Global Warming

2944 Responses




Global Warming has come to be a hotly contested issue. Are there valid concerns that we should consider, or is Global Warming just the latest manufactured crisis to cash in on the public’s fears and generate new support for global governance, global carbon taxes and other oppressive policies?

On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul said in a New York Times / Freakonomics interview:

“I try to look at global warming the same way I look at all other serious issues: as objectively and open-minded as possible. There is clear evidence that the temperatures in some parts of the globe are rising, but temperatures are cooling in other parts. The average surface temperature had risen for several decades, but it fell back substantially in the past few years.

Clearly there is something afoot. The question is: Is the upward fluctuation in temperature man-made or part of a natural phenomenon. Geological records indicate that in the 12th century, Earth experienced a warming period during which Greenland was literally green and served as rich farmland for Nordic peoples. There was then a mini ice age, the polar ice caps grew, and the once-thriving population of Greenland was virtually wiped out.

It is clear that the earth experiences natural cycles in temperature. However, science shows that human activity probably does play a role in stimulating the current fluctuations.

The question is: how much? Rather than taking a “sky is falling” approach, I think there are common-sense steps we can take to cut emissions and preserve our environment. I am, after all, a conservative and seek to conserve not just American traditions and our Constitution, but our natural resources as well.

We should start by ending subsidies for oil companies. And we should never, ever go to war to protect our perceived oil interests. If oil were allowed to rise to its natural price, there would be tremendous market incentives to find alternate sources of energy. At the same time, I can’t support government “investment” in alternative sources either, for this is not investment at all.

Government cannot invest, it can only redistribute resources. Just look at the mess government created with ethanol. Congress decided that we needed more biofuels, and the best choice was ethanol from corn. So we subsidized corn farmers at the expense of others, and investment in other types of renewables was crowded out.

Now it turns out that corn ethanol is inefficient, and it actually takes more energy to produce the fuel than you get when you burn it. The most efficient ethanol may come from hemp, but hemp production is illegal and there has been little progress on hemp ethanol. And on top of that, corn is now going into our gas tanks instead of onto our tables or feeding our livestock or dairy cows; so food prices have been driven up. This is what happens when we allow government to make choices instead of the market; I hope we avoid those mistakes moving forward.”

After additional consideration and analysis and shortly before the release of the Climategate emails in late 2009, Ron Paul identified the artificial panic around Global Warming as an elaborate hoax:

“The greatest hoax I think that has been around for many, many years if not hundreds of years has been this hoax on [...] global warming.” – Ron Paul on Fox Business, Nov. 4, 2009

“[The Copenhagen treaty on climate change] can’t help the economy. It has to hurt the economy and it can’t possibly help the environment because they’re totally off track on that. It might turn out to be one of the biggest hoaxes of all history, this whole global warming terrorism that they’ve been using, but we’ll have to just wait and see, but it cannot be helpful. It’s going to hurt everybody.” – Ron Paul on the Alex Jones Show, Nov. 5, 2009

For an environmental insider’s view on the “Green Agenda” and its background and motivations check out The Green Agenda. Also read Lew Rockwell’s Anti-Environmentalist Manifesto.

Likes(0)Dislikes(1)

2,944 responses to “Global Warming”

  1. Travis

    If you want to stand out and be noticed, you can get novelty billiard balls.

    These types of players are eventually outwitted by the more experienced poker player
    who. Hours laughing at the top of our lungs or just shaking our heads for the sheer
    ridiculous nature of what had happened.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Big Susie

    Hmmmmm well u need your chill pill hun.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  3. คาสิโนออนไลน์

    I rarely drop remarks, however after reading
    a few of the responses on Global Warming. I do have
    2 questions for you if it's okay. Is it just me or do a few of these responses appear
    like they are written by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at additional sites, I'd like to follow anything new you have to post.

    Could you list of the complete urls of all your social networking sites
    like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin
    profile?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

  4. AntarmAcini

    tqqewc Nike air 18 xepsyt nike air max 18 cznbtw Nike 18 Air Max wrgomi http://nike-airmax180.org nsejrq Michael Kors Handbags Outlet hpycde Michael Kors Handbags Outlet On Sale tdvxrn Michael kors Handbags Outlet on Sale gmdmfi http://michaelkorsehandbagsoutletonline.com vohpgg acg Shoes fwsllz nike acg boots titfrn nike Acg sneakers qywhon http://nikeacgbootsonsale.org sywsil airmax 9 rcyrbb Nike air Max 9 shoes vzkgbm Nike Airmax 9 pimaxp http://nikeair-max90shoes.com jlrdyh Michael Kors Watches nuzukv Michael Kors Watches jhgtxr Michael Kors Watches osodwc http://michaelkorsewatchesonsale.com zjruzf air max online shop fpkvej Air Max Online Shop cxkote nike air max shop hlcmif http://air-maxshop.org boujmu michael Kors handbags qswymu Michael kors Handbag yznpsi michael kors handbag glonqo http://michaelkorshandbagsooutlet.org pafsua Nike Air Max Bw Classic jlwmvk Nike air Max Bw classic ikjqeu Nike air Max Bw classic ayazbc http://nikeair-maxclassic.com swfxyb cheap Nike air max Ltd ibrnhu Cheap nike Air Max ltd dajdbe nike air ltd qhwlqw http://nikeairmaxltd2.org lthjcg michael kors purses ojvtyb Michael kors Purses glrzza Michael kors Purse ajshmq http://michaelkorspursesoutlett.com qqnlgo Michaels Kors Handbags bcqudn Michaels Kors Handbags xafgva Michael kors Python Handbag tuvbul http://handbagsmichaelkorse.com fsgdcw Nike airmax Skyline xnlcxa Air max Skyline fqvntm Air max Skyline tjnipi http://nikeair-maxskyline.com xurmcj michael Kors bags sswoqq michael Kors bag whkpnm Michael Kors Diaper Bag nshfrl http://michaelkorsebagssale.com

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4

  5. Mike

    As long as there's a planet, the climate will always endure weather changes. Man-made climate change is made up by eco friendly nut jobs. And Al Gore is one of them. He pays scientists to give people false alarm about this "global warming" scam because thats how he gets his money. This winter, the east coast has had RECORD COLD TEMPERATURES, (temperatures that, ACCORDING TO WEATHER FORCASTERS, that hasnt been seen in almost 20 years) All you tree huggers need to get a life and quit posting non sense.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Hotly debated. What do you think? Thumb up 17 Thumb down 16

    1. Lo

      Are you a climate scientist? If not, what gives you authority to speak about whether or not climate change is real?

