59 responses to “Ron Paul: Sequester Is Just A Fear Tactic”

  1. mvpmets2012

    no mention of racist newsletters now huh?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. John Andrew

    Other than perhaps Gary Johnson, RP was the only candidate proposing real cuts in federal spending (Obum admitted this, calling out Bush for wanting the debt ceiling raised & campaigning on a “net cut in spending”), to the tune of $1 trillion. This sequester is just nibbling away at baseline-budgeting, there are no substantial cuts. If they go nuts over these paltry “cuts” then they’re not serious about balancing the budget & should leave office promptly (that includes Boehner too).

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. UTubekookdetector

    Other than perhaps Gary Johnson, RP was the only candidate proposing real cuts in federal spending (Obum admitted this, calling out Bush for wanting the debt ceiling raised & campaigning on a “net cut in spending”), to the tune of $1 trillion. This sequester is just nibbling away at baseline-budgeting, there are no substantial cuts. If they go nuts over these paltry “cuts” then they’re not serious about balancing the budget & should leave office promptly (that includes Boehner too).

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Skibum Willy

    Watch “Occupying Chairlifts” on youtube, a simple rule tweak on inheritance ends up changing the direction and purpose of modern human life! Here’s a fair way to transition forward, something specific we can demand, protest for, and adopt ourselves! Spread it around! If this isnt the best answer, at least we’re thinking about what might be. What if we were really just this close to having it work right?
    Oh yeah, it’s a Ski movie thing. Watch “Occupying Chairlifts” on Youtube!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. atwitsend

    “I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election… It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!”

    Quote by: George W. Malone
    (1890-1961) U.S. Senator (Nevada)
    Date: 1957
    Source: speaking before Congress

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. john doe

    You are right what Obama has done will only start to effect us this year and for the next 10. Its really going to start and show in 2014 and 2015 how bad things are going to get. America is starting to wake up to the corruption and is starting to speak out. WE need more now though to stop the rest of the destruction we are likely to incurr in the next 4 years.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. john doe

    You are right what Obama has done will only start to effect us this year and for the next 10. Its really going to start and show in 2014 and 2015 how bad things are going to get. America is starting to wake up to the corruption and is starting to speak out. WE need more now though to stop the rest of the destruction we are likely to incurr in the next 4 years.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  8. Adrin Strachan

    and John Kerry just gave Mohammad Mursi 450-480 mil.

    fuk these politicians

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  9. MongoMedicineMan

    Half the cuts ARE military. Confused? Old Fart explains it well here… watch?v=hWT0JYd6r54

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. llg4ever

    Sequester … what a joke – why don’t you cut the war machine assholes????

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Jay Stimson

    If the DHS targets aren’t enough to convince you of the Obama regime’s intentions then you must be completely brain dead. Wake the hell up America !!! It’s time to make a stand against tyranny. /watch?v=0DJTaEmaWbQ

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. revolution4freedom1

    YOU asked why he said “2016″. You got the reason right, its the Presidential year. Now keep your own rants to yourself.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. ckairnes68

    Right, Executive Orders were never meant for a President to enforce upon the People. They were meant only to direct members of the administration or military to carry out laws created by the Congress. We can thank Abraham Lincoln for redefining what an executive order is and how they were to be used. The Reconstruction Acts also changed the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia unlawfully to subjugate the citizens.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. jyeamans02

    Its an excuse to hurt the little people on disability benefits, shaft the teachers and screw the last of the honest cops left out there…

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. monjiaitaly

    don’t forget executive orders, those alone signed by obama should make us revolt.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. monjiaitaly

    these people in washington are incompetent and unwilling to cut, but what people fail to understand is yeah, go ahead and tax the rich more, we will all suffer from that. CUT THE GD SPENDING OBAMA, get some balls and do what is right.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. ckairnes68

    Of course not, but we do vote for the House and Senate, which has more of an impact on our lives. They are the ones who are passing the legislation which affect us. The President only can choose to execute those laws or not. My point in asking; why 2016 was because, it shouldn’t matter who we vote into office as President because the current Congress and President will have done the damage long before 2017 when the next President takes office. Why should we wait until then to revolt?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. bnfox

    lolol – had same reaction and came to post comment…and there you are! So true – these clowns here treat him with near reverance now and I remember specifically this bunch, like all the others, ridiculing Paul.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. muzta14

    This filthy Koch Brothers shill is not even a Congressman anymore so should STFU!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  20. jhhgz

    The dollar as a safe haven? It’s only the prettiest pig at the ball and it is being devalued by the Fed. This is a safe haven? Laughable…

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. Glamrma

    This is a perfect example of a red herring!!!!!!!!!

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. revolution4freedom1

    We have presidential elections every 2 years now?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. nickhb90

    Haha .. why didn’t she bring that up when he was still on

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Jim Blake

    Risk aversion ? I think I will stick with Dr Paul young lady .. :-)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. Dozguyz314

    I know. I live in Missouri 2 laws were introduced this week to block any new Infringements and 1 for the Audit of the Fed :)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. ckairnes68

    If all the gun grabbing legislation is enacted and the criminal de facto government demand the people to turn in their weapons, you will see the 2nd American Civil/Revolutionary War. Keep an eye on Missouri and Minnesota.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. ckairnes68

    2014 is the next election year but that is besides the point. Do you think the next election for the criminal de facto government President would really stop a Civil War?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. Dozguyz314

    Because Washington DC will get an Enema then .

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. engine2truck6

    It is safe to treat Dr Paul with respect now that the election is over.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. cch62

    haha! Yes! “I personally believe….”

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. cch62

    haha! Yes! “I personally believe….”

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. wheine34

    That chick at the end sounded like Miss South Carolina.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. revolution4freedom1

    Thats the next election year, duh.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. ckairnes68

    Why 2016?

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. Dozguyz314

    So Glad to hear an opinion from someone who is Honest and is Loyal to the USA these UN agents are ruining our country. I Hope the Civil war can be prevented till 2016

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0