516 responses to “WSJ Economist: 0516 Income Tax Would Lead to Most Massive Insourcing of Jobs in the History of the World”

  1. ViCe1986

    No I did not miss you point you want the state to do the job of taking care of yourself for you which is fine, go move to some socialist nanny state.

    I like having the liberty to choose for myself how I will take care of myself. It is a great thing to not have my income sucked away by a corrupt national government and be able to spend, donate, and use it as I desire not as some politician’s agenda desires.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. ViCe1986

    Paul is not asking forgiveness he is lying to cover up his mistake which is twice as bad as doing wrong in the first place.

    The man has 0 responsibility like all his libertarian goons do.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Xaeleep

    Poor choice of words indeed. But I think you missed my point there.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. FoxDavidson

    Well then, according to your logic, you are Not forgiven for your sins because you deny others when they ask of it.. Judge not, lest ye be judged. You’re guilty as charged.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. ViCe1986

    Ok so he had to agree with it before he could disagree with it I guess is your agreement?

    Makes no sense to me and smacks on DC insider political crap, but cool if you are that taken by the Ron Paul kool aid, GREAT!!

    The man accepted the message in the 1990′s and we have evidence of it, so if he now states he never agreed with it the only liar is DR. RON PAUL.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. FoxDavidson

    You are a liar there guy. Your evidence is so fucking asinine. –But just for the sake of argument, let’s say you’re absolutely right.. Look up the word Disavow. You can’t legitimize your argument by just skipping over that like it doesn’t register. Duh.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. ViCe1986

    Kinda like how tobacco and all the legal drugs cut there products legally with FDA approval with the same harmful chemicals like embalming fluid, rat poison, etc?

    Legalizing narcotic of any kind is not the answer just more problem, legal or illegal the FDA will change none of the current industry standards for cutting weed, cocaine, or any other drug.

    All legalizing drugs does is remove the penalty for doing them and increase the size of the federal government

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. ViCe1986

    You are correct and that is the problem of Libertarianism.

    Expanding the FDA is anti-fiscal conservatism, who’s principals are to reduce the size of the Federal Government and allow most if not all of the extra constitutional administrations like the FDA to be greatly downsized, returned to the state level, or removed completely.

    Libertarians though are liars about there fiscal conservatism policies, they just use that as a wrapper to cover the stink of there liberal roots.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. ViCe1986

    See I could blindly follow Paul or look at the evidence at follow it where it leads. Now you have several members of the newsletter that have come out on record saying that nothing was mailed to the subscribers without Paul first reading it. That he came down every week personally to read and approve the final production before it printed and was mailed.

    This is a 2 to 4 page monthly newsletter not the encyclopedia britannica here, he read it, he agreed with it, and he is not trying to forget

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. FoxDavidson

    Oh, I take back calling you a racist. Obviously you’re an apologist. Which is the Liberal position. Nice job.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. ViCe1986

    First off where did I state that Spike Lee, the New Black Panthers, etc, etc, etc was not racists?

    Maybe if you put the bong down you wouldn’t be so high out of your libertarian mind and seeing stuff that isn’t there?

    But hey Libertarianism is all about choice without responsibility you I can’t expect you to be responsible for your complete libel and ignorance towards me since that would impede your choice to be a moron!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. FoxDavidson

    Uhhh.. Expanding the FDA is anti-Libertarian. Who do you think puts regulations on things like raw milk, and which party actually advocates against it? Sorry, you burned that one pretty bad.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. FoxDavidson

    Even though you didn’t direct your last comment to me, I agree with it entirely. Obama’s policies and stimulus are just extensions of Bush doctrine.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. ViCe1986

    Only someone high would think that a Government Bureaucracy would put an end to they use of chemicals to prevent the consumer from growing a plant from the seed of product they bought.

    They already allow it in every plant commercial sold in the US form bananas to pineapples, why would weed be different.

    Also like to point out that only a pot head can think that it is fiscally conservative to expand the size of the FDA, which is the libertarian position.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. ViCe1986

    FYI, over 50% of the expediters of the Federal Government of the United States is entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Food Stamps, Unemployment, etc

    Social Security costs more PER YEAR than Iraq has cost in 9 year or Afghanistan in 11 years.

    But keep drinking that liberal media kool aid, Iraq and Afghanistan combined since 2001 has cost the US about $1.1 Trillion dollars OVER 11 YEARS. Obama’s failed stimulus cost us the same about of money in 9 MONTHS!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. FoxDavidson

    You guys are so fucking racist it’s unbelievable. What excuses do you have for Spike Lee and his Black supremacist attitude? The Black Panther Party? Etc etc etc. Or do you think because they’re a minority it is ‘acceptable’. Double standard prick.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. FoxDavidson

    He didn’t read it when it came out, so how could he endorse it? Which means he never actually even needed to disavow it to begin with. Wherein since he did it anyway, that makes him all the more innocent. So either 1) You’re blatantly lying because you’re racist, or 2) … Actually there is no 2nd option. You’re lying because you’re a closet racist.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. ViCe1986

    “You’ll now have to pay for things that the state provided for free”

    REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, just when you think you find the bottom of the rhetoric barrel some genus comes along and blows the bottom out!

    How do you think that the state is getting the capital to fund all that free stuff?

    Here is a free hint, YOUR TAXES, you actually you are paying of the things anyway on top of paying unwillingly for everyone else as well!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. ViCe1986

    The problem is your case study is a socialist nation of Sweden where the people are so dependent on the state and business is so tightly regulated that even massive tax cuts cannot spur economic growth.

    It is like have a tire stuck in mud and thinking sprinkling some sand will help instead of getting a tow truck to lie you out.

    The conservative movement is not simply about tax cuts, it is about freeing up capital and lessening the legislative burden of business to bring economic growth.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. ViCe1986

    No I want the government to follow the Constitution instead of destroying it by eliminating personal responsibility with this socialist agenda true wrapped in a final conservative icing and falsely advertised as “what the Founding Father’s envisioned”.

    Libertarianism is a lie, they want big government social liberalism, and somehow magically limit the government and glance the budget?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. ViCe1986

    You mean the Super Tuesday Bomb where Romney won 6 of the 10 contests AND Paul won 0 of 10 contests?

    That Super Tuesday?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. ViCe1986

    Disavowing it after endorsing it and reading it is not really disavowing it. I know that Paul insists he was completely ignorant of everything written in his name on his Libertarian newsletter, BUT the evidence supports that he was aware of the racial messages it put out at times and did nothing to stop it.

    Which means he is either 1) racist or 2) catered to a group of racists betraying his own values for the almighty dollar, either way it is a lose/lose

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. KonokoFromOni

    So basically, you want the Government to wipe you after you go away from the bathroom or toilet?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. YNation7

    There’s more young people than old people in the country. More young people should vote and then the country won’t suck from stupid grumpy old people making the rules and voting for the people in office.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. n8tedoe

    We need the older people to research ron paul. They are the majority when it comes to voting.Without the older generation we do not stand a chance.As long as they feel their social security is threatend they will not vote for Ron.Sad.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. DGAMFBF3

    if he is not elected, i may just move to canada

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. escenzmusic

    God I miss the Judge.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. HandyMan101

    “The Libertarians want choice but refuse to accept responsibility for there choices”

    Your wrong… And… your wrong…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. ViCe1986

    Maybe because he is a judge supporting the legalization of deadly and addictive narcotics.

    Pro Choice everything is the opposite of the foundation our founders built this republic on.

    The Libertarians want choice but refuse to accept responsibility for there choices, it is immature and the reason why there largest block is college kids and pot heads with no sense of reality.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. ViCe1986

    This is why whomever the next President is, they need Ron Paul to be the Secretary of the Treasury.

    Paul is an excellent, reasonable, and devoted on fiscal matters, if only he could wake up and realize that he needs to bring his foreign policy and social policies out of the left’s corner.

    The reason why Paul gets so much money from service members is that the young lower enlisted have lots of disposable income, the leadership has low support for Ron Paul.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. blotto85

    Ron Paul takes the income tax out back and shoots it in the head while Santorum, Gingrich, Romney, and Obama cry like a childeren

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. john420e

    Problem is most Americans are so controlled by fear, they would pass up on a 0% income tax in order to have a politician like Santorum promise them he’ll keep them safe from the big bad boogie man Iran. America have you lost your minds? This man wants you to keep your own money and you reject it because you’re so afraid of this boogie man half way around the world who doesn’t even have the capability of harming you?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. bozolazic

    …I am also told, but this I hardly believe, that their Great Chief compels every man to pay him for the land he lives upon and all personal goods – even those he needs for his own existence – every year. I am sure we could not live under such a law.
    —Charles Alexander Eastman’s uncle – Santee Sioux
    (;

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. bozolazic

    …I am also told, but this I hardly believe, that their Great Chief compels every man to pay him for the land he lives upon and all personal goods – even those he needs for his own existence – every year. I am sure we could not live under such a law.
    —Charles Alexander Eastman’s uncle – Santee Sioux
    (;

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. cooooooool1357986420

    ron paul doesnt end the income tax, he kills them with his bare hands

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  36. therobp600

    Stephen Moore is a moron

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  37. therobp600

    Stephen Moore is a moron

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  38. davidmaren2000

    ron paul is right but the media and people feeding from the public trough is going to make this impossible. was it a coincidince that the federal reserve and the income tax act came in the same year 1913. thus began the era of slavery to the banks. thanks woodrow wilson

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  39. TOTCD

    0% is over the top dude.
    35 % flat tax is the way to go.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  40. aguapurification

    youtube
    In Heaven – Eraserhead

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  41. aguapurification

    In Heaven – Eraserhead

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  42. lmacorp

    GOOGLE:
    Angry White Man
    The bigoted past of Ron Paul.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  43. mattxr2i

    Ron Paul’s Fus Ro Dah can shrink government! Ron Paul 2012!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  44. Anghellic389

    Is this why Judge got fired for talking about Ron Paul?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  45. TheFr3sh1

    Ron Paul

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  46. ibelieve2012FTW

    im from sweden. i like the ide. wote ron paul. pleaseeeeeeeeeeee

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  47. Xaeleep

    This is the problem with conservatists, they think that there will be more jobs if you lower/remove different taxes, this has been tried in alot of countries, and as far as i’ve understood that has never worked. Take Sweden for example, the right-wing lowered the income tax with 5-7% (depending on where you live) that gave us nothing except a downgraded welfare.If anyone say “But this will give the people more money” I respond: You’ll now have to pay for things that the state provided for free

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  48. inmamata

    If Ron Paul is elected I`m moving to America…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  49. Hategrin

    For instance Marijuana is often sprayed with formaldehyde (embalming fluid) somewhere along the chain of distribution to enhance it’s inebriating effects. It has the same effects on your living body as it does on a corpse, even if the dose is much smaller.

    The first time I smoked weed I smoked some bad shit w/ that in it and it really ruined the whole thing for me. Really sucks because it seems people really enjoy it but every time I smoke I flashback to that 1st time that was so so messed up.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  50. Hategrin

    I would do drugs if they were legal.

    The god damn cartels cut drugs with so many HORRIBLE chemicals that the reason people usually OD isn’t even because of the drug, it’s because of the Drano, Bleach or Rat Poison that the cartels cut the drugs with.

    For those that don’t know ‘cut’ means that they add substances to the cocaine, heroine or marijuana to create a larger volume and magnify euphoria and profits.

    That magnification causes significant damage sometimes death.

    And yes, pot/weed too.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply