Ron Paul Reacts to State of the Union Address


John Stossel: If only someone who really believed in limited government, someone who respects the dignity of the individual and individual freedom, if only someone like Ron Paul would run for president. Oh, he’s here via satellite. Dr. Paul, why didn’t you run for president?

Ron Paul: Well, John, that’s interesting, because I had a dream once that I actually did, and I had a dream that I was doing very well, and that I won the primary in Iowa. And, boy, I woke up that next morning, I went out and watched the TV, and my name was never mentioned, so I guess it was all just a dream. But I thought about it, so maybe some day I will.

John Stossel: And hence the point of my joking introduction. You were often ignored by, not this program, but many in the media. But you did get more than two million votes in the Republican primary.

Ron Paul: Yes, I was pretty pleased. Of course, you always want to do better, but I was very encouraged by the number of people, especially the young people that showed up when I went to the universities, because that’s where I have become more optimistic. I have to admit that I did watch some of the State of The Union message, and I didn’t come out of watching that very optimistic, that was rather depressing. But, in going to the college campuses, which I will continue to do, there’s reason to be optimistic. A lot of young people know what you and so many others have been talking about, it’s so different than it was when I first got into politics in 1970. A lot of people now do care about individual liberty and limited government.

John Stossel: And you and a few other congressmen didn’t attend the States of the Union, and I don’t blame you. Some of these guys show up 10 hours early to be at the end of the aisle so they can get their faces on TV. It’s a big suck-up fest.

Ron Paul: It was terrible. I watched a little bit of that tonight, and I keep thinking it’s like a circus, a joyous occasion and they’re rushing in there and getting those seats. And they’ll go in there and occupy a seat, they’ll go very early, hours and hours before. But the jumping up and down, and the ritual that they go through … “Should the Republicans get up on this one, or should they sit on their hands?”, “Oh, this is one where everybody gets up and down”, and it sounds like the world has been saved.

If you were locked in just were on that floor, it would be so distorted. But that’s the way Washington is, it’s so distorted. They live in their own little bubble and they don’t know that there’s anybody like you or anybody in your audience that might have questions about what’s going on in this country. And certainly we didn’t get any answers tonight.

John Stossel: And I know that there’s no requirement that they hold these big celebrations, the constitution just says, “The President, from time to time, shall give Congress information on the state of the union”. Thomas Jefferson wrote his, and that’s what happened for a hundred years. George Washington said 800 words, Obama said several thousand years. That depresses me, I’m going to drop that. You have retired, but are there younger members of Congress now who give you hope?

Ron Paul: Oh, yes, certainly. The numbers aren’t great, but there are 6 to 12 that are going to do a very good job, and that’s a lot more than there have been during the many years that I was there, so that’s very encouraging.

John Stossel: Do you endorse the few, like Representative Justin Amash, Senator Ted Cruz, Thomas Massie, Ted Yoho, Kerry Bentivolio and Steve Stockman?

Ron Paul: Yes, and that’s a real good start. We do need a lot more, but the truth is, after listening to a speech like that, I think we should be convinced that this spending isn’t going to quit before we have a calamity, that’s what I think is going to happen. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t stop trying to change people’s minds. But to think that next year and two years from now we’re going to have more members of Congress and we’re finally going to come to our senses and we’re going to vote against some of these largess for all the special interests and we’re going to bring our troops home and they’re going to repeal and restraint the president from assassinating Americans citizens and repeal his so-called right to do that, that’s not going to happen. There’s going to be a serious economic problem and a crisis here where there will be a decision made by the people, mostly the young people right now that are in college and are getting out of college, on what kind of a system we have. We have an outline, it’s been around, it’s called the Constitution, and if we would go in that direction once again, we could solve some of our problems. But it’s not going to be gradual, I think it’s inevitable that we’re going to have this financial crisis, which is going to be very, very serious.

John Stossel: The answer is in the constitution. I happen to have one here and I’m always struck by how thin it is compared to the laws that we now must obey.

Ron Paul: Right.

John Stossel: You were in Congress for 35 years, did anything get better?

Ron Paul: No, it all got worse. The spending always went up, and government got bigger, and there were more wars and more printing of money and more power to the Fed and more central economic planning. But that’s what you see on the surface, in the 1930s, most of the things you saw on the surface was the defense of liberty, and even Roosevelt ran on a balanced budget and a gold standard in 1932. So I think the reverse is the case now, everything on the surface looks like it’s welfarism and warfarism for ever. But I think underneath there is a smoldering desire that is growing by leaps and bounds that’s saying that a lot of people in this country have had enough of it. And I think tonight he talked a lot about gun control, I don’t think the American people are going to put up with that, and I think this awakening is coming, it’s own its way. So I would like to do my share and try and nourish that awakening.

John Stossel: He did talk a lot about gun control, but he never mentioned the word ‘drone’ once.

Ron Paul: That’s the gun we ought to really control. I think the drone missile and our drone warfare, is one of the most dangerous things. When I left Congress, in my speech I listed ‘An attack on civil liberties’ was our most serious threat. But the other thing was the killing of foreigners in foreign countries, like we’re doing in endless countries, by drones. And civilians get killed and Americans get killed and it’s so over the top, and there’s not enough talk about that. And that, to me, …

John Stossel: They do talk about it, but they do say they are keeping us safe: “Kill them there so they don’t kill us here”.

Ron Paul: Yea, that’s what they say, but every time they kill a civilian over there, you probably get ten more that are dedicated to the principles of what the Al-Qaida stands for: keep foreigners out of our land, and punish those who come here to kill us. And the war fever that is built up … I saw a statistic where we’re actually putting putting troops into probably about 35 countries in Africa because we’re competing with China. Now China has earned some money, we buy their stuff, and they’re going over there and investing in natural resources. So we’re investing by buying more weapons and going over there and putting more troops in Africa, and now they say, “Well, we’ve had this victory in Iraq and Afghanistan, so we’re going to move to the Far East and into Africa and conquer those lands as well”. And it’s going to backfire, because we will go bankrupt, and these things will have to stop and there’s going to be a lot of piling on. This is not the way to win friends and influence people by dropping drone missiles on them constantly.


  • don’t you think DNA, since it is a code, shows design, and anything but random activity..Darwin said if cells and human biology wind up being more complex than previous though the theory would fall through, and also said the fossils would have to show tens of thousands of transitional remains of fossilized skeletons going from species to species…wing to leg for instance…but 0 are found….You have nothing but the luciferians pushing it. It’s the best theory going, but seriously inadequate

  • Pull your head out of wRong Paul’s creationist ass!

  • aguafinatv…I don’t trust what the F.B.I. wants us to believe. They are part of the undermining of America. There is much frustration in society, today. Obama and his superiors, “The Elitist” want to divide us as much as possible so we fight among ourselves because WHEN WE ARE UNITED TOGETHER is when we become a POWERFUL FORCE to fight for our freedom and the right to bear arms! WE MUST REMEMBER THIS! They want civil unrest so they can throw ALL OF US of ALL RACES into FEMA Camps, or worse!

  • Ron Paul makes too much sense. Chief tells it like it is.

  • I suppose you think its unscientific for him to not blindly accept the entirety of a theory he is not familiar with just because people tell him to do so- yea I see you really respect science

  • “hates gays” He was going to take away advantages the married had over non married people- thats more then the idle words offered by everyone else in terms of civil liberties. “atheists” Thats really a spurious claim. “Science” since he is for stem cells, I assume you refer to a highly edited video that cut out all of the context. That being a display of perfect scientific reasoning. He said he did not know the entire theory parameters, more specific about mutual exclusivity in theories.

  • You should not have to expect someone to say sorry for something they did not do. Do you really expect a congressman and doctor to have read every newsletter when people in congress do not even read every page of a bill they vote on? Dr. Paul is pretty darn good at prioritizing things and I would expect he put reading bills ahead of a publication he affiliated with amongst dozens of writers.

  • Pull your head out of your ass.

  • I like how in the head of you RonBots, Ron Paul can do no wrong ever! HA HA HA Accept reality you dopes, wRong Paul has requested that the UN use their authority to give him back control of the Site! Why didn’t wRong Paul just pay the $ 250,000? Because he’s a senile hypocrite!

  • So you just proved your own point wrong. You’re using counterproductive logic. But that probably went over your head, am I right?

  • HAHA! Get real, man.

  • Yup, you’re a moron.

  • kolya

    Have a great day…

  • OK Blah blah blah, have a nice day. It is really not that hard to be a good person.

  • oblama hates freedom, liberty and the constitution, so there.

  • You know who makes Libertarian ideology? The Cato Institute. Know who sits on the Cato Institute’s board of directors? David fucking Koch the King of the Robber Barons himself. So the Libertarians are presenting themselves as an alternative to the 2 parties they themselves corrupted in the first place. Fucking idiots all round.

  • If the Ron Paul had his way..No interstate highways, schools, libraries, prisons, clinics, egual rights, food regulations. food labeling, FBI, CIA, EPA, DOT, OSHA ,national parks and more…… He also wants to end the fed so a private company could be the Central Bank.

  • Ron Paul is an unbelievable hypocrite, after making countless speeches about how the UN is threatening american sovereignty, he goes and uses the UN’s protocols to try and get the domain name for RonPaul org/ com, i mean get real! the owners asked for $250,000 and Ron Paul supporters called them “greedy”, are these guys pro-free market or communists? please, give me a break this guy is no better than any other politician.

  • I’m a chemical engineer…please…

  • RON PAUL kicks ass, everyone else sucks ass.