“Madam Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this bill, because it won’t solve our problem. It is said that we’re in a liquidity crisis and a credit crunch, and all we need is more credit. The Federal Reserve has already injected over a trillion dollars worth of credit, and it hasn’t seemed to help a whole lot. Injecting another 600 or 700 billion dollars will not solve the problem.
I think one of the reasons why we’re floundering around here is that we don’t understand the problem, because instead of it being a credit crunch I think a lot more serious than that and that is, I think what’s happening in the market today is signalling something much more draconian.
Because it’s probably telling us that our government is insolvent, that we’re on the verge of bankruptcy, and big things are starting to happen, and we don’t quite understand it, so we fall back on the old cliches: What we need is more appropriations, more spending, more debt, and more credit in the market, that means more inflation by the Federal Reserve system. And yet that is what caused the trouble.
We want to do this, it is said, to prevent the recession or depression, because that is “unbearable”. But the truth is, you should have thought of that about 10 or 15 years ago, because the financial bubble created by the excess of credit and the lowering of the interest rates is the cause of the recession.
The recession is a demand. It’s a must. You can’t avoid it. Yes, it’s been papered over several times over these last several decades, but that just made the bubble bigger. But the message now is you can’t paper it over any longer, so the recession and/or the depression will come.
My sincere conviction is that by doing more mischief and not allowing markets to adjust, debt to be liquidated, you’re going to guarantee a depression. It’s going to be prolonged, the agony is going to be there a lot longer than if you allow markets to adjust. Liquidation of debt, let the bankruptcy occur, let the good assets come up, and let it react.
This idea that there’s just not enough regulation is completely wrong. There’s too much regulation and lack of regulation of the Federal Reserve system and the Exchange and Stabilization Fund.”
Earlier today, Ron Paul was interviewed on Fox Business:
Yes, they should pass it: 146 votes (3%)
No, they should reject it: 5,000 votes (94%)
Not sure: 173 votes (3%)
The House of Representatives is approaching a crucial vote on the Bailout Bill later today [Update: The bill passed 263 to 171]. The mainstream media claims that public opinion is increasingly in favor of the bill, so we decided to run our own poll to verify these claims.
In your opinion, should the House pass the Bailout Bill? Please take a second to vote in our poll, then tell everyone you know about the poll to make sure that all our voices will be heard.
(Feel free to post an explanation of your vote in the comments section.)
The controlled media’s “shock and awe” propaganda blitz and fear mongering campaign had its desired effect: Last night, the Senate passed the Bailout Bill 75 to 24.
See who voted “yes” and “no”:
Alabama
Sessions (R)
No
Shelby (R)
No
Alaska
Murkowski (R)
Yes
Stevens (R)
Yes
Arizona
Kyl (R)
Yes
McCain (R)
Yes
Arkansas
Lincoln (D)
Yes
Pryor (D)
Yes
California
Boxer (D)
Yes
Feinstein (D)
Yes
Colorado
Allard (R)
No
Salazar (D)
Yes
Connecticut
Dodd (D)
Yes
Lieberman (I)
Yes
Delaware
Biden (D)
Yes
Carper (D)
Yes
Florida
Martinez (R)
Yes
Nelson (D)
No
Georgia
Chambliss (R)
Yes
Isakson (R)
Yes
Hawaii
Akaka (D)
Yes
Inouye (D)
Yes
Idaho
Craig (R)
Yes
Crapo (R)
No
Illinois
Durbin (D)
Yes
Obama (D)
Yes
Indiana
Bayh (D)
Yes
Lugar (R)
Yes
Iowa
Grassley (R)
Yes
Harkin (D)
Yes
Kansas
Brownback (R)
No
Roberts (R)
No
Kentucky
Bunning (R)
No
McConnell (R)
Yes
Louisiana
Landrieu (D)
No
Vitter (R)
No
Maine
Collins (R)
Yes
Snowe (R)
Yes
Maryland
Cardin (D)
Yes
Mikulski (D)
Yes
Massachusetts
Kennedy (D)
Absent
Kerry (D)
Yes
Michigan
Levin (D)
Yes
Stabenow (D)
No
Minnesota
