Please note that you cannot reach Ron Paul through the email address and web form posted on this page. (His contact details are further below)
Email the authors of this website:
grassroots@ronpaul.com
Or complete and submit this contact form:
Disclaimer: The RonPaul.com website is maintained by independent grassroots supporters and is not paid for, affiliated with, or endorsed by Congressman Ron Paul.
We value your suggestions and comments and will do our best to spread important information to the community. RonPaul.com editors carefully read all comments submitted through this page and if your information is of interest we will do our best to repost it at this site or in our email newsletter as quickly as possible.
If you’d like to contact Ron Paul directly, try his house.gov contact form (only expect a response if you live in the 14th Congressional District), or call or write to one of his offices:
Washington, DC
203 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone Number: (202) 225-2831
Lake Jackson, Texas
122 West Way, Suite 301
Lake Jackson, TX 77566
Phone Number: (979) 285-0231
Galveston, Texas
601 25th Street, Suite 216
Galveston, TX 77550
Phone Number: (409) 766-7013
Victoria, Texas
1501 Mockingbird Lane, Suite 229
Victoria, TX 77904
Phone Number: (361) 576-1231
Alternatively, contact the Campaign for Liberty, the successor organization of Ron Paul’s presidential campaign, through their online form, or call them at (703) 347-6886.
This information is provided for the convenience of our fellow supporters and other interested parties. It does not imply endorsement by or association with Ron Paul and/or the Campaign for Liberty!
Thisis an email sent out earlier today. It has a link in it which will explain some of the questions I have read on this site.
Okay, Ted, the following paragraph describes what I saw:
“Those nations and banks to whom we owe money have been very patient indeed with us. They know that our economies are so tightly entwined that what hurts America will hurt them. But sooner or later, possibly after a market crash, someone, in order to pay their own debts, will demand their loans to the United States be paid. Rather than get caught with “bad paper”, there will be a run on the United States government.”
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE2/doodoo.html?q=ARTICLE2/doodoo.html
Without having the information to describe the circumstances underlying what I saw, the only way for me to state it was to state what I saw.
So, once again,
The men in the black cloth are on our soil. They trip over our garden rows. The President at the time (the one we have now) has a choice to make. He makes the wrong choice and the fighting gets worse. Then I was standing on a street corner watching a fight between the government and the people. The people were being accused of doing something wrong by the government. Then the soldiers just stop fighting. It’s like they lost their will to fight. So the soldiers stopped hurting the people. The President either dies, or loses all his power, I don’t know, I just remember I was very sad for him. Then foreign governments come in and take over the country.
That paragraph, when it says there will be a run on the United States government, that part of the sentence made me feel the same way I felt in the vision when I was sad and scared for the President and foreign governments took over our country.
The men in black cloth tripping over the field rows… one way to look at it is to realize that the real terrorists were the same people who lobbied the government for war with the ME; and the real ones behind 9/11; and the ones behind the real estate crash and the banking crashes. If you think about it, the American People started working harder and longer, and were keeping their homes until the banking crisis. The banking crisis and wal street crash was forced. People did it on purpose, in other words. This applies like this:
Read this article:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE2/doodoo.html?q=ARTICLE2/doodoo.html
Now think: TARP caused the banks to get really proactive with foreclosures because the banks wanted that $8,000.00 pop every time they traded a bad loan. Look at that map: that is all the bad loans, along with the wetlands and nature preserves. All of that land is going to be owned by foreign countries because that is all the land in control of the corrupt federal government instead of the People, like the Founders intended. And the article tells me exactly what the Federal government is up to with that land.
I see no way out of this except to bring our troops home and guard us from foreign countries while we spend the next 30 years repaying loans AFTER we go back to a currency standard and find something to manufacture. That is the only way we will keep what the Founders gave us. We need our military AT HOME to do this.
And I don’t think I have gotten through to the President on this. So I think he has already made wrong decisions that he is not willing to backtrack on in order to fix the problem. For example, he is starting this huge, mega media blitz about getting back the TARP, even though most of the banks have already paid back the TARP, but he has said NOTHING about the funds from the bailout, the TLGP, or whatever, that happened right after the Lehman brothers “collapse,” which the banks have NOT paid back. It’s very suspicious, if you ask me.
It is not like he didn’t know all of this in advance, Ted. So when he and Pryor read my copious mailings about that vision, they already knew what I was describing.
I am sending this out to everyone on both lists. I am sending it to all of the news agencies. I am sending it to Ron Paul, if I can find a way to reach him. I suggest you send it to every military guy you know and get it to that radio station guy too. We have to do something or be ready to lose our Country because it is coming if we do not act. If the journalists, for example, don’t want to be told by a foreign government what to put in their newspapers, they have to start telling the truth and let the American People come up with the solutions. They have to stop trading insults and lies about the other party. They have to face the facts and stop trying to alienate people who are being honest about those facts. If the middle management of corporations do not want to be run by China, or Israel, then they have to come together and forget their petty squabbles long enough to push the government to turn around. Can they even think ahead, at the vitriol they will face and the starvation wages they will face, simply because of a few government backed NGOs history in foreign nations? If the people, working and not working, don’t want to face foreign soldiers with guns policing their lives, they have to organize and speak plainly to American soldiers. If the teachers and professors do not want to have to teach from the vantage point of despair and deprivation, then they have to push the government to turn around. If they think Annenberg is going to help them now, they should read up on Annenberg’s criminal history. If the whole nation does not forget its controlled opposition game between the republican “agenda” and the democratic “agenda,” (both of which are really one and the same) long enough to make sure there is a free nation in which to have an agenda, then we will lose this Nation to foreign countries as surely as we have experienced what I already expressed from the vision that already came true.
We have a chance to save our Country, if we will. Otherwise, we deserve whatever comes, whether we knew about it in advance or not. It does not matter that the government broke the Constitution and lied to us… the Founders would say what matters is us. Do we want our free Country or not?
The CIA already has, as does the Isreali government, what I have written in this email. So that means that I have done the best I can for this Country. So no matter what happens, you should pass this on to others. This is about this Country, this Nation that the Founders gave us.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FORTY SIX POINT ONE BILLION!!!!!
Where the hell does this go? It was borrowed from our children’s future, now where does this indulgence money go?
This is the people’s money. Our children’s future.
Ron Paul, demand that this money be return to it’s owners.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
To anyone who has a thorough answer:
I fully agree that the Fed must end, but I’ve continuously been perplexed by two factors. If we get rid of the fed and return to the gold standard:
#1 How do we go about creating a new dollar-value based on gold without literally creating a “New Dollar”? We can’t keep this new, pegged dollar at $1200 per ounce of gold for the same reason that companies can’t keep their stock prices at 40 cents per share. No one wants their currency to appear “cheap”. Hence we’ll need to do a ‘reverse split’ of the dollar in order to create a “New Dollar”. Not so easy. Thoughts?
#2 If we have a fixed amount of dollars based on a fixed amount of gold, then how do we fund future wars? In other words, how do we borrow money? Intuitively, it seems we’d have to literally borrow gold from other countries and print more money equal to that borrowed gold. As the gold (and interest) is repaid, we’d then have to destroy an equal amount of dollars. Is there an easier way??
Much thanks….
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You create a 2nd currency.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Don’t ask questions! Don’t look behind the Ron Paul curtain! A commodity basket and/or private competing currencies is the solution to everything!
End the Fed! Take our country back!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dr Paul when talking to Judge Napolitano Thurs referred to the powerful NY Special interests which will eventually succeed in blocking the vote to audit the Fed. Those Special Interests, not named is The Tri Lateral Commission. They believe in Globalism and use the Fed to promote their aims. Pres Obama is spending us into oblivion following the Clowers and Pivan model to collapse the economy leading to Globalism. Obama’s chief economist is Paul Volcer, the former Chrmn of the Tri Lateral Comm. The ties between the Fed, the WH, Acorn and the Tri Lateral Comm are many.Google “The Obama Deception” and see for yourselves.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
oh shutup, johnny.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I don’t think it would matter what they decided to value the dollar just as long as it is stable. As far as how to do it I’m not totally sure. I think the biggest issue would be what we do with our foreign debt. A fixed dollar would force us to pay every dime back ligitimately or rip them off and default. However the initial problems of the conversion would be far less than the perpetual problem caused by a cental bank and paper money.
If we had a sound currency, many wars would not be fought. Much more deliberation would occur before we decided to go to war and their would be less of the fruitless, pointless wars. However, if it was totally necessary, you could convert to a temporary paper currency for the war just as Lincoln did with the war of northern aggression. Shortly after the war they converted back to the gold standard with little controversy.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A % of GDP.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If Ron Paul received suggestions from the American people. I as one of them would love to suggest that education should be paid for by the government. Many many teenagers today don’t continue college degrees because they can’t afford it here in California. If there were some sort of Education Reform… I think more and more American people would Respect Ron Paul and for all that he is doing for the American people.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Isaac, Yes I know education is very expensive but we don’t need government handouts or a education reform, we have the public school system indoctrinating us and the whole breakup of the American family, that combined with the silent war on the middle and lower class has destroyed allot of moral values and our economy, the answer is less government and more personal responsibility. Ron Paul, even though he is a good man is not the answer, we are the answer.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
LINDER V. UNITED STATES, 268 U. S. 5 (1925) (9-0)
“Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government.” Even “Incidental regulation of such practice by Congress through a taxing act cannot extend to matters plainly inappropriate and unnecessary to reasonable enforcement of a revenue measure.”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hi Everyone,
I wish to share this post with you. It might initially seem totally bizarre, as though I had lost my way online and posted to the wrong planet. But I promise you that if you read through it you will see that it is absolutely related to Ron Paul and his work, referenced in an admittedly very unconventional manner:
http://hierocryptic.blogspot.com/2009/11/all-souls-day-is-special-time-to.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron Paul is not a God… Will American’s buy it?
Will Americans buy a realistic, reasonable WASP who wants nothing more than a stable America in which the words of the Constitution are more important than anything else. Will American’s finally get off their a**es and realize that their fate is not in the hands of the man they elect, but that the fate of the man elected is in the hands of the people. When will Americans step out of their meek shells and realize that the government works for them; they do not work for the government. The Fed does not have a place in my country. My government does not have a place in my bank. My bank does not have a place in my government.
It’s time to let self interest and the power of the invisible hand take a firm fist to those who oppose economic opportunity equality. Let those on welfare and medicare realize that it is their fellow man supporting them, not Barack Obama.
End The FED
Mr. Paul I support you.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron Paul is a great American and one this country desperately needs as president. I am a first generation American and saddened by the cancer it has been plagued with by the likes of the Democrats and Republicans. Both parties have undermined the core principles of our constitution and are destroying our great nation. Why are we footing the bill to support corrupt organizations such as the UN which is nothing more than a hate America debate club? Why are we footing the bill to defend wealthy nations such as Germany, Japan and S Korea? Why have our troops defend those nations when the Rio Grande needs defending. We need a strong 3rd party lead by a true leader such as Ron Paul to free us of the shackles of the 2 party dictatorship which is ruining America.
Proud Veteran standing by in Illinois to support your efforts!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Glad to hear Thomas in Illinois isn’t as corrupt-minded as it’s former Senator.
It’s time to get back to the basics.
It’s time to ask ourselves; Where does the constitution say that there must be a UN? Where does the constitution say that each American has a right to healthcare? Where does the Constitution say that anyone who crosses the border illegally can be a citizen? Where does the Constitution say the Fed has rule of my dollar and it’s value? Where does the Constitution give the President the power to tell people how to live their lives? How to spend their money? How to use their time?
WHERE DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE THE RIGHT TO TELL ME HOW TO BETTER SPEND MY TAXES?
God Bless
RP 2012
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
About a new book.
CONSTITUTIONAL INDEPENDENT
Followers
Blog Archive
* ▼ 2009 (1)
o ▼ September (1)
+ TOO BIG TO SURVIVE
About Me
Luco
United States
I have been Republican and Conservative in all previous elections. Now with the performance of the Republicans during the last presidential term I feel they have lost their conservative principles. I now feel the need for a new perspective for Constitutional Independents.
View my complete profile
Saturday, September 12, 2009
TOO BIG TO SURVIVE
Recurrence to constitutional principles for effective government in a free society.
