54 responses to “Ron Paul: Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston”

  1. Free Bird

    Ron Paul no one was crying you idiot. You and your supporters are a bunch of white trash. Blah Blah.

    »crosslinked«

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

  2. FreedomsReigning

    “Fact is hes more of a LIBERTARIAN which REQUIRES a GOVERNMENT.”

    I am a Libertarian, a Constitutionalist, and a Republican. If you are too, it should piss you off that an Anarchist masqueraded in your political coloration’s. He’s tying you to a bunch of Anarchists trash.

    Anarchists are a repellent force, a stench that drives people away, and the establishment is trying to attach them to what people want, liberty.

    I’m sorry you don’t understand. I wish you did. They need to be dealt with.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. FreedomsReigning

    “RP and his supporters are NOT Anarchist or Communist.”

    Who’s living in denial? Open your eyes. Ron Paul calls himself a Voluntarist. Voluntarism is called Anarchism. Those who advocate Anarchism are called Anarchists. Anarchists are frauds who know what they offer fails. They sell Communism as voluntary.

    Ron Paul hangs out with Anarchists and Communists such as his long time friend and associate Lew Rockwell.

    Wake up! He’s a two faced fraud. He’s had his chance to deny it, but he can’t.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. klubs9017

    Wow your really in denial aren’t you? You cant seem to admit the fact RP is not a Anarchist. And u sound like a paranoid maniac ranting about things you don’t understand.. ha you even like your own comments. You would rather believe the delusional reality you’ve created for yourself, then look at the facts.

    RP and his supporters are NOT Anarchist or Communist. No matter how many times you tell yourself that. Fact is hes more of a LIBERTARIAN which REQUIRES a GOVERNMENT. Do some Research bud.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. FreedomsReigning

    “So if Ron Paul does a interview with Lew Rockwell, No it doesn’t make rp a Anarcho-cap”

    Lew Rockwell has been Ron Paul’s close friend and associate for the past 40 years. He’s NOT an Anarcho-Capitalist. He’s an Anarchist.

    He’s the executor for the estate to the king of Anarchist trash Murray Rothbard. I wouldn’t even share a beer with an Anarchist. They’re repellent frauds and two faced liars who think they’re surrounded by sheep, retards and imbeciles.

    They get what’s coming them.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. klubs9017

    The fact that you call him Anarchist when hes obviously not, shows me your going to believe what you want to. I have a friend in Russia who is a communist.. that doesn’t make me a communist. So if rp does a interview with Lew Rockwell, No it doesn’t make rp a Anarcho-cap.

    You scream Anarchist Anarchist! But fail to understand what that actually means. Rp has always supported a Limited government. Anarchist= No Government. Rp knows a government is necessary. Being paranoid clouds our judgement.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. FreedomsReigning

    I know what’ he tells people’, but what he tells people doesn’t make any sense. Look at the kind of frauds he hangs out with, Anarchists and Communists. If you can be honest about it, him saying Anarcho-Capitalism is his ultimate goal starts making sense.

    He’s a two faced fraud. I don’t need to equivocate about Anarchism or try to use Anarchists to serve my purpose. They oppose my purpose and he can’t be honest about it with his supporters, I can no longer support him.

    He had his chance.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. klubs9017

    **April 7th 2013**

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. klubs9017

    April 24 2013 at Oberlin College RP was asked hes thoughts on Anocho-cap and he said

    “I don’t accept that, but I’ll certainly accept the minimalist approach to government with the sole purpose of protecting liberty, property, and contract. I am not a Anarcho-cap”

    He says he supports more of a Minarchism view, requiring a Limited government as oppose to Anarcho-cap which has No government.

    What your saying is simply not true. Both are VERY similar but one requires a Government.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Jim Kane

    Exellent

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. FreedomsReigning

    You don’t seem to know what an Anarchist is. They aren’t hell bent on holding the country together, defending the Constitution, participating in self government or serving justice. They’re freeloaders trying to “opt out” and destroy all of the above.

    They’re hell bent on breaking up the country, (sign any petitions for secession?) demonize the very idea of “a collective” (freedom, liberty, and their common defense?) and do nothing but spit on everything my forefathers created and stood for.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. john gatter

    you’re right, my bad. I thought you were another poster who made another comment. sorry bout that.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. john gatter

    they don’t seem hellbent in breaking up the country. they seem hellbent in holding the country together and protecting the freedoms your forefathers handed to you.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. FreedomsReigning

    The only useful thing that’s come from Ron Paul is to get people to start thinking about liberty, but what comes from it won’t be Anarchism. Anarchists are a repellent force.

    He should have been making the connection between liberty and justice, but like most Anarchists, he can’t really talk about justice because justice is why we create governments in the first place, to defend liberty. Their BS falls apart. Anarchists think injustice originates from government.

    They’re useless to liberty.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. FreedomsReigning

    What HE is saying doesn’t make sense.

    He says he’s a Libertarian, a Constitutionalist, and a Republican, but he also says he’s a Voluntarist and that his ultimate purpose is Anarcho- Capitalism (Anarchism). Voluntarism is Anarchism.

    Anarchism is just Communism sold to people who don’t understand why it fails or why governments are created in the first place.

    You can’t be all those things at the same time. They oppose each other. His ultimate purpose is to destroy that which he claims to be.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. klubs9017

    I think I see where your coming from now.. But what your saying doesn’t make sense. You say RP is a anarchist = someone who wants No government and no rules. You say RP is a communist = someone who wants a classless society, Big government and anti capitalism. RP is more of a Libertarian = admits the requirement of government but wants little intervention from it as possible + pro capitalism. I could understand your confusion because of the similarities of the 3.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. FreedomsReigning

    What do you want to know about Anarchism, Communism and Ron Paul?

    I can tell you anything you want to know. Anarchists masquerade as something they aren’t (your bud) and prey on young people with worthless slogans and drivel. (Get em young right?) They offer people NOTHING and try and sell nothing as having value in the defense of liberty.

    All they offer is destruction. Anarchists are worthless to liberty. Liberty is the foundation justice is built on, yet they condemn those serving justice.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  18. klubs9017

    I gave you a chance to explain your side of the story and you go on a dramatic rant about Anarchist again. I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt. What are you so paranoid about? Tell me whats up

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. FreedomsReigning

    “You must be in your 50′s or 60′s ”

    Nope, but it’s interesting that you believe somebody has to be 50 or 60 to understand that Communism and Anarchism are a fraud.

    Get em while they’re young right? Well sorry “bud”, you don’t have to be 50 or 60 to have discernment or to understand that Anarchists are worthless to liberty.

    Anarchists are just another version of an establishment tool trying to destroy what they hate and fear, the United States and the rule of law used to defend your liberty.

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply