Could Ron Paul Still Win the Nomination?

719 Responses

Processing your request, Please wait....
  • dilan4me

    romney and obama work for the bankers and corporations Ron Paul works for the people


    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • waypasthadenough

    Millions will dig the ditch they are told to dig then piss their pants when the machine gun bolts slam home and die stupidly wondering “How did this happen to me?” The tiny minority will have to do what will be required.

    It’s time to stop arguing over the culture war. It’s time to stop hunkering down for the apocalypse. It’s time to stop waiting to get beamed up. It’s time to start thinking Normandy.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Serpentmatrix

    This is like slow motion commenting of your own car crash where u die. But with a very objective emotionless viewpoint.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • SuperMagnetizer

    One of my great uncles signed the Declaration of Independence. Ron Paul is who I’m voting for.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • thelumberjackjohn

    LOL even his son said he cant win…lol

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • indiereplicant

    Obama and Romney are the same person. Actually, I think Romney may be worse in a number of ways.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • SLSLWarlock

    I can’t wait to watch Ron Paul curbstomp Failbama up and down the street till he is nothing but roadkill.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • chris marshall

    I’d rather have ron on my team anyway than some lying fucker that America vote in. good luck USA. you need it lol

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • wyzyrddrummer

    Well said! Because the ‘majority’ of Americans are too stupid to see what’s up, I hope that after Romney or Obama wins that the country crashes and burns in such a HUGE way that there’s no recovery. Then, maybe THEN the stupid masses will wake up and see that Ron Paul was right all along and MAYBE out of the ashes will rise a country that can be great again WITHOUT GREEDY Corporations and Banks and Industrial Military Complex and Fascist type of people running it.!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • railroadtrash09

    Romney disposition is too shifty… He looks like he is constantly lying. Can’t vote for a goofy Mormon. I’ve been broke since Obama took office. He needs the boot!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Lionelmessi10fc

    i hope he wins impossible is nothing :)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • javyisthis300

    It would?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • johnz281994

    Didn’t he win 11 states? This is becoming hard to sift through the BS

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • ToxinalX

    Perhaps you do, perhaps you don’t. But your collapse would shake the rest of the world in the most violent way.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • VoxPeople

    Romney what? The next McCainlike clown to be trashed by Obama Bin Medicladen?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • jersdream

    LOL delusions of grandeur.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • zervan69

    paultard said what

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • gzazanis

    Lkjgfr456ug. Why are you lying again? Are you working against amerika? Are you a spy working for a hostile country to the USA? You are failing and honestly you cant be amerikan. You sound like a communist or worse like a terrorist. If you dont like the USA get the fuck out.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • s,

    Happy Fourth of July!

    This is one of my favorite holidays. Historically we get together with family and have a reunion centered around a picnic, watermelon, and fireworks.

    What did you do? Did you have a picnic with family? Did you go out and watch a fireworks display, or shoot off your own traditional fireworks?

    Our family enjoys fireworks.

    Yet, sometimes I wonder, what are we celebrating?

    Are we celebrating war by shooting off beautiful explosions of light, sound, and smoke reminiscent of “bombshells bursting in air”.

    Are we celebrating Independence from England.

    Or, have we forgotten what we’re celebrating, so we just celebrate for the sake of the celebration.

    On the Fourth of July, 1776, the 13 independent States of North America united in a Congress, through their plenipotentiary delegates and signed the Declaration of Independence. As separate States, united in their cause for freedom from tyranny, they went to war as a nation. For the first time these unbound States stood together to fight a war, without a single document to bind them as a nation. They had together declared their Independence.

    But what did it mean? What does it mean now? – Independence.

    Great Britain thought of this nation as one of their colonies for hundreds of years and in that time it grew to become one of their most productive assets.

    Though the people and the States were self governed, recognizing that they were independent sovereign Land owners with the Magna Carta and their Land Patents securing their rights, Great Britain controlled them under merchandising contracts and progressively violated their rights until the people would take no more.

    It became necessary to stop England’s abuse of the colonist’s rights so ultimately the Declaration of Independence was drafted.