The Federal Government is on an exponential growth path with alarming, dangerous potentials regardless of Constitutional restraints such as US Constitution Amendment X:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
To reestablish a principled Federal Government a Constitutional Federal Limit Amendment is needed:
FEDERAL LIMIT AMENDMENT
The total annual expenditures of the government of the United States shall not exceed a limit established at the time of ratification of this amendment except as may be authorized at any time for periods of up to twelve months by at least fifty one percent of the State Legislatures. After ratification of this amendment, all income of the Government of the United States in excess of the established limit shall be disbursed to the States on the basis of population or shall be used to reduce the national debt.
BASIC EFFECTS
Basic disciplines would be created by such an amendment;
1. Control of the size and growth of the Federal Government through contitutional budgetary restraints.
2. Debt reduction or dispersion of excess federal funds in a manner that is nationally equitable and not subject to federal political influence.
3. Federal competition for available funds will cause program rejustification and the elimination of unnecessary functions.
4. The Korean, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars would likely not have been authorized and funded with this amendment in effect.
5. States rights and constitutional federalism would be reinforced.
Freedom within limited government represents the most modern, vital concept of government yet known to man. American testing of this concept as defined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights represents a relatively limited evaluation in terms of longevity in society experiments. Today, we see the experiment changing to provide ever more limited liberties and exponentially expanding government. The history of the experiment, however, shows resultant evidence that must be considered and applied in further development of the original concepts. Hopefully, such development would gain a mass re-acceptance of freedom’s principles thereby returning all constitutional rights to the people and providing for a government that is constitutional, effective and responsive to the nation’s needs and restoring liberty to the individual, dignity to the legislature and purpose to the ballot box. This would be the goal of a Constitutional Independent voter.
The Book “Too Big To Survive” details the critical need, benefits and effects of a Federal Limit Amendment. It also discusses problems with unconstitutional government and the current political parties and defines the role of a Constitutional Independent. It is available at LULU Publishing:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/too-big-to-survive/7387797
For info, Email: aluco@msn.com
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Greetings m’noble friends,
Are you familiar with
http://www.project10tothe100.com/vote.html
Google is giving 10 million dollars to ideas that are voted upon to make the world a better place. Among the ideas is a more transparent and socially conscious tax policies.
Please spread the word and let’s see if we can have people vote for this.
-s
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
All Hail, Chairman Maobama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zrsl8o4ZPo
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I just now realize that I have to learn alot. you are a genius.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Audit the Fed – Take the poll and cast your vote now!
_apps.facebook.com/yoursay?pid=5481&refer=di
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
As a Canadian, I just wanted to let you know how impressed many of us were in hearing Ron Paul’s positions during the 2008 Republican vote. I wish we had someone of his intelligence to vote for in our country. It’s good to know there are still people in this world who don’t have a problem with telling it the way it is.
I sincerely hope he runs again in 2012 and if I was able to somehow support him, I would do so in a heartbeat.
And I personally would like to thank him for making some of us into believers again!
PS: We are probably looking at an election here in November. It’s a shame that he can’t be on our ballot!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You are correct when you mention Canada’s sad lack of a candidate who thinks like Ron Paul. Canada is in worse peril than the united states from the same dark forces which are ruining our country.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Maybe one day we can trade Socialists in the USA for Federalists in Canada.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dear Mr. Ulbert:
Thank you for contacting my office to express your views on S.604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009, which would require the Comptroller General to conduct an audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and its banks before the end of 2010 and to report its detailed findings to Congress.
I believe that all citizens should become involved in the legislative process by letting their voices be heard, and I appreciate the time and effort that you took to share your thoughts with me. One of the most important aspects of my job is keeping informed about the views of my constituents, and I welcome your comments so that I may continue to represent California to the best of my ability. Should I have the opportunity to consider legislation on this or similar issues, I will keep your views in mind.
For additional information about my activities in the U.S. Senate, please visit my website, http://boxer.senate.gov. From this site, you can access statements and press releases that I have issued about current events and pending legislation, request copies of legislation and government reports, and receive detailed information about the many services that I am privileged to provide for my constituents. You may also wish to visit http://thomas..loc.gov to track current and past legislation.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me. I appreciate hearing from you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron Paul will be President with non-credit money.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Long time fan Mr Paul, if only you had won the Republican nomination for the Republican party, we may not have a socialist for a President. I watched Bruno last night (for laughs), and thought your performance was great, its a pity however, that you did not punch the queer bastard…NOT…(thats a joke from Borat) watch that too. Actually I’m Australian, and subscribed to Ron Pauls email last year during the campaign (again just for laughs)…Ron Paul will never get elected and is an idiot, the future is not liberitarian, liberitarians (and their neo-con and economic rationalism butt buddies (by that I mean Reagan, Bush, Bush, Cheney…and all the rest)screwed American (and the world and now the future is big government and lots of regulation…you may as well just give up, really theres no point…enjoy your day.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
All of that from one piece of navel fuzz?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Non-credit money is the way for solving both national and world economic crisis. Non-credit money is the necessary additional quantity of money in circulation (dM) as percentage (k) of existing quantity of money in circulation (M). dM = kM ;
k = (supply – demand)/demand ; If non-credit money is emitted according to the cited formula, inflation cannot exist.
Also, taxes are annulled for the amount of non-credit money.
The consumers pay less and producers get more than today, in the order of credit money. All get!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hmmm Please send more info!!!!
Isn’t money itself a credit? How can physical currency be constantly monitored? How can the goods/services be prevented from changing in price? Circulation (supply/demand) dictates price no?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
What does Ron Paul think of the book SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE and has this book provided useful information to him and other members of government concerning the Federal Reserve Bank?
Thank you! LS
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The Socialization of America
By Dr. David Noebel
March 27, 2009
THIS IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT FOLKS…READ ON
In retrospect, we might discover that 1883 was a most significant year. We’re familiar with 1848 giving us The Communist Manifesto and 1859 giving us The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. But 1883 gave us three portentous happenings. These seemingly unrelated happenings turned history toward socialism.
1. Karl Marx died on March 14, 1883, and was buried in Highgate Cemetery in London, England. The assumption that Communism died with him was logical since only six people attended his funeral. But the truth is that it had not yet begun its murderous journey through the 20th century.
2. John Maynard Keynes was born on June 5, 1883, in Cambridge, England. His political, economic, and moral influence continues to affect every American.
3. The Fabian Socialist Society was an offshoot of The Fellowship of the New Life, which was born in October 1883 in London, England.
