“Global Warming”, which is now frequently called “Climate Change” to account for the recent decline in global temperatures, has come to be a hotly contested issue. Are there valid concerns that we should consider, or is “Global Warming” just the latest manufactured crisis to cash in on the public’s fears and generate new support for global governance, global carbon taxes and other oppressive policies?
Just like many of his supporters, Ron Paul took a long, hard look at the issue, and after careful consideration, and even before the release of the “Climategate” emails in late 2009, he identified the artificial panic around “Global Warming” as an elaborate hoax:
“The greatest hoax I think that has been around for many, many years if not hundreds of years has been this hoax on [...] global warming.” – Ron Paul on Fox Business, Nov. 4, 2009
“[The Copenhagen treaty on climate change] can’t help the economy. It has to hurt the economy and it can’t possibly help the environment because they’re totally off track on that. It might turn out to be one of the biggest hoaxes of all history, this whole global warming terrorism that they’ve been using, but we’ll have to just wait and see, but it cannot be helpful. It’s going to hurt everybody.” – Ron Paul on the Alex Jones Show, Nov. 5, 2009
On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul said in a New York Times / Freakonomics interview:
“I try to look at global warming the same way I look at all other serious issues: as objectively and open-minded as possible. There is clear evidence that the temperatures in some parts of the globe are rising, but temperatures are cooling in other parts. The average surface temperature had risen for several decades, but it fell back substantially in the past few years.
Clearly there is something afoot. The question is: Is the upward fluctuation in temperature man-made or part of a natural phenomenon. Geological records indicate that in the 12th century, Earth experienced a warming period during which Greenland was literally green and served as rich farmland for Nordic peoples. There was then a mini ice age, the polar ice caps grew, and the once-thriving population of Greenland was virtually wiped out.
It is clear that the earth experiences natural cycles in temperature. However, science shows that human activity probably does play a role in stimulating the current fluctuations.
The question is: how much? Rather than taking a “sky is falling” approach, I think there are common-sense steps we can take to cut emissions and preserve our environment. I am, after all, a conservative and seek to conserve not just American traditions and our Constitution, but our natural resources as well.
We should start by ending subsidies for oil companies. And we should never, ever go to war to protect our perceived oil interests. If oil were allowed to rise to its natural price, there would be tremendous market incentives to find alternate sources of energy. At the same time, I can’t support government “investment” in alternative sources either, for this is not investment at all.
Government cannot invest, it can only redistribute resources. Just look at the mess government created with ethanol. Congress decided that we needed more biofuels, and the best choice was ethanol from corn. So we subsidized corn farmers at the expense of others, and investment in other types of renewables was crowded out.
Now it turns out that corn ethanol is inefficient, and it actually takes more energy to produce the fuel than you get when you burn it. The most efficient ethanol may come from hemp, but hemp production is illegal and there has been little progress on hemp ethanol. And on top of that, corn is now going into our gas tanks instead of onto our tables or feeding our livestock or dairy cows; so food prices have been driven up. This is what happens when we allow government to make choices instead of the market; I hope we avoid those mistakes moving forward.”
For an environmental insider’s view on the “Green Agenda” and its background and motivations check out The Green Agenda.
You know if you neocons (libertarians) hadn’t destroyed tens of millions of jobs, and threaten to destroy 100 million more, with your free-trade/open-borders; pushing out tens of millions of voters out of the Republican Party and into the Democratic Party; than the Democrats wouldn’t be in power and we wouldn’t have to worry about this Global Warming hoax.
But noooo, your neoconnory (libertarianism) inevitably ends up enlarging the state.
Pat Buchanan was right in more than one way:
http://buchanan.org/blog/pjb-does-libertarianism-lead-to-statism-415
Like or Dislike:
0 
4
No, you’d rather have your little HAARP-FED conspiracy theories.
FACE REALITY! Heck I was a Libertarian once upon a time, and I broke out of the Libertarian-delusion, IT CAN BE DONE! If I can do it, you can do it.
HAARP…gawd. Do you know how retarded that is. Ever hear of specific heat capacity?
Like or Dislike:
0 
5
Do you talk to yourself often? This could be a problem.
Like or Dislike:
4 
1
psssst buddy, Art Bell is entertainment fictional radio, not to be taken seriously.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Is our govt really concerned about global warming, the earth and the people? Why then is there a govt weather modification program funded through national defense that is harming the earth and the people? By a treaty, nations have agreed not to use this technology as a weapon. Have they forgotten or is there a loophole?
HAARP At Work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jV6Dhza2G0&feature=related
HAARP IN IRAN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSABjN7gZyg
HAARP Holes in Heaven Part 1/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dT1UUXNgMA&NR=1
Angels Still Don’t Play This HAARP_1/9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jOqfmN_3vA&feature=related
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Perhaps global warming is just a way to get a fund going to pay for all the NWO’s/govt’s demo work, when the military goes into countries following a “natural disaster” as they use HAARP (U.S. weather modification program) around the world?
The HAARP Induction Magnetometer Jan 11th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmTEt0UOUQY&feature=related
The HAARP Induction Magnetometer Jan 12th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36Iye5RaKSQ&feature=related
Haiti Possible H.A.A.R.P Target (what does HAARP do?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lp6F9-GPT4k&feature=related
1977 treaty saying we would not use this type of technology as a weapon.
Did HAARP weapon cause Haiti Earthquake killing thousands ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhJfkh0e3l0&feature=related
Sky changed colors before 2008 earthquake in China
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiZbT5U3IQk&feature=related
Earthquakes Worldwide, daily (Chile, California, Alaska, Tawain and others)
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
HAARP, lol, I haven’t heard that term since I last listened to Art Bell.
Hey how are the Shadow People doing these days. They are seen at the corner of your vision, DONT LOOK! They will disappear.
Like or Dislike:
2 
4
I agree one hundred percent that the HAARP is causing all these earthquakes.It seems like there is an earthquake every 2 days somewhere on the planet.All this precipitation is not normal wheather.It is all being caused for the purpose of controlling the masses .Shut the HAARP off .
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
Was it the 70’s or 80’s that the rain in Southern California was much worse than it is now? I was only a kid then but I remember the flooded corners and deadly channels.
There are several earthquakes somewhere on the planet every day and I believe they tend to come in clusters (several in a short time). We’ve been waiting for the “big one” in Southern California at least since I was a kid. Earthquakes are nothing new or unusual. Anticipating a bigger one is nothing new.
How soon will the US government be blamed for the San Francisco quake in 1906? (Shh … don’t give Hugo any ideas!) I’m sure someone somewhere has proof that the government uses time travel as a weapon. There is probably a secret brigade of phonebooths in the deserts of Arizona.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
The money coming from taxpayers to fund the federal government’s programs, such as HAARP, need to be shut off.
The more revenue streams big government creates (healthcare, IRS, FED, robbing the people’s money from social security and medicaid, their homes, their jobs, their businesses, the defense fund 2.6 trillion missing and unaccounted for, any of them) the more money they have to fund these wicked programs of destruction and to fund their projects such as 9/11. This federal govt is not the government of our American Republic. It’s something else. They say that a democracy is mob rule. Believe it. That’s why our founding forefathers created a Republic, not a democracy. A republic values the individual’s rights. A democracy values their own mob rules. They are insane when it comes to money, drugs, war, killing, control over everyone and everything. And Rockefeller and Bush says the NWO has a real chance to bring about world peace. Tell me how logical or likely is it for someone who has these plots and plans on their mind, to continuously terrorize people worldwide, to have made these things their life’s work, a history of them for more than 60 years, to all of a sudden bring peace to this world? The elite live in self-delusion.
We bring peace by being peaceful.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Well said Christine, The truth shall set you free.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
We are a generation that has grown up insulated from the issues of survival that are very clear in the underdeveloped parts of the globe. We realize we spend most of our time focused on issues that have nothing to do with life, maybe not consciously, but certain below the conscious level. Thus we are not confident as human beings in the survival sense. That makes us prone to fear about anything that might disrupt a perceived baseline of comfort.
With the passage of the 16th amendment we became enslaved to the interest on the national debt. Ever cent of income tax goes to pay down that debt. And it’s a debt we shouldn’t even have because congress could have issued the money without paying interest in the first place. How does this relate to global warming?
As a nation, we rush from one panic to another because we feel like we’re out of control of our lives. That, at least, is true. The masters are the powers behind the federal reserve. Watch the Money Masters on youtube, the 22 part series and you’ll see exactly what has happened, why it has happened and the fraud perpetrated on the american public. Global warming is just the latest tactic of fear, unconfirmed by any good science but backed by global ‘one-world-order’ interests. And those folks? They have direct ties to a one currency plan, a one government plan, all controlled by a central bank directing all other central banks. It is power lust at its worst.
Wealth is not destroyed by collapse. It merely changes hands. And guess which bloody hands they are. For a cause and effect understanding, watch the money masters on youtube.
Ron Paul is our best hope.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Thank the free traders for the 16th amendment, they removed tariffs and replaced it with income taxes. The free traders love taxing American income and give a free pass to foreign business, because the free traders are traitors. Free traders like Ron Paul.
Like or Dislike:
0 
5
We are certainly suffering from ‘climate change’ — with every change of the seasons. Perhaps we should consider a global seasonal tax to lessen the effects of these changes.
Can I puke now?
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
Thankfully the free traders pushed tens of millions of voters out of the Republican Party and into the Democratic Party by costing them their jobs. Now you will have to endure Enviro-Communism. Enjoy, ‘you people’ enabled the Enviro-Commies.
Like or Dislike:
1 
4
So people should not vote for the best individual if it interferes with the party line?
You realize, don’t you, that most of those people “pushed out” felt they didn’t leave the party but the party left them.
Besides, was it really RP’s fault that neither the republican or democrats provided a viable alternative? I’m sorry you can’t sleep well in the bed you made, but quit blaming others.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This is in regards to jasons comment.
So, were all idiots becouse we believe in respecting the only enviroment were subjected to. Think about what you said, and get back to me.
You made some good conspiracie theories about microwaves and ion charged whatevers, but global warming isnt a conspiracie theorie, its bappening. Not at the rapid microbial pace that politicians use to refocuse the LCD’s, but its happening.
I’ll agree with you though about the polarities being insufficient, and something has to be done.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You say global warming is “happening.” I say that’s complete bullshit. I have actually read roughly 1/3 of the Climate Research Unit’s emails. I can follow their conversation. They have cherry-picked the data. They have reviewed their own colleagues’ manuscripts that were submitted for publication. They debated over the best way to create the famous “Hockey Stick” graph so it would have “maximum visual impact.” They managed to get at least one editor of a journal fired because he dared disagree with them. They strung a bunch of correlation statistics together and came up with dire predictions for what would happen within the next 90 years—-with 33-64% certainty. That’s not certainty that is accepted as “scientific.” Scientific certainty requires 95% confidence.
In addition to their questionable science, these guys were/are heavily connected with a variety of screwballs who would give us a world government that would level the incomes for everyone—-worldwide. They would, if they could, limit car ownership to the “Singapore model.” Google that and see what you get. These are statists of the most vile kind—-politicized scientists who will lie to you to get what they want. This group envisions a technocracy that is controlled by scientists, computer experts, engineers and an army of state bureaucrats.
Call it “global warming.” Call it “climate change.” It doesn’t matter. It’s the same turd in a new box—-and it is definitely not “happening,” as you say.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
scientists said not too long ago that the polar ice caps are melting exponentiallyand faster than they had anticipated that would head us for a iceless north polar sea in ten years-I hink that global warming is a global hoax if you see it from the point of view that humans are the sole source of the problem,which of course is nonsense,but there are other factors such as increased solar flares and decreased gravitational field strength,an ozone hole over the north pole ect. Besides high altitude spraying of barium to electrify the atmosphere from manipulation of the ionisophere. As well cellular towers pumping out massive amounts of microwave radiation causing the release of heat energy from protons. Yea were only cutting down too many trees and not replacing them and industrial smoke stacks pollute with various nefarious chemicals and we are too slow to switch to hydrogen. However we dont need a global consortium of hippocrites telling us how to Run the country if they wont subject themselves to the same rigorous standards simultaneously.We have far too many resources to make safer fuels for the environment towards lower greenhouse emissions,fuelcells and liquified gasses are a wonderfull alternative as well as ultracapacitors in electric cars among other technological advancements for motors and powerplants besides offgrid energy. I dont think that Ron literally believes this,but is being safe around the dragon greed and small mindedness.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Yay Ron Paul!
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
I said earlier that my opinion of PHDs was in the gutter. I’ve been reading about a doctor that I do respect (beside RP): Patrick Moore. He is one of the founding members of GreenPeace and is taking heat for his opinions that go against the current GreenPeace group.
His idea seems to be that while humans need to respect our environment, the goal should be to help humans survive. If nuclear energy, genetically modified crops, and synthetic pesticides help then they need to be considered.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
There is no overpopulation. You can fit everyone on planet earth inside the borders of Australia comfortably with a nice piece of land. That leaves a whole lotta room to roam the planet.
What we are trying to survive is our govt’s attempts to soft kill us via unnecessary financial stress, GMO food that lack nutrition, chemtrails in our air supply full of the harmful chemical barium –guised as a “weather modification program”, HAARP that causes earthquakes, tsunamis, etc., codex alimentarius and food bills for the govt to gain control over our food supply from the farm to the table (control the food, control the people), control over farms while policing them and filling animals with shots of drugs we eventually ingest, big pharma drugging us and funding political campaigns, fluoride in our water to make us passive and cause osteoporosis and thyroid illnesses as well as flu vaccines that kill and harm us so big pharma makes big profits while the elite get their wish to reduce the population, healthcare bill to gain control over our healthcare and pick winners and losers in the insurance industry and to make big profits via the health insurance industry for their budgets and political campaigns, a reason to go to war to gain control over the earth’s resources such as oil, to kill us off as soldiers fighting wars in countries where the people have done us absolutely no harm in an attempt to control the world to bring in their one world government via the U.N., foreclosures, joblessness, lack of loans for homes and businesses but bailouts for the corporations to tax us with and put us in further debt for something WE DID NOT DO …and destroy America and all other countries in the process, causing the ultimate chaos and hardships for everyone.
It seems to me we are at war with the elite, a war we did not start, but need to find way to overturn their attempts and survive to bring about true peace for everyone. Psychopaths and sociopaths don’t make good leaders. hey, their crazy to put it simply. Why do we continue to follow their lead? Because they have money and we have been brainwashed to believe money equates to power? We need to discover and use our own power!! This could very well be what this chaos, evolution and revolution is all about.
…and we pay these folks their benefits and salaries to do this to us! to our own demise. How long will we live in this insane way before we discover there is another way of being. Ordinarily we put psychopaths under a doctor’s care and confine them because they are a threat to society. Why are these so-called leaders allowed to roam free and do what they do? I can’t figure it out.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Cristine, you’re dreaming. 6 billion people in Australia? Most of it is uninhabitable desert. To deny overpopulation is to perpetuate the fact. Resources are dwindling, and a vastly reduced world population would help to alleviate the problem. Of course, there is no easy way to accomplish this.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Dan,
She offered you an analogy of square feet per person and gave you the continent of Australia so that you can put it into perspective. You went off about Australia’s outback not being able to support humans…WTF? Your logical train just flew off the tracks.
I will offer a similar analogy, which is truth. You can fit everyone in the United States into the state of Texas and they can still have comfortable living space. No don’t tell me that it cannot happen because everyone will be pricked by cacti…lol.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Did I say anything about over-population? I don’t think so.
When it comes up I remember when I was a teen and was pushing the idea to my family. When I talked about how over developed land was here in America, my uncle who was a long distance (coast to coast) driver looked at me weird. After moving to the edge of a desolate area I know what he meant.
BTW: I would like to live in the desert and some actively seek the ability to live in much smaller quarters.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You’ve ignored so much. Sure there is a way to change things for the better concerning resources, and it will take revamping the way we do business and think of business. Currently we think everyone needs to contribute to making things to sell and we see the world as a market instead of something to preserve. This is is what corporations and the govt would like us to believe. They need us to need money so they can use it as a tool of control. They also control the abundance of world’s resources, plenty enough for everyone, but their business practices rape the earth of resources, create wars. If products were made not for the sake of generating constant profits, but for quality and longevity, we would use a lot less of the earth’s resources. Products are made to break at certain times (note limited time of warranties) so we need to buy again to replace them. This keeps us in constant buying mode instead of making them for long term use limiting the need to take more and more resources. Corps and govts would not like the change, but it’s the change we need to make.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
“Currently we think everyone needs to contribute to making things to sell and we see the world as a market instead of something to preserve.”
So what?
Would it be better if we had to grow our own food and not sell it to others? Picking an apple is forcing nature to our desires isn’t it?
We are not the only animal that manipulates our environment to survive and not the only one that uses tools to do so. But that is how humans survive. Why is manipulating our environment to survive worse that animals that manipulate their environment by killing other animals?
Why are you so sure how to preserve the planet? It was around for a long time before you were ever thought of and there is no reason to think it wont be around for another million years at least. It has been through a lot more than humans are capable of.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
We Are All One
http://www.weareallone-support.org/
THE CORPORATION [1/23] What is a Corporation?
Psychopathic, Inc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pin8fbdGV9Y
The current way of being….to go to work to make something, anything, just to have a job to make money to pay the bills has inconvenient consequences. Environmental movement issues and unresolved human issues (poverty/pollution). To make things to sell with a short life (barely through a warranty period) so that people remain in a buying mode, to make money, to enrich the corporations, to use the earth’s resources in a wasteful manner could and should be changed to
Making things that last a long time, are quality products, things that are necessary and truly useful, whereby we use less of the earth’s resources and produce less garbage and waste. Machines and the use of technology can make these products freeing us from laborious, mundane jobs, to enjoy life. The way we think about money, jobs, power, and our personal energy needs to change to develop a new way of being that will allow us to evolve beyond our current troubled state. It is obvious it is time to evolve past this level of living. When more harm than good is being caused by the status quo, it is time. The longer we take to admit it, the more painful things will be come…unless and until…
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Christine;
Are we all the same? Deep down probably, but each species has a different set of capabilities and how they survive. We survive much differently than a dolphin or a cheetah. I would say at most, we are all similar.
Do we want to be all the same? I don’t. I am an individual with unique capabilities, needs, and desires. I (probably) do not want your characteristics and do not expect you to want mine. Being a part of a colony like a drone bee or worker ant is a nightmare in my mind.
So before you tell me to change my ways, please convince me there is a reason beyond avoiding the gun that is the underlying threat in everything the government does.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I just did.
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
Climategate: Dr. Tim Ball on the hacked CRU emails
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac
Climategate: The Backstory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8CVh2deXTI&feature=related
A message to the environmental movement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEggt0ldQUI
Who is really responsible for creating pollution and poverty? The corporation and government, not “we the people”. The global warming lie is another attempt at a corporate bailout and to find a way to fund the new world order. Governments and corporations govern the world instead of “we the people”. We need to turn this around and get government back in the hands of “we the people” or our world and our lives will be destroyed by govt/corp greed. “We the people” are the ones with the strong morals, principles and values, not govts or corps. Note the advantage of incorporating in this documentary and you will see the corp structure is one of irresponsibility, the same as we experience with our government. The federal government, as is the UK government are “corporations”. Currently we are having the same difficulty with corp health insurance companies and our corp govt unable to provide us a reduction in health care costs. Health insurance is not healthcare. It is a business for profit. We do not need it. We need lower health care services and medicine, period. The govt, over the past several years could have enacted a law to make it illegal for health insurance companies to use “pre-existing conditions”, but they have not. They are instead using it as a manipulative tool to gain control over our health care system. This is an example of how corps and our govt collude together for their own benefit, not ours. Both have stopped serving us. They serve themselves at our expense. Their goals are not worthy of pursuit. They are destructive. Stop both and we will see a mighty change in the quality of our lives and life on planet earth.
THE CORPORATION [1/23] What is a Corporation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pin8fbdGV9Y
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If you keep adding sugar to a cup of coffee, it continues to get sweeter and sweeter. Heat bounces off of Carbon Dioxide molecules. That is why it acts as a green house gas in our atmosphere. If concentrations of CO2 go up, there is a corresponding warming that occurs just like the coffee gets sweeter as you add more and more sugar. We need CO2 in our atmosphere of course to help keep us from freezing but the issue here is HOW MUCH. For hundreds of thousands of years the populations of the earth remained relatively flat until the last 200 years. When the industrial revolution started and we started burning fossil fules our wealth, our populations, and our production of green house gas exploded. In 200 years we have gone from around 1 billion people on earth to nearly 7 billion people! To conclude that this will have no dire impact on our global atmosphere seems completely unreasonable to me.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
We now know we cannot trust any of the data coming through the govt. The hacked emails. This is not the first time the govt has made use of twisted science and lies, the H1n1 vaccine for example, chemicals in our food, microbiologists being mysteriously killed, nor is it the first time the govt has lied for profit, huge profits, for something the American people are not doing, but that corporations have and are doing. Yet they whip together a law that makes us suddenly responsible for the destructive acts of others.
America is in trouble because there is a steady stream of lies and deceit coming out of Washington D.C. I would like you to imagine for a moment what it would be like without the profuse amount of concerns we have today BECAUSE OF Washington D.C. and imagine life without them. What would that feel like, with each of the issues they start suddenly gone. We really are at war with our own govt, pushing back. What would daily life be like without these tyrants? They are not an asset anymore, they are not behaving like Americans, but rather something else. They are a source of troubles (not the remedy)…and the sad thing is, we pay them their comfy benefits and salaries so they can continue to do this. How idiotic is that? The constitution allows that if there comes a time when the govt is no longer constructive, it’s our duty and obligation to create a new government. I hope the tea party is thinking seriously about this obligation. May we return to our founding documents and America, the Republic and the return of every God-given freedom!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Christine, You speak as though people that become elected officials go through some kind of metamorphosis and suddenly start plotting against the American people. That is not true of most of our elected officials including Ron Paul. Is the information that comes out of “for profit” business enterprises like the gas and oil companies pure and true? Why should we believe them any more than we do the government that you hold in such contempt?
Would you stop funding of all forms of medicare and medicade, our national highways, our public parks, our police? Where would you draw the line? What about our public schools? All these things are funded through wealth redistribution and all require a federal government.
Here is something you may find interesting. In a letter to James Madison in 1785, Thomas Jefferson suggested that taxes could be used to reduce “the enormous inequality” between rich and poor. He wrote that one way of “silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise.”
During the early days of the republic, the government relied mostly on tariffs to collect revenue, under the theory that since the rich bought most of the imports, they would pay most of the taxes.
“The rich alone use imported articles, and on these alone the whole taxes of the general government are levied,” Jefferson wrote in 1811. “The poor man, who uses nothing but what is made in his own farm or family, will pay nothing. (With) our revenues applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings.”
Even our beloved Thomas Jefferson favored wealth redistribution through a central government. Its called a civilization.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
What wealth?
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
The FED is a private corporation, is not a government agency and it controls our money supply and monetary policies. it operates above the law, makes treaties and lends money to foreign countries. It is like a government unto itself and congress has no say-so over what they do. It is above the president. The FED is charged with the responsibility for keeping unemployment high and our monetary system stable. They are doing a great job, eh? Rather, they give us highs and depressions, recessions by controlling interest rates and our money supply. We are undergoing a financial controlled demolition currently.
Zeitgeist – The Federal Reserve
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ
The Creature from Jekyll Island
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIs4ckyKSDA
Unemployment is very high, millions of Americans working part time when they need full time work or they are unemployed.
Millions of Americans are losing their homes due to bad, deceitful loan programs. I work with a foreclosure company and see what is happening to the foreclosed homes in just one county. There are millions of counties across our nation. The banks are eating up the foreclosed homes, very few are being sold to third party home buyers. What will they do with them all of our homes? Two other types of bad loans will cause more defaults in the Spring. Commercial loans are due to start defaulting here soon too, which means more business closures and job losses, and when that happens homeowners will be unable to afford their mortgages. This will lead to more and more foreclosures very soon.
The government is a corporation and it acts in collusion with other large corporate structures. We saw that in the bailout. They make mistakes, but seek to shift the financial burden onto the taxpayers. They win. We lose.
Our dollar is destined to crash. What wealth belonging to American citizens will you speak of distributing when that happens? America’s wealth consists of debts to many foreign countries around the world, including China.
Currently in America we have a government we see. They put a face to the real government that operates behind the scenes, the one that controls everything, the shadow government. JFK was killed for speaking up against this shadow government that is destroying America and causing the great upheaval of our dear Republic.
The Speech that got JFK Killed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS7l6i4w11U
(The conspiracy he speaks of is what I detest. It has infiltrated our government in high places.)
The Shadow Government
(recorded before the current administration)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1S2CzgjRm4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6mBigIIRs&feature=related
Zeitgeist – Full version and Addendum II – Full version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHiuaGJ46zo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gKX9TWRyfs
Presidents are really appointed in America. Look into vote fraud. The media is owned by the elite, so they shift the voting public in the direction they want us to vote by how they handle coverage, just like they did when Ron Paul was ahead in the last election, not to mention the fraud that occurs on ballots and voting machines. We have corrupt elections yet elected officials are always telling us we go into other countries to square away THE corruption in their government, ha!
Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd72.htm
Psychopathic, Inc. – The Corporation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoQqH3yHd2E
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wake up people they are using the H.A.A.R.P to melt the polar ice caps. You know every crisis is an opportunity.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
It’s not working
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Global Warming is spelled Washington B.S.
The warping and distrust of Washington is spreading to the scientific world. That’s unfortunate. For every good thing that is created, there are those who will use it for bad, an exhibit of the very nature of those who are behind the usage. Take “money” for example, and how it us used. Bad people do bad things. Good people use things for the good of all and are not selfish and self-centered, like the corporation of the federal govt and those they partner with. Safe to say these folks are psychopaths and sociopaths and have been especially chosen for these high positions because of these qualities. No other could perform the controlled demolition of entire countries like these folks. Their entire lives have been focused on perpetrating lies. They feed the lies to congress and the administration, then our elected feed us the B.S. with the hope that their main sales guy, and buddy Pelosi can read the teleprompter with conviction to convince us of what amounts to a con job. They have no sense of balance or of “other”, just themselves. This global warming scam is causing hunger and the deaths of millions of people, needless and senseless suffering. But this helps meet the elitists quota in population reduction…while the global warming program is touted worldwide as something that will save us from destruction by supposed concerned people. Oh, really? What sane person can get behind such twisted and confused thought processes? They really need to try a detox program to clear up their minds, then maybe they can come talk to the American people with some ideas and concepts that advance America instead of putting our dear county and its citizens and those around the world in constant turmoil. We need leaders who think straight, like a Constitutional Republic American. Perhaps the tea party will bring us leaders who are not even remotely connected to the corrupt elite so we can clear the “bad apples” out of our country and get back to being ourselves again, Republic Americans who are Free, truly free from this gangster and bankster riff-raff who are an un-American as they come.
