Ron Paul Gaining on Romney in New Hampshire

126 Responses



Processing your request, Please wait....

126 responses to “Ron Paul Gaining on Romney in New Hampshire”

  1. AznAndy9000

    Check out my Ron Paul’s Greatest Moments on my channel!

    »crosslinked«

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. MinisterAilingTongue

    The virtue of engineering & the physical sciences and why government should fund professionals in organizations and individually is that the peer review process works just like the market place. Physicists, chemists, electrical/mechanical engineers are held to a high standard by each other. Fraud is quickly sniffed out and punished meted out. The virtue of those disciplines is that their ideas are constantly subject to testing. Investing in them is safer than doing so in defense or health.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. MinisterAilingTongue

    When Rand Paul runs against Democrat X (Hilary???) in 2016, you can still vote for liberty.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. MinisterAilingTongue

    You’ve fallen into your own trap. I side with Lawrence Krauss and Ben Franklin when I say enlightenment through science improves human lives. I don’t know why I bother with boors like you. Franklin was wont to ask what good is a newborn baby? when plebeians or idle people derided the utility of, say, studying electricity and building hot air balloons. Ron Paul’s most glaring weakness is his improvident disregard for science. The key founders of our republic believed in it! Piss off

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. lonewolf1369

    the only use of scientific advancement is TO SERVE HUMAN NEEDS AND WANTS dummy! That’s WHY PROFIT IS IMPORTANT SILLY! Profit signals to entrepreneurs that what they are doing is WORTH IT and VALUABLE because it’s serving the NEEDS AND WANTS of consumers! Why else would we do scientific advancement for? What the hell is the purpose of “for its own sake” other than to improve our lives????? Silly government spenders have no economic education!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. lonewolf1369

    DARPA copied HP which was already making networks to communicate amongst employees. The GUI was invented by Xerox….wireless communications was invented by Tesla, Marconi, etc…we don’t need government to do any research….market research is the best because it aims to serve consumer needs and wants….government research is politically doled out, it’s not concerned with satisfying consumer needs and wants, which is all that scientific research is good for!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. lonewolf1369

    real scientific progress is at the hands of the MARKET, not the uber rich….even small businesses create scientific progress and they’re not “rich”! The government doesn’t do scientific progress, because SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH MONEY IS POLITICALLY DOLED OUT. Government spending doesn’t dole out money according to the highest valued ends of consumers! It arbitrarily picks some areas of research over others! This is why soviet union had food shortage but had plenty of jets.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. lonewolf1369

    and which “science” do governments know best to fund? And how do they know which end is more valuable? Should they use the money to fund healthcare research, or NASA? Should it ALL go to healthcare research, or some of it to military? There is no way to know without profit/loss and prices. And military spending rarely benefits everyone, only makes contractors and employees rich while impoverishing the material standard of living of everyone else.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. lonewolf1369

    correction, I meant it’s impossible to economically calculate WITHOUT profit/loss system. This is why the Soviet Union had food shortages, and toilet paper shortages, while they had a giant military and space program. It’s impossible to deploy scarce resources to achieve the highest valued ends without profit and losses and a price system. That’s why government spending is always wasteful because the results may have been less than the costs of the spending.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. lonewolf1369

    your comment doesn’t make any sense at all. I’m talking about government spending and its inability to do economic calculation. All government spending does is redistribute wealth from other types of spending that could have achieved more valuable ends. There is no way to economically calculate with government spending. So is it better to fund NASA or use that money to fund healthcare research which may save 6000 lives? which one is more valuable? Impossible with profit/loss system.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. superbboy s

    Mitt Romney u fool, don’t click the dislike button!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. superbboys

    Mitt Romney u fool, don’t click the dislike button!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. UnderDog988

    Remember: RON PAUL MONEY BOMB TOMORROW SATURDAY 14

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES? IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT? REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. UnderDog988

    Remember: RON PAUL MONEY BOMB TOMORROW SATURDAY 14

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES? IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT? REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Shane Bennett

    most americans agree you fuck tard, anyone who has a chance of being scene as a runner up is extreamly qualified, soo…. shut the fuck up ass hole

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. ShBenEd

    most americans agree you fuck tard, anyone who has a chance of being scene as a runner up is extreamly qualified, soo…. shut the fuck up ass hole

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. SmokeAlexOut

    It looks like Mitt Romney is the only one who disliked this haha.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. EndTimeLadyPreacher

    Yes, you have to listen to the message. Does what they say really line up with what they’re doing and with what our country needs? If you do that it becomes obiously clear who to vote for: Dr. Ron Paul.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. io007a

    mitt is cool man good loocking and knew how to talk i personaly hate theese people your hart tells you to vote for them like obama for ex ,you think that their succes can become your succes but it’s wrong actualy their succes comes becaouse most people are ugly fat talk simple ,only after you really listen to what they are sayng after you understand the subjects that matter you realize they don’t actualy say anything and ron is the only one that makes sense

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. io007a

    health care is a result of a nation development not a priority you save people to do what ? it’s a little bit grose at first to think about but then you realize that not only you save theese people for nothing you need to save more people in the future ,so healthcare should be a result of the nation’s development with fix %gdp otherwise no matter how you increase funding the basic development remains the same no new resources available no new technologies and so on

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. io007a

    america is in no real danger if people are afraid in america with neighbours like canada and mexic how would they feel near russia? it’s clearly a case of massive brainwashing ,maybe people should be told that dollar for dollar military spending creates the most fewer jobs than any other sector in the economy ,better try to go to mars than make war and it still will be a lot better for the economy

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. io007a

    us has only one way to avoid bankrupcy and that is to stop doing what other empires had done in history stop overextending their armys and their promises around the world ,military spending does nothing for the economy ,a lot more jobs can be created in any other sector with the same money ,hopfully ron paul will win in us ,on thing i would beg the american people think about the world if yo guys loose your freedoms for us there is no hope.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. EndTimeLadyPreacher

    How can people truly think that a man who is for peace is dangerous to our foreign policy? Are people really that ignorant? War propaganda and fighting leads to more war! Is that what Americans really want? Are we a country that wants to go around being bullies to other nations?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Ajay Prabhat

    It’s so sad. By the time I become old enough to vote, Ron Paul will either be dead or too old to run. MY GOD IF I COULD JUST VOTE FOR HIM….GRRR

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. TheFrickinPope

    It’s so sad. By the time I become old enough to vote, Ron Paul will either be dead or too old to run. MY GOD IF I COULD JUST VOTE FOR HIM….GRRR

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. MinisterAilingTongue

    Trust me. I can handle the math of economics. Physicists have applied math to explain nature more than any other group. Welfare, healthcare, and military spending are able to prevent economic turmoil in that they make individuals more secure, stable, and long lived. What they don’t do is create anything. They sustain. When spending is sloppy in those areas, the funds just get burned up. Science offers rewards that will live as long as the knowledge is preserved. That’s the point!!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. MinisterAilingTongue

    To have scientific progress hinge on the whims of the über-rich doesn’t make sense. Some of them make contributions, but they would never replace the funds government provides to the physics community. Do you support funding for DARPA? Well, NASA is underfunded which is why it doesn’t yield as many new technologies. The private sector cannot afford to make even accidental discoveries PURELY for the sake of scientific advancement because they are slaves to profit.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. Robert Downey

    maybe my grandchildren will finally wake up and vote rand paul into the office..

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. WhenYourStrange93

    maybe my grandchildren will finally wake up and vote rand paul into the office..

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. duncan7599

    Your people are such assholes. In the 2008 election everyone from the UK supported Obama and was even seen crying for joy in the streets of Lonndon and Sydney when they found out Obama got elected. Now you all want Ron Paul who has no chance on getting the Republican nomination never mind getting elected president when he only has a strong 15% support base that is NOT rising. Most Americans see him as a nut case and don’t take him seriously.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. UnknownXV

    At least we know that Rand Paul will be more than capable of replacing his father, if need be. He seems amazing.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. UnknownXV

    I do ask myself those questions too Brown. How are the other candidates genuinely considered? What processes are firing in the minds of people voting for Mitt Romney?

    That’s taking the hand of a man that would sell you for a dollar over the man that would save your life for less.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. alwakeme70

    I am from Singapore. I have been following the American elections since 2008. Since then, I have been watching Ron Paul’s speeches on youtube, some of them dated back to 80s/90s.One thing is sure, this man is very consistent. He speaks the truth. I will be overjoyed if he wins this coming election. Wish Dr Ron Paul all the best. My prayers with him. May God bless him, and may God bless America!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. Tohellwithoursouls

    What does it tell us about Ron Paul that when his son was born he chose to call him Rand? Tells me he has held his beliefs for a long time, he’s no flip flopper who changes his opinion with the wind.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. louisbrassyy

    ✓the best health products
    ✓The best automated internet marketing system
    Go here >>> buildincomeonline.weebly.com < <<

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0