    In response the King of England doubled the sales tax to the colonies from 3% to 6%. Rather than paying the increased tax some of the colonists had a party and threw a load of tea into the harbor (the Boston Tea Party).

    The colonists went to war over – the last straw – a sales tax hike on tea.

    To get into this history and understand what it was like to be a alive then read Prelude to Glory, by Ron Carter. This 8 volume historical novel brings our history to life. Your passion for our nation will awaken with understanding while you follow these people from the first signs of war through the setting of the Constitution. Valley Forge and many other landmarks of these incredible patriots come to life and finally you will awaken to your rights and what it took to secure them.

    From March 1, 1781, to June 21, 1788, The Articles of Confederation were in force as the first constitution of The United States of America.

    When the War was over they formed a new nation with a foundational document, The Articles of Confederation, that document recognized this nation as a nation made up of independent sovereign united States, and gave the name to the new nation as: “The United States of America”.

    Many of the people of this new nation felt that it was wrong to leave England. Sure there were rights violations but those were livable and their future was a certainty as an English Colony. Now that they were on their own nothing at all was sure.

    Over the next ten years conditions in this country continually got worse. The individual States gave little regard to any other State and paid nearly no attention at all to the central government. After ten years of independence from England conditions were far worse than they had ever been under England’s rule and protection. Many wanted government officials to go back to England and beg the King to take us back, and they almost did. Again, in the Prelude to Glory: Vol. 7: The Impending Storm you’ll discover the starvation and destitution the Articles of Confederation left our country in after the war and the necessity of our Constitution to save the nation. It was incredible!

    “To form a more perfect Union”
    Allowing Great Britain to retake the nation was considered too severe without first attempting to resolve the problems of this new nation by getting the States to sit down and work out the problems with the Articles of Confederation. That meeting was finally arranged and each of the Sovereign States gave authority to a few men, Deputies, to sit in convention, and review the present form of government as set in the Articles so as to eliminate its limitations, give sufficient power to the central government to function while still preserving the liberty of the People and autonomy of the States. A Trust trust indenture was formed, it simply began as follows:

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
    Continuing with VII Articles and concluding with the signatures of the representative of the twelve States present at the convention. Once agreed to and signed by the individual State’s representatives at the convention, the Trust was formed.

    The Trust indenture, with the intent and authority of the people created a “Constitutional Republic” form of government in trust.

    Though the document had no header its leading paragraph named it this: ” Constitution for the United States of America”.

    On, September 17th, 1787, it was resolved by the Convention to take the Trust to the individual States for ratification.

    The States conditionally turned the Trust down because it removed their sovereignty and didn’t secure man’s God given inherent rights, without which the States would not give up their sovereignty to support the Constitution.

    Remember, these individual States were recognized as individual Sovereign States in the Articles of Confederation. That was the principle error with the Articles of Confederation; there was no accountability or control over the individual States—there was no unity. Without accountability whoever was in power simply ignored the central government and moved forward however they saw fit, in violation of individual rights, or not, literally however they saw fit. In essence, they were each literally absolutely powerful kingdoms.

    It was obvious that if something wasn’t done to unite the States with a more perfect Union they would be destroyed from within or without. So when offered the Constitutional Republic, the individual sovereign States leaders could see they would no longer be sovereign if they accepted it—but they would be destroyed if they didn’t.

    Not much of a choice, but the war with England ended only a little over ten years earlier and they couldn’t go back, so they demanded that if they were to give up their sovereignty, the people’s rights must be preserved from the central government. Thus they conditionally refused the Trust until the “Bill of Rights” were added.

    Therefore, the Constitution was first created to form a Trust commonly known as the government of The United States of America. Government officials were set up within the Trust as Trustees with specific defined responsibilities and functions.

    The People were made beneficiaries of the Trust and when any government official takes office he or she is required to swear or affirm an oath of allegiance [make a contract with the people to uphold the Constitution].

    Remember, at this point the government was already created in trust, by the signed Constitution and George Washington was already positioned as its President, yet the Trust had nobody sitting in the other offices of government and the States were not willing to support it (give up their sovereignty) and authorize its officers to function with control over them unless the people’s rights and the State’s rights were secured.

    The Deputies reconvened as the First Constitutional Convention and went back to work to draft the requested, Bill of Rights, which were later provided as the First Twelve Amendments to The Constitution of the United States of America (only ten were ratified), a document that was created to bind officers in an Oath to uphold the Trust of the people and secure the peoples rights.

    Then The Constitution for the United States of America (still signed and unchanged from its original version as first presented to the states), along with the “Bill of Rights” as the first ten amendments to The Constitution of the United States of America, were returned to the individual States and were ratified by each of those States and returned to the Constitutional Convention where the new government was made fully effective and put in operation on or after, December 15th, 1791, the “Effective date” of The Constitution of the United States of America.

    Now let’s go back and again review the documents created in the process by name. (Names are about to become very important when we go to the next step and begin to follow the money.)

    Here’s what happened step by step:
    First: There was the Trust, named within its own first paragraph as this, “Constitution for the United States of America”. Remember this document is a Trust indenture; it created a Trust called “the government of The United States of America. This document was accepted and signed by all of the Deputies. The signed Constitution created the government and under the capacity therein granted to Senators the Delegates seated George Washington as President of that government.

    Second: The Trust was sent out for ratification of the individual States (because they had not yet agreed to give up their sovereignty).

    Third: The individual States conditionally declined requiring a Bill of Rights limitation on the Constitution to make it acceptable.

    Fourth: The First Constitutional Convention sat and generated the Bill of Rights (a set of supreme laws that limit government). The wording of the Bill recognized it as “Articles in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America”; presupposing that the Constitution already existed as set. Note: they did not regenerate the Constitution; it was already signed and accepted by each of the State’s representatives and the Constitutional Republic was already in force; they simply added the Bill of Rights so the Republic would forever remain of, by, and for the people.

    Fifth: The individual States were given the original Constitution with the attached “Bill of Rights” under the name “Constitution of the United States of America” and all of the States accepted and ratified the documents.

    Sixth: With the ratification of the Trust and its “Bill of Rights”, the government was accepted as formed, in trust, yet still, other than George Washington, there were no officers in the seats of the government. [It's very important for us to notice this status of the government.**]

    Seventh: The Constitutional Convention again sat to perform their final acts as the Creator of the Trust. They appointed officials to sit in the primary seats of the newly formed Constitutional Republic and to so serve until an election could be held.

    Eighth: Those officials now appointed could not take office until they each individually first swore an Oath of Office stating they would uphold the,
    Constitution of the United States of America. Again it is very important to notice the name used in the Bill or Rights and now used for this “contract” with the officers and agencies serving under Oath to obey and uphold the: Constitution of the United States of America, not, “for”, but “of”.

    Note: It’s important to note here that we are indeed talking about two different documents. The First, the, Constitution for the United States of America, is a Trust and the Second, the, Constitution of the United States of America, is a contract between the officers of government and the beneficiaries of the Trust.

    After the Constitution was in place, and elections were held ratifying George Washington as President things went fairly well until the Civil War.

    In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law and ordered that the States either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as and enemy of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today—what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This martial law authority is still in effect to this day and this Act was the foundation of today’s Presidential Executive Orders.

    By 1868 the war was over and the government had a gigantic problem. Until that time Congressmen were equally, collectively and severably liable for any official acts they performed outside of their constitutional limitations. It was much like a General Partnership. In the wake of the war martial law was necessarily enforced in the South and carpetbaggers were sent down to “help adjust property ownership problems” after the war. Many great atrocities were committed making the vulnerability to lawsuit unbearable. It was considered that, in the interest of better handling the business interests and needs of government, the government should form a corporation, because from the protection of such a corporation they could continue to do what they felt was necessary to reunite the Union. To accomplish this, under the Constitution’s allowance for Congress to pass (and enforce) any law within the 10 mile square of Washington, D.C., they passed The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (Chapter 62, 16 Statutes at Large, 419).