Coleman (R)
Yes
Klobuchar (D)
Yes
Mississippi
Cochran (R)
No
Wicker (R)
No
Missouri
Bond (R)
Yes
McCaskill (D)
Yes
Montana
Baucus (D)
Yes
Tester (D)
No
Nebraska
Hagel (R)
Yes
Nelson (D)
Yes
Nevada
Ensign (R)
Yes
Reid (D)
Yes
New Hampshire
Gregg (R)
Yes
Sununu (R)
Yes
New Jersey
Lautenberg(D)
Yes
Menendez (D)
Yes
New Mexico
Bingaman (D)
Yes
Domenici (R)
Yes
New York
Clinton (D)
Yes
Schumer (D)
Yes
North Carolina
Burr (R)
Yes
Dole (R)
No
North Dakota
Conrad (D)
Yes
Dorgan (D)
No
Ohio
Brown (D)
Yes
Voinovich (R)
Yes
Oklahoma
Coburn (R)
Yes
Inhofe (R)
No
Oregon
Smith (R)
Yes
Wyden (D)
No
Pennsylvania
Casey (D)
Yes
Specter (R)
Yes
Rhode Island
Reed (D)
Yes
Whitehouse (D)
Yes
South Carolina
DeMint (R)
No
Graham (R)
Yes
South Dakota
Johnson (D)
No
Thune (R)
Yes
Tennessee
Alexander (R)
Yes
Corker (R)
Yes
Texas
Cornyn (R)
Yes
Hutchison (R)
Yes
Utah
Bennett (R)
Yes
Hatch (R)
Yes
Vermont
Leahy (D)
Yes
Sanders (I)
No
Virginia
Warner (R)
Yes
Webb (D)
Yes
Washington
Cantwell (D)
No
Murray (D)
Yes
West Virginia
Byrd (D)
Yes
Rockefeller (D)
Yes
Wisconsin
Feingold (D)
No
Kohl (D)
Yes
Wyoming
Barrasso (R)
No
Enzi (R)
No
The Bailout Bill will now be sent “back” to the House. Our final hope rests on the brave Congressmen and women who already defeated the bill on Monday. Let’ keep contacting them and ask them to remain firm in their opposition.
As predicted earlier this week, the failed bankers and their government enablers won’t take “no” for an answer. Even though the Bailout Bill was soundly defeated by the House on Monday, the Senate still plans to vote on the bill tonight.
How is this even possible?
In circumvention of normal procedures, the Senate merged the Bailout Bill with another bill that deals with completely unrelated matters: renewable energy tax incentives and a mental health parity provision for health insurance companies (!). If the new hodgepodge version is approved by the Senate, the bill would then be sent back to the House for a final vote.
According to the Campaign for Liberty, the following Senators are considered key votes. Please take a moment to call these Senators and urge them to cast their vote against the Bailout Bill. And please, call your two U.S. Senators and urge them to vote “no” as well.
Thanks in no small part to massive public rejection and outcry the “Bailout Bill” was defeated today 228-205.
But the bankers and their allies in Congress won’t take “no” for an answer.
There could be another vote as early as Thursday… so let’s keep up the pressure!
In addition to speaking out against the Bailout Bill we need to work on getting our financial system back on its feet. As C4L President John Tate pointed out in his email last week, it is time to:
End the Bailouts – Congress must revoke the Federal Reserve’s authority to bail out failed businesses at your expense.
Cut Taxes and Curb Regulation – If we really want to stimulate businesses and revive the market, we need to cut corporate and capital gains taxes, spurring investors to come back to the market and making it easier to attract new workers and clients. It is also time to end failed legislation like Sarbanes-Oxley, which has crippled capital markets, diminished our competitiveness, and greatly harmed small businesses.
Reduce Spending – We must freeze all non-entitlement spending by the federal government at current levels and eliminate wasteful spending both domestically and in our trillion-dollar overseas budget. Our debt has to come down, and it won’t until we start living within our means.
Reform the Monetary System – If we are to have long-term economic progress, we must end the system of printing money out of thin air. The current laws limiting the circulation of gold and silver-backed currency must be overturned. We can no longer base our money on the empty promises of bureaucrats that it is sound.
Keep up the pressure!
Say NO to the forced redistribution of billions if not trillions of dollars and the de-facto nationalization of our nation’s entire financial system.
Say NO to the special interests who are working to destroy the dollar and eliminate global confidence in America for decades to come.
Say NO to any sell-out congressman or senator who would vote in favor of this disastrous piece of legislation.
Enough is enough! Take action and spread the word.
Go here to get your representatives’ contact info.
The process of this bailout reminds me of a panic-stricken swimmer thrashing in the water only making his situation worse. Even a “bipartisan deal” – whatever that is supposed to mean – will not stop the Congress from thrashing about.
The beneficiaries of the corrupt monetary system of the last three decades are now desperately looking for victims to stick with the bill after they have reaped decades of profit and privilege.
The difficulties in our economy will continue because the Legislative and the Executive branches have not yet begun to address the real problems. The housing bubble’s collapse, as was the Dot Com bubble’s collapse, was predictable and is merely a symptom of the monetary system that brought us to this point.
Indeed, we do face a major crisis but it is much bigger than the freezing up of Wall Street and dealing with worthless assets on the books of major banks. The true crisis is the pending collapse of the fiat dollar system that emerged after the breakdown of the Bretton Woods agreement in 1971.
For 37 years the world built a financial system based on the dollar as the reserve currency of the world in an attempt to make the dollar serve as the new standard of value. However since 1971, the dollar has had no intrinsic value, as it is not tied to gold. The dollar is simply a fiat currency, which has fluctuated in value on a daily, if not hourly, bias. This worked to some degree until the market realized that too much debt and malinvestment existed and a correction was required.
Because of our economic and military strength, compared to other countries, trust in America’s currency lasted longer than deserved. This resulted in the biggest worldwide economic distortion in all of history. The problem is much bigger than the fears of a temporary decline on Wall Street if the bailout is not agreed to.
Money’s most important function is to serve as a means of exchange – a measurement of value. If this crucial yardstick is not stable, it becomes impossible for investors, entrepreneurs, savers, and consumers to make correct decisions; these mistakes create the bubble that must eventually be corrected.
Just imagine the results if a construction company was forced to use a yardstick whose measures changed daily to construct a skyscraper. The result would be a very unstable and dangerous building. No doubt the construction company would try to cover up their fundamental problem with patchwork repairs, but no amount of patchwork can fix a building with an unstable inner structure. Eventually, the skyscraper will collapse, forcing the construction company to rebuild – hopefully this time with a stable yardstick. This 700 billion package is more patchwork repair and will prove to be money down a rat hole and will only make the dollar crisis that much worse.
But what politicians are willing to say that the financial “skyscraper” – the global financial and monetary system-is a house of cards. It is not going to happen at this juncture. They’re not even talking about this. They talk only of bailouts, more monetary inflation, more special interest spending, more debt, and more regulations. There is almost no talk of the relationship of the Community Reinvestment Act, HUD, and government assisted loans to the housing bubble. And there is no talk of the oversight that is desperately needed for the Federal Reserve, the Exchange Stabilization Fund, and all the activities of the President’s Working Group on financial markets. When these actions are taken we will at last know that Congress is serious about the reforms that are really needed.
In conclusion, there are three good reasons why Congress should reject this legislation:
a. It is immoral – Dumping bad debt on the innocent taxpayers is an act of theft and is wrong.
b. It is unconstitutional – There is no constitutional authority to use government power to serve special interests.
c. It is bad economic policy – By refusing to address the monetary system while continuing to place the burdens of the bailout on the dollar, we can be certain that in time, we will be faced with another, more severe crisis when the market figures out that there is no magic government bailout or regulation that can make a fraudulent monetary system work.
Monetary reform will eventually come, but, unfortunately, Congress’ actions this week make it more likely the reform will come under dire circumstances, such as the midst of a worldwide collapse of the dollar. The question then will be how much of our liberties will be sacrificed in the process. Just remember what we lost in the aftermath of 9-11.
The best result we can hope for is that the economic necessity of getting our fiscal house in order will, at last, force us to give up our world empire. Without the empire we can then concentrate on rebuilding the Republic.
RonPaul.com is maintained by independent grassroots supporters of Ron Paul. Neither this website nor the articles, posts, videos or photos appearing on it are paid for, approved, endorsed or reviewed by Ron Paul or his staff. