DARPA copied HP which was already making networks to communicate amongst employees. The GUI was invented by Xerox....wireless communications was invented by Tesla, Marconi, etc...we don't need government to do any research....market research is the best because it aims to serve consumer needs and wants....government research is politically doled out, it's not concerned with satisfying consumer needs and wants, which is all that scientific research is good for!
Like or Dislike: 0 0
real scientific progress is at the hands of the MARKET, not the uber rich....even small businesses create scientific progress and they're not "rich"! The government doesn't do scientific progress, because SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH MONEY IS POLITICALLY DOLED OUT. Government spending doesn't dole out money according to the highest valued ends of consumers! It arbitrarily picks some areas of research over others! This is why soviet union had food shortage but had plenty of jets.
and which "science" do governments know best to fund? And how do they know which end is more valuable? Should they use the money to fund healthcare research, or NASA? Should it ALL go to healthcare research, or some of it to military? There is no way to know without profit/loss and prices. And military spending rarely benefits everyone, only makes contractors and employees rich while impoverishing the material standard of living of everyone else.
correction, I meant it's impossible to economically calculate WITHOUT profit/loss system. This is why the Soviet Union had food shortages, and toilet paper shortages, while they had a giant military and space program. It's impossible to deploy scarce resources to achieve the highest valued ends without profit and losses and a price system. That's why government spending is always wasteful because the results may have been less than the costs of the spending.
your comment doesn't make any sense at all. I'm talking about government spending and its inability to do economic calculation. All government spending does is redistribute wealth from other types of spending that could have achieved more valuable ends. There is no way to economically calculate with government spending. So is it better to fund NASA or use that money to fund healthcare research which may save 6000 lives? which one is more valuable? Impossible with profit/loss system.
Mitt Romney u fool, don't click the dislike button!
Remember: RON PAUL MONEY BOMB TOMORROW SATURDAY 14
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES? IN MOST STATES.
IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF YOU ARE NOT? REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere
most americans agree you fuck tard, anyone who has a chance of being scene as a runner up is extreamly qualified, soo.... shut the fuck up ass hole
It looks like Mitt Romney is the only one who disliked this haha.
Yes, you have to listen to the message. Does what they say really line up with what they're doing and with what our country needs? If you do that it becomes obiously clear who to vote for: Dr. Ron Paul.
mitt is cool man good loocking and knew how to talk i personaly hate theese people your hart tells you to vote for them like obama for ex ,you think that their succes can become your succes but it's wrong actualy their succes comes becaouse most people are ugly fat talk simple ,only after you really listen to what they are sayng after you understand the subjects that matter you realize they don't actualy say anything and ron is the only one that makes sense
health care is a result of a nation development not a priority you save people to do what ? it's a little bit grose at first to think about but then you realize that not only you save theese people for nothing you need to save more people in the future ,so healthcare should be a result of the nation's development with fix %gdp otherwise no matter how you increase funding the basic development remains the same no new resources available no new technologies and so on
america is in no real danger if people are afraid in america with neighbours like canada and mexic how would they feel near russia? it's clearly a case of massive brainwashing ,maybe people should be told that dollar for dollar military spending creates the most fewer jobs than any other sector in the economy ,better try to go to mars than make war and it still will be a lot better for the economy
us has only one way to avoid bankrupcy and that is to stop doing what other empires had done in history stop overextending their armys and their promises around the world ,military spending does nothing for the economy ,a lot more jobs can be created in any other sector with the same money ,hopfully ron paul will win in us ,on thing i would beg the american people think about the world if yo guys loose your freedoms for us there is no hope.
How can people truly think that a man who is for peace is dangerous to our foreign policy? Are people really that ignorant? War propaganda and fighting leads to more war! Is that what Americans really want? Are we a country that wants to go around being bullies to other nations?
It's so sad. By the time I become old enough to vote, Ron Paul will either be dead or too old to run. MY GOD IF I COULD JUST VOTE FOR HIM....GRRR
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
− 2 = six
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Yes, send me email updates and action alerts from RonPaul.com
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
RonPaul.com is maintained by independent grassroots supporters of Ron Paul. Neither this website nor the articles, posts, videos or photos appearing on it are paid for, approved, endorsed or reviewed by Ron Paul or his staff.