the GOP to say that all the entilement programs need to be phased out as quick as can be done?
Yawn, Ok I understand now. You are a troll. You are here to get a rise out of everyone. You have nothing constructive to say. You are full of non concrete insults and an agenda to just be an all out non informed person, who doesn't sound a bit older than 12.
I encourage everyone to do their own research about Ron Paul. He really has our best interests at heart.
@RonPaul2012alldaylong yea right, and what is a troil since i am a old gezzer now. so who is the troil anyway?
@RonPaul2012alldaylong , hmm sorry but i don,t even know what a troll is? We will see who is right and who wrong. But as i have just wrote , i think the US is to far gone. Just my opinion. And yes i voted for Rand Paul and i am again.
I respect you opinions, even if they are wrong. He does want to phase Social Security out, but not as quickly as possible like you say. He wants to give 25 year olds or younger the opertunity(opertunity the key word) to opt out. That would mean that SS would still be around for 35+ years. Also, he is the only one who wants to make the programs solvent, unlike some who want to make cuts to the programs. Obama took $500 bill from medicare to start the healthcare act, and romeny put out his plan to cut SS/Medicare/Medicade. Ron Paul is the best candidate for the job.
@FreedomIsAbsolute so my opinions are wrong. Well i can say the same thing about your opinions. and ours are just opinions. But i would say the US is already gone to far and is going to crash. Just to many socialists here and say gimmie gimmie from the Fed Gov. SS is not going to be around 35 years from now as it is. The Fed Gov is going to jack up the retirement age in a few years to at least age 70. and then find out that is not high enough and then jack it up to age 72. And the Gov will also raise up the age when you can receive benefits. it all comes down to mony. and i do agree with Ron Paul on letting 25 and younger opting out of SS. All for that. It is just not right to take away youngs person mony they earn and then hand it over to older people. No matter what the Fed Gov says, it is still stealing.
No my friend, I said I respect your opinions even if they are wrong. I am not disrespecting you at all. Also, what I have stated previously are not my opinions, but are facts strait out of the Ron Paul campaign. I agree the govt is in the tank and to many want handouts, and since the fed govt has put their grimy fingers on the SS trust fund it has become a Ponzi Scheme; however we do not have to jack up the retirement age at all unless people don't want to cut spending on wastful programs. Paul has set forth a bold plan to cut $1trill his first year as prez, and even balance the budget in 3yrs. He isn't for raising the retirement age or raising taxes, infact he wants to phase out the IRS as well. However, once again you cannot do that without cutting spending. Every other candidate including the incumbant are planning on raising the retirment age & taxes because they are for big gov't. Paul is so serious about cutting spending he will take a paycut of $360k as prez, now that is dedicated I know I may not be able to get you to research Ron Paul in detail, but at least I tried. And I agree with you on some points. Good luck to you.
Eyes on Trade: Ron Paul: For Free Trade, Against NAFTA(Except for missing a vote on the Morocco ... are links to weblogs that reference Ron Paul: For Free Trade, Against ... Job-Killing Trade Deals Pass Congress Amidst ...citizen.typepad.com/eyesontrade/2007/07/ron-paul-for-fr.html
Guess you are not understanding his reasons....read the article. I agree with Paul
@RhondaReichel sorry but i don,t agree with Paul. I am for NAFTA . I am for free trade. And Paul could have voted present a few years ago. but no , he had to vote against it and says he is a free trader. for as i care at this point , i don,t trust him as i don,t trust pol.s , and as i said i voted for Rand Paul and i will again. He did vote for the latest trade deal. and i don,t think NAFTA is a job killer. That is simply BS.
Sparkobuzzer: You could not be more misinformed and wrong than you are. NAFTA was a huge American Job Killer. Many Large auto manufacturers and General Electric, and MANY MANY other companies closed shop in the USA and took it to MEXICO where they pay people 1/3 less, and there is quite less regulation in Mexico.
So either stop trolling or get informed on the subject.
@RonPaul2012alldaylong@RhondaReichel , and just how high do you want tariffs on incoming goods from overseas? I want none. what is free trade anyway? Are do you want to jack up costs here to everybody?
