Ron Paul: No Second Thoughts about Leaving Congress





Transcript

Alan Colmes: I’m Alan Colmes, and I’m always delighted to have with us on the program Congressman Ron Paul. Dr. Paul is leaving Congress after this term, he served during the late 1970s and early 1980s and returned in 1997 to represent the 14th congressional district in Texas. In 1988 he was the Libertarian Party candidate for President, he’s also the author of several books, including The Challenge to Liberty, The Case for Gold, and The Republic. By the way, you’ve done some great cookbooks, too.

Ron Paul: Oh, yea, my wife did those and we kid a lot about that. I always ask, “Why do you want to do such a silly thing as a cookbook”, but then it turns out that she probably got more votes for me than I got for myself.

Alan Colmes: Are you disappointed with the results of this election?

Ron Paul: Well, not in any way, it is probably exactly what I expected. I remember a couple of days before the election I was asked to predict the outcome, and I said the status quo is going to win. So, from my viewpoint, where I want less war and better protection of civil liberties and free markets, we still have the status quo, we still have the deficits, and they’re going to argue for a while longer. So, I guess I wouldn’t say it’s a disappointment. It’s disappointing, I guess, if we don’t ever shift gears, but it wasn’t unexpected.

Alan Colmes: You didn’t think it would make a difference if it if it was Obama or Romney?

Ron Paul: No, not really.

Alan Colmes: Did you vote for Garry Johnson?

Ron Paul: I’m not telling.

Alan Colmes: You haven’t answered that question yet.

Ron Paul: No, I haven’t answered it, and it’s a little bit late now.

Alan Colmes: What do we do about the fiscal cliff, can we avoid it? And I know you’ve said it’s already happened, but what’s the path that should now be taken by the Congress and by the President?

Ron Paul: I think if you’re in a deficit crisis and a debt problem, that you have to cut back on the spending. If you or I got into serious trouble, we would have to say that if we were ethical, we’d want to pay off our debt. And what we would do is we would get two jobs and we would cut back the spending and get out of the mess we’re in. Governments are different, they never do that, they always just keep borrowing more and printing more and making the problems that much worse. So I would get out of it by cutting back. But during the campaign, I emphasized some priorities, and my idea would be to get people to agree on the overseas spending, because our debt, in the last ten years, probably went up over 4 trillion dollars just from the militarism and the wars. And that’s going to be ongoing when you think of all the men who have come back and are suffering and all the seriously wounded; and I think we can save a lot of money. We don’t have to go immediately after the entitlement system or Child Healthcare. Of course, as a libertarian, I don’t think those are good ideas, I think they usually end up the way they are today: they cost too much and services get rationed and people are worse off. And this was the message that I gave and it was well received on the campuses. The young people are inheriting this mess, they know the wars are useless and they know the spending doesn’t make any sense, and they were very open to my views on the Federal Reserve System, too.

Alan Colmes: So it seems, in your view, perhaps, that if we went off the fiscal cliff, that wouldn’t be such a bad idea if no deal were made, right?

Ron Paul: Well, it’s going to be bad if it doesn’t wake us up. If it wakes us up, it’s good. It’s good that the Soviet Union went off the cliff, and they had to retrench, and they went back home and they quit invading these countries. So I think when it’s admitted in the world sense that the United States is broke and they can’t afford it and they’re tired of loaning us money, we’re going to have to come home because we won’t be able to afford it, because I think then they’ll say, “We better take care of the people here at home rather than fighting these senseless wars”. And I think this is one of the things that actually hurt Romney, he wanted to spend 2 trillion dollars more on the military. And I always think that the candidate that sounds like he’s better for peace, wins the election. And even though Obama actually softened his stand, yet his policies aren’t very peaceful.

Alan Colmes: Yes, he had the surge in Afghanistan and he went into Libya, that’s where I differ from the President, and that’s where your messages resonates so much with me in terms of troops. And you’ve talked so often about all these military bases we have based on the geo-politics of World War II around the world, and how many dollars could we save there

Ron Paul: Yes, and also, as soon as you get this war attitude and you end up with carelessness about civil liberties. Now we have a President that can kill and assassinate American citizens and put them in prison without a trial.

Alan Colmes: Anybody can be declared an ‘enemy combatant’. And how about the Defense Authorization Act where the homeland is declared a ‘battlefield’ or smt.

Ron Paul: Yes, and the military can arrest people. But this is why I see that there is too much bipartisanship, both parties endorse this system. If people are honest with themselves, the foreign policy didn’t change from Bush on to Obama, civil liberties were abused by bush, and they’re abused by Obama. About spending, the conservatives have a reputation for cutting, but they never cut. As a matter of fact, they took a position that deficits don’t matter, that was supply-siders. I think deficits do matter, even though in the short run people think they can keep borrowing. But governments eventually get into trouble, and if an individual gets into trouble, the banks quit giving them any more loans and they have to quit. But governments only quit when they ruin the money, and we’re very capable of doing that.

Alan Colmes: We’re talking with Dr. Ron Paul, you obviously still have a lot to say, and you’ve had a very consistent message for a long time now. Any second thoughts about leaving Congress at the end of this term?

Ron Paul: No, matter of fact I’m sort of looking forward to a little bit different schedule, I’ll get to do things that I have been doing and hopefully I can get back to college campuses. I think that’s where the action is, you can’t have revolutionary changes without young people endorsing it, and I believe they are very open to some of the many things that I’ve talked about.

Alan Colmes: But you obviously want to still be part of the political discussion, you want to be part of the dialogue that’s going on.

Ron Paul: Yea, at least on policy. I have a foundation, and the foundation is going to concentrate on foreign policy. I had dinner last night with Dennis Kucinich, and we’re good friends and we’ll be working together trying to show that somebody who’s calls himself a progressive and libertarians can get together (Republican and Democratic) and agree on some of these things.

Alan Colmes: Some of us talk about the Kucinich-Paul ticket 4 years ago, right?

Ron Paul: Yea, some people said that, but I think it’s not likely to happen. But we can still work together since we’ll both be out of Congress.

Alan Colmes: I’ve also been fortunate enough to have your son, Rand, on the program a few times. And is he now carrying the torch of your message going forward, and can you talk about him running as a candidate in 2016?

Ron Paul: Well, we haven’t talked about that, but I hope he basically sticks to the principles of Liberty, and I believe he will, but it has to be more than Ron Paul and Rand Paul. I mean, if this is significant, you have to have literally thousands of people involved and you have to have an intellectual change, and that’s what I’m interested in more than the politics. And that’s probably why I never became a chairman of a major committee, because I was sort of bored with that. But, hopefully, a few people got to thinking about monetary policy and foreign policy.

Alan Colmes: Let me ask you about the secession movement, and you’re belief is that it’s patriotic. In fact, and it’s called for in our founding documents that states that we certainly have the right to speak up. But are you surprised by the number of people who have signed petitions on the White House website since the election?

Ron Paul: Yes, a little bit, it just seemed like that popped out of nowhere, but many of us have believed that if people read the history honestly, it was sort of understood. But the numbers of people signing up sort of surprised me. But those people who tried to paint us as a little bit off the wall by saying , “Yes, the principle of secession should be there, we should be able to leave”, wonder what they would say about if Greece wanted to leave the European Union, do we say that the European Union ought to invade Greece and destroy them and kill them all because they’re leaving?

Alan Colmes: Do you have empathy or sympathy, at least, for those who want to secede?

Ron Paul: Oh yea, I think the principle is a very good principle. But one thing where I get hesitant about it – because I don’t take the position that Texas should secede, I’m not going to believe that – is because you have to look at what the states are doing. Maybe the state officials are going to abuse the system just like the federal government, so you have to know what you’re substituting it for. So, for me, it’s more important to understand free market principles and why we don’t need these wars and why we should have a government that protects civil liberties. And, you know, the states can be very abusive, too.

Alan Colmes: I only have a moment left, let me take a quick call here for Ron Paul. Rob in San Jose, go ahead quickly.

Rob: Hi, first of all I would just like to say that I so wish that Dr. Paul would have been the nominee. Actually I wish he would have been the third party nominee, which leads me to my question: what can we do to get a viable third party in this country, because the two parties are just …

Alan Colmes: Okay, we only have about 30 seconds left, but let’s try to get an answer, go ahead, Ron.

Ron Paul: Yes, that would be nice, and I’ve worked in that area and have tried to change the rules, but it’s not going to happen in the near future because the Republicans and the Democrats write all the rules. Guess who runs the debates, it’s the Republican and Democratic Parties. So it’s very biased, you can’t get on the ballots and you don’t get recognized by the media.

Alan Colmes: And that was Gary Johnson’s frustration, I’m sure.

Ron Paul: Yea, we go over and send kids overseas and get killed trying to promote democracy, and there are a lot of shortcomings here in this country, that’s my argument, we ought to clean up our mess.

Alan Colmes: Dr. Paul, I appreciate having you on, thank you so much for being with us tonight.



style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3666212842414688"
data-ad-slot="9478233584">

»crosslinked«

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

260 Comments:

  1. Foreign Policy has always been one of the biggest differing points from his dad.

    Look, we can stay 100% hardcore in line with the liberty beliefs and continue to be marginalized and sidelined and barely part of the process. Or we can see that Rand is right on 90% of everything, and not too far off on the rest (except some FP stuff).

    Sure, you can call for no taxes... and then almost no ones listens to you. Or you can take steps to work towards that and actually make progress.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Ive never heard them get called hipsters...thank you, lol. I've always thought the same.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. As a supporter who wrote in Ron Paul, i will NOT vote for his son Rand Paul in 2016. He eff'd up the liberty movements momentum for a 2012 election. He hasnt proved sh*t to me, besides being a typical slimy leech of a politician which sold out to the establishment, and he rides off his dads style to appease a base. I believe he attended the bilderberg 2012 meeting.

    The elections are rigged and is just an illusion hiding the true Oligarchy,

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. I'm not even American, but from the outside how could your country not elect Ron Paul. Everything he says is common sense.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. The truth often hurts, but it may also set you free. Ron Paul is the TRUTH.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Endorsement of Romney was the worst thing he could have done, concerning ron's fans

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. "Hipsters"? Why hipsters? What are you talking about?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. I truly believe that Rand's endorsement of Romney was a political chess move.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. I truly believe that Rand's endorsement of Romney was a political chess move.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. French Canadian,
    Thank you for your input. I've met a few new Ron Paul supporters today that think like we do. There aren't any people like that on Ben Swann's site, but because of his Reality Checks they have accused him of being in league with those Arabs. I'm also so surprised how many people who have responded to his latest Reality Check believe Palestinians are being well=treated and that Israel does not practice apartheid. There is a definite disconnect with reality. As soon as anyone mentions anything about Israel, you are branded anti-Semitic or you want to exterminate all the Jews. I tell you that emotion overrides reason with many people as we have seen on this site.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Robin,

      Don't worry about it. You know how humans are. They hate successful people like Ben Swann, Alex Jones, Ron Paul, etc. Whatever they say, they trash them. These people cannot face the truth and they cannot stand people who brings the truth to people. This is why they demonize them. I can predict you without a doubt, that Ben Swann will have the same treatment as Alex did and still do. This is the price to pay apparently for been honest, genuine, patriot, informed... and to have a back bone.

      Forget these people, they are losers.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • French Canadian,
        I know my husband says not to waste my time to respond on Ben's site, but I met some like=minded people by doing so, and we are sharing info. I'm not worried about these people because their minds are a steel trap. When our fear, intolerance and hatred runs deep, it's almost impossible to wake up unless your very world is shaken in a profound way. It is just another example of how brainwashed people are by propaganda. I will continue to expose the lies about the Middle East for those that are willing to research on their own. My younger son said recently that he used to enjoy studying history until he realized that you never know what is true and what is not. In 5th grade, I remember he told me much of history is written from the point of view of the victor(s). Both our children are awake, and once you are awake, you can never go back to sleep.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Regarding the mosque: opposing something philosophically or emotionally is different form opposing it legally. I guess I'm unclear where the flip flop occurred in regard to Gitmo. The position I heard him state was: deport them back to their countries. Presumably they could be tried in their country of origin, rather than military tribunal or a civilian court. Honestly though, I would be interested if you could direct me to something he said counter to that. Do you disagree with that position?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. You ignored my counter to your silly tax bit. I'm not an apologist for any politician, so stop fighting a straw man. Rand's made mistakes, obviously, but you're misrepresenting his actions. I Never heard of any muslim-baiting attack ads. He proposed screening foreign travelers from countries notorious for terrorists, yes. His statement said nothing about "muslims". Sided with neocons? Why has he threatened to filibuster the hell out of everything in defiance of them?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. My "strategy" didnt harm me this past election, it did however allow me peace with myself. No inner turmoil about voting for someone i believed would be a shitty potus.

    If these new rules in place now had been in effect in the 70's there would never have been Ronnie. Another part of the problem is you are thinking democracy, when in reality we are supposed to be a Republic, i shouldnt need to "inject my will".

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 3232 to S. 3254 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013)
    Statement of Purpose:To enhance sanctions imposed with respect to Iran.
    Vote Counts: YEAs 94
    NAYs 0
    Not Voting 6

    Rand was one of the "YEAs". And this isn't the first time he has voted for these sanctions either. So I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Like I said before, by voting for increased sanctions on Iran, he is depriving innocent people of adequate food and healthcare.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 3232 to S. 3254 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013)
    Statement of Purpose:To enhance sanctions imposed with respect to Iran.
    Vote Counts: YEAs 94
    NAYs 0
    Not Voting 6

    Rand was one of the "YEAs". And this isn't the first time he has voted for these sanctions either. So I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Like I said before, by voting for increased sanctions on Iran, he is depriving innocent people of adequate food and healthcare.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. Your wrong about Rand.In order to prevent World War III from breaking out, Rand single-handedly blocked the Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Human Rights Act (S. 2101) from being passed by unanimous consent by demanding the inclusion of a one sentence amendment to the bill which reads, "...nothing in the Act shall be construed as a declaration of war or an authorization of the use of force against Iran or Syria."

    Google "Rand Paul stops war with Iran"

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. I'd hope he wrote himself in.. I wrote him in. Johnson was nowhere close-enough.. and I mean close enough to Paul (and my) stance.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. Here's the thing.
    I've never seen Rand as attached to the principles of liberty, and unless he (finally) grows into it, he will never stand up for us.
    Sure, Rand stood up to the TSA, but only after TSA messed with him.
    I hope Rand will grow into half the principled man his father is, but I'm not all that trusting he will.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. Not necessarily... considering all the voter fraud stories. They learned from Stalin: "It doesn't matter who they vote for, they always vote for us." What matters is who counts the votes.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. Not necessarily... considering all the voter fraud stories. They learned from Stalin: "It doesn't matter who they vote for, they always vote for us." What matters is who counts the votes.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


three + = 6

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>