      Weather and climate are NOT the same thing. I understand that the east coast has experienced severe cold this winter, but California has been plagued by heat waves and drought. 2013 was the driest year on record in California. Making claims about the weather in a particular region and then trying to extrapolate meaning to world climate just makes you sound ignorant.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Hotly debated. What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 15

      1. James

        So unless you are a certified scientist in a field you can't know anything about that field? Really?? That will severely limit one's topics for conversations.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Highly rated. What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 3

        1. Paul

          James, like Lo said, the issue is that climate and weather are separate topics. Weather is day to day, maybe a season. Climate is the average of a 30 year period of global temperatures, and science undeniably proves human carbon emissions are harming our environment and changing our climate temperatures a significant amount.

          Likes(1)Dislikes(0)

          Report this comment

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3

      2. Johnny

        @Lo: By the same token, are you a certified climate scientist? If not, what gives you authority to speak about whether or not climate change is real?

        @Paul: Nobody denies human emissions make some contribution. The question is "How much?" and if that amount is negligible then why these monstrous government taxes? Even if climate change is as true as you say, "fighting it" is not government's duty. The free market can come up with solutions far better and more cost effective than the govt. can - and all without robbing a single person.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

  6. oil delivery long island

    It's more of an old school bulletin board than a modern forum, navigating the site and locating information can take some
    getting used to. You can usually find this information
    on their website, or by calling them. In fact, US per capita consumption is 14 times that
    of China.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2

  7. jake

    An interview with Ron Paul about his presidential platform on energy and the environment: http://grist.org/article/paul1/

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1

    1. saleem

      Marijuana: Hemp Made Cars Running on Hemp, Supressed Oppertunities . I’ll guess the oil and steel industry didn’t want this world to be green. Nor to be a bit more peaceful either. With that much hemp around needed to fuel all our engines and to replace many of the metals and plastics, the temptation of that first marijuana sigare

      studenten haarschnitt berlin

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  8. jhon

    Ouch! ‘Senate global warming hearing backfires on Democrats’ — Boxer’s Own Experts Contradict Obama! — ‘Skeptics & Roger Pielke Jr. totally dismantled warmism (scientifically, economically, rhetorically) — Climate Depot Round Up
    ‘Sen. Boxer’s Own Experts Contradict Obama on Climate Change’ -- Warmists Asked: 'Can any witnesses say they agree with Obama’s statement that warming has accelerated during the past 10 years?' For several seconds, nobody said a word. Sitting just a few rows behind the expert witnesses, I thought I might have heard a few crickets chirping': http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/07/19/ouch-senate-global-warming-hearing-backfires-on-democrats-skeptics-roger-pielke-jr-totally-dismantled-warmism-scientifically-economically-rhetorically/
    Warmist admits recent 97% ‘consensus’ survey paper is bogus: http://junkscience.com/2013/07/20/warmist-admits-recent-97-consensus-survey-paper-is-bogus/
    71% Of The US Below Normal Temperature in 2013: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/71-of-the-us-below-normal-temperature-in-2013/
    Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry on Sen. Boxer’s key warmist expert on ocean acidification: ‘Doney’s [Senate] testimony didn’t score too high on my credibility meter’: http://judithcurry.com/2013/07/19/ocean-acidification-discussion-thread/
    Paper finds Arctic climate & sea ice extent related to solar activity — Paper published by the Danish Meteorological Institute: http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/07/new-paper-finds-arctic-climate-sea-ice.html

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 9

  9. jake

    Are wind farms saving or killing us? A provocative investigation claims thousands of people are falling sick because they live near them The symptoms they claim to have suffered may vary – including dizziness; increased blood pressure and depression – but the theme remains the same. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2199284/Wind-farms-Are-wind-farms-saving-killing-A-provocative-investigation-claims-thousands-people-falling-sick-live-near-them.html#ixzz2XRwvjbYc
    The Great Global Warming Swindle, A great documentary by the BBC that exposes the poilitics behind this shameful manipulation of the people of the world: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ-1iL9g8nU

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 4

  10. jakeliberman

    Marijuana: Hemp Made Cars Running on Hemp, Supressed Oppertunities . I'll guess the oil and steel industry didn't want this world to be green. Nor to be a bit more peaceful either. With that much hemp around needed to fuel all our engines and to replace many of the metals and plastics, the temptation of that first marijuana sigaret would be too close around the corner for the masses. The powers that be like the people more to consume stupifying and aggressifying alcohol products so they'll stay in their matrix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKEubbn_2oA

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2

  11. Bushwhacker

    With some understanding of farming practices around the world and soil biology, it's not difficult to understand that the main cause of rises of CO2 levels are from deforestation. When bare soil is exposed to the sun's heat the microbial life within it is killed off and oxidation of the soil occurs (Deforestation is also a contributor to flooding, since the ground can then no longer hold as much water but that's a different subject).

    To reverse CO2 buildup we must not only plant more trees, but learn from nature and create forests that feed us. Forests have up to 8 different growth layers ranging from root plants, through small shrubs, climbing plants all the way to canopy trees. There are foods that can be cultivated this way too and we should look to nature to see how we can improve the earth.

    Fighting nature with ever stronger toxic chemicals (mostly derived from natural gas and oil) means we are killing the soil and increasing CO2 levels in our atmosphere and also damaging our health from consuming traces of such toxic chemicals in addition to eating foods grown with lower nutritional value.

    Farming as it is today is unsustainable, since it is highly dependent on use of oil to produce it. 5 times more energy is used for production of food (through burning of fossil fuels by tractors, trucks, planes, ships, etc) than is actually contained within. When oil runs out, we'll be doomed if we continue on this path.

    Learn about Permanent (Agri)culture a.k.a. Permaculture and grow your own foods at home to give your family and the earth the best chance of heath & future.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 6

    1. Shannon

      Thank you so much for sharing this great information!
      It sounds like you have true knowledge and understanding about these issues. I hope you find many ways to share your knowledge and suggestions... MANY people need to learn about this!
      I am working on putting together some educational programs to help raise awareness.
      thanks again! :-)
      Shannon

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4

  12. jam

    More and more scientists are challenging the conventional wisdom on Global
    Warming. The ground-breaking 2004 Channel Four film “The Great Global Warming Swindle” set out the scientific case against climate alarmism, with interviews with top scientists in the field. In the eight years since then, it’s been confirmed by events. Professor Phil Jones of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia recognises that there has been no statistically significant warming for fifteen years. In fact over the last century the temperature has increased by only about 0.7° C. Even green guru James Lovelock, inventor of the “Gaia” hypothesis and godfather of environmentalists, has conceded that climate alarmism has been hopelessly over-hyped. He sais 20 years ago we know what climate is doing. now we dont. The slight warming in the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established long term natural climate cycles- The Roman Optimum, The Dark Ages, The Mediæval Warm Period, The little Ice Age. And now we seem to be moving into a new natural 21st century optimum.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 5