Today’s financial events illustrate that America is not exempt from being led toward socialism. Predictions differ, depending on one’s perspective, as to whether this will be a socialistic paradise or a socialistic hell. Time will tell. In the meantime, we’d do well to listen to warnings from the past.
Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on socialism: “The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of spiritual suffering and poverty.”
Socialist George Bernard Shaw added: “You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner.”
That’s probably why Margaret Thatcher added that the “problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”
Today, we can link the U. S. House of Representatives—and its radical, progressive, socialistic societies and caucuses— directly to Karl Marx through Keynes and the Fabians.
Before identifying many of the House members caught up in the socialist web, however, let’s first identify the major economic dogma of the early socialists.
Socialism is the economic system of both the Marxist-Leninist worldview and the Fabian Society worldview. John Maynard Keynes was a member of the British Fabian Society, whose American counterparts were the Intercollegiate Socialist Society and the League for Industrial Democracy. Their American voices were centered in the ideas of Norman Thomas and John Dewey among others. Dewey, you may remember, was an early signatory of The Humanist Manifesto (1933) and its atheistic, socialist gospel.
Socialists are united in their desire to see capitalism destroyed, either forcefully or gradually, and most would rejoice if Christianity were destroyed along with it. Socialists and liberals generally see in Christians “an infallible marker of mental retardation.” (Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2008/09, p. 6)
The Christian worldview endorses sound or hard money, fiscal responsibility, saving for a rainy day, deferred gratification, paying off monthly credit card bills, living within one’s means, etc. Keynesian economics, by contrast, argues for consumption, extravagance, and not providing for the future, arguing that “the great vice is saving, thrift, and financial prudence.” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 63) Keynesians love huge national spending, debt, and high inflation—anathema to Christians and conservatives.
Socialists see capitalism as an evil economic system founded on the concepts of profit, individualism, private property, private business, freedom to buy and sell products and services, etc. Indeed, a working definition of capitalism is “the peaceful and free exchange of goods and services without theft, fraud, and breech of contract.” Capitalism is tailored to individual initiative rather than groupthink or community initiative. Nearly all inventions that have furthered the capitalistic enterprise and blessed humanity in the process have been the result of individual initiative rather than committee, group, or government activity.
Marx advanced the socialist cause by calling for social or public ownership of property and the abolition of private property. He believed that people were best suited to work on state farms, public parks, nationalized banks, or the government bureaucracy rather than for private employers, who would certainly take advantage of their employees, causing them both social and economic harm. Marx was an economic leech on fellow communist Engels, who supported him with his capitalistic father’s monies.
George Bernard Shaw represented the Fabian point of view by calling for “the socialization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange” to bring about an equal distribution of goods and services to all members of society and to make the State “the ALL of social well-being.” The State “subsumes all economic life of the nation.”
In other words, socialism is an economic system that downplays the individual in favor of the group, social order, or the State. It is a system in which the State directs the economic activity of the social order through central planning and by placing economic activity under the jurisdiction of the State. Socialism is also known as collectivism or Statism and, to Marx, Communism.
Today, we call this economic system “interventionism” or Keynesism. Interventionism is a kind of socialism or communism, but without the destruction of the bourgeoisie (which were slaughtered by the millions by Soviet and Chinese communists). Today’s Fabians/Progressives/ Radicals allow their capitalist enemies to create wealth, but acquire it by taxing them instead of slaughtering them (Marx’s “reign of terrorism on the bourgeoisie”). They are then free to distribute the wealth among the economically disadvantaged, the intellectual elites, and the superior governing classes.
Such (re)distribution of wealth ensures the favorable vote of the masses being fed, entertained, housed (with sub-prime loans) and doctored. ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and socialism fit hand-in-glove just as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fit Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd to a “T.”
Most Americans are totally unaware that the U.S. House of Representatives crawls with a large, well-organized assembly of socialist organizations. These organizations are dedicated to (a) bringing about the destruction of the capitalist economic system (portrayed as greedy, conservative, religious, and/or filthy rich) and (b) slowly but surely bringing production, education, food, and health care under the complete control and regulation of the federal government.
A prime example of this governmental takeover is the carbon tax currently under discussion. It would punish business and industry’s use of gas and oil products (which according to Al Gore will warm the planet by one degree over the next 100 years) by “allowing] the federal government to ‘control every aspect of our economy,’ according to Christopher Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute” (The Weekly Standard, March 16, 2009, p. 17).
The legislators involved in this socialistic undertaking belong to one or more radical House organizations: the Progressive Democrats of America (6 House members), the Congressional Progressive Caucus (74 House members), the Congressional Black Caucus (43 House members), and the Democratic Socialists of America.
Incidentally, the Democratic Socialists of America do not identify their House members since they consider all members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus part of their membership due to the fact that “they both shared operative social democratic politics.” The most prominent national member of DSA is AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney, who could well be the most powerful influence in the House of Representatives. And for the record, the Chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus is Congressional Progressive Caucus member Barbara Lee (CA-9). The interconnections between all these socialist-based organizations is staggering.
These organizations and their members quite literally comprise a Socialist Red Army within the very contours of the House of Representatives. According to the Wikipedia article on the organization, “The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the single largest partisan caucus in the United States House of Representatives and works together to advance progressive [socialist] issues and causes. The CPC was founded in 1991 by independent [socialist] Congressman Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who remains a member as Senator. [The CPC] represents about a third of the House Democratic Caucus. Of the twenty standing committees of the House, eleven are chaired by members of the CPC.”
When the CPC claimed 64 members in 2006 (now 74 and gaining), the leftist publication The Nation boasted, “The largest ideological caucus in the new House Democratic majority will be the Congressional Progressive Caucus, with a membership that includes New York’s Charles Rangel, Michigan’s John Conyers, Massachusetts’s Barney Frank and at least half the incoming chairs of House standing committees” (The Nation, November 12,2006).
These current eleven chairs are CPC members:
•George Miller (CA-9)—Chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee;
•Henry Waxman (CA-30)—Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce;
•Bob Filner (CA-51)—Chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee;
•Barney Frank (MA-4)—Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee;
•John Conyers (MI-14)—Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee;
•Bennie Thompson (MS-2)—Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee;
•Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)—Chairwoman of the House Small Business Committee;
•Charles Rangel (NY-15)—Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee;
•Louise Slaughter (N Y-28)—Chairwoman of the House Rules Committee;
•Bob Brady (PA-1)—Chairman of the House Administration Committee; and
•Edward J. Markey (MA-7)—Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.
As of February 20,2009, the Co-Chairs of the CPC are Raul M. Grijalva (AZ-7) and Lynn Woolsey (CA-6). The Vice Chairs are Diane Watson (CA-33), Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18), Mazie Hirono (HI-2), and Dennis Kucinich (OH-10). Incidentally, the CPC website was “hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America” until 1999, a group affiliated with the Socialist International which was founded by Karl Marx, Saint-Simon, and Fourier!
The Commission for a Sustainable World Society is one of the Socialist International’s sub-organizations. Until President Obama picked Carol M. Browner as his global warming czar, Browner was a member in good standing of the Socialist International. Upon her appointment, her name and biography were removed from its website “though a photo of her speaking June 30 to the group’s congress in Greece was still available” (The Washington Times, January 12,2009, p. 1). We can expect Browner to manipulate and push for every piece of socialist legislation to advance the defeat of capitalism and the imposition of more government on the American people. Oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy represent capitalism, and we can expect Congressional socialists to do everything in their legislative power to thwart their discovery, drilling, usage, and distribution. Socialists promote wind(mill) power because they know it alone cannot meet the energy needs of a capitalist economy and will, therefore, hasten the death of capitalism.
Browner will enjoy a great deal of support from the newly appointed Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, who is also a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. And when Browner needs further help, she can rely on the committee chairs, co-chairs, and vice chairs listed above to assist her in using the global warming/climate change scare to bring the United States of America into a socialistic world governing body. She can also count on former CPC member Nancy Pelosi (who is already manifesting dictatorial tendencies) to drive the socialist agenda as fast as humanly possible. Pelosi’s San Francisco district (CA-8) is synonymous with socialism/ progressivism/ collectivism/statism/leftism/radicalism that in turn are synonymous with scientific socialism/communism/ Marxism/Leninism/Maoism.
We have yet to address the ideological role played by John Maynard Keynes in the demise of American capitalism and Christian influence. Anyone with a Christian, conservative bent fears the reality that the United States is falling headlong off the cliff into socialism and all that this will entail. It is no secret that the radical left is both anti-capitalist and anti-Christian. Marx would be, no doubt ecstatic, realizing that his life’s work of dethroning God and destroying capitalism are about to be accomplished.
Zygmund Dobbs conducted the research for Keynes at Harvard (KeynesatHarvard.org) and summarizes the political, moral, and economic slant of Keynes and his friends at Cambridge University: “Singing the Red Flag, the highborn sons of the British upper-class lay on the carpeted floor spinning out socialist schemes in homosexual intermissions….The attitude in such gatherings was anti-establishmentarian. To them the older generation was horribly out of date, even superfluous. The capitalist system was declared obsolete and revolution was proclaimed as the only solution. Christianity was pronounced an enemy force, and the worst sort of depravities were eulogized as ‘that love which passes all Christian understanding.’ Chief of this ring of homosexual revolutionaries was John Maynard Keynes…Keynes was characterized by his male sweetheart, Lytton Strachey, as ‘a liberal and a sodomite, an atheist and a statistician.’ His particular depravity was the sexual abuse of little boys.”
Keynes, like Marx, had a fixation that should have been a clue to his character. Marx practiced phrenology (the study of bumps on one’s head), and Keynes practiced chirognomy (the study of people’s hands). After studying the hands of Charles Darwin’s brother, Sir George, Keynes remarked, “His hands certainly looked as if they might be descended from an ape.”
Overall, Keynes despised free or private enterprise, considered homosexuality superior to heterosexuality, sought to replace the gold standard with fiat paper money which was more easily produced by government printing presses, did not believe in the family unit, despised “savings” as a stumbling block against the march of socialism, called on the state to control the number of children per family.
The Keynesian economic formula fits all totalitarianisms, including Fascism, Nazism, and Communism. Sir Oswald Mosley, for example, was a Fascist leader and a member of the Fabian Society. Lauchlin Currie, a prominent Keynesian advocate, was a Soviet spy and an economic aide to F.D.R. Joan Robinson, a Marxist economist, assisted Keynes in some of his economic writings, arguing, “the differences between Marx and Keynes are only verbal.” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 68; also see Mark Skousen, The Making of Modern Economics, p. 433)
Keynes also had a strong relationship with the notorious Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. Keynes considered White to be “the central figure in the Keynesian manipulations in the United States.” Harry Dexter White just happened to be the Assistant to the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. Even after White was exposed as a Soviet spy, Keynesians to this day “see nothing wrong in White’s Soviet role,” a “typical . . . attitude of Fabian socialist elements toward the whole coterie of spies and Fifth Amendment communists in the United States” (Keynes At Harvard, p. 83).
It was Keynes himself who admitted that by “a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate, but confiscate arbitrarily: and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some [e.g., Al Gore]. The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million can diagnose.”
Thus it is astounding that Larry Summers, head of President Obama’s National Economic Council and former president of Harvard University, when asked by Charlie Rose “what idea, what person has most influenced your thinking on how to deal with this [financial] mess?” without hesitation answered “Keynes.”
Following the economic advice of Keynes (huge government spending, debt, and inflation) is kissing the American capitalist system goodnight! His advice is what every socialist would give, even though clear-thinking, common sense Americans know that excessive debt and excessive spending are the main ingredients that created this current financial mess (with the help of Congressional Progressives like Barney Frank hatching socialist schemes in the House of Representatives).
When Whittaker Chambers took up his sling and aimed his rock at Communism, he admitted that he hit “something else.” What he hit “was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which, in the name of liberalism, spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades.”
That inching is fast becoming a rout with national and international socialists alike thinking their best opportunity to strike a deathblow to the greatest, freest economic system in all of human history is now.
Because capitalism has raised more human beings out of poverty than all other economic systems combined, we should remember the wisdom of Robert Heilbroner, a former Marxist economist who changed his position before the fall of the Berlin Wall: “The Soviet Union, China, and Eastern Europe have given us the clearest possible proof that capitalism organizes the material affairs of humankind more satisfactorily than socialism: that however inequitably or irresponsibly the marketplace may distribute goods, it does so better than the queues of a planned economy; however mindless the culture of commercialism, it is more attractive than state moralism; and however deceptive the ideology of a business civilization, it is more believable than that of a socialist one.”