    Corp. USA
    Under The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 a private corporation named, “The District of Columbia”, was formed. It trademarked the names “THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT”, “United States”, “U.S.”, “U.S.A.”, “USA”, and “America”. It should be noted that this corporation was not simply a reformation of the municipality as it’s Organic Act was chartered in 1808. Without amending that municipality’s charter, this 1871 Act marked the creation of a new private corporation known as, “The District of Columbia” (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. In said, Act Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution the (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national Constitution’s 13th Article of Amendment and the national Constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th Articles of Amendment are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments in their constitution.

    Corp. U.S. was not well received by the people so Congress revised the Act in 1874 and finalized it in 1878.

    Corp. U.S. began issuing bonds to cover the expenses of running government. By 1912 there was more bond debt due than there was money in the Treasury to pay and the debt was called.

    Seven very powerful families had been buying up the bonds and in 1912 they demanded their timely redemption. When Corp. U.S. couldn’t come up with the money due, its owner (the actual government) was obligated to pay. The Treasury of the United States of America did not have sufficient funds to cover the bonds either but the seven families accepted all of the assets of the nation’s Treasury along with all of the assets of Corp. U.S’. Treasury as a settlement of the debt saving the nation from bankruptcy.

    By 1913 there was still no money for operating the government/corporation, and if Corp. U.S. didn’t do something the people would revolt against them, so Corp. U.S. went to those seven very powerful families and asked if they could borrow money from them.

    The Federal Reserve Bank
    The heads of those families refused to loan Corp. U.S. any money because Corp. U.S. had already proven that it would not pay its debts back in full. They did however make arrangements and provisions to issue notes (Federal Reserve Notes) like letters of credit while they secured the notes for redemption with real money. On Jekyll Island in 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank privately agreed to so fund Corp. U.S. in their endeavors. Such an action would have been a gigantic violation of law if the government tried such a thing, but there is no law against private corporations making such arrangements.

    The real problem is in the name. How does one tell the difference between a corporation going by the name, “THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT”, and the government of the Unites States of America?

    What’s worse, how do you tell the difference between the “United States” [a Trust and the body of government that represents the Trust, as Trustees], and the “United States” a trademark name for, “The District of Columbia” [a private corporation]?

    The answer is simple, you can’t unless you can tell by the context of what’s being done.

    The problem gets even larger when you take into consideration the fact that the officers of government are also the officers of the corporation. They were simultaneously appointed or elected into their offices, both in the corporation and in the government at the same time. In virtually every way the name of their offices and their responsibilities as corporate officials and as government officers were coincidental between 1871 and 1913.

    There was no conflict in interest because the Corp. U.S’. purpose was to fulfill the business needs of the actual government.

    I’m not going to here go into all of the details and ramifications of the arrangements between Corp. U.S. and the Federal Reserve Bank. The simple fact is: Where the government couldn’t lawfully be involved with the Federal Reserve Bank, the corporation can be.

    Vacating the seats of Government
    Under all of the media coverage of the Federal Reserve Bank Act, Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th Amendment. Remember, this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th Article of Amendment as of 1870. The Supreme Court ruled that Corp. U.S’. 16th Amendment did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were obviously created only under the authority of Corp. U.S. Two months later Corp. U.S’. Congress entered their 17th Amendment as ratified. Again in the corporate ratification pattern of the Corp. U.S. 16th amendment was followed with actual State ratification. This amendment is not even constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected. For our national Congress to pass such an Amendment they would first have to Amend the Constitution to allow their discussion of the matter. Either way the result is that in Corp. U.S. their corporate officials known as Senators would thereafter be elected by a popular vote of their contracted voting public, while in the actual government (hereinafter “original jurisdiction government”) Senators would continue to be appointed by the State’s Legislature or by the State’s Governor. In other words, the Corp. U.S. seats and the original jurisdiction government seats would not thereafter be seated by the same individual.

    In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only and the original jurisdiction Senate seat was vacated, because the States failed to appoint new Senators (after all no law compels them to).

    In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W.I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

    In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers.

    In 1933, Corp. U.S. went bankrupt and the States agreed to support their resolution. In keeping with the bankruptcy, the Corp. U.S. Congress adjusted their Trading with the Enemies Act with their Emergency War Powers Act, which recognized the people of the United States of America are enemies of Corp. U.S.

    No Elections since 1913
    Therefore there was no election of officers of the government of the United States of America. And all of America was none the wiser. The government was still there and the Constitution was still alive and well and living in Washington, D.C. but once again** there was nobody sitting in the seats of the officers of government; just like it was when the founding fathers signed the Constitution but the States had not ratified it, the government existed but no one was seated in office.

    There hasn’t been an Election since, and there won’t be one until America once again wakes up.

    This is fantastic, I know, but look at the facts! This is the only solution that makes sense and fits the facts.

    The U.N., IMF, & World Bank
    So we jump from 1913 and the setting of the Federal Reserve Bank as the financier of Corp. U.S. to 1944 and W.W.II. The war was continuing and the United States was not fairing too well until the formation of The Bretton Woods Agreements and their new players—”The International Monetary Fund” (a.k.a. the “Fund”, hereinafter “IMF”), and “The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development” (a.k.a. the “Bank”, hereinafter “World Bank”). Make sure you’re sitting down for this one.

    The United States Code (USC) Title 22 § 286 reads:

    Ҥ 286. Acceptance of membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund.
    “The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the “Fund”), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch. 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.) Short titles: . May be cited as the ‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’.
    “Other provisions:
    Par value modification. For the Congressional direction that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in terms of gold of the Inter-American Development Bank’s holdings of United States dollars following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the authorization of the appropriations necessary to provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC § 449a.” (accents in red added).

    [It should be noted that recently, to cover-up the Bretton Woods Agreements (hereinafter "BWA") control and the quitclaim of the United States Government to the IMF, the United States Congress abolished the references in the USC referring to the BWA. Other than removing such references that abolishment had no effect on the BWA.]

    The Quitclaim
    The agreement further transfers control of assets of the United States Treasury to the IMF by stating words to the effect of: ‘the United States Treasury is now the individual drawing account of the IMF.’

    Think about it.
    “The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the the IMF”

    The President is authorized by whom? By Congress? No. According to the Act the authorization came from, “the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944″, a.k.a. The Bretton Woods Agreement’s final act.

    Even if Congress could have authorized such a thing, where would they get the authority? Certainly not from the Constitution, and Congress can’t lawfully do anything the Constitution doesn’t authorize them to do. Even under the President’s dictatorial authority of martial law, the President cannot lawfully do anything not authorized in the Constitution.

    The Constitution plainly states: “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Ninth amendment; and, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Tenth Amendment

    Further, this joining in with the IMF is obviously an international agreement; and, any good dictionary will define, “an agreement between nations” as a, “Treaty”. The constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with this nation — First, the President signs the treaty; and Second, the Senate ratifies his signature with a two-thirds majority vote. That didn’t happen here.

    So, if the right wasn’t given in the Constitution, Congress can’t take it and give it to the President. This act itself states that the alleged authorization came from the “Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference” instead of from Congress.

    Now, hold on a second here. There appear to be too many things going on here that can’t be. Too many conflicts. Even in a corrupt government they’d never get away with it. Thus, we must examine the matter further to discover whether there is a way that what they did might be construed as, lawful.

    I was watching Star Trek one time when Spock explained a logical solution to an identity problem like this, ‘When you examine the solutions and you discover what cannot be, the solution can only be whatever is left.’

    That’s the problem here, in Law, it cannot be what it seems to be, yet it is. The United States of America cannot be a member in the IMF absent a lawful Treaty; and, the Treasury of the United States of America cannot lawfully be turned over to a foreign bank’s control. Thus, only thing left is these relationships must be limited to Corp. U.S.; which relationships effectively made Corp. U.S. a general partner with the IMF under the Bretton Woods Agreement; as a settlement of W.W.II; and, that makes Corp. U.S. a private foreign corporation.

    Now think about it. And, this time instead of thinking the government did it [because they couldn't have], think about Corp. U.S. OK. In that case, where it says, “The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States”, “United States” as used here can only mean be the trademark name for the corporation known as, “The District of Columbia” in other words the corporation formed in 1871, and not the government.

    Want further confirmation? OK. In the “Other provisions:” section it talks about, “the Secretary of Treasury”, which is an officer of the corporation only. That position does not exist in the national government. The relatively equivalent position in national government is, “the Treasurer of the United States of America” and that seat was vacated by an Act of Congress in 1920.

    As a matter of fact when you review the whole document, Title 22 § 286, and the underlying “Bretton Woods Agreement”, you’ll find these elements.

    One — Corp. U.S’. signs the Bretton Woods Agreements (treaty) and Congress gives Title 22 § 286 the short title of Bretton Woods Agreement Act.

    Two — In said Agreement, Congress Grants to the IMF the “United States Treasury” as, “The individual drawing account” for the IMF.

    Three — “The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a governor of the Fund who shall serve as a governor of the Bank” USC 22 § 286a.

    The person the President chose as Governor of the World Bank and IMF is Corp. U.S’. Secretary of the Treasury.

    The elements of a Quit Claim Deed are: there must be a Grantor, a Grantee, and some thing, asset or right must be granted.

    In this case the thing being granted is a corporation known as, “The District of Columbia”, trademark names, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, United States, U.S., USA, America, etc.; its assets are its Treasury (The United States Treasury), and its purpose is to carry out the business needs of the national government of United States of America. Up until the Bretton Woods Agreement, the owner of Corp. U.S. was the United States of America, the actual government; thereafter it was the IMF. The Treasury of the corporation was granted by Grantor, the government of the United States of America (Congress and the President) to the Grantee, the IMF.

    Therefore USC Title 22 § 286 exemplifies the Quit Claim Deed of Corp. U.S. from The United States of America to the IMF, which is owned and controlled by the Great Britain’s Bank of International Settlements. Up to the point of the quit claim deed, there was allegedly no conflict in interests between Corp. U.S. and its owner the national government of the United States of America, but after the quit claim deed, with the new owner being foreign and having foreign interests, there is a gigantic conflict in interests.

    Upon review of these actions, as Spock would say, that is the only solution left when you remove all other options.

    The States join Corp. U.S.
    Starting around 1962 and continuing through 1968. Corp. U.S. went to the States and pointed out to them that their own constitutions forbid them from participating in foreign currencies and/or foreign loans, foreign bonds, etc., and yet they were dealing in the foreign note system of Federal Reserve Notes. They were warned that if the people became aware of this they could imagine a scene similar to that of the Magna Carta signing where the Lords held a sword to the King’s head and said sign or we’ll get a new king.

    The king signed, as did the States. One by one, they organized private corporations as sub-corps. to Corp. U.S.

    For example, Colorado rewrote Colorado’s Constitution, revised their Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS), and enacted CRS Title 24 as the “Administrative Organization Act of 1968″ restructuring its laws in 1968. Said Title 24 is the new corporate charter for, “THE STATE OF COLORADO” which is Corp. U.S. possession.

    By 1972 every State in the Union had done the same thing.

    The California Republic, formed “THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA”; The Republic of Texas formed “THE STATE OF TEXAS”; The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, formed “THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA”; and so it went, until each and every State had formed a private corporation of a name like “THE STATE OF _______”, where the blank is a common name for the State. As people registered to vote with these corporations they participated in their elections of corporate officials and bonded debts; they also stopped electing original jurisdiction State government officials, thus unknowingly vacating their actual State governments.

    Where Are You, Do You Know?
    Like a ship at sea, in order to plot a course, you need to know: who you are, where you are, where you’re going and which way the wind is going (what the enemy is doing).

    Who are you?

    Answer: According to Foundational Law in the United States of America, that being recognized as the King James Version of the Bible (see Public Law 97-280), God created man in His own image, giving man dominion, agency and possession (sovereignty) and a commandment to multiply, replenish and subdue the earth (stewardship). With a promise that if we will obey this commandment and remain not of this world then shall we receive our inheritance in His Kingdom. This is a start from foundational law. Should we accept that stewardship, we also have direction in taking responsibility for our stewardship.

    Where are you?

    Answer: You’re living in a nation where the chosen form of government is a Constitutional Republic, and where, historically, almost no elections of government officials have been held since 1913, and where a private foreign corporation is responsible for providing the business needs of the government under a direct conflict of interest, which government again is alive and well and living in Washington, D.C.— there just are no officers of government sitting in the seats the Constitution provides. It will serve you well to remember that Corp. U.S. has declared war against the people of this nation.

