Ron Paul: Why I Didn’t Run as an Independent


Interviewer: Ron Paul is packing up his Washington condo this week, preparing to sell it and move back to Texas for good. Paul is retiring from Congress, and last week he gave a farewell address from the House floor, repeating the small-government sermon he first shouted in obscurity, and then injected into the national debate. With his time in Washington DC coming to a close, I sat down with Paul for a kind of ‘exit interview’.

Question: You’ve been here on-and-off since 1976, what would you say the three most damaging special interests are in Washington?

Ron Paul: You know, I see so many, and they’re all the same.

Interviewer: I know, but you much have some that really bother you.

Ron Paul: I think the military-industrial complex is very bad.

Interviewer: That was No.1.

Ron Paul: I don’t know if they should be in order.

Interviewer: Okay, don’t give them in order.

Ron Paul: Another one would be the banking system: how the Federal Reserve works and how it helps big banks. The interest that I would like to see, and that I worked on, was to try to get those people who just want their freedom to take care of themselves, and that’s the one that’s the least influential. Up here, it’s the people who want stuff and who get the benefits by just lobbying for those things that they want.

Interviewer: Another thing you mentioned in your farewell speech is your belief that we need to build coalitions, not necessarily reach compromises. And I wonder if you think your beliefs could be a 51% coalition in your lifetime, or in what timeframe?

Ron Paul: I think if I talk to a crowd of people, no matter which crowd, and say, “Do you believe in the free enterprise system, that people should be able to work and have their earning?” they say, “Yea, I believe that”. And if I asked, “Do you believe that your privacy should be protected, that the government shouldn’t be in your bedroom, that they shouldn’t be spying on you?” people would agree. And, most of the time when I asked, “Do you think we should be the policeman of the world?” they say, “No”. But when it comes to the particulars, they don’t stick with it, and they say, “Yes, but go too far, you want too much freedom”.

Interviewer: Well, this is another thing you touched on in that speech, you said this idea of liberty is popular, has been popular, so why doesn’t it win. It’s kind of a question that you didn’t fully answer in that speech, why do you think it doesn’t win?

Ron Paul: Not a lot of people talk about it, and I did try to explain it in the speech, in that, the concern about freedom was lost because freedom creates so much prosperity, that people get complacent. Then they become materialistic, and all they can deal with is redistribution and they find that with the government, you can make more money by getting a contract from the government than by being a genius and being productive. You know, when I first came here in 1976, I think I was under the impression that if you talk about welfare, you’re talking about those people who won’t work and get food stamps. But I have a very different opinion now. That exists, and it’s not healthy, but that’s minor compared to the food stamps the wealthy get. The wealthy get the contracts and the special deals, and that’s where I think the biggest trouble is.

Interviewer: That’s a way of speaking that most Republicans don’t usually engage in. Your son, the senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, said recently that the Republican Party is in danger of becoming a dinosaur.

Ron Paul: Yea, but I think the whole government and the Democratic Party and the Republican Party are all dinosaurs.

Interviewer: What’s the future of the Republican Party, though?

Ron Paul: Well, the same as the Democratic Party. The principles are dinosaurs. The parties are going to linger because they’re locked in by law. You know, we’re not allowed to compete, the laws are biased against us from competing. And if you go third-party, you can’t get in the debates and you can’t get on ballots.

Interviewer: You talk about the grip of that two-party system, did you seriously consider running as an independent for President in 2012?

Ron Paul: No.

Interviewer: You didn’t consider it because it’s not practical?

Ron Paul: Not practical, absolutely not practical. Because this would have been a good year to have an alternative, and you can’t get much of a showing either on the Libertarian side or the Green side.

Interviewer: So then, how do we get out of this system, what do us see as the answer to this, or do we just keep bumping along with the way things are? You can’t believe that, that would make you too sad.

Ron Paul: No, you go to the campuses, you rally the young people, and you stir up a whole generation of people. Ideas do have consequences, and that’s where the good news is, because the campuses are alive and well with these views and they know the system is bankrupt. And there is this illusion that you can spend endlessly and print endlessly, and there will always be credit out there. And so far so good, but credit can end quickly, the dollar can crash quickly, and a new system will have to be developed.

Interviewer: One last thing, where do you pride yourself?

Ron Paul: Nothing in particular, other than the fact that the people say, “One thing we can say about you is that you are very consistent”, and they say this in a very nice way.

Interviewer: And you’ve changed the discussion in this country, you must be proud of that.

Ron Paul: Yea, that would be nice, time will tell. But what I always get a charge out of is when they’re so nice and they say, “This is good, you’re very consistent”, they must say to themselves, “But I’m always inconsistent”, and that’s wonderful. And they run the show, I never ran anything, I was just bubbling along here when it came to legislation. So the people who, in a way, admit they’re inconsistent, get to run the Legislative System.

Interviewer: Thank you so much for your time, we really appreciate it.

Ron Paul: You’re welcome.


  • muhammaDEsmustafa

    the bitter truth .. american people MUST rise up before their stupid government and deceptive Zionists drag them down the abyss

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • guido10986

    Thank you Ron Paul!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • k12rising


    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • roseagain2

    Ron Paul r3VOLution!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • blotto85

    After the revolutionary militia takes down the corrupt government and carries out an American version of the Nuremberg Trials, Ron Paul will be appointed commander in chief

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • doodelay

    Ron Paul is right, he didn’t listen to the people when they told him “You want too much freedom”

    Its too extreme, and that was his only flaw. He just couldn’t move with the people on EVERY issue, not just some. He should have looked deeper into his policies after people started saying that he wants too much freedom. Damnit Ron Paul, why did you have to be so stubborn?

    The part I’m referring to starts at 1:38 and ends at 2:10

    He didn’t listen :/

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • mweibleii

    sorry :im using PS3 and ticked thumb down :(

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • khoraski

    Except for, erm, Ron Paul? The only one who’s actually spoken out about the blatantly obvious issues? The ones that both Obama and Romney seemed to conveniently ignore? Why do you think he had no chance of winning?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • yourliestopshere

    that interveiw was very telling. Viva la vida, Ron Paul!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • tipubhai

    Goodbye Paul. You will be missed.

    Love from Pakistan

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • SillyPottyMouth

    Different names,same story. The people in the United States are the problem. No, the whole planet. And these professional actors will play you all like puppeteers.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • SpraxIAKS

    But they aren’t Robot Dinosaurs with Lasers.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • StopTheMorons

    0:44 The guy interrupts RP and starts numbering his points and he says “I don’t know whether they should be numbered”, lol

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Arie Raymond

    Ron Paul’s face will be on a coin of real value one day

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • xbrandnew99

    All the drug dealers and traffickers hate this guy. Does that indicate anything?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • khoraski

    I’m quite sure druggies liked Obama and Gary Johnson much more…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • xbrandnew99

    It always amazes me that, while Paul has been so passionate and influential for liberty, accomplished more than many could fathom, ignited a youth revolution… he remains to be one of the humblest of people that I know of.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • MercuriallyStatic

    It indicates that they want to live their lives without the constant proselytizing and moral superiority that is so endemic in American culture.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • zedubman

    you obviously have NOT listened to this man and simply BELIEVE anythig your told through your TV…oh well your loss stupid.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • TheBoxingCannabyte

    PS: I do know that Bernie and Ron had some disputes in the bill, Ron made a video, Bernie made one. Eventually it got cleared up. If it weren’t for the Ron Paul Movement the bill would never have gotten the traction it did, so, kudos to my libertarian friends for doing so! :)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0