Little wonder that Winston Churchill painted socialism as a philosophy of failure, a creed of ignorance, and a gospel of envy whose inherent virtue “is the equal sharing of misery.”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Announce as soon as possible. Get the ball rolling.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Obama stinks. Commie bastard. I knew he’d suck. Too bad the monsters in DC railroaded Ron Paul. Obama the kiss ass is doing whatever his puppeteers tell him to. He’s not undone anything Bush did and has done much more to oppress Americans.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If elected for President, will Ron Paul reopen a new, independent 9/11 investigation and JFK investigation?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Please Ron you do know that the whole government is just nothingelse bu a big FRAUD. Let’s have this link forwarded to all american soldiers. Lets not fight. If there are no soldiers, there will be no generals.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2435306494963970680
I am from Sweden and our country, via the EU, will be affected by the secret government.
Kind regards
Pax Tielman
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dear Ron Paul and supporters,
I beg of you – if it won’t work making americans wake up – please come to Denmark. We need people of you integrety and most of all in these times of greed.
I will spend all my time off job teaching you danish!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You must tackle the fascist CFR and all its sub-elements of which thw FED is only a part. An important part to be sure. Chet…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
According to the Federal Reserve website and I quote “The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review. Under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (enacted in 1978 as Public Law 95-320), which authorizes the Comptroller General of the United States to audit the Federal Reserve System, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has conducted numerous reviews of Federal Reserve activities. In addition, the Board’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits and investigates Board programs and operations as well as those Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks. Completed and active GAO reviews and completed OIG audits, reviews, and assessments are listed in the Board’s Annual Report (before 2002, the reviews were listed in the Board’s Annual Report: Budget Review). ” but then it says “To ensure financial accountability, the financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors are audited annually by an independent outside auditor. In addition, the Government Accountability Office, as well as the Board’s Office of Inspector General, can audit Federal Reserve activities.”
they are audited by “independent outside auditor” haha someone they know/own prob,
notice how the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act wasnt put into place till 1978, FED started 1913 Dec 23, supposedly only 3 congress members were there to pass the act.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I don’t know what will become of America. There is no honesty in any politician that I can see. Not even Ron Paul.
I heard that he had over 90 earmarks in this last bill. Very disheartening. I liked Ron.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hello Steph,
It appears you misunderstand what earmarks are and how Ron Paul’s actions are entirely consistent with his positions. Please read this…http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/earmark-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-15168. Also see his recent discussion with Neil Cavuto.
Don’t be disheartened at all.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The election is a total fraud, TruWrecks, but in more ways than the public realizes.
Neither Barack Obama, John McCain or Roger Calero were constitutionally eligible to run for POTUS. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 that you need to be a “natural-born citizen” in order to run for POTUS. A natural born citizen is a person who is born on U.S. soil, of TWO American citizens at the TIME OF BIRTH.
Barack Obama was born of a Kenyan father under British control and an American mother. He does NOT meet the criteria. John McCain was born in Colon, Panama, in a hospital outside the military base, unfortunately excluding him as well.
The Senate knows this and tried to pass a bill in March, 2008 which tried to legislate John McCain into being a natural born citizen. That bill failed. The truth is, one cannot be legislated into being a natural born citizen. It’s a status one has at the time of their birth. The only way to change what the Constitution says is to amend it through Article V. All attempts to amend that pertinent clause in Article II have failed to date.
After the bill failed in March, 2008, Sen. McCaskill attempted to side-step the Constitution by sponsoring a non-binding resolution S.R. 511. In that document, co-sponsored by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, they tried to deceive the American public through the media by pointing out it was a unanimous decision by the Senate to hold John McCain as a natural born citizen with legal opinions that were attached to the memo. While it had no force of law at all, they didn’t point this fact out to the public, but rather, allowed the media to run with a story that told the public that the Senate had come to a conclusion about John McCain’s citizen status that was purely false according to the Constitution.
Through this atrocious mishandling of information and operations within the government to manipulate the 2008 election, we the people relied on them for honest answers, and what they gave us were ineligible candidates, one of which, they are now ALLOWING to take the highest office in the land. We have had 25 lawsuits on this matter with several having reached the United States Supreme Court, all being ignored because now they don’t know what to do because the people weren’t as stupid as they believed we were. So they instead, dismiss our petitions and act as if the Constitution doesn’t exist.
The people have been duped. The GOP and DNC have maliciously and unbelievably manipulated this election, knowing the candidates were ineligible to run. The only hope is to have someone in the Senate and the House stand as the ballots are counted and object. Unfortunately, these lame congress people are afraid of being laughed at because they have successfully fed lies to the American people as to what the Constitution says and anyone who might bring up the truth now, is threatened to be hung out to dry.
The people are being led down a road of losing their Constitution, the one and ONLY document that preserves their freedom via politicians who were willing to sell that document in lieu of getting their party into the White House. That’s all they were concerned about and if they tell you they are concerned about the Constitution, they were lying.
Every single one of these congress people involved should lose their seats, be impeached and the process started to begin taking this country back in line with what the framers intended. It is the only way to preserve our freedom and turn around this mess of a government. The only reason we are in the economic mess we are in and the wars we are in, is BECAUSE of turning our backs on the TRUE Constitution, the way it was written and the way our brilliant forefathers protected us from harm.
Ron Paul is the constitution politician. Ask him why he won’t take a stand for the Constitution in January and stop this madness from continuing? We only need one Senator and one House representative, yet where are they? Silent on the matter, as usual. They don’t want to lose their seats. But they will anyway by the time we are done telling the people what really happened in 2008.
If there’s any question as to who ZAPEM is, we are the group who originally defended Leo C. Donofrio in his battle up to the United States Supreme Court in Donofrio v. Wells (NJ) that started the ball rolling against these illegitimate candidates jointly and severely in accord with the CONSTITUTION and not a birth certificate.
We intend to continue this fight and refuse to shut up until someone in Washington does what they took oaths to do — defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, which is the ONLY thing they are there to do.
We don’t care what party you are, but if they can’t do at least that much for the people of this country, they are in effect, communists of this country and we will expose them and the media doing it until the word is completely out to the people.
Then let the people will decide who was telling the truth and who was lying. It is the people in the end, who will either keep or destroy their own freedom and this was noted by the framers who signed those documents back in 1787.