    1. hammlatern

      We hear a lot about “green jobs” in the renewables industry. The reality is rather
      different. A recent report called “Worth The Candle?” by Verso Economics
      demonstrates that for every job created in the renewable sector, four jobs are
      destroyed elsewhere in the economy. How? By driving up energy costs, reducing
      competitiveness and deterring investment. A Spanish study entitled “Effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources” by Professor Gabriel Calzada Alvarez at King Juan Carlos University questions whether “green jobs” are worth the public investment. According to this document renewables have received €28.7 billion in subsidies. This is nearly €600,000 for each of the 50,200 jobs created. Meanwhile renewables businesses are collapsing. In the US, President Obama touted solar-PV company Solyndra as a text-book example of renewables and green jobs: it soon went belly-up. A study by The Washington Post shows that of the approximately $19 billion loaned so far, a total of just 3,545 jobs have been created.That comes to over $5 million per job.
      In China, solar PV manufacturers are facing a crisis as demand fails to match projections and prices slip below costs. Renewables are not about “green jobs”.
      They’re about green unemployment. In the UK, the world’s largest wind turbine manufacturer, a Danish company called Vestas, has scrapped plans to build an offshore wind factory in Kent. The 70 hectare site would have housed a facility designed to build the Danish company’s 7MW V164 offshore wind turbines but a lack of confirmed orders led to the project being cancelled. This decision is the second time that Vestas has opted out of the UK market; in 2009 it closed down a plant making onshore turbines on the Isle of Wight. Contrary to the claims of the green lobby, the renewable industry is unsustainable. It needs massive ongoing public subsidy. Such levels of subsidy are unaffordable,especially in current economic times. These subsidies are also profoundly regressive. They take money from poor consumers, including pensioners, and give it to rich landowners and corporations.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1

    2. Cal

      That film, "The Great Global Warming Swindle", has been proven to have an ironically accurate title: the film itself is the swindle. The claims that it makes have been comprehensively debunked, and it relies heavily on deceptive editing of interviews with scientists. Likewise, Professor Phil Jones most certain has not said that there has been no statistically significant warming for fifteen years.

      Also, the "Roman Optimum", "Medieval Warm Period" and "little Ice Age" did not exist on a global scale. They were merely regional warming and cooling trends. It's just that they were warming and cooling trends that occurred in the regions where the dominant world civilizations of the day were located, and thus they get disproportionate attention in written history. Had those regional warming and cooling trends instead happened in the pre-colonization Americas or in sub-Saharan Africa, few would have ever even heard of them.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 7

      1. jhon

        A dose of COLD reality: The ironic saga of the eco-campaigners trying to highlight global warming and melting ice caps trapped in the freezing Antarctic: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2532013/A-dose-COLD-reality-The-ironic-saga-eco-campaigners-trying-highlight-global-warming-melting-ice-caps-trapped-freezing-Antarctic.html
        Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com joins us to discuss his recent Climate Depot Round Up: "The great warmist retreat has officially begun. The mainstream media cannot maintain the official man-made global warming narrative any longer." In a characteristic tour de force of climate-realist commentary, Marc also addresses Climategate 3.0, how massive public funding has distorted science through incentivising pro-warmist research, and why Climate Science is the new astrology: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77HzyoCm6Kg
        Morano takes down “extreme weather” witchcraft on Sun TV - See more at: http://www.cfact.org/2013/12/27/morano-takes-down-extreme-weather-witchcraft-on-sun-tv/#sthash.XtSxKtMI.dpuf Pat&Stu interview Marc Morano from ClimateDepot.com about the dirty tactics climate alarmists use. Brilliant Marc Morano Skewers Climate Alarmists : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zO9zEfqWDA Defusing the explosive conversation on fracking: http://www.cfact.org/2013/12/31/defusing-the-explosive-conversation-on-fracking/

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  13. cj3bm2hb

    I've read many of the comments presented here and I was baffled as to why none of them made any sense. I then realized I did not have my tin-foil hat on properly so I was not getting the correct signals from the mother ship.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Hotly debated. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 11

  14. hancock

    2013 Global Temperature Standstill Continues: ‘So far 2013 is proving to be statistically identical to the past 15-years or so’: http://www.thegwpf.org/2013-global-temperature-change/
    Dr. Roy Spencer: Increase in "superstorms" is "an urban myth": http://newnostradamusofthenorth.blogspot.com/2013/05/dr-roy-spencer-increase-in-superstorms.html
    Prominent Princeton Scientist Dr. Happer Testifies to Congress: increased CO2 will be good for mankind’. CO2 is not a pollutant and it is not a poison and we should not corrupt the English language by depriving “pollutant” and “poison” of their original meaning. Our exhaled breath contains about 4% CO2. That is 40,000 parts per million, or about 100 times the current atmospheric concentration. CO2 is absolutely essential for life on earth. Commercial greenhouse operators often use CO2 as a fertilizer to improve the health and growth rate of their plants: http://www.climatedepot.com/2010/05/21/prominent-princeton-scientist-dr-happer-testifies-to-congress-warming-and-increased-co2-will-be-good-for-mankind/

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3

    1. Cal

      By "statistically identical to the past 15-years or so" you mean it's one of the 10 hottest years on record.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 5

  15. jhon

    Global warming or Global Governance: If you were to ask ten people on the street if mankind was causing global warming, at least eight out of ten would say yes. After all, Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth allegedly provides incontrovertible evidence that this is the case. Both presidential candidates are committed to passing economically devastating legislation that will do little to nothing to stop global warming. Contrary to what is heard in the media, however, there is overwhelming evidence that the warming we are experiencing is natural, with maybe a small amount contributed by man's activities. Nor is there any scientific consensus. 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating there is "no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide is causing...catastrophic" warming. The debate is still raging within the scientific community. In this DVD, Sovereignty International has put together interviews of respected climate scientists and biologists from numerous sources who explain, step by step, why Al Gore and the global warming alarmists are incorrect. In some cases, blatantly so. The dvd global warming or global governance also provides evidence that the global warming agenda is being funded with tens of billions of dollars as a mechanism to create global governance.Hear from congressmen, experts and even well-known news broadcasters how global governance puts global institutions, especially the United Nations (UN), that are not accountable to the American people in control of every aspect of our economy. The skyrocketing gas and food prices today are a direct result of this agenda: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u81qXOYfKg

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 6

    1. Cal

      That "petition" is a massive fraud filled with forged signatures, duplicate signatures and signatures of fictional characters. Even the non-forged signatures are largely from non-scientists. The only standard to be recognized as a "scientist" when signing the thing is to claim to have a college degree in any field other than liberal arts. Nor is there any verification that signatories of the petition actually meet even that meager standard. Go to their website and sign the petition claiming to have a PhD in the field of your choice, and your name will appear with that alleged credential even if in reality you're a high school dropout who's never so much as set foot on a college campus.

      In total, only about 200 out of those 31,000 signatures are actual scientists who have legitimately studied the subject of climatology. So no, there is not still an ongoing debate in the scientific community about the reality of global warming.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 7

  16. jhon

    The Myth of Nuclear ‘Waste’ by Marjorie Mazel Hecht. There’s no such thing as nuclear waste! This nasty term was invented just to stop the development of civilian nuclear power.The spent fuel from nuclear power plants is actually a precious resource: About 96% of it can be recycled into new nuclear fuel. No other fuel source can make this claim—wood, coal, oil, or gas. Once these fuels are burned, all that’s left is some ash or airborne pollutant by-products, which nuclear energy does not produce.Thus, nuclear is a truly renewable resource. Furthermore, unlike wind, solar, and other so-called alternative energy sources, a nuclear fission reactor (the fast reactor or breeder reactor) can actually create more fuel than it uses up: http://larouchepac.com/node/14724

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 4

    1. cj3bm2hb

      You have no clue what you are talking about. You think the fissile material in spent nuclear fuel will just cleanly jump out of those fuel assemblies and right back into a reactor ready to generate more megawatts of electricity without any impact on the environment? Check into what is involved in reprocessing spent nuclear fuel and you'll find out there will be a great deal of both chemical and radiological waste generated before it can be put back into a reactor. Yes there is the breeder reactor but the fuel still needs to be chemically reprocessed. Also, do you have any idea how screaming hot (radiologically speaking) a spent nuclear fuel assembly is? Get the full picture before you babble on about how nuclear waste doesn't exist. Oh by the way, I'm a nuclear engineer by degree and by working in the industry for 15 years so I do have a significant measure of knowledge about this.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 7

      1. d

        What it takes to generate 9 million Megawatt-Hours of electricity per year: 1 1154 Megawatt Nuclar Power Plant 90 percent capacity factor, constant output, offline for refueling, maintenance 60 year life span or 2077 2 Megawatt Wind turbines 25 percent capacity factor, variable output based on weather conditions, 20 year life span. Nuclear requires massive up-front investment, but once the plant is in place, it delivers low-cost electricity, consistently, for decades, so that the overall life-time electricity cost is highly competitive, even after factoring in the costs of waste disposal and subsequent decommissioning. Anti-nuclear campaigners say “No nuclear
        power station has ever been built without subsidy”. This is not true — for
        example nuclear plants have been built commercially in Finland. Some
        politicians have grudgingly accepted the need for nuclear but insisted there should be no public subsidy. I support free markets and prefers to avoid subsidies —but this must apply to all technologies not just nuclear. No wind turbines would have been built in the UK without massive subsidies. In
        fact they’re not farming wind at all — they’re farming tax-payer subsidies. Techniques for long-term storage of nuclear waste in appropriate geological structures are well developed, for example in Olkiluoto,
        Finland. This is no more than a technical problem with well-understood
        solutions. The British Geological Survey advises that suitable safe sites exist in the UK. Future reactor developments (fast-breeder reactors) will dramatically reduce amounts of high-level waste. Anti-nuclear lobbyists love to argue that the waste will remain dangerous for tens of thousands of years. But our descendants in a few hundred years will have made vast technical strides that we cannot even imagine today. They may be
        mining our waste deposits, safely, to reuse in new ways. Thorium as a fuel for nuclear fission has several potential advantages: it produces less waste suitable for weapons, and thorium is plentiful. Nuclear fusion, the creation of helium and energy from hydrogen, offers the potential for very clean nuclear energy in unlimited quantities.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3

        1. Shannon

          just wondering if it's still "low cost" when we consider the damage done by leaking of waste. Just look at what's been going on with the Fukushima plant!

          Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

          Report this comment

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

          1. jhon

            Tokyo's Daily Radiation Readings NOW Equivalent to Background Radiation Levels BEFORE March 11, 2011, Underscoring the Big Lie of Fukushima Radiation Hysteria : http://educate-yourself.org/cn/tokyoradiationreadings20sep13.shtml

            Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

          2. jhon

            In two and one half years, Tokyo Electric Power Company has done the impressive work of disassembling eighty percent of the four bombed nuclear reactors at the Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Fukushima prefecture. Three reactors are totally shutdown with all fuel rods removed and reactor building number four, the building with the largest bomb damage, did not go into meltdown. Piece by piece, the core is being chopped and hauled away for safe disposal.

            The Japanese are most likely using remote manipulators and robots to pull the core apart under an air tight seal. There have been very few factual reports of the marvellous work they have been doing as the western media has misrepresented every aspect of the attack on Japan since March 11 2011.

            The Tokyo Electric Power Company has been blamed for the 'failure' by not safeguarding the reactors for earthquakes and tsunamis. The structures were not damaged by the earthquakes, and the planted ocean sea floor Hydrogen Bombs did not send a large enough surge of water to inundate the complex. There was no M9.0 earthquake. The bombs which exploded within the buildings were not placed there by Tokyo Electric Power Company. In no way can they be blamed.

            The conspiracy arrayed against Japan and nuclear power is centred on nations and corporations pushing natural gas turbine electric power plants. These are the same people who have prevented the development of Free Energy in its many forms. They want to control energy production and control all nations through their control of all levers of power. The greedy do not want to release their hold of patents allowing families to generate all the power they need within their own homes. All the power grids would be taken down and people would be free of the centrally controlled money machine. Energy Independence!

            It would be best to end the use of nuclear reactors and the threat of A-Bombs and H-Bombs. It would be best to make the changeover to alternative energy voluntary and not coerce people into another regime of power generation.

            I am praising the Tokyo Electric Power Company because they are showing how to safely dismantle large reactors quickly and efficiently. It is challenging to disassemble a demolished reactor core without going into meltdown, but they are doing so.

            There has been NO MELTDOWN at any of the four reactors.

            Somehow in the midst of the attack, the Tokyo Electric Power Company decided to "scram" at least two of their operating reactors. It is likely there were no fuel rods in two of reactors prior to the attack. To scram any reactor is a costly undertaking of pumping tons of light molten metals into the core to absorb the neutrons creating the sustained nuclear fission. The reactor core is ruined, but there is zero chance of any meltdown. The Tokyo Electric Power Company did the right thing.

            Jim Stone on May 28 2011 wrote of a sophisticated virus computer program over-riding the normal operating system and sending the cooling systems into disarray and setting the stage for a meltdown when the bombs exploded. But there was no meltdown. Some engineer decided to hit the scram button therefore the computer virus was a non-issue. Jim Stone writes nothing about the emergency stoppage of the nuclear chain reaction.

            TEPCO has hundreds of water tanks containing much of the contaminated water from the area around the reactors. Some water has seeped into the ocean. They are planning to freeze the ground around the buildings in order to dam the contaminated ground water in place. This is a brilliant move. In all likelihood the cooling coils are already in place. The Japanese move fast.

            Arnie Gunderson wrote in 2011 that it would take forty years to clean up the four plants. Later he wrote it would take a century to clean up all the radiation. TEPCO will have the cores extracted in less than five years and the contamination contained in less than ten: http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/tokyoelectricpower03oct13.shtml

            Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

            Report this comment

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

  17. Brad

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDoW8sJ7HMI&NR=1&feature=endscreen
    This one is hard to believe but I just witnessed it. It's a nice and sunny here this morning and I watched a Jet fly past leaving a chem trail, well it dicapated 10, 20, 100x and now from that one jet it is now haizy! Like Ron Paul says "What's going on here!"

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

    1. jhon

      As the natural world dies around us, what will take its place? Planetary engineering includes bioremediation measures to bring us genetically engineered trees and crops. And what of humans themselves? How are we being transformed from the inside out? this 1 hour power point presentation by Sofia Smallstorm introduces primary and scientific findings hidden in the muffles of mainstream alternative media. People around the world are observing aerosol spraying (also called "chemtrials") and strange man-made clouds. White skies filter sunlight as trees around the country sicken and die. Soil and water tests high for heavy metals, and artificial fibres fall on us from the sky.Is aerosol spraying only about experimenting with weather? What do the self-replicating fibres found in Morgellons patients signify? Why are engineered materials being found in airborne environmental samples?All this suggests a planetary engineering program that is affecting and targeting all living things. Synthetic biology is science's most exciting new frontier, combining genetics, robotics and nano-technology with artificial intelligence, hybridizing natural forms and engineering tissues beyond our wildest dreams. The technology explosion is skyrocketing, and artificial intelligence will soon surpass our own capabilities. How will our world be organized then? WIll we turn ourselves over to machines? Or will we have become technological hybrids ourselves?Is aerosol spraying only about experimenting with weather? What do the self-replicating fibres found in Morgellons patients signify? Why are engineered materials being found in airborne environmental samples? All this suggests a planetary engineering program that is affecting and targeting all living things. Synthetic biology is science's most exciting new frontier, combining genetics, robotics and nano-technology with artificial intelligence, hybridizing natural forms and engineering tissues beyond our wildest dreams. The technology explosion is skyrocketing, and artificial intelligence will soon surpass our own capabilities. How will our world be organized then? WIll we turn ourselves over to machines? Or will we have become technological hybrids ourselves?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSQ-dp1sV5w

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2

  18. jhon

    Israeli Award Winning Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv rips 'consensus': 'The story we hear from the UN IPCC is faulty...the predictions by the IPCC are wrong': http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8QtnueIJGjc

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2

    1. jay

      Check out the Greenland ice core for the relevant period of time. As can be plainly seen, modern warming isn’t even close to the “highest” in the past 4,000 years.: http://junkscience.com/2013/03/08/new-4000-year-temperature-reconstruction-debunked/

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3

    2. Brad

      Ya jhon but he's Jewish and seems to be on some sort of stimulant but definately interesting. Forget the 100 year models how about 500 and 1000 year models, has anybody shown the broader spectrum?

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 7

  19. Brad

    Wow how about compressed air motors watch these.
    September 2003 WHAT! now that's global supression! or Compression ;-D
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVIwropRMME
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXrnCYAlUFc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-A3XHFT5qc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc46Bihi3s
    not forgetting the H2O motor, inventer murdered!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ2QciCN5Ks

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2

  20. Brad

    I am waiting for the Sterling Generator blue prints, check these out, free energy;
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIaz0TzISCw
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7NdxnjetSw
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMhAIdqH0Cs

    Real Samples:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0fwjY6_-1M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WooCJ3mye54
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRJSGLvvDh4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPI6OfBME5E

    "Save the world!"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amb08N05_Ww&playnext=1&list=PL8A56876EF674EE92
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_cFi_kKbJM

    Water:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir5XgMiXlzM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POJQKg9CRJc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgU9ez9ben4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKKNsW29a0g

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2

  21. Sam Adams

    Check out Sterling engines for producing electricity, also for turning any turbines or equipment in the world. They work just about with a pilot light, cold side and hot side. Similar to steam engines, that drive huge drive chafts with minimual energy.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2

  22. Sam Adams

    Are you all telling me man-made Global warming isn,t true. Too much CO2 isn,t caused by me and more CO2 is better for all life on Earth. My 5th grade science teacher was Right? Wow, lied to again/.Maybe they just wanted to tax us, and move us to Agenda 21 city blocks. I always thought the Sun was in charge of the tides, weather cycles, wind, and maybe even the temperature.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6

    1. Brad

      Exactly! Forest fires, Volcanoes, and maybe nuclear disasters but I hear its clean energy ):-I ?

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4

  23. Brad

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztb2QZCkUrE
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nh0BYgSc4g
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjr2PyABIvI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4a_8osYdug
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNdAvVJf5I

    Maybe but not for the reasons you were thinking.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

    1. lam

      the oil, coal, and natural gas companies fund the environmental movement. The oil, coal, and natural gas companies give the enviromental movement, and all the enviromental groups in the world recieve millions of dollars evrey year from the oil, coal, and natural gas companies and are propoganda arms of them. When a oil company is stopped from drilling the price of oil goes up so the oil company makes more money, and less work for the oil company because now they dont have to drill there. When a coal plant is shut down the price of electricity goes up because electricty comes from coal so the coal companies make more money. When a natural gas company is stopped from fracking they make more money because the price of natural gas goes up. That is why the oil, coal, and natural gas companies pay groups, and movements to attack them. Also Nuclear power produces more energy than oil, coal, and natural gas combined and that is why it is attacked so much. The oil, natural gas, and coal companies in their ads, will say, solar not nuclear. The oil, natural gas, and coal companies promote solar, wind, bio-fuels, biomass, geothermal because it cannot compete with them but dont promote nuclear because it can compete with them and is the only form of energy that is being produced that can produce more energy then them. Right now you have top enviromentlists who are calling for all of the nuclear power plants in the world to be shut down and replaced by natural gas. This would allow the natural gas companies to have a monopoly on natural gas. I have friend in japan. Evreywhere that they shut down the nuclear power plants they replaced them with natural gas, and coal. In germany they replaced their nuclear power plants with natural gas and coal. That is the motive. You see to benefit two different industries.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3

      1. Brad

        Anything is better than nuclear but free energy is best for everybody, including your childrens childrens children. Now we just need more trees and grow hemp for fibre and medicinal (cures cancer etc!).
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTEQzyQzJkc
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=p52Epx6lJes&NR=1 WOW a must see!
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54vD_cPCQM8

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4

        1. iam

          well theHeavy Watergate the coal, oil, and nuclear companies war on cold fusion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htgV7fNO-2k
          brad the coal, oil, and nuclear companies do not want cold fusion and have done their best to stop it. When first presented in 1989 cold fusion was quickly dismissed as junk science. But, as Scott Pelley reports, there’s renewed buzz among scientists that cold fusion could lead to monumental breakthroughs in energy production: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4967330n&tag=contentBody;storyMediaBox cold fusion is nuclear energy like that powers the sun but on a tabletop. It is cheap, limitless, and clean. It has now been demonstrated to work succesfully in thousands of labs around the world recently. So maybe one day it will see the light of day again.

          Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

          Report this comment

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2

  24. Brad

    jhon Nuclear energy will be outlawed in my life time for being so dangerous and destructive. "Magnetic Perpetual Motion" is the only way to go for the future, it is clean, inexpensive and virtually free. It is for that reason all such things have been hidden by the oil, electric and nuclear companies. May 21, 1927 Charles Lindbergh was the 1st to fly across the Atlantic direct to refueling. His motor was mostly a magnetic perpetual motion a hidden unknown fact. Howard Johnson finally had 3 patents (pat 4151431, 4877983, 5402021) awarded to him on "Magnetic Perpetual Motion Energy" but limited to personal non commercial production. This is "Clean, free and infinite Free Energy based on magnetism,"we live on a magnet". In the 80's Stan Ovishinsky invented a super cell battery for GM enabling their first electric car to run for 300 miles before recharge but Big Oil bought the patent out. Muller manetic generator and solar power but not the way you think, wind sure but not nessisary with Tesla's repressed power generation. NO SPILLS, NO EXPLOSIONS, NO EARTH QUAKES NO PROBLEMS "FREE ENERGY FREE WORLD!"

    PS: will did out more examples and patents!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 8

    1. jhon

      I agree with you on magnetic perpetual motion. I have seen them in operation producing energy in person by meeting people who are using them. But realistically it is so suppressed I do not see it going public. On the other hand with cold fusion there is no power plant to operate to. More than junk science. When first presented in 1989 cold fusion was quickly dismissed as junk science. But, as Scott Pelley reports, there’s renewed buzz among scientists that cold fusion could lead to monumental breakthroughs in energy production: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4967330n&tag=contentBody;storyMediaBox cold fusion is nuclear energy like that powers the sun but on a tabletop. It is cheap, limitless, and clean. Heavy watergate the war on cold fusion by the coal, oil, and nuclear companies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htgV7fNO-2k

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3

      1. Brad

        Are you like 2 stepping me, you know one step foreward and 2 steps back.
        Is it not the best and cleanest way to go, above all else. At least you can agree. In 50 years I hope it is common place and everything else is just a distant dream.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6

      2. Brad

        I finally watch about cold fusion, it sounds fantastic but I still don't understand it, I'm too simple and like common sence things. I hope the Tesla and other forms of free energy being over a hundred years old will be adapted to our everyday power source, I'm banking on it!? The bottom line is clean energy is our only choice for the next century and beyond and if it's free that sounds best to me...

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6

        1. jhon

          Former British MI6 intelligence agent Dr. John Coleman writes, The Assault on Iran's Right to Nuclear Energy Former British MI6 intelligence agent Dr. John Coleman writes, One needs to have a clear understanding of just why it is that nuclear power is so hated all over the world, and why the fake "environmentalist" movement, established and financially supported by the Club of Rome, was called upon to wage war on nuclear energy. With nuclear energy generating electricity in cheap and abundant supplies, Third World countries would gradually become independent of U.S. foreign aid and begin to assert their sovereignty. Nuclear generated electricity is THE key to bringing Third World countries out of their backward state: http://www.indytruth.org/iran.html
          former brtish mi6 intellegence agent Dr John Coleman also sais that: Less foreign aid means less control of a country’s natural resources by the I.M.F. It was this idea of developing nations taking charge of their destiny that was an anathema to the Club of Rome and its ruling Committee of 300. We have seen oppo-sition to nuclear power in the United States successfully used to block industrial development in conformity with the Club’s [“Post-Industrial Zero-Growth” plans. It is not difficult to see how the Club of Rome has maintained its grip on U.S. energy policies and where “environmentalist” opposition to nuclear energy is coming from. Perhaps the Club’s greatest success story is its hold over Con-gress in regard to nuclear energy which has had the effect of preventing the U.S. from entering the 21st century as a strong industrial nation. The effect of the anti-nuclear policy of the Club of Rome can be measured in terms of silent blast furnaces. derelict railroad yards, rusting steel mills, shipyards long since closed down and a valuable trained work force scattered across the United States, which may never again be assembled.
          One of the greatest advances made by man was the discovery of nuclear energy as a source of cheap and safe electricity. It promised to transform the world within a time frame of a maximum of three decades. In order to understand world events in both the areas of politics and economics, one must have a thorough understanding of religion and secret societies which play a leading role in world events. Secret societies, more so in 2008 than ever before, greatly influence the course of momentous events. The rich and the powerful belong to secret societies that most ordinary people have never, even heard about, and it comes as a surprise to many to find out that such notable personages the Elizabeth, Queen of England is a member of a number of them, all of which play a big role in shaping the course of events.
          Nuclear power generated electricity is particularly hated by the leaders of secret societies. Nuclear power is hated by the elite because it brings new hope to millions of people who will aspire to a better life once nuclear power is running and available in every city and town throughout the world. The very poor, the downtrodden and the unwanted see new hope in nuclear generated power, the very thing the Illuminati members are so much against. They don’t want an extension of life for those who would otherwise die at a very early age in such countries and India and China.

          Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

          Report this comment

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 4

      3. Brad

        OK jhon at least they are consistant. They suppress free energy, cancer cures etc at about the same time for the same reasons, greed money & control. So lets do nothing and say nothing about any of the facts we know are true as our planet dies and us with it.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

  25. jhon

    More than junk science. When first presented in 1989 cold fusion was quickly dismissed as junk science. But, as Scott Pelley reports, there's renewed buzz among scientists that cold fusion could lead to monumental breakthroughs in energy production: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4967330n&tag=contentBody;storyMediaBox

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2

  26. Brad

    jhon, your a fool and an @ i'll straighten you out in the morning. Unlike you I don't speak in tongues, fidlers frick you P me off!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 7

  27. jhon

    There are eight radiation detection stations evenly spread around Tokyo prefecture. Each monitoring station reports the hourly minimum, maximum, and average reading in micro Grays per hour (or micro sieverts per hour). This chart shows you the summary daily readings for Toyko from March 1, 2011 through December 2, 2012. The Japan attack occured on March 11, 2011. You will notice from the chart that the radiation levels in Tokyo didn't show an uptick in readings until March 15, 2011 when the average reading went from 0.0341 uGy/h to 0.109 uGy/h. They then dropped somewhat for a week and rose again above 0.100 uGy/h for a period of exactly ONE week from March 23 through March 31, 2011. This ONE week period represents the HIGHEST radiation readings that have been recorded in Tokyo since the sabotage events orchestrated at the Daiichi Nuclear power station took place on March 11 and 12 of 2011. You will notice from March 31, 2011 until December 2, 2012 that the radiation readings have steadily and consistently fallen back towards the pre-attack radiation background levels.
    There is nothing even remotely dangerous or worrying about these radiation readings. They are well below the average daily radiation background readings at many populated area of this planet. The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health added all of the daily readings from the date of the attack until roughly one year later and concluded that Tokyo residents would have experienced no more than 24 micro sieverts of radiation. Compare that to the normal 400 micro sieverts per year that people experience in Japan from radon gas exposure. It's important to note that Tokyo is 124 miles from the Daiichi Nuclear Power station in Fukushima prefecture, while Los Angeles is 5,541 miles from Tokyo. If "tons" of plutonium had been spewed into the air from the Daiichi power station, as some Japan radiation hysteria promoters have wildly claimed, then you would have seen a HUGE and unprecedented uptick in Tokyo readings BEFORE such radition could ever traverse the entire Pacific Ocean and show up on the west coast of America. Anyone can look at the radiation monitoring data in all of Japan, and in Fukushima prefecture especially, and see that the hysteria and angst generated by Japan radiation promoters on rense.com or enenews.com, or any of the dozens of blogs who mirror the Japan radiation psyops, is all out of proportion to the actual radiation exposure experienced by Japanese residents in northern Japan. I can't tell you how infuriating it is to hear repeatedly from Japan radiation propagandists like Leuren Moret or commenters on internet blogs how northern Japan will forever be "unhabitable" due to the "deadly radiation" (that never was). The Fukushima radiation psyops is one of the greatest frauds to be perpetrated in modern times. It astounds me how many people simply acquiese and accept the dire pronouncements of radiation promoters as fact, when just a little bit of checking and verification will show you the extreme level of exaggeration and confabulation being employed.: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/tokyodailyradiationmonitor03dec12.shtml One more thing hydrocarbon markets have antinuclear motive: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d3thaYkc5A&feature=player_embedded#!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2

  28. jhon

    Nuclear power is the second cleanest form of power and does not pollute because you do not burn it to produce power. Hydro power is the cleanest. Now the stupid enviromentalists are having trying to have all the dams blown up evreywhere supposedly to save the fish. According to small farmers affected by this the fish were just fine before the dam was blown up. Endangered species, also hyped as 'biodiversity' is the top reason for blowing up the dams, which is based on junk science and hypocrisy. Can you guess how many species have been saved by the Endangered species Act of 1973? If you guessed ZERO, you are correct! Phony environmentalism and conservation are really just land, water and power grabs. An example of the endangered species scam to save the salmon is really a cover for a more grand agenda that is playing out in the Klamath River on the Oregon and California border. Hydro power is Oregon's main power source, providing about 90% of Oregon's electricity. The Klamath River dams light up 70,000 homes. Hydropower is the cleanest energy, so why should 4 hydro-electric dams be busted down? This is a lose-lose proposal because: Farmers will be wiped out (another attack on food production): http://morphcity.com/home/107-dam-liars-crooks-and-killers

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2

  29. Brad

    jhon, you are obviously over educated unfortunately with that you've lost common sense, unknowingly to make your $60000 education relevant. Just a hunch but your talking over my head about something I know little about, you will never convince me Nuclear energy is our future. That thinking is total hopefully be lost in my generation but I fear your thinking has been accepted in favor of cleaner less controled ($) energy. At least it is consistant with the cancer cure suppressions for the past 100 years. I live in Alberta, Canada & for you to say oil is mineral oil tells me you never owned a car or seen one. I have no doubt you are more educated than most but are you still in university? It is fair to say our head space is like oil & water, your obviously oil and I'm water.
    Peace brother!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 8

    1. jhon

      my point is though that oil does not come from fossil fuels so can not run out like claimed. You should read this book. It is very well done. Cornell University physicist Thomas Gold, who argued in his book, :The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels” that micro-organisms found in oil might have come from the mantle of the earth where, absent photosynthesis, the micro-organisms feed on hydrocarbons arising from the earth’s mantle in the dark depths of the ocean floors. Also there are people I know, I am friends with and have met who are small oil contractors who have told me that there is a natural chemical underneath the earth that automatically replenishes all the oil wells everywhere on earth all the time. To begin with, oil is not a fossil fuel. This is a theory put forth by 18th century scientists. Within 50 years, Germany and France's scientists had attacked the theory of petroleum's biological roots. In fact, oil is abiotic, not the product of long decayed biological matter. And oil, for better or for worse, is not a non-renewable resource. It, like coal, and natural gas, replenishes from sources within the mantle of earth. This is the real and true science of oil. In fact, working in the 1950s, Russian and Ukrainian scientists, cut off from the Western World's oil supply, applied their keen minds to the problem and, by the 1960s, had thoroughly demolished the idea of oil as a 'fossil fuel,' Is it any wonder then that Russia is one of if not the leading producers and exporters of oil. The isolation of the Cold War forced Russia to dig deeper, literally, to find oil deeper in the earth in some places, and to look in other places where no one had thought to look to reveal more: http://rense.com/general67/oils.htm I am from your generation I am 19 years old. I am not only for nuclear power. I am in favor of other forms of energy. The only problem is that alternative energy which they claim is renewable is not and is very harmful and does not do well at producing energy. In africa you have very rich investors from the us that will scare the africans away from developing their own resources with talk of global warming and tell them they have to use solar and wind instead so they do and when they do they find that with the solar and wind it does not produce enough power to power more than a min radio or to even build a railroad. And that when they use the solar power they can not turn on the light and refrigerator at the same time because there is not enough power to do so. Also they add high amounts of arsenic and high amounts of the most toxic chemicals on earth to all solar cells. Then you have this on you roof this toxic solar panel. It is stupid. Also the solar farms take up a very large amount of land. Wind turbines destroy the soil where they are place and kill all the animal life. They kill the animal life because the electromagnetic frequencies they emit are very harmufl. My grandpa who lived in a farm in france who is now dead had hunreds of birds who were flying around his farm evreyday and after a couple of windmills were installed next to his farm they all died. Also I met a farmer in france last year who told me that a big bank installed windmills all over the countryside including next to where he lives and that he hates them. He said that the windmills only work half of the time, stall, and make a lot of noise. Then there is biomass which produces a moderate amount of energy. Then you have geothermal which when it is used creates large earthquakes.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2