@RonPaul2012alldaylong@RhondaReichel so tell me what does Ron Paul stand for? lets kick back and bring home all the troops? Yea he really is going to get elected saying that. Pres. Obama will kill him over that. And yes i do think a lot of troops should come home. I said a lot. like out of Japan and Germany. lets start there. But you might have noticed that the middle east is a hot bed now. are we going to talk them to death? just wondering how you deal with them. Please tell me here.
Sparkobuzzer: Why don't you just go to his official website www.ronpaul2012.com and read his policies.
or would you rather TROLL here instead?
trade in peace with all nations
stop imperialistic foreign policy
treat them as you would want to be treated....the golden rule
Their leaders are their choice....if they want better leadership it's up to them to have a revolution....NOT US
we fought for our freedom....let them do the same
The reason the middle east is a hotbed is our intervention....DUH???
Yeah right....Obama has such a great record ...he's ran this country into the ground. Dream on little dreamer
The TSA, Patriot Act, warrantless searches and seazures are all freedom killers, and Paul is the only one who will put an end to it. If you want to look at the numbers check this article out that had the University of Chicago run a fact checker. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/oct/24/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-terror-attacks-have-increased/
Ever since thses wars started the suicide attacks have skyrocketed in number against the US and her allies. You may be fooled by the news, but these wars are making us less safe. Also, we were supposed to fight these wars to protect our freedoms, but if that is so why are they all being taken away. "Those who give up essential liberties for security will not nor deserve either" FRANKLIN ALso, if we go into IRAN there will be a WWIII between USA/Europe vs IRAN/ russia/china. Russia and china has alread stated this, but our news doesn't mention it.
@RhondaReichel@RonPaul2012alldaylong Who says i said that Obama has a great record? i think he has a terrible record.
@RhondaReichel@RonPaul2012alldaylong as i have said Free trade means free trade and no restrictions. i want free trade and not fair trade as it is not fair trade. just a smoke screen.
@sparkobuzzer Then why do we have such huge trade deficits now if NAFTA is so wonderful....explain that please
@sparkobuzzer Educate yourself before you shoot off your mouth....you obviously don't understand Paul's stance on trade
@sparkobuzzer Here you go sunshine!
No North American Union; no WTO; no UN Q: Will you abolish all plans to promote economic integration of North America?
A: Not only do I not want a North American Union, I want us out of the U.N., the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA. NAFTA has nothing to do for free trade. It’s a pretense to lower tariffs, but it’s a reason to go talk to the WTO to raise tariffs. We need free trade. That’s very, very important. But you don’t get that by world government.
No restrictions on import/export; but maintain sovereignty .Paul adopted the Republican Liberty Caucus Position Statement:
As adopted by the General Membership of the Republican Liberty Caucus at its Biannual Meeting held December 8, 2000. WHEREAS libertarian Republicans believe in limited government, individual freedom and personal responsibility; WHEREAS we believe that government has no money nor power not derived from the consent of the people; WHEREAS we believe that people have the right to keep the fruits of their labor; and WHEREAS we believe in upholding the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land;
BE IT RESOLVED that the Republican Liberty Caucus endorses the following [among its] principles: The US government should inhibit neither the exportation of US goods and services worldwide, nor the importation of goods and services. The United States should not be answerable to any governing body outside the United States for its trade policy.
Block NAFTA Superhighway & North American Union.Paul co-sponsored blocking NAFTA Superhighway & North American Union
This resolution urges disengaging from the NAFTA Superhighway System and the North American because these proposals threaten U.S. sovereignty:
Whereas US trade deficits with Mexico and Canada have significantly increased since the implementation of NAFTA; Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System from the west coast of Mexico through the US and into Canada has been suggested as part of a North American Union to facilitate trade; Whereas the State of Texas has already begun planning of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a major multi-modal transportation project beginning at the US-Mexico border, which would serve as an initial section of a NAFTA Superhighway System;
@RhondaReichel i no nothing of a so called North American Union and not interested. no UN, I want free trade period. Not fair trade. My wife happens to be from a Southeast Asian country. i would want a free trade agreement with that country.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
five × = 5
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Yes, send me email updates and action alerts from RonPaul.com
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
RonPaul.com is maintained by independent grassroots supporters of Ron Paul. Neither this website nor the articles, posts, videos or photos appearing on it are paid for, approved, endorsed or reviewed by Ron Paul or his staff.