If we don’t wake up soon, we will accept any type of forced socialism out of sheer desperation to survive and Ron Paul knows it, hence all the videos that point to what we’re saying, but doesn’t address the root of the problem that is causing it — putting in elected officials, against the Constitution, who don’t belong there and setting a precedent in history that violates the Constitution, including a president, who claims our Constitution is “flawed and needs to be changed”.
Enjoy your change, America! You’re going to get more than you ever thought was coming.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
WOW! That was very well thought out. Came across totally complete.
I Agree with every Red White and Blue cell in my body.
I can only hope America has found faith in who or whatever God you
believe in.Myself Jesus knows I am on his side, and I am ready to fight like…., well you know. Hold on it’s going to be a bumpy
downhill ride.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The election process is a total fraud! There is no other way a candidate like Obama could win such a huge victory with his voting record.
We need someone in the Oval Office that know the difference between “Change” and “Make a Difference”.
“We, The People” just signed away all of the liberties that make America worth coming to. Hopefully we make it to the 2012 election as a free country so we can “Make a Difference”.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
12-27-2008
USURY, THE ROOT CAUSE OF OUR FINANCIAL WOES.
“Greed” and “the love of money” have been selfish and destructive traits of men throughout history. These traits have been amplified, however, by the allowance of the principles of “Usury” and “Fractional Reserve Banking”. Usury; the act of lending money at an rate of interest or an exorbitant rate of interest. Fractional Reserve Banking; the act of lending out several times the amount of money a bank has on deposit. These two tools have been used by the past money changers and present day International Bankers to create the greatest accumulation of wealth for a small minority of men, who are legally allowed to use these tools, and the greatest amount of debt the U.S. government and the American people in our history. Usury is a “zero-sum game” where someone gains at another’s loss. Unfortunately, the loser is usually the one least able to pay. It is a “win-lose” system where those who have been empowered to loan money (Federal Reserve Banks and International Banks) win, and the people and nations lose. It is a rigged game where the rich get richer and the poorer get poorer. Abolishing these two tools (Usury and Fractional Reserve Banking) from our financial system would not stop “greed” and “the love of money”. Some men will always do what they can get away with regardless of the expense to others. But it would contain the greed, thus reversing much financial suffering of the majority of people, over time. It seems clear that we need a more equitable financial system, a “win-win” system that benefits the whole of mankind and not just the few who take advantage of others, for profit.
Listed below is a reference from the writings of Aristotle and four references from the bible, all warning man against the use of the Babylon usury system. We have neither listened to nor heeded these warnings and, therefore, have allowed this adversarial tool and the money changers (International Bankers) to rob us of our prosperity and make debt slaves out of our present and future generations. Will we, now, finally listen and learn the lesson of the ages?
Aristotle
Aristotle (384-322 BC) formulated the classical view against usury.
Aristotle understood that money is sterile; it doesn’t beget more money the way cows beget more cows. He knew that “Money exists not by nature but by law”:
“The most hated sort (of wealth getting) and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange but not to increase at interest. And this term interest (tokos), which means the birth of money from money is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent.
Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth, this is the most unnatural.” (1258b POLITICS)
And he especially disliked usurers:
“…those who ply sordid trades, pimps and all such people, and those who lend small sums at high rates. For all these take more than they ought, and from the wrong sources. What is common to them is evidently a sordid love of gain…” (1122a, ETHICS)
Deuteronomy 23:19
Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:
Ezekiel 18:8-9
He that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and man, Hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept my judgments, to deal truly; he is just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord GOD.
Leviticus 25:37
Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.
“DANIEL’S VISION
Daniel was given a vision of the Babylonian succession of world powers. The vision was an image of a man with a head of gold, representing Babylon itself, arms of silver representing Medo-Persia, body of brass representing Greece, and legs of iron representing Rome. The feet were mixed iron and clay. A stone “cut out without hands” was to come out of heaven and destroy this system by striking it at the feet, “at the time of the end” after it secretly gained control of the world, therefore becoming “MYSTERY, Babylon the Great, the whore that sitieth upon many waters (nations) committing fornication with the Kings of the earth.” (Rev. 18-3)
Archaeological searches have uncovered much evidence of Babylon’s social and economic systems which were very similar to ours of today. For instance, the Igibi Bank was found with thousands of clay tablet ‘notes’ and interest (usury) bearing contracts which served as their money.
Babylon loaned much money at interest (usury) to Persia which, of course, Persia could not repay. Therefore, Persia conquered Babylon to eliminate its debt and acquire Babylon’s gold.
Persia adopted the Babylonian usury system and loaned Greece much money at interest (usury). Greece, of course, could not repay the debt and conquered Persia to eliminate its debt and acquire the gold in Persia.
Greece adopted the Babylonian usury system and loaned Rome much money at interest (usury). Rome, of course, could not repay the debt and conquered Greece to eliminate its debt and acquire the gold in Greece.
After the fall of Imperial Rome, the various nations of Europe were kept in bondage and poverty by the ABs (International Bankers) for many centuries, known as the Dark Ages.”
“DANIEL’S VISION” is an excerpt from the Phoenix Journal 53, Tangled Webs Volume IX – If There Be “Will” There Be “Way” ,by Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn-Aton
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Obama is a fraud. His name is Barry Soetero and he is an INDONESIAN citizen. He cannot be President according to Constitution. Must be natural born, not naturalized. Why isn’t Mr. Paul making this known?!
Further, McCain was born in Panama, and according to 1795 Congress, all foreign born children born to Americans, are known as citizens but not known as “natural born” citizens, as the Constitution requires for the presidency.
Both of these men are ineligible to be president! Why isn’t Mr. Paul on this issue!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron, you are one of the few politicians I have come to trust and very much admire. I have a very important question. Please watch this short clip and tell me if what Maxwell is saying is true? You may already be farmiliar with it. I really don’t know who else in government to ask. So please let me know your opinion. Cut and paste: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1866496783791986992&ei=U0onSdm8CI6qrgKCzLHxBg&q=jordan+maxwell
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Keep up the fight against the central bank and its boom-bust destruction.
There is no loyalty among theives as as soon as foreign banks begin redeeming their checking accounts in hard currency the scam will be up and a liquidation of debt will have to occur.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
anyone have links to ron paul specifically adress his viewpoints on vaccinations or fluoride in the water?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Go to this link and vote for Ron Paul – Time Magazine Man of the Year. Over 10,000 votes already mostly for Ron Paul.
Spread the word!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm94D1TqYwQ
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Write in Ron Paul and Goldwater!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I very hope Ron Paul will be an American president in the future. I am not from U.S.A. , but I think that not only U.S.A. but all the world needs such an American president as Ron Paul.
P.S. I am mistake for my bad English.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I see the lies and distortion that our so called leaders are spreading. A great teacher once said that you should clean the inside of your up before you clean the outside. Ron Paul has it right.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I appreciate email from Ron Paul since last year. I appreciate all of his efforts and enlightening lessons. It saddens me that I now have to withdraw my support for this coming Presidential election. I feel Ron Paul is making a fatal mistake in not supporting John McCain. One of two men will be elected. One man is immoral because he supports abortion and it is against God’s will as defined in Jeremiah 1. John McCain is Christian and is Pro-life as is Sarah Palin. The makeup of the Supreme Court is crucial in many ways. Ron Paul is making a mistake in not supporting John McCain. Ron Paul would make an excellent Treasury Secretary. Ron Paul will never be President because he cannot garner mass appeal. Jesse Ventura could have won as a Republican but he is not running. It saddens me that I know have to write papers and National papers and withdraw support from Ron Paul. You have a week to contact me and attempt to change my mind.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Subject: Re: September 25th, 2008 by Ron Paul
Mr. Paul is painfully correct. Greed fueled “excessive lending” and Gluttony caused “excessive borrowing.” Sloth leads to Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Repossession … unless the Clinton’s bring in Big Government dressed as Robin Hood!
We must return to: KC’s “Four Cs of Credit”
Character: Are you stable in your community? Are you stable in your field of employment?
Capacity: Payment to Income Ratio, Debt to Income Ratio. Prove it. While we’re at it, let’s see your Savings Account balances.
Credibility: Have you managed this level of debt before? Did you repay all of your prior creditors as agreed?
Collateral: Loan to Value Ratio. No one gets an overadvance. No one. A “AAA” risk earns the maximum 100% LTV. If you don’t like it, hang your paper at WaMu!
In closing, if we could put Ron Paul’s brain into Mitt Romney’s body, we’d have a candidate 60% of Americans would vote for! This is not a slam on our Elder Statesman, it’s the stark reality of “The Packaging of the Presidency”!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron,
Please see my agenda at: http://www.proudican.ning.com. Hopefully, you’ll find something there of interest … Since late April, I have been unsuccessful with getting any media coverage as a potential 3rd party candidate running a grassroots “virtual” Presidential campaign under a new independent banner, “THE PROUDICAN PARTY”. My intent is to promote a series of “outside-the-box” prolutions (progressive solutions). We have seen absolutely nothing but rhetoric offered from the leading party nominees in terms of viable solutions to critical issues. I suggest that we boldly rally all 3rd party Presidential candidates and unite under a common motto of “We the People” to promote an atmosphere of real, positive problem-solving for America.
Please help me get this message to Ron and any of the other 269 candidates. I do have several unique ideas on how to unite us which may just have significant impact on the November election!
Thank you,
Bruce D. Bongardt
Founder “THE PROUDICAN PARTY”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
ron,
thanks for trying for us and doing your best, but you don’t have a chance. the main stream media is doing everying they can to help obama – they have not time for anyone else. luckily mccain/palin are still managing to successfully fight them. if you don’t do the right thing for the country and take one for the team, you are helping to put a socialist in control of this country. this can not happen.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Will you (Ron) please do the nation a favor and drop out of the running entirely? Although I agree that there will be a time when a candidate could be elected that wasn’t nominated by his party, this is obviously not the year. I also agree that Libertarians, Green Party candidates, etc. will undoubtedly get elected in the future, again it isn’t going to be this time.
For those of you who are asking Americans to vote for Ron Paul : you are actually campaigning for Barack……I know you are intelligent enough to realize this fact.
For those of you asking Ron Paul to endorse Ralph Nader……you too are actually campaigning for Barack……this is a simple reality to comprehend.
If you want Barack Obama to be our next president, vote for Paul, Nader, or any other write-in candidate that you want, but realize that you are directly responsible for putting Obama in the white house and will suffer the consequences like the rest of us.
Don’t be delusional and think that anyone but McCain or Obama is going to win this election……the numbers simply are not there at this time. You MUST be smart enough to realize this simple fact.
Although I will be voting for McCain this election, it is done with a sour taste due to the fact that he is too liberal in many of his views. I am swallowing the salt and doing it because no matter how much I want a true conservative in office, and McCain is obviously not a true one, he is far and away a better choice than a staunchly liberal Democrat who adheres to Marxism.
God Bless America
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I heart Ron Paul!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ron Paul is a very intelligent individual and I think he should have been President. However, the RNC made their choice and I think Ron Paul should stand behind that decision.
You can do so much more from within, rather than being an outsider. Ron Paul to me is looking like a sore loser and being very divisive of the Republican Party. (this has taken some points away from the man in my opinion)
I do hope McCain adds Mitt Romney and Ron Paul to the McCain administration.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
McCane wasn’t borne in the U.S. he was borne in colone Pannama
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=v5Jdg8SxH7c
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Please join Nader, and give us a chance. If you don’t think he’d be good for the nation, will you explain why?
Thank you
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I AS A MITT SUPPORTER BUT NOW I AM A RON PAUL-
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ask the Granny’s, I sent them some pics… I’d like to see them posted. Thanks Kip
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I too am really afraid for the future and sovereignity of my beloved country-Philippines. It becomes too ovious that the “money bags” are doing their best to rape our constitution and our economy. As I became more aware of the decepcion and greed of the Wall Street Thugs, my blood is boiling. I fear that my beloved 2 1/2 year old nephew will have a grim future if those ripp offs wont be stopped. I admire the courage of Rep.Ron Paul for chasing after the thugs. I too wrote one of the Senators of the Republic of the Philippines-Sen.Benigno Aquino III (the son of the late Pres.Corazon Aquino and Sen.Benigno Aquino) asking him to defend the constitution and audit the international group of bankers. The freedom that we Filipinos enjoy is too precious to me. Certainly my great grandfsther on my father’s side fought againts the Spaniards will revolt if the sovereignity of the nation is desecrated. Let us all unite in ending the tyranny,greed,lies and lust of power that those elites wanted. No more slavery,no more lies! Long live the fight of the masses
Like or Dislike:
0 
0