Interview with Lord Monckton re: Hitler Youth comment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21SCR2yyETk&NR=1
Lord Monckton Confronts Obama’s Nazi Youth Members With Some Hard Facts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8WawButqIc
OBAMA Youth Crash Lord Christopher Monckton Webcast in Copenhagen: “No Freedom Of Speech”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b-vrBKMxy4&feature=related
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Funny to read this a week before my Environmental Science class learns about global warming in their textbooks. I’m already getting comments from both sides of the argument, which has made me decide to hold a global warming debate for their class project in this lesson. We will also compare “An Incovenient Truth” with “The Great Global Warming Swindle.” Both of those give both sides of the story, but both have invalid information. What I’d like for my students to develop is the ability to make the decision on their own, even if that decision is, “I don’t think there’s enough out there to know either way.”
“I am certain there is too much certainty in the world.”
- Michael Crichton
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Global Warmings a exagerated issue, but the concers are non the less valid and worth considering, but let the E.P.A. evaluate this without the bullshit clouding the facts. We must as a species respect the enviroments immediate impact on or lives. Someday this could be a troubleing nuisance. Plus I think the argument of this issue is more of a concern becouse of the bullshit behind it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Heres a fundamental question we should all ask ourselves on this issue; What are the risks of believing in global warming? What are the risks in not believing in global warming? Think about it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
There’s a steady stream of lies coming out of Washington D.C. They want to use the money gained from global warming to give to poorer countries to help eliminate poverty (so they say), and they want to give money to countries who have endured the results of pollution. Since corporations hire people in poorer countries for the low wage, sweatshops, corporations are guilty of creating poverty. Since corporations are the ones who transport and manufacture the items that create pollution, corporations are the ones who are guilty of creating the pollution. We are just the consumers of whatever corporations put on the shelves for us to buy. It seems to me it is the corporations who need to change their ways and pay for their own mistakes. Our govt as of late, has a habit of making “we the people” responsible for the irresponsible corporations. We’ve had enough of that! Making us pay through the cap and trade tax that results from this treaty (that needs to see a quick death) they have been working on will not cure the ails they talk about curing. Do you see how it never will? Irresponsible corporations are never made to be responsible for their own mistakes so they will just continue as they always have.
Also, the science behind global warming is a lie. CO2 is as natural as breathing. They want to get us to the point where we consider ourselves, our very lives as something harmful to the earth, our breath. These are thoughts of a sociopaths. Trees need out CO2. The world was perfectly designed with a harmonious ecosystem of which our lives are a part.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Isn’t the fundamental question, how much more burden do we want to put on the backs of the American taxpayer for unproven science?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Zip, Nadda, None! We’re in debt up to our eyeballs and all we have to do is get up, go to work, come home, eat, sleep, get up go to work, come home, eat, sleep….and somehow we are mysteriously in debt beyond our means. This is the result of a broken system that no longer serves the people that it depends upon for an economy…a people and a government that once touted itself as the wealthiest nation on earth.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
How the hell have you been, Christine?
Keep fighting the good fight. You win either way.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hey there Louie. How goes it? Glad to be back. These website pages were going a little bazzerk for awhile, helter skelter. I see they have it all squared away now, good job. Shedding the light of truth is a good and worthwhile fight. Too many folks are still running around in the dark. I’ve been sharing with family and some are finally seeing things as they really are, not how they have been brainwashed for many years to believe. Takes awhile to transfer data, if you know what I mean. And just when I think we have enough issues to tackle, they come out with a new one without settling the ones already in the mix. They’re big on chaos.
I ventured into a new realm that caught my attention. I was just admiring the stars and sky one night and noticed something different, these strange lights in the sky. I’ve got up to 11 of these things hanging in the sky every night, most times 5 to 8 of them. They definitely are NOT stars or planets. They are much, much larger and a halogen bright white, red and blue twinkle in color, stationary, not flying about. At least they are patriotic, ha! So bright, so obvious. (Pacific NW) I checked out YouTube to see if other folks were filming these lights and they are, all over the world, various kinds. Don’t know what they are, what they are doing, but they are most definitely there every night on a regular basis. World leaders might have some astro competition with superior technology they can’t beat, or this could be another episode of the govt’s mis-directed use of technology. Just not sure what to make of it yet.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think I agree with Ron Paul on this issue. It’s hard to say when there’s so much information out there and how can we trust the news when even they are now a business only for the sake of making money? And therefore they need stories the public is interested in to sell their papers and watch their coverage.
However, I do think that it would be in our interest to begin moving toward more energy efficient techniques and vehicles, and the like. Like Obama said as his town hall meeting in Vegas recently, “We don’t want to get left behind.”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Much controversy surrounds the European Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC Reports have been attacked for their exaggerations about the possible bad effects of global warming.
So far, there have been three exaggerations identified. The first was about the glacier melt rates in the Himalayan mountains. The second was about the amount of land below Sea Level in Holland. The third was about African crop production. All three are exaggerations of possible effects of global warming.
The IPCC has now acknowledged that their comments about the Himalayan glacier melt rate had no basis in fact.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/himalayan-glaciers-melt-claims-false-ipcc
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7062667/Pachauri-the-real-story-behind-the-Glaciergate-scandal.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7107873/Climate-change-leader-knew-about-false-glacier-claims-before-Copenhagen.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7062667/Pachauri-the-real-story-behind-the-Glaciergate-scandal.html
Exaggerations about the possible effects of Global Warming on Holland have been exposed in the papers there.
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/02/anger_over_second_climate_pane.php
“According to the last IPCC report, published in 2007, some 55% of the Netherlands is below sea level and 65% of gross national product is produced in that area. But according to the national statistics office CBS, just 20% of the country is below sea level and 19% of GDP is earned there.”
The most recent scandal involves exaggerations about the effect of Global Warming on African Crop Production:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7017907.ece
“The most important is a claim that global warming could cut rain-fed north African crop production by up to 50% by 2020, a remarkably short time for such a dramatic change. The claim has been quoted in speeches by Rajendra Pachauri, the IPCC chairman, and by Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general.
This weekend Professor Chris Field, the new lead author of the IPCC’s climate impacts team, told The Sunday Times that he could find nothing in the report to support the claim.”
Since then, a friend pointed me at this article:
‘Professor Phil Jones, member of the IPCC, who is at the centre of the “Climategate” affair, concedes that there has been no “statistically significant” rise in temperatures since 1995.’
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/158214
I despise being lied to, no matter by whom, nor matter what your motives are.
Chris Shaker
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Many people can not describe the glacial cycle, nor describe where we are in it.
Over the past 800,000 years, we’ve had 8 glacial cycles, each about 100,000 years long, consisting of roughly 90,000 years of advancing ice followed by roughly 10,000 years of warmth. Sometimes, the warm period has been up to 23,000 years long.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/289/5486/1897
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/289/5486/1897
We appear to be around 10,000 to 14,000 years into the current warming period.
The glacial cycle times changed drastically about 800,000 years ago, from a 41,000 year cycle to a 100,000 year cycle. Not only that, but previously, the glaciation and deglaciation phases had been balanced. Instead, for the past 800,000 years, the 100,000 year cycle has been asymmetric, with about 90,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of deglaciation.
No one seems to know for sure why the cycle changed so much, but Gordon MacDonald and Richard A. Muller at Berkeley have a theory that the cycle of orbital inclination seems to explain it. They explain this in their book, “Ice Ages and Astronomical Causes”. Other theories exist, such as the one proposed by Eli Tziperman and Hezi Gildor.
http://www.agu.org/pubs/sample_articles/cr/2001PA000627/
Here is a web page from the polar foundation that talks about the 100,000 year glacial cycle, and the fact that the cycle changed 800,000 years ago:
http://www.sciencepoles.org/index.php?/articles_interviews/dr_eric_wolff_climate_cycles_and_million_year_old_ice/&uid=1481
Somehow, they measure deuterium in the ancient ice cores, and derive the temperature record from that. They’ve currently got ice cores, and the temperature record they provide, going back about a million years.
This National Geographic web page mentions that the highest and lowest temperatures obtained from analysis of the ice cores spanning the past 800,000 years occurred during our most recent glacial cycle. The hottest temperature was 4.5 degrees Celsius warmer than today. That was 130,000 years ago.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/070705-antarctica-ice.html
It seems interesting to me that record high and low temperatures, and the glacial maximum, for the past 800,000 years were set during this most recent glacial cycle!
Given that the maximum temperature during the last warming cycle was about 4.5 C warmer than today, it seems likely that we’ll continue to see much warmer temperatures during this warm cycle, just due to the natural glacial cycle.
This source gives a history of the science behind our understanding of the past glacial cycles.
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/cycles.htm
It seems to show that the end of this warm period is fairly near.
I welcome factual corrections, additional information, or education.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The climate change movement hijacked the true environmental movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEggt0ldQUI
This causes confusion. Separate the two and you will see one, climate change, is the lie. The true environmental movement has to do with pollution, which is by the way created by corporations. these same corporations, which we have no control over and therefore are not responsible for their mistakes, also use sweatshops in foreign countries to keep people in poverty. Policies of the United States of America, a federal corporation, are responsible for allowing them to do this. Probably some lobbying going on there. So, if we truly want to get rid of poverty, then these corporations have to change their ways. And if we want to reduce pollution, then these corporations have to change their ways (i.e can no longer run ships dumping toxins into the waters that contaminate and sicken entire villages and sea creatures). Point is….Americans should not be taxed for the mistakes of big corps. I think the govt has arranged enough corporation bailouts already, ones that never should have been to cast the payment for corp mistakes onto the consumers and the American people….and people around the world. Corporations are responsible for their own mistakes! Just like the govt is responsible for its own mistakes!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Anger, snarky remarks, and unresearched opinions will get you nowhere. If you want to debate the merits of this bill or that law, fine. But please do not try and convince me or anyone else that the climate is not affected by things like ocean temperatures or desalinization. The polar ice caps are melting, which WILL add fresh water to the ocean, which WILL cause desalinization, which WILL create new and more extreme weather patterns. I respect all who oppose the climate change legislation. Much of it is written by and benefiting the same corporate interests who at the same time rail against it. However, anyone who believes cold weather and snow storms are proof that climate change is a hoax needs to read something other than unsubstantiated blogs. Lets keep the debate civil and based in fact.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chaddrbox: We should be civil in this debate. You have to understand that this site has a lot of conspiracy theorists. To them, everything that happens in this world has an evil intention behind it. Having said that I believe that Dr. Paul is right about the fact that there is “something afoot”. I disagree with him that it is a hoax however. A hoax is something that is totally false. He even admits in his New York Times interview that there is smothing afoot so he doesn’t really believe it is a hoax. He just thinks the potential effects have been exaggerated. However, I don’t see the need to be as alarmed about it until we gather more definitive evidence about the truth of the theory and its potential affects.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yea. Lets just sit tight and wait until all the fish will bi fished out and polluted to the point that only these giant jellyfishes would floating in 3 meter size around.
Then all the polar bears will permanently come around to the mainland and start chewing some warm-padded “Columbia” boots in Canadian towns. Then water in Arctics and Antarctica will acidified to the point that all the ocean microorganisms will die one after another…then organisms that supposed to eat these micro’s, then fish that supposed to eat these organisms… and then finally it comes to empty shelves in Publix and WinDixie fish sections. Then water streams will be dried out bc there is not enough snow accumulated up in the mountain’ glaciers to create ice storages. and slowly melt down to create of what we’re drinking today…
Then we will surely start fighting each other for fresh water sources and all came to chaos…
Then one last human’s sunset, some stupid fuck will check the Google (via Opera of course) at his last breath for the last time and see this cashed-out page, were we trying to WARNING everyone that planet climate DOES changing. No matter how much benefits some corporations did at “carbon taxes” or any other Grand BS. And then tiny spark of intellect will freeze his list thoughts: “o, shit…”
And for those who had fallen into another modern meditation about poles changing.
Do Earth changing poles due to change in its elliptical trajectory around Sun?
And how that physically possible. Bc if its right, then we should be experiencing VERY SLOW ice storages and permafrost levels decline. Instead, (if the Earth changing its climate over every 100K’s of years) then how
‘inda’Hell these Argentinian glaciers were melting in only 25-30 years of scientific recording???????????
Which poles are changing, btw, did they told you? Magnetic ones? Geo-physical? If so, how come Antarctic icing is not crawling to Australia or Argentina? Or Arctics are not close with permanent ice shield at Norwegian Sea, Bering’s or northern Canadian sea.
And you sure that Dr. Paul (with all my respect and hope for him) clearly understands the “Human factor” in such: http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/sea_otter.php#
and these http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/habitat/coral_reef.php
and these http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/antarctic-marine-life-threatened-by-crab-invasion-782989.html or http://www.thewe.cc/weplanet/news/arctic/permafrost_melting.htm
Btw, these are just scientific encounters, nothing to do with new political debates.
Damned, just imaging 2 polar cups and
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Pole shift. Will cause weather changes. Cause has nothing to do with humans.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
First of all, are you aware at all of the recent exposing of the leading research being based off with held and even contradictory research? Well here you go:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html
Second of all you make the point of human intervention, then post a bunch of links of endangered animals. These all the well may be the cause of human intervention, but you fail to realize that these animals are endangered not because of “human caused climate change”. Pollution is the cause of these endangered animals, not climate change. As seen in the above article, man made climate change is STILL not supported by concrete evidence. You people are speaking out of your ass. What kind of research conspires to withhold evidence and findings, then proceeds to make fact of it, in turn governing us into paying unnecessary taxes for excessive prevention of a mythical event?
You are blind.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chaddrbox
In theory, yes, the melting of polar ice caps would cause desalinization of the oceans. By how much, though? If the oceans hold 97% of the world’s water (3.1622 x 10^21 gallons), and glaciers and polar ice caps combine to hold 2.4%, then how much would the overall salinity of the ocean change? Correct me if I’m wrong, but the polar ice caps hold 7.824 x 10^19 gallons of water. Adding that would mean an increase of water into the oceans by 2.4%
The average salinity of the ocean is around 3.5%. If you were to take 1 liter of water with a salinity of 3.5% and add 24mL of fresh water to that sample, what would be the new salinity of the sample? The answer is 3.4 percent. In other words, if conditions were such that you could melt all glaciers and polar ice caps on Earth, you would decrease the salinity of the oceans by .1% Can you name one organism that is incapable of surviving a change in salinity of .1%? See? I was able to make a valid point using math, science and no caps lock.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Please Note: The next person who says harsh winter means global warming is not happening will receive a long lecture. Adding large amounts of water to the climate does not mean there will be less weather; it means there will be more. Your common sense does not trump science; these people have PhDs in climate science…. You know, the physics, chemistry and math behind it. You’re making yourself sound like a rube.
We are talking about a matter of a few degrees Farenheit. You can’t just decide based on whether you can tell that it’s hotter. Do you also insist that “them fancy computer boxes must work by magic” because you don’t understand electronics?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
HAARP
govt weather modification program…weather warfare…more techy than the box…better get to reading and researching. You’ll probably ask why. That will get you started on a long journey. Synchronicity and coincidence or planned cover-up, or man-made proof of man-made “global warming”?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
They Use Science for Military Weather too. Follow the $.
Stay on your Toes?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
PhDs? My respect for that level of education is in the gutter now. I won’t bow down to them because of a piece of paper they possess. Maybe they would act nicer if I chanted that I was unworthy of their grace.
Their short term predictions (the earth is getting hotter every day) have proven fake. Their long term predictions are shown to be manipulated by the rulers of academia (via email). They have shown to not have the guts to accept that they made a mistake.
There probably is an external motivation like owning stock in a company that would profit from the government requiring alternate energy.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I wonder; how many would harp on the current weather we are experiencing if it wasn’t for the harping on from the pro-CC group. Every hot or dry day during the summer was used as an excuse to disregard human survival needs. We are returning the favor.
Why is the pro-CC group harping on the current 4 year drought as if it was the worse we’ve had. Talk to some people who survived the 10 year complete lack of rain called the “dust bowl”. Only someone with a very tender foot would complain about what we have now. Maybe Al Gore has had too many foot massages through-out the years.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Agenda 21
They are trying to move people around, make some places inhabitable, not life sustaining, ruining the earth with chemicals (air, land, water, food) depopulate and use weather strategically as a weapon against all people everywhere per how they want the world to be. Isn’t that thoughtful?
Search Agenda 21 on youtube. Plenty of vids.
MUST BE STOPPED. THESE ARE PROGRAMS DESIGNED BY THE SOCIOPATHS AND PSYCHOPATHS. We ordinarily confine these folks because they are a threat to society…yet we are calling them leaders today? ha! Confine them!
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
Cap And Trade Scam To Be Enforced At State Level
http://www.prisonplanet.com/cap-and-trade-scam-to-be-enforced-at-state-level.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“The Science is Scuttled” – NASA climate page, suckered by IPCC, deletes their own ‘moved up’ glacier melting date reference
And the purge begins.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/23/nasa-climate-page-suckered-by-ipcc-deletes-a-moved-up-glacier-melting-date-reference/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
One thing that is clear,
Scam, Scam, Scam.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYj5baVfB0Y
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Brrrrrrrrrrr
Where is Al baby, as Lord Monckton calls him, these days anyway? Not around to take any of the heat, warming, heat, get it? Somebody should take that hockey stick and shove it where the sun don’t shine, the lie’n arse. I understand Mr. Obama is still going to pursue this climate change. Maybe we need two hockey sticks. We do need new leaders who show some sign of intelligence, some truth would be good.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
One thing absolutely clear on this issue is that nothing is absolutely clear. ANYONE WHO TAKES A POLARIZED OPINION ON THIS SUBJECT IS FULL OF THEMSELVES. It is embarrassing to read strongly worded, (some even indignant) posts by ignoramuses. A friend of mine, who has devoted his life to studying this subject believes that it is best to keep an open mind and be safe rather than sorry; meaning that some measures are smart to try and others are too expensive at this stage of uncertainty. That makes sense.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
World misled over Himalayan glacier meltdown
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
AGW Debunked for £5.00
http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
1200 new cold and snow records set in the last week in the USA, more coming
wattsupwiththat?!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/06/the-frigid-hit-parade-over-1200-new-cold-and-snow-records-set-in-the-last-week-in-the-usa-more-in-progress/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A letter sent from:
The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
1 January 2010
His Excellency Mr. Kevin Rudd,
Prime Minister, Commonwealth of Australia.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/03/climate-change-proposed-personal-briefing/#more-14778
Monckton wields a mean logic hammer
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Temps Plunge to Record as Cold Snap Freezes North, East States…
Vermont sets ‘all-time record for one snowstorm’…
Iowa temps ‘a solid 30 degrees below normal’…
Seoul buried in heaviest snowfall in 70 years…
Peru’s mountain people ‘face extinction because of cold conditions’…
Beijing — coldest in 40 years…
World copes with Arctic weather…
Where is that global warming when you need it?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Co2 is food, not pollution
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/01/oh-snap-co2-causes-ocean-critters-to-build-more-shells/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Are’t you just sick of the lies and the liars? For “we the people” to be much brighter in intelligence than our govt sort of makes them an unnecessary expense don’t you think? Who of us needs more expenses when we can do with a whole lot less, a lot less stress, and make it more successfully on our own?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Wikipedia’s Climate Doctor
“The Medieval Warm Period disappeared, as did criticism of the global warming orthodoxy. With the release of the Climategate Emails, the disappearing trick has been exposed. The glorious Medieval Warm Period will remain in the history books, perhaps with an asterisk to describe how a band of zealots once tried to make it disappear.”
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/12/18/lawrence-solomon-wikipedia-s-climate-doctor.aspx
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
William Connolley sure has been busy rewriting climate history online.