  30. jhon

    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 97, 074109 s2005d Electron and positive ion acceleration with pyroelectric crystals Jeffrey A. Geuthera! and Yaron Danonb! Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
    sReceived 29 November 2004; accepted 9 February 2005; published online 28 March 2005d The phenomenon of pyroelectric electron emission has been employed to develop miniature x-ray sources, such as the Cool-X by Amptek swww.amptek.com/coolx.htmld. The source strength of a
    pyroelectric x-ray generator is dependent on the emitted electron energy and current. Similarly, the source strength of a pyroelectric neutron generator will be dependent on the energy and production rate of deuterium ions in the fill gas. This paper summarizes our results in experiments directed
    toward creating high-energy electrons and positive ions with a pyroelectric source. Single-crystal sources are shown to produce positive ions with energies of up to 98 keV and electron energies of up to 143 keV. X-ray spectra are presented as proof that a paired-crystal source can increase electron energy to at least 215 keV. In addition, we offer independent verification of the “bunched”
    electron emission effect observed by fBrownridge et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1158 s2001dg. © 2005 American Institute of Physics. fDOI: http://fire.pppl.gov/accel_crystals_japhys_05.pdf10.1063/1.1884252g

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3

    1. Jerry

      Cool!

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2

  31. Brad

    Sorry jhon, I am being too harsh and will look up your information but please look up mine. I think we could move mountain's together (without nuclear generation), I am ignorant to it as I believe you may be to the truth of it. It is just not worth the risk...

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

    1. jhon

      Italian physicist and inventor Andrea Rossi has conducted a public demonstration of his "cold fusion" machine, the E-Cat, at the University of Bologna, showing that a small amount of input energy drives an unexplained reaction between atoms of hydrogen and nickel that leads to a large outpouring of energy, more than 10 times what was put in. The first seemingly successful cold fusion experiment was reported two decades ago, but the process has forever been met with heavy skepticism. It's a seemingly impossible process in which two types of atoms, typically a light element and a heavier metal, seem to fuse together, releasing pure heat that can be converted into electricity. The process is an attractive energy solution for two reasons: Unlike in nuclear fission, the reaction doesn't give off dangerous radiation. Unlike the fusion processes that take place in the sun, cold fusion doesn't require extremely high temperatures. Life's Little Mysteries reported on the E-Cat machine in April, when Rossi and fellow physicist Sergio Focardi successfully demonstrated the device for a group of Swedish physicists. At the time, we explained that the Italian physicists are two of a handful of researchers around the world who have kept the cold fusion fire burning. These cold fusion devotees believe that there is a little-understood physical process occurring in their machines that produces a safe, clean and endlessly renewable form of energy. The physicists who were invited to the demonstration in April gave the E-Cat a solid thumbs-up. It produced too much excess heat to have been originating from a chemical process, they wrote in their report, adding that, "The only alternative explanation is that there is some kind of a nuclear process that gives rise to the measured energy production." In the intervening months, Rossi has built a large version of his device that combines many smaller cold fusion modules. At the demo in October, after an initial energy input of 400 watts into each module, each one then produced a sustained, continuous output of 10 kilowatts (470 kW altogether) for three to four hours. Rossi has not published any details about the inner workings of the E-Cat because the device is not patent-protected, but other cold fusion researchers have theories as to how the process works. Peter Hagelstein, an MIT professor of electrical engineering and computer science and one of the most mainstream proponents of cold fusion research, thinks the process may involve vibrational energy in the metal's lattice driving nuclear transitions that lead to fusion. There are several close connections between the E-Cat and other recent experimental results, Hagelstein said, noting that the excess power seems to respond to lattice spacing in both experiments, vacancies within the lattice (e.g., spots where the nickel atoms are missing) seem to be important in both, the excess power seems to increase with operating temperature in relevant operating regimes and other connections: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45153076/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/italian-cold-fusion-machine-passes-another-test/#.ULvTCWetSSo the reason brad why we should have nuclear power is because cold fusion which is free energy would not have been possible without nuclear power to be invented or continue to be invented

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2

  32. Brad

    jhon you need your own nuclear run planet, you have not heard what i said,"CLEAN FREE ENERGY". It's been repressed from the world for a hundred years. I don't expect anything less in the next 50 years, you move to all those nuclear disaster zones. It is a bold faced lie that everything is back to normal in Japan but they seemingly know how to fend cancer off.
    "Cancer Cures Supressed", "Thrive", "Royal Raymond Rife", "Jason Vale", Dr Linus Pauling, DCA, marijuana etc cures cancer but I recently discover there was an "1839 CANCER ACT" TO SUPPRESS ALL CURES!

    So go to Chernoble and tell US how it is, I DARE YOU!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

    1. jhon

      I told you that I have friends who lived in chernobyl and 3 mile Island during the disaster and still live there now and they do not have cancer and they say no one else got cancer living in chernobyl and three mile island. I told you that I have a friend who has a blog in japan and he said that he took radiation readings before the fukishima disaster in japan and it was negligible and after fukishima and it was still negligible and he said that the reacotr 3 in japan did not melt down like they said in the media because he was there. I have friends living in the north of japan and they had their radiation readings done and it was negligable and the north of japan has been rebuilt all the way. Cornell University physicist Thomas Gold, who argued in his book, :The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels” that micro-organisms found in oil might have come from the mantle of the earth where, absent photosynthesis, the micro-organisms feed on hydrocarbons arising from the earth’s mantle in the dark depths of the ocean floors. Are Coal, Natural Gas, and Crude Oil are not “Fossil Fuels” and Is There no Real Shortage of Oil: http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/Are%20Coal,%20Natural%20Gas,%20and%20Crude%20Oil%20Really%20Fossil%20Fuels

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2

  33. Brad

    Don't forget the "Polar Shift" that has been, is or will take place causing all of these earthquakes and polar caps melting. All of this is known but we are not privy to the truth and are kept ignorant to the facts and the progress or regress of the situation.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6

  34. Brad

    It is a tax scam to charge us more, stop all forest fires, volcanoes and seriously run the world on clean free energy. Who was the source of the "Idea" any ways and how many books did he sell?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

1 23 24 25

Leave a Reply