    Where are you going?

    Answer: Considering the fact that you are at war, you only have two choices on where to go. You must decide whose side you’re on. Are you on the side of Liberty, Independence, and the Creator, or are you on the side of the private foreign corporation that has declared that you are its enemy?

    What is the Enemy doing?

    Answer: The enemy is usurping control over the people, breaking up families ironically through the use of the Marriage License and “parens patria”, public education, and the media (see “Family Ties”, this issue). The enemy is usurping “Color of Law” land control over family farms, homes, and land under the guise of Taxes, the Endangered Species Act, and the Wetlands Act. That doesn’t take into consideration all of the specious cases brought in courts against land owners. Under the Patriot Act they can call anyone a terrorist and hold them indefinitely without trial and under the Homeland Security Act they can do or take almost anything they want simply because they want to.

    Example, in eviction cases in Colorado, the Sheriffs Offices never use warrants to gain access to the land, they use a “Color of Law” “Writ of Restitution” instead and then say they are breaking and entering in good faith on the specious authority of the court ordered writ.

    The UN has set a World maximum population at One Billion people, current world population is near Six Billion. (United Nations Environment Program-UNEP, Global Biodiversity Assessment-GBA) The enemy is killing people, worldwide with biological warfare. The death toll is already over 300,000,000 people. In state aided abortions over 40,000,000 children have been murdered in the last ten years. Population growth rates are at .83% and need to be at 2.1% just to stay even.

    The bottom line: if you look at all the people around you, your neighbors, your family, etc., for every six you see only one will survive the plans of this war, if the enemy has its way. The simple fact is that we are in trouble and if we do not awaken and fix the problem with our current trend our history will end.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  • heymisterderp

    Ron Paul is a superhero in US politics. If we only had 100 more just like him!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • angryamicus

    uuuuhhhh i was being sarcastic. just look at the link i posted

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • DigitalDogg21

    To the guy talking in this video, RON PAUL 2012 you fool!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • SLSLWarlock

    you’re retarded and should put a shotgun in your mouth and pull the trigger

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • SLSLWarlock

    90% of the American population are stupid sheep who believe the other 10% are all crazy conspiracy theorists. 100% of the American people are fucked if the 90% continue to not care and not want to be informed.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • JBaseball777

    well we have tried hard and given it our best now we needa show up in force in Tampa and make ourselves heard

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • golitely7

    America is finished pull the fucking plug already.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • wiggledytoes

    5 States. So how many states has he won? Or looks like hes going to win?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • samcan1980

    Well said, and I agree! At least the next time someone like RP stands-up, then the dumbed-down public will listen and vote for him. Ignorant people need a hit before seeing the light. If everything you say comes to pass, that would be the “hit” that I talk about.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • moneysuccesslegacy


    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • ronpaul2012rp

    no, I know Ron Paul he is not a fraud just the media ignores the fact that he is winning and at the debates they ignore him but the revolution will start if he does not get elected

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • ctkelly85

    Romney won all delegates in Mississippi.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

  • ctkelly85

    He has not proven himself a fraud. I have spoken with him and I can tell you, he gives himself more credit than he deserves. He said conspiracy theorist hurt the Liberty movement. In reality, over half of the Liberty movement consists of conspiracy theorist. He and Jack Hunter are trying to divide us. He works for the Propaganda Media. Did you expect better?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  • ronpaul2012rp

    how does that make him a fraud?????

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • SuperFreetochoose

    there does come a time when non violent people like me refuse to be criminalized and not going to be beat up anymore,,,,,,tough subject,,,,well spoken,,,,there does come a time when asking politely for someone to take their foot off your or your families throat requires more….and just letting it fail isnt right…..i see these things and wish only good. good old fashioned ruckus to run the criminals out of town…I get way to upset though and then collaspe so im not the guy. Mr. ron paul is

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • concordspirit

    Ignorant, shallow and incompetent nations don’t deserve someone like Ron Paul. However, the nation is shifting toward more knowledge, more deepness and in coming future, financial situation will push people to be competent.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0