History of climate gets ‘erased’ online
More than 5,000 entries tailored to hype global-warming agenda
A new report reveals a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator rewrote climate history, editing more than 5,000 unique articles in the online encyclopedia to cover traces of a medieval warming period – something Climategate scientists saw as a major roadblock in the effort to spread the global warming message.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S….._Connolley
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?f…..eId=119745
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The death toll from winter storms across Europe has risen to at least 80, as a bitter cold wave plunged temperatures to minus 20 degrees Celsius and heavy snow continues to plague the continent.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=114363§ionid=351020606
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Climategate II
Russian data ‘cherry picked by CRU’ to fit theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElPunkm1zYQ
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The final Copenhagen draft agreement which was hammered out in the early hours of Friday morning includes provisions for a global tax on financial transactions that will be paid directly to the World Bank, as President Obama prepares to bypass Congress by approving a massive transfer of wealth from America into globalist hands.
As Lord Monckton, Alex Jones and others warned, the notion that the globalists would achieve nothing at Copenhagen has likely been a ruse all along. The elite look set to ram through the lion’s share of their agenda, which would include a massive global government tax at a cost of at least $3,000 a year for American families already laboring under a devastating recession, double digit unemployment and a reduction in living standards.
Your global government has arrived.
Congratulations
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Monckton And Pure Logic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuovqFwUtDc&feature=player_embedded
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Should this man be chairman of the IPCC?
‘All Roads Lead To Pachauri’
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2009/12/all-roads-lead-to-pachauri.html
Pecunia Non Olet
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
‘Open Letter to Secretary-General of United Nations’
http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You can’t make up this stuff …..
Woman Who Invented Credit Default Swaps is One of the Key Architects of Carbon Derivatives, Which Would Be at the Very CENTER of Cap and Trade
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/12/woman-who-invented-credit-default-swaps.html
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“When the EPA published its “Endangerment Finding” on greenhouse gases and proposed rule, back in April, almost every paragraph of the text (Federal Register, April 24, 2009, pp 18886-18910) cited as authority the IPCC’s 2007 Report, which the Agency acknowledges it “relies on most heavily”.
And whence came the main input on climate change to that report?
Yes, that’s right! You’ve got it: from Phil Jones, Michael Mann and the rest of the lads at the CRU, East Anglia. From the innovative, creative “scientists” who wanted to “beat the crap” out of a climate change sceptic; who “just completed Mike’s Nature trick”; who “can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t”; who deleted e-mails in the interests of science; who tried to prevent publication of dissenters’ views; who coined the historic phrase ‘hide the decline’.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100019206/climategate-barack-obamas-rule-by-epa-decree-is-a-coup-detat-against-congress-made-in-britain/
“Truth is the daughter of time, not of authority.”
– Francis Bacon
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ohhhhh, my gosh…. Great find! Look at all those incriminating emails… Is this where they get the phrase, mad scientist?
Al Gore’s, Obama’s and the UN’s worlds just got a little hotter! Just in time for Copenhagen!! Now what will they think up next?
Breaking News Story: CRU has apparently been hacked – hundreds of files released
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/
Thanks for the post. This totally made my day!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
http://www.climateaudit.org/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The center of the earth is like 12,000 degrees because THAT IS WHERE HELL IS!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Steve,
I am not sure where you got that figure from, but that model is broken..
The centre of earth is far from being 12000degrees.
In fact, there is far more evidence to suggest that planets (including earth) and even the Sun are actually hollow spheres..and can actually sustain life…
Experiments with gravity show the earths crust (which is where the centre of gravity really is)to be more dense than the centre or earth, and the so called molten iron core that main stream scientists would have us believe..
Not only that, but liquid and gas, no matter how dense or hot do not produce an electromagnetic field.. Scientists can measure these fields and know they are there.. So on one hand they claim the earth has a molten iron core, and on the other they are taking measurements of the the earths electromagnetic field and stating that the fields themselves cant be produced by liquids of any kind..
You cant have both… Since we can prove the fields exist, it is far more plausible and likely that the earth is hollow and has openings at the poles than it is to suggest otherwise..
Earth along with all the planets is also expanding. Its estimated to be about 40% larger now than it was when the continents were all joined. And yes the crust is all one piece.. Our continents are not drifting freely as academia teaches our children in school..
You can even see the grow lines with Google Earth..
This information is freely available on the web..
You just have to look.
And as far as your reference to hell is concerned..
Well…religion would love for you to believe in such a place, but from my understanding… that is an imaginary place produced by the imaginations of fear mongering control freaks, bent on scaring people into submission and obedience..
Obey, and repent or go to hell..
Ha haha what a pisser…
If there was such a place, it too would be a place of God, as there is only one thing.. and everything is a part of the one thing that is… Anyone who believes in hell, does not know God..And anyone who tells you that you must do this or that to find God has even less of an idea of the true nature of things, than the poor saps following them…
All paths lead to god by the way… where else is there to go??
Happy researching.. i know you will…
All the best.
Peace I AM
P
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Was this a serious post? The earth is hollow?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yes John,
This was a ’serious’ post.. I know how this must sound at first, but if you are a dedicated researcher with an open mind, then you should have no problem finding and digesting the information related to this theory.. Remember, even relativity and gravity are just theories, even though they are taught as fact..There is more evidence to suggest the earth and other planets (spheres) are hollow than there is otherwise..
Remember nothing in the universe is solid.. Everything is mostly space.. You only need view inside an atom (you know, the stuff that all material things are made of and what scientists once believed to be solid matter), to see that they are 99% empty space..
By looking closer again we see inside the protons & neutrons (components of the atomic nuclei) are also proportionately hollow, (except for the quarks attached by gluons that form hadrons or(protons & neutrons). When technology improves it is expected that we will find the same scenario again as we look closer, only on a different level. So there are worlds upon worlds within and without.. Planets are just giant atoms, (somewhat more complex-but u get the idea), that also contain a nucleus (central sun).
Look at the milky way galaxy.. It has a bright centre or powerhouse (nucleus) and approx 400 billion suns (stars), (giant electrons spinning around the nucleus), which based on its 30000light year diameter would be a similar scale to an atom.
So, in some ways, amongst others not mentioned here, it makes perfect sense that planets and even suns are hollow.. It is also summized that planets give birth to other planets.. It makes sense to me anyway.. And I feel that one day this will not only be proven and taught in schools, but we will witness it. Maybe NASA already have.. God knows they are hiding alot of information..
Oh thats right, NASA doesnt have to disclose any of their findings as they are actually a military organization protected within their charter by the US President…
Check it out.. you wont be disappointed..
Peace I AM
P
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I learned a great deal about the ‘Myth of Global Warming’ from a prominent scientist (Arthur Robinson), who sponsored the ‘MGW’ petition which was signed by thousands of scientists ~ prior to Kyoto.
Art Robinson also shows full supportion of Ron Paul on his website. You can see more information on this at http://oism.org/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0