New Ron Paul Ad: Etch A Sketch

728 Comments:

  1. CURRENT DELEGATE COUNT
    ROMNEY NOW HAS 568 DELEGATES
    SANTORUM HAS 261 DELEGATES
    GINGRICH 137 DELEGATES
    AND RON PAUL HAS 71.
    REMEMBER PAULTARDS THE FIRST TO REACH 1144 DELEGATES WINS THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION LOL

    »crosslinked«

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  2. i thought they just used some type of technology to make it seem that way do u think that was real?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. who cares about his beliefs. its not like hes gonna win! your main man is that robot Mitt Romney. Mr Etch N Sketch. He is the repub nom.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. You like Paul, I like Paul, Everybody likes Paul for President!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  5. I wonder if either santorum or gengrich played with their etch n sketch oh well XD RON PAUL 2012 XD VOTE AND DONATE!!!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. I am sick of arguing about this racist crap, I don’t believe he’s racist, he disavowed the letter, I am done with it. Now, I’d rather debate with you on his policy-than his PERSONAL BELIEFS that will have frickin’ effect on his Oval Office job.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Lmaoo dude is quoting shit from decades back that aint even true. smh i’m done,i can’t. whatever its not like hes gonna win anyway ha!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  8. Lmaoo dude is quoting shit from decades back that aint even true. smh i’m done,i can’t. whatever its not like hes gonna win anyway ha!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  9. >Comments about Racism>Internet>Derp.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. >Comments about Racism
    >Internet>Derp.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. >Comments about Racism
    >Internet>Derp.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Robin,

    By far, most jews…practically every single one (with very, very few exceptions) support Israel. That means they are Zionists.

    Zionist = Jew

    Jew = Zionist

    Zionist = supporting the private jewish central bank

    Jew = supporting the private jewish central bank

    Let’s stop splitting hairs.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    • French Canadian,
      First, are you still posing as the French Canadian I was conversing with this past month? I have to ask you what you are basing this information on because I’ve come across many stories about Jews in Canada and America that do not support Israel-as a nation(considered heretical for many until their messiah returns) and because of what they have done to Palestinians historically and currently. I will post some videos. We just saw one by an Israeli peace activist whose father was a highly decorated general in the Israeli army, and the transformation his father went through when he realized the policies of his country. His son also does not support what Israel is doing. Now, if you mean that someone who is Jewish supports the right to a homeland, that is a different story, but even then you have many who don’t agree on religious grounds. So, I think this is why I don’t like sweeping generalizations, and I am making this point which seems absurd to you. My husband, whose parents are Russian went through this growing up during the heighth of the Cold War where everyone thought every Russian was a communist. He endured so much discrimination and hatred because of these sweeping generalizations. His parents feared for their children’s well=being. All Russians are evil. So, you need to understand why I have a problem with this. Just like my dad, who was an officer in the Air Force believed all Japanese were evil because of Pearl Harbor.

      If you can give me concrete evidence that practically ALL Jews support Israel, then maybe I will consider what you have to say, but I have found many who speak out against the state of Israel and what they are doing there. There are religious zealots and Zionists that believe Israel right or wrong, and there are others that speak out and don’t support what they are doing. You do know that they are also silenced in the state of Israel for going against the established order of things, so how would we know how many don’t support what their country is doing? They aren’t allowed to do it openly. There’s a lot we don’t know about how ALL or even most, Israeli’s feel unless you hear it from the source.

      So, please give me the proof, and then I will consider what you say to have some authenticity with respect to how many, but to say ALL or most, I don’t believe that until you show me the evidence.

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. QUESTION: Why must any government take loans from private jewish bankers? Why go into catastrophic debt? Why become Greece? Why can’t we have a public central bank, and just print our own money?

    ANSWER: Because politicians don’t want a public central bank, as this would force politicians to be accountable.

    Why ELSE do you think this horror continues? If we had a public central bank that served the people, then politicians would have to show how they spend money and run the economy. They would have to earn their pay. By contrast, with a privately owned central bank, politicians and their jewish cronies can make up any lie they wish, and get limitless money for any purpose (e.g. war, which makes the rich richer), while they dump the debt on the masses in the form of austerity (e.g. slashed social programs). This is the essence of jewish corruption.

    A private jewish central bank is a sealed black box. No one may look inside it, and (most) politicians don’t want anyone to see inside it, since politicians can claim that the nation must have a “balanced budget” (i.e. the masses must accept more and more poverty).

    Of course, the budget can never be balanced, since the debt can never be controlled. Jewish bankers and politicians don’t want it balanced. They prefer to rule as gods, and their pleasure is enhanced by mass poverty.

    Politicians and jewish central bankers are totally in bed together. Politicians say, “Don’t blame me; blame the central bank.” Jewish Central bankers say, “Don’t blame me; blame the politicians.” Both rule with no accountability.

    When the central bank is private, then politicians get the money, while the masses get the debt. This lets politicians and their jewish banker cronies build giant monopolies, while the debt forces the masses to accept more and more theft (i.e. austerity). Hence private jewish central banks always create a vast and ever-widening gap between rich and poor. If politicians and speculators make bad bets with money given them by the private central bank, then again they dump all losses into the masses.

    If, by some miracle, the masses overthrow the private jewish central bank, then the politicians simply create another one, whereon the game resumes. When Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the jewish bankers did not swindle the politicians. No, the jewish bankers and politicians together swindled the public. Any politician that protested was marginalized by all the others, and was not re-elected. Any politician that protests too loudly is sent to prison, and physically tortured (e.g. Idaho Congressman George V. Hansen).

    Any government that declines to play this evil game is vilified, and targeted for regime change. The jewish bankers first weaken it with sanctions, and then launch a military attack (e.g. Iraq, Iran, Nazi Germany, Libya, Syria, Venezuela, etc).

    So – what are you gonna do about it?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  14. General Patton was Assassinated

    Legendary U.S. General George S. Patton realized late in the war that the United States fought the wrong country. Patton felt the U.S. should have sided with Germany to destroy Jewish Bolshevik/Communist USSR. This information comes from Patton’s diary entries, letters he wrote to his wife, and comments he made to military officers and staff.

    If Hitler had won World War II (and he would have had the U.S. and Britain allied with Germany against the USSR) we’d have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious.

    Had Hitler won World War II, what would be different in the post war world? Here are a few examples:

    1 – No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people during its 70 year reign; to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated Russia, though taking parts of Western Russia for lebensraum, “living space”)

    2 – No cold war (because there would be no USSR)

    3 – No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WWII ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism – this was part of Stalin’s spoils of war)

    4 – No Red China and Mao’s subsequent killing of 40 – 60 million Chinese (the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao’s Communists which ultimately led to Mao’s victory over Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalists in 1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)

    5 – No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)

    6 – No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot’s slaughter of 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)

    7 – No dividing Korea into North Korea & South Korea (the allies split Korea after WWII ended, with North Korea becoming Communist… another of Stalin’s spoils of war)

    8 – No Communist Cuba (given the previous, what support would Castro have had in the 1950’s?)

    9 – No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world’s most fervent anti-Communist)

    10 – Liberalism & multiculturalism wouldn’t dominate Western ethos (both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no liberalism and no multiculturalism… at least certainly nowhere near the degree we see today)

    11 – No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social engineering “tools” which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School)

    12 – No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn’t be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews are responsible for each Western nation’s liberal immigration policy, as most were orchestrated by the World Jewish Congress)

    13 – No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn’t run Hollywood)

    14 – No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of “Freedom of Speech”)

    15 – There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called “separation of church and state,” something that appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution)

    16 – No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key drivers of radical feminism)

    17 – No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians

    18 – Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish homeland)

    Many reading this will ask, “But what about the Holocaust?” The Holocaust has been grossly exaggerated by organized Jewry in order to create sympathy for Jews worldwide and thus help advance the Jewish agenda (i.e., people seen as victims tend to get their way). It is also used as a political weapon to justify Israeli militarism against the Palestinians. Hitler’s Final Solution (rebranded in the early 1970’s as the “Holocaust”) was a plan to remove Jews from Europe, not to kill them. During WWII, just as the U.S. couldn’t trust Japanese Americans, thus causing FDR to round many of them up and place them in concentration camps, Hitler couldn’t trust Jews since many were partisans sympathetic to the USSR and hence they aided the USSR in various subversive, anti-German activities. Therefore the Nazis rounded up Jews and placed them in concentration camps. Somewhere around one million Jews died during WWII (not six million) mostly due to disease and starvation in the final months of the war. Allied bombing of German occupied Europe destroyed many roads, rail lines, and bridges making it impossible for Germany to adequately supply the camps with food and medicine. The result is that many Jews died of starvation and disease; and of course many non-Jews also died of starvation and disease (again, due to a massive Allied bombing campaign and its destruction of German transportation infrastructure). Lastly, there were no “gas chambers.” Much has been written about this. To study this subject, read the research papers published by Germar Rudolf & Carlo Mattogno (there are many others as well).

    It should also be noted that Hitler never wanted to “conquer the world.” He simply wanted to safeguard Europe from nefarious Jewish influence and safeguard the world from usurious Jewish banking.

    Sadly, FDR and Churchill were puppets of International Jewry; each sold his soul for power and prestige. World War II was a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism -vs- Jewish Bolshevik Internationalism/globalism — and unfortunately International Jewry won.

    Was World War II “the good war?” No, it was exactly the opposite. The Allied victory marked the beginning of the end of Western Civilization.
    .

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

    • We are researching this time in history, so I would appreciate any other sources of credible information(primary documents) you have found regarding the Holocaust besides those you have listed. The Transfer Agreement is a very important document that most people aren’t aware of. It also was uncovered by a Jewish researcher(stumbled upon it while researching in a German archive) and when he wrote his book by the same name, his parents disowned him and so did the Jewish community. Since then, he has apologized for writing this book as I’m sure it affected his career. Our question is if Hitler was so anxious to exterminate all Jews from Germany, why did he make an agreement with Zionists to transfer 60,000 Jews to Palestine? Just does not make sense. Also, it means that Hitler was instrumental in helping to create the state of Israel. No one wants that to get out. They were able to take all their assets including Germany goods. Why didn’t he instead ransom them for more money and refuse to let them take German goods from Germany? There are many other discrepancies in the number that died as well as how they died. Also, no one is allowed to collect any forensic information regarding the gas chambers, etc. 20,000,000 Russians died at the hands of Stalin, but no one seems to talk about that. Why is that? Same for other groups of people who have experienced genocide in their country..So, I am looking for answers and uncovering the truth because the Holocaust continues to be used to hide behind and justify acts against humanity by Israel and others that support Israel in this country and around the world. NO time in history, no matter how terrible, should be taboo to research and question the evidence. In fact, this is the only time this is allowed, just as apartheid is overlooked in Israel as are their nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Everyone else is under close scrutiny…

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  15. I’m not a liberal. Again, whenever you want to respond to the private conversation feel free; or you can continue to “execute” arguments no one’s brought up.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. No, most of you Liberals also use the Civil rights act as a back-up plan, SO I just wanted to execute it.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. Who’s talking about the Civil Rights Act? Lay off the red herrings and stop avoiding our private conversation.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. Also, the ONLY GOD DAMNED problem Ron Paul had with the Civil Rights act was because it was a Federal mandate. There were local state, county, and community movements in the Civil rights era. They should of had the civil rights act in there hands, not the Feds hands.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. That was scarcasm my friend.. < .<

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. Also, about Ron Paul not voting for the Civil rights act- because I feel both you and Pig are going to go after me on that one. There wasn’t any RACIAL reason he did that, I can garuntee you Ron Paul doesn’t believe blacks are less human then white. He promotes Freedom and Liberty for ALL people.

    The military industrial complex are meant to lock up minorities, if Ron Paul was racist why would he have campaigned against it, and voted against legislation making it stronger?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply