Contact

16122 Responses




RonPaul.com is a grassroots-run “Fan Site” – we have no direct contact with Ron Paul!

If you’d like to send a message to Ron Paul, please contact the Campaign for Liberty, the successor organization of Ron Paul’s presidential campaign, through their online form, or call them at (703) 865-7162.

This information is provided for the convenience of our fellow supporters and other interested parties. It does not imply endorsement by or association with Ron Paul and/or the Campaign for Liberty!


Would you like to contact the grassroots supporters at RonPaul.com? Please only do so for the following reasons…

  • To send us Ron Paul-related news, photos, videos, recordings, events etc. that we might have missed and that should be posted on this site.
  • To send us feedback, comments and questions about this site that you’d rather not post publicly.
  • If you want to help out as a volunteer in running this site; please state your skills, background and time availability in as much detail as possible.
  • To suggest business ideas, products and services, potential alliances, link requests, etc.

Do not contact us with interview requests, autograph requests, random news not related to Ron Paul, messages intended for Ron Paul personally, anything about Rand Paul, or requests to be removed from a physical mailing list (we don’t have one).

Due to the massive volume of emails received each day we can respond only to a very small percentage of requests. If you’d like to make a comment or ask a question about Ron Paul, posting a public message at the bottom of this page is a more effective option to make your voice heard. Other supporters will be able to see your message and respond.

Email the authors of this website:

grassroots@ronpaul.com

Or complete and submit this contact form:





Your Name (required)

Your Email Address (required)

Subject (please be specific)

Your Message

What's Ron Paul's full first name? 

Disclaimer: The RonPaul.com website is maintained by independent grassroots supporters and is not paid for, affiliated with, or endorsed by Ron Paul.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

16,122 responses to “Contact”

  1. stojan nenadovic

    Ron Paul will be President with non-credit money.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Jarrod Sutton

    Long time fan Mr Paul, if only you had won the Republican nomination for the Republican party, we may not have a socialist for a President. I watched Bruno last night (for laughs), and thought your performance was great, its a pity however, that you did not punch the queer bastard...NOT...(thats a joke from Borat) watch that too. Actually I'm Australian, and subscribed to Ron Pauls email last year during the campaign (again just for laughs)...Ron Paul will never get elected and is an idiot, the future is not liberitarian, liberitarians (and their neo-con and economic rationalism butt buddies (by that I mean Reagan, Bush, Bush, Cheney...and all the rest)screwed American (and the world and now the future is big government and lots of regulation...you may as well just give up, really theres no point...enjoy your day.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. H S Caterpillar

      All of that from one piece of navel fuzz?

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. stojan nenadovic

    Non-credit money is the way for solving both national and world economic crisis. Non-credit money is the necessary additional quantity of money in circulation (dM) as percentage (k) of existing quantity of money in circulation (M). dM = kM ;
    k = (supply - demand)/demand ; If non-credit money is emitted according to the cited formula, inflation cannot exist.
    Also, taxes are annulled for the amount of non-credit money.
    The consumers pay less and producers get more than today, in the order of credit money. All get!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Benjamin Fuller

      Hmmm Please send more info!!!!

      Isn't money itself a credit? How can physical currency be constantly monitored? How can the goods/services be prevented from changing in price? Circulation (supply/demand) dictates price no?

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Levin Sheridan

    What does Ron Paul think of the book SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE and has this book provided useful information to him and other members of government concerning the Federal Reserve Bank?

    Thank you! LS

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. dan

    The Socialization of America
    By Dr. David Noebel
    March 27, 2009
    THIS IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT FOLKS...READ ON
    In retrospect, we might discover that 1883 was a most significant year. We’re familiar with 1848 giving us The Communist Manifesto and 1859 giving us The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. But 1883 gave us three portentous happenings. These seemingly unrelated happenings turned history toward socialism.

    1. Karl Marx died on March 14, 1883, and was buried in Highgate Cemetery in London, England. The assumption that Communism died with him was logical since only six people attended his funeral. But the truth is that it had not yet begun its murderous journey through the 20th century.

    2. John Maynard Keynes was born on June 5, 1883, in Cambridge, England. His political, economic, and moral influence continues to affect every American.

    3. The Fabian Socialist Society was an offshoot of The Fellowship of the New Life, which was born in October 1883 in London, England.

    Today’s financial events illustrate that America is not exempt from being led toward socialism. Predictions differ, depending on one’s perspective, as to whether this will be a socialistic paradise or a socialistic hell. Time will tell. In the meantime, we’d do well to listen to warnings from the past.

    Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on socialism: “The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of spiritual suffering and poverty.”

    Socialist George Bernard Shaw added: “You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner.”

    That’s probably why Margaret Thatcher added that the “problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

    Today, we can link the U. S. House of Representatives—and its radical, progressive, socialistic societies and caucuses— directly to Karl Marx through Keynes and the Fabians.

    Before identifying many of the House members caught up in the socialist web, however, let’s first identify the major economic dogma of the early socialists.

    Socialism is the economic system of both the Marxist-Leninist worldview and the Fabian Society worldview. John Maynard Keynes was a member of the British Fabian Society, whose American counterparts were the Intercollegiate Socialist Society and the League for Industrial Democracy. Their American voices were centered in the ideas of Norman Thomas and John Dewey among others. Dewey, you may remember, was an early signatory of The Humanist Manifesto (1933) and its atheistic, socialist gospel.

    Socialists are united in their desire to see capitalism destroyed, either forcefully or gradually, and most would rejoice if Christianity were destroyed along with it. Socialists and liberals generally see in Christians “an infallible marker of mental retardation.” (Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2008/09, p. 6)

    The Christian worldview endorses sound or hard money, fiscal responsibility, saving for a rainy day, deferred gratification, paying off monthly credit card bills, living within one’s means, etc. Keynesian economics, by contrast, argues for consumption, extravagance, and not providing for the future, arguing that “the great vice is saving, thrift, and financial prudence.” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 63) Keynesians love huge national spending, debt, and high inflation—anathema to Christians and conservatives.

    Socialists see capitalism as an evil economic system founded on the concepts of profit, individualism, private property, private business, freedom to buy and sell products and services, etc. Indeed, a working definition of capitalism is “the peaceful and free exchange of goods and services without theft, fraud, and breech of contract.” Capitalism is tailored to individual initiative rather than groupthink or community initiative. Nearly all inventions that have furthered the capitalistic enterprise and blessed humanity in the process have been the result of individual initiative rather than committee, group, or government activity.

    Marx advanced the socialist cause by calling for social or public ownership of property and the abolition of private property. He believed that people were best suited to work on state farms, public parks, nationalized banks, or the government bureaucracy rather than for private employers, who would certainly take advantage of their employees, causing them both social and economic harm. Marx was an economic leech on fellow communist Engels, who supported him with his capitalistic father’s monies.

    George Bernard Shaw represented the Fabian point of view by calling for “the socialization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange” to bring about an equal distribution of goods and services to all members of society and to make the State “the ALL of social well-being.” The State “subsumes all economic life of the nation.”

    In other words, socialism is an economic system that downplays the individual in favor of the group, social order, or the State. It is a system in which the State directs the economic activity of the social order through central planning and by placing economic activity under the jurisdiction of the State. Socialism is also known as collectivism or Statism and, to Marx, Communism.

    Today, we call this economic system “interventionism” or Keynesism. Interventionism is a kind of socialism or communism, but without the destruction of the bourgeoisie (which were slaughtered by the millions by Soviet and Chinese communists). Today’s Fabians/Progressives/ Radicals allow their capitalist enemies to create wealth, but acquire it by taxing them instead of slaughtering them (Marx’s “reign of terrorism on the bourgeoisie”). They are then free to distribute the wealth among the economically disadvantaged, the intellectual elites, and the superior governing classes.

    Such (re)distribution of wealth ensures the favorable vote of the masses being fed, entertained, housed (with sub-prime loans) and doctored. ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and socialism fit hand-in-glove just as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fit Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd to a “T.”

    Most Americans are totally unaware that the U.S. House of Representatives crawls with a large, well-organized assembly of socialist organizations. These organizations are dedicated to (a) bringing about the destruction of the capitalist economic system (portrayed as greedy, conservative, religious, and/or filthy rich) and (b) slowly but surely bringing production, education, food, and health care under the complete control and regulation of the federal government.

    A prime example of this governmental takeover is the carbon tax currently under discussion. It would punish business and industry’s use of gas and oil products (which according to Al Gore will warm the planet by one degree over the next 100 years) by “allowing] the federal government to ‘control every aspect of our economy,’ according to Christopher Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute” (The Weekly Standard, March 16, 2009, p. 17).

    The legislators involved in this socialistic undertaking belong to one or more radical House organizations: the Progressive Democrats of America (6 House members), the Congressional Progressive Caucus (74 House members), the Congressional Black Caucus (43 House members), and the Democratic Socialists of America.

    Incidentally, the Democratic Socialists of America do not identify their House members since they consider all members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus part of their membership due to the fact that “they both shared operative social democratic politics.” The most prominent national member of DSA is AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney, who could well be the most powerful influence in the House of Representatives. And for the record, the Chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus is Congressional Progressive Caucus member Barbara Lee (CA-9). The interconnections between all these socialist-based organizations is staggering.

    These organizations and their members quite literally comprise a Socialist Red Army within the very contours of the House of Representatives. According to the Wikipedia article on the organization, “The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the single largest partisan caucus in the United States House of Representatives and works together to advance progressive [socialist] issues and causes. The CPC was founded in 1991 by independent [socialist] Congressman Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who remains a member as Senator. [The CPC] represents about a third of the House Democratic Caucus. Of the twenty standing committees of the House, eleven are chaired by members of the CPC.”

    When the CPC claimed 64 members in 2006 (now 74 and gaining), the leftist publication The Nation boasted, “The largest ideological caucus in the new House Democratic majority will be the Congressional Progressive Caucus, with a membership that includes New York’s Charles Rangel, Michigan’s John Conyers, Massachusetts’s Barney Frank and at least half the incoming chairs of House standing committees” (The Nation, November 12,2006).

    These current eleven chairs are CPC members:

    •George Miller (CA-9)—Chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee;
    •Henry Waxman (CA-30)—Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce;
    •Bob Filner (CA-51)—Chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee;
    •Barney Frank (MA-4)—Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee;
    •John Conyers (MI-14)—Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee;
    •Bennie Thompson (MS-2)—Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee;
    •Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)—Chairwoman of the House Small Business Committee;
    •Charles Rangel (NY-15)—Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee;
    •Louise Slaughter (N Y-28)—Chairwoman of the House Rules Committee;
    •Bob Brady (PA-1)—Chairman of the House Administration Committee; and
    •Edward J. Markey (MA-7)—Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.
    As of February 20,2009, the Co-Chairs of the CPC are Raul M. Grijalva (AZ-7) and Lynn Woolsey (CA-6). The Vice Chairs are Diane Watson (CA-33), Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18), Mazie Hirono (HI-2), and Dennis Kucinich (OH-10). Incidentally, the CPC website was “hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America” until 1999, a group affiliated with the Socialist International which was founded by Karl Marx, Saint-Simon, and Fourier!

    The Commission for a Sustainable World Society is one of the Socialist International’s sub-organizations. Until President Obama picked Carol M. Browner as his global warming czar, Browner was a member in good standing of the Socialist International. Upon her appointment, her name and biography were removed from its website “though a photo of her speaking June 30 to the group’s congress in Greece was still available” (The Washington Times, January 12,2009, p. 1). We can expect Browner to manipulate and push for every piece of socialist legislation to advance the defeat of capitalism and the imposition of more government on the American people. Oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy represent capitalism, and we can expect Congressional socialists to do everything in their legislative power to thwart their discovery, drilling, usage, and distribution. Socialists promote wind(mill) power because they know it alone cannot meet the energy needs of a capitalist economy and will, therefore, hasten the death of capitalism.

    Browner will enjoy a great deal of support from the newly appointed Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, who is also a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. And when Browner needs further help, she can rely on the committee chairs, co-chairs, and vice chairs listed above to assist her in using the global warming/climate change scare to bring the United States of America into a socialistic world governing body. She can also count on former CPC member Nancy Pelosi (who is already manifesting dictatorial tendencies) to drive the socialist agenda as fast as humanly possible. Pelosi’s San Francisco district (CA-8) is synonymous with socialism/ progressivism/ collectivism/statism/leftism/radicalism that in turn are synonymous with scientific socialism/communism/ Marxism/Leninism/Maoism.

    We have yet to address the ideological role played by John Maynard Keynes in the demise of American capitalism and Christian influence. Anyone with a Christian, conservative bent fears the reality that the United States is falling headlong off the cliff into socialism and all that this will entail. It is no secret that the radical left is both anti-capitalist and anti-Christian. Marx would be, no doubt ecstatic, realizing that his life’s work of dethroning God and destroying capitalism are about to be accomplished.

    Zygmund Dobbs conducted the research for Keynes at Harvard (KeynesatHarvard.org) and summarizes the political, moral, and economic slant of Keynes and his friends at Cambridge University: “Singing the Red Flag, the highborn sons of the British upper-class lay on the carpeted floor spinning out socialist schemes in homosexual intermissions….The attitude in such gatherings was anti-establishmentarian. To them the older generation was horribly out of date, even superfluous. The capitalist system was declared obsolete and revolution was proclaimed as the only solution. Christianity was pronounced an enemy force, and the worst sort of depravities were eulogized as ‘that love which passes all Christian understanding.’ Chief of this ring of homosexual revolutionaries was John Maynard Keynes…Keynes was characterized by his male sweetheart, Lytton Strachey, as ‘a liberal and a sodomite, an atheist and a statistician.’ His particular depravity was the sexual abuse of little boys.”

    Keynes, like Marx, had a fixation that should have been a clue to his character. Marx practiced phrenology (the study of bumps on one’s head), and Keynes practiced chirognomy (the study of people’s hands). After studying the hands of Charles Darwin’s brother, Sir George, Keynes remarked, “His hands certainly looked as if they might be descended from an ape.”

    Overall, Keynes despised free or private enterprise, considered homosexuality superior to heterosexuality, sought to replace the gold standard with fiat paper money which was more easily produced by government printing presses, did not believe in the family unit, despised “savings” as a stumbling block against the march of socialism, called on the state to control the number of children per family.

    The Keynesian economic formula fits all totalitarianisms, including Fascism, Nazism, and Communism. Sir Oswald Mosley, for example, was a Fascist leader and a member of the Fabian Society. Lauchlin Currie, a prominent Keynesian advocate, was a Soviet spy and an economic aide to F.D.R. Joan Robinson, a Marxist economist, assisted Keynes in some of his economic writings, arguing, “the differences between Marx and Keynes are only verbal.” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 68; also see Mark Skousen, The Making of Modern Economics, p. 433)

    Keynes also had a strong relationship with the notorious Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. Keynes considered White to be “the central figure in the Keynesian manipulations in the United States.” Harry Dexter White just happened to be the Assistant to the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. Even after White was exposed as a Soviet spy, Keynesians to this day “see nothing wrong in White’s Soviet role,” a “typical . . . attitude of Fabian socialist elements toward the whole coterie of spies and Fifth Amendment communists in the United States” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 83).

    It was Keynes himself who admitted that by “a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate, but confiscate arbitrarily: and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some [e.g., Al Gore]. The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million can diagnose.”

    Thus it is astounding that Larry Summers, head of President Obama’s National Economic Council and former president of Harvard University, when asked by Charlie Rose “what idea, what person has most influenced your thinking on how to deal with this [financial] mess?” without hesitation answered “Keynes.”

    Following the economic advice of Keynes (huge government spending, debt, and inflation) is kissing the American capitalist system goodnight! His advice is what every socialist would give, even though clear-thinking, common sense Americans know that excessive debt and excessive spending are the main ingredients that created this current financial mess (with the help of Congressional Progressives like Barney Frank hatching socialist schemes in the House of Representatives).

    When Whittaker Chambers took up his sling and aimed his rock at Communism, he admitted that he hit “something else.” What he hit “was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which, in the name of liberalism, spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades.”

    That inching is fast becoming a rout with national and international socialists alike thinking their best opportunity to strike a deathblow to the greatest, freest economic system in all of human history is now.

    Because capitalism has raised more human beings out of poverty than all other economic systems combined, we should remember the wisdom of Robert Heilbroner, a former Marxist economist who changed his position before the fall of the Berlin Wall: “The Soviet Union, China, and Eastern Europe have given us the clearest possible proof that capitalism organizes the material affairs of humankind more satisfactorily than socialism: that however inequitably or irresponsibly the marketplace may distribute goods, it does so better than the queues of a planned economy; however mindless the culture of commercialism, it is more attractive than state moralism; and however deceptive the ideology of a business civilization, it is more believable than that of a socialist one.”

    Little wonder that Winston Churchill painted socialism as a philosophy of failure, a creed of ignorance, and a gospel of envy whose inherent virtue “is the equal sharing of misery.”

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Clarissa Nation

    Announce as soon as possible. Get the ball rolling.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Michelle

    Obama stinks. Commie bastard. I knew he'd suck. Too bad the monsters in DC railroaded Ron Paul. Obama the kiss ass is doing whatever his puppeteers tell him to. He's not undone anything Bush did and has done much more to oppress Americans.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Gary Price

    If elected for President, will Ron Paul reopen a new, independent 9/11 investigation and JFK investigation?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Pax Tielman

    Please Ron you do know that the whole government is just nothingelse bu a big FRAUD. Let's have this link forwarded to all american soldiers. Lets not fight. If there are no soldiers, there will be no generals.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2435306494963970680

    I am from Sweden and our country, via the EU, will be affected by the secret government.
    Kind regards
    Pax Tielman

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Allan Petersen

    Dear Ron Paul and supporters,

    I beg of you - if it won't work making americans wake up - please come to Denmark. We need people of you integrety and most of all in these times of greed.
    I will spend all my time off job teaching you danish!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Chester L. McWhorter Sr

    You must tackle the fascist CFR and all its sub-elements of which thw FED is only a part. An important part to be sure. Chet...

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Chris

    According to the Federal Reserve website and I quote "The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review. Under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (enacted in 1978 as Public Law 95-320), which authorizes the Comptroller General of the United States to audit the Federal Reserve System, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has conducted numerous reviews of Federal Reserve activities. In addition, the Board's Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits and investigates Board programs and operations as well as those Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks. Completed and active GAO reviews and completed OIG audits, reviews, and assessments are listed in the Board’s Annual Report (before 2002, the reviews were listed in the Board's Annual Report: Budget Review). " but then it says "To ensure financial accountability, the financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors are audited annually by an independent outside auditor. In addition, the Government Accountability Office, as well as the Board's Office of Inspector General, can audit Federal Reserve activities."
    they are audited by "independent outside auditor" haha someone they know/own prob,
    notice how the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act wasnt put into place till 1978, FED started 1913 Dec 23, supposedly only 3 congress members were there to pass the act.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. Steph

    I don't know what will become of America. There is no honesty in any politician that I can see. Not even Ron Paul.
    I heard that he had over 90 earmarks in this last bill. Very disheartening. I liked Ron.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Nate Y

      Hello Steph,

      It appears you misunderstand what earmarks are and how Ron Paul's actions are entirely consistent with his positions. Please read this...http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/earmark-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-15168. Also see his recent discussion with Neil Cavuto.

      Don't be disheartened at all.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. ZAPEM

    The election is a total fraud, TruWrecks, but in more ways than the public realizes.

    Neither Barack Obama, John McCain or Roger Calero were constitutionally eligible to run for POTUS. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 that you need to be a "natural-born citizen" in order to run for POTUS. A natural born citizen is a person who is born on U.S. soil, of TWO American citizens at the TIME OF BIRTH.

    Barack Obama was born of a Kenyan father under British control and an American mother. He does NOT meet the criteria. John McCain was born in Colon, Panama, in a hospital outside the military base, unfortunately excluding him as well.

    The Senate knows this and tried to pass a bill in March, 2008 which tried to legislate John McCain into being a natural born citizen. That bill failed. The truth is, one cannot be legislated into being a natural born citizen. It's a status one has at the time of their birth. The only way to change what the Constitution says is to amend it through Article V. All attempts to amend that pertinent clause in Article II have failed to date.

    After the bill failed in March, 2008, Sen. McCaskill attempted to side-step the Constitution by sponsoring a non-binding resolution S.R. 511. In that document, co-sponsored by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, they tried to deceive the American public through the media by pointing out it was a unanimous decision by the Senate to hold John McCain as a natural born citizen with legal opinions that were attached to the memo. While it had no force of law at all, they didn't point this fact out to the public, but rather, allowed the media to run with a story that told the public that the Senate had come to a conclusion about John McCain's citizen status that was purely false according to the Constitution.

    Through this atrocious mishandling of information and operations within the government to manipulate the 2008 election, we the people relied on them for honest answers, and what they gave us were ineligible candidates, one of which, they are now ALLOWING to take the highest office in the land. We have had 25 lawsuits on this matter with several having reached the United States Supreme Court, all being ignored because now they don't know what to do because the people weren't as stupid as they believed we were. So they instead, dismiss our petitions and act as if the Constitution doesn't exist.

    The people have been duped. The GOP and DNC have maliciously and unbelievably manipulated this election, knowing the candidates were ineligible to run. The only hope is to have someone in the Senate and the House stand as the ballots are counted and object. Unfortunately, these lame congress people are afraid of being laughed at because they have successfully fed lies to the American people as to what the Constitution says and anyone who might bring up the truth now, is threatened to be hung out to dry.

    The people are being led down a road of losing their Constitution, the one and ONLY document that preserves their freedom via politicians who were willing to sell that document in lieu of getting their party into the White House. That's all they were concerned about and if they tell you they are concerned about the Constitution, they were lying.

    Every single one of these congress people involved should lose their seats, be impeached and the process started to begin taking this country back in line with what the framers intended. It is the only way to preserve our freedom and turn around this mess of a government. The only reason we are in the economic mess we are in and the wars we are in, is BECAUSE of turning our backs on the TRUE Constitution, the way it was written and the way our brilliant forefathers protected us from harm.

    Ron Paul is the constitution politician. Ask him why he won't take a stand for the Constitution in January and stop this madness from continuing? We only need one Senator and one House representative, yet where are they? Silent on the matter, as usual. They don't want to lose their seats. But they will anyway by the time we are done telling the people what really happened in 2008.

    If there's any question as to who ZAPEM is, we are the group who originally defended Leo C. Donofrio in his battle up to the United States Supreme Court in Donofrio v. Wells (NJ) that started the ball rolling against these illegitimate candidates jointly and severely in accord with the CONSTITUTION and not a birth certificate.

    We intend to continue this fight and refuse to shut up until someone in Washington does what they took oaths to do -- defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, which is the ONLY thing they are there to do.

    We don't care what party you are, but if they can't do at least that much for the people of this country, they are in effect, communists of this country and we will expose them and the media doing it until the word is completely out to the people.

    Then let the people will decide who was telling the truth and who was lying. It is the people in the end, who will either keep or destroy their own freedom and this was noted by the framers who signed those documents back in 1787.

    If we don't wake up soon, we will accept any type of forced socialism out of sheer desperation to survive and Ron Paul knows it, hence all the videos that point to what we're saying, but doesn't address the root of the problem that is causing it -- putting in elected officials, against the Constitution, who don't belong there and setting a precedent in history that violates the Constitution, including a president, who claims our Constitution is "flawed and needs to be changed".

    Enjoy your change, America! You're going to get more than you ever thought was coming.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. greg

      WOW! That was very well thought out. Came across totally complete.
      I Agree with every Red White and Blue cell in my body.
      I can only hope America has found faith in who or whatever God you
      believe in.Myself Jesus knows I am on his side, and I am ready to fight like...., well you know. Hold on it's going to be a bumpy
      downhill ride.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. TruWrecks

    The election process is a total fraud! There is no other way a candidate like Obama could win such a huge victory with his voting record.

    We need someone in the Oval Office that know the difference between "Change" and "Make a Difference".

    "We, The People" just signed away all of the liberties that make America worth coming to. Hopefully we make it to the 2012 election as a free country so we can "Make a Difference".

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. Rocky

    12-27-2008

    USURY, THE ROOT CAUSE OF OUR FINANCIAL WOES.
    "Greed" and "the love of money" have been selfish and destructive traits of men throughout history. These traits have been amplified, however, by the allowance of the principles of "Usury" and "Fractional Reserve Banking". Usury; the act of lending money at an rate of interest or an exorbitant rate of interest. Fractional Reserve Banking; the act of lending out several times the amount of money a bank has on deposit. These two tools have been used by the past money changers and present day International Bankers to create the greatest accumulation of wealth for a small minority of men, who are legally allowed to use these tools, and the greatest amount of debt the U.S. government and the American people in our history. Usury is a "zero-sum game" where someone gains at another's loss. Unfortunately, the loser is usually the one least able to pay. It is a "win-lose" system where those who have been empowered to loan money (Federal Reserve Banks and International Banks) win, and the people and nations lose. It is a rigged game where the rich get richer and the poorer get poorer. Abolishing these two tools (Usury and Fractional Reserve Banking) from our financial system would not stop "greed" and "the love of money". Some men will always do what they can get away with regardless of the expense to others. But it would contain the greed, thus reversing much financial suffering of the majority of people, over time. It seems clear that we need a more equitable financial system, a "win-win" system that benefits the whole of mankind and not just the few who take advantage of others, for profit.
    Listed below is a reference from the writings of Aristotle and four references from the bible, all warning man against the use of the Babylon usury system. We have neither listened to nor heeded these warnings and, therefore, have allowed this adversarial tool and the money changers (International Bankers) to rob us of our prosperity and make debt slaves out of our present and future generations. Will we, now, finally listen and learn the lesson of the ages?

    Aristotle

    Aristotle (384-322 BC) formulated the classical view against usury.

    Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn't beget more money the way cows beget more cows. He knew that "Money exists not by nature but by law":

    "The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), which means the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent.

    Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth, this is the most unnatural." (1258b POLITICS)

    And he especially disliked usurers:

    "...those who ply sordid trades, pimps and all such people, and those who lend small sums at high rates. For all these take more than they ought, and from the wrong sources. What is common to them is evidently a sordid love of gain..." (1122a, ETHICS)

    Deuteronomy 23:19

    Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:

    Ezekiel 18:8-9

    He that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and man, Hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept my judgments, to deal truly; he is just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord GOD.

    Leviticus 25:37

    Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.

    "DANIEL'S VISION

    Daniel was given a vision of the Babylonian succession of world powers. The vision was an image of a man with a head of gold, representing Babylon itself, arms of silver representing Medo-Persia, body of brass representing Greece, and legs of iron representing Rome. The feet were mixed iron and clay. A stone "cut out without hands" was to come out of heaven and destroy this system by striking it at the feet, "at the time of the end" after it secretly gained control of the world, therefore becoming "MYSTERY, Babylon the Great, the whore that sitieth upon many waters (nations) committing fornication with the Kings of the earth." (Rev. 18-3)

    Archaeological searches have uncovered much evidence of Babylon's social and economic systems which were very similar to ours of today. For instance, the Igibi Bank was found with thousands of clay tablet 'notes' and interest (usury) bearing contracts which served as their money.

    Babylon loaned much money at interest (usury) to Persia which, of course, Persia could not repay. Therefore, Persia conquered Babylon to eliminate its debt and acquire Babylon's gold.

    Persia adopted the Babylonian usury system and loaned Greece much money at interest (usury). Greece, of course, could not repay the debt and conquered Persia to eliminate its debt and acquire the gold in Persia.

    Greece adopted the Babylonian usury system and loaned Rome much money at interest (usury). Rome, of course, could not repay the debt and conquered Greece to eliminate its debt and acquire the gold in Greece.

    After the fall of Imperial Rome, the various nations of Europe were kept in bondage and poverty by the ABs (International Bankers) for many centuries, known as the Dark Ages."

    "DANIEL'S VISION" is an excerpt from the Phoenix Journal 53, Tangled Webs Volume IX - If There Be "Will" There Be "Way" ,by Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn-Aton

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. Patriot

    Obama is a fraud. His name is Barry Soetero and he is an INDONESIAN citizen. He cannot be President according to Constitution. Must be natural born, not naturalized. Why isn't Mr. Paul making this known?!

    Further, McCain was born in Panama, and according to 1795 Congress, all foreign born children born to Americans, are known as citizens but not known as "natural born" citizens, as the Constitution requires for the presidency.

    Both of these men are ineligible to be president! Why isn't Mr. Paul on this issue!!!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. william sanford

    Ron, you are one of the few politicians I have come to trust and very much admire. I have a very important question. Please watch this short clip and tell me if what Maxwell is saying is true? You may already be farmiliar with it. I really don't know who else in government to ask. So please let me know your opinion. Cut and paste: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1866496783791986992&ei=U0onSdm8CI6qrgKCzLHxBg&q=jordan+maxwell

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. edward

    Keep up the fight against the central bank and its boom-bust destruction.

    There is no loyalty among theives as as soon as foreign banks begin redeeming their checking accounts in hard currency the scam will be up and a liquidation of debt will have to occur.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. yabuddy

    anyone have links to ron paul specifically adress his viewpoints on vaccinations or fluoride in the water?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. stephen

    Go to this link and vote for Ron Paul - Time Magazine Man of the Year. Over 10,000 votes already mostly for Ron Paul.
    Spread the word! :-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm94D1TqYwQ

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. David K

    Write in Ron Paul and Goldwater!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. mt-svk

    I very hope Ron Paul will be an American president in the future. I am not from U.S.A. , but I think that not only U.S.A. but all the world needs such an American president as Ron Paul.

    P.S. I am mistake for my bad English.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Curtis

    I see the lies and distortion that our so called leaders are spreading. A great teacher once said that you should clean the inside of your up before you clean the outside. Ron Paul has it right.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. Richard Swing

    I appreciate email from Ron Paul since last year. I appreciate all of his efforts and enlightening lessons. It saddens me that I now have to withdraw my support for this coming Presidential election. I feel Ron Paul is making a fatal mistake in not supporting John McCain. One of two men will be elected. One man is immoral because he supports abortion and it is against God's will as defined in Jeremiah 1. John McCain is Christian and is Pro-life as is Sarah Palin. The makeup of the Supreme Court is crucial in many ways. Ron Paul is making a mistake in not supporting John McCain. Ron Paul would make an excellent Treasury Secretary. Ron Paul will never be President because he cannot garner mass appeal. Jesse Ventura could have won as a Republican but he is not running. It saddens me that I know have to write papers and National papers and withdraw support from Ron Paul. You have a week to contact me and attempt to change my mind.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. K.C. Collins

    Subject: Re: September 25th, 2008 by Ron Paul

    Mr. Paul is painfully correct. Greed fueled "excessive lending" and Gluttony caused "excessive borrowing." Sloth leads to Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Repossession ... unless the Clinton's bring in Big Government dressed as Robin Hood!

    We must return to: KC's "Four Cs of Credit"

    Character: Are you stable in your community? Are you stable in your field of employment?

    Capacity: Payment to Income Ratio, Debt to Income Ratio. Prove it. While we're at it, let's see your Savings Account balances.

    Credibility: Have you managed this level of debt before? Did you repay all of your prior creditors as agreed?

    Collateral: Loan to Value Ratio. No one gets an overadvance. No one. A "AAA" risk earns the maximum 100% LTV. If you don't like it, hang your paper at WaMu!

    In closing, if we could put Ron Paul's brain into Mitt Romney's body, we'd have a candidate 60% of Americans would vote for! This is not a slam on our Elder Statesman, it's the stark reality of "The Packaging of the Presidency"!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. Bruce D. Bongardt

    Ron,
    Please see my agenda at: www.proudican.ning.com. Hopefully, you’ll find something there of interest ... Since late April, I have been unsuccessful with getting any media coverage as a potential 3rd party candidate running a grassroots "virtual" Presidential campaign under a new independent banner, "THE PROUDICAN PARTY". My intent is to promote a series of "outside-the-box" prolutions (progressive solutions). We have seen absolutely nothing but rhetoric offered from the leading party nominees in terms of viable solutions to critical issues. I suggest that we boldly rally all 3rd party Presidential candidates and unite under a common motto of “We the People” to promote an atmosphere of real, positive problem-solving for America.

    Please help me get this message to Ron and any of the other 269 candidates. I do have several unique ideas on how to unite us which may just have significant impact on the November election!

    Thank you,
    Bruce D. Bongardt
    Founder "THE PROUDICAN PARTY"

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. Hank B

    ron,

    thanks for trying for us and doing your best, but you don't have a chance. the main stream media is doing everying they can to help obama - they have not time for anyone else. luckily mccain/palin are still managing to successfully fight them. if you don't do the right thing for the country and take one for the team, you are helping to put a socialist in control of this country. this can not happen.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. Chuck

    Will you (Ron) please do the nation a favor and drop out of the running entirely? Although I agree that there will be a time when a candidate could be elected that wasn't nominated by his party, this is obviously not the year. I also agree that Libertarians, Green Party candidates, etc. will undoubtedly get elected in the future, again it isn't going to be this time.

    For those of you who are asking Americans to vote for Ron Paul : you are actually campaigning for Barack......I know you are intelligent enough to realize this fact.

    For those of you asking Ron Paul to endorse Ralph Nader......you too are actually campaigning for Barack......this is a simple reality to comprehend.

    If you want Barack Obama to be our next president, vote for Paul, Nader, or any other write-in candidate that you want, but realize that you are directly responsible for putting Obama in the white house and will suffer the consequences like the rest of us.

    Don't be delusional and think that anyone but McCain or Obama is going to win this election......the numbers simply are not there at this time. You MUST be smart enough to realize this simple fact.

    Although I will be voting for McCain this election, it is done with a sour taste due to the fact that he is too liberal in many of his views. I am swallowing the salt and doing it because no matter how much I want a true conservative in office, and McCain is obviously not a true one, he is far and away a better choice than a staunchly liberal Democrat who adheres to Marxism.

    God Bless America

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. Liz

    I heart Ron Paul!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  31. sore loser

    Ron Paul is a very intelligent individual and I think he should have been President. However, the RNC made their choice and I think Ron Paul should stand behind that decision.

    You can do so much more from within, rather than being an outsider. Ron Paul to me is looking like a sore loser and being very divisive of the Republican Party. (this has taken some points away from the man in my opinion)

    I do hope McCain adds Mitt Romney and Ron Paul to the McCain administration.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Vann Wilson

      McCane wasn't borne in the U.S. he was borne in colone Pannama

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. Truth

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=v5Jdg8SxH7c

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. A

    Please join Nader, and give us a chance. If you don't think he'd be good for the nation, will you explain why?
    Thank you

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. PENNI

    I AS A MITT SUPPORTER BUT NOW I AM A RON PAUL-

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. Fight4Freedom2008

    Ask the Granny's, I sent them some pics... I'd like to see them posted. Thanks Kip

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Maria Retina Sarmiento,OP

      I too am really afraid for the future and sovereignity of my beloved country-Philippines. It becomes too ovious that the "money bags" are doing their best to rape our constitution and our economy. As I became more aware of the decepcion and greed of the Wall Street Thugs, my blood is boiling. I fear that my beloved 2 1/2 year old nephew will have a grim future if those ripp offs wont be stopped. I admire the courage of Rep.Ron Paul for chasing after the thugs. I too wrote one of the Senators of the Republic of the Philippines-Sen.Benigno Aquino III (the son of the late Pres.Corazon Aquino and Sen.Benigno Aquino) asking him to defend the constitution and audit the international group of bankers. The freedom that we Filipinos enjoy is too precious to me. Certainly my great grandfsther on my father's side fought againts the Spaniards will revolt if the sovereignity of the nation is desecrated. Let us all unite in ending the tyranny,greed,lies and lust of power that those elites wanted. No more slavery,no more lies! Long live the fight of the masses

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  36. KEVIN O'NEILL

    i have to agree with you,but this is the way of this world.greed and envy is the american way.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

1 2 3 34

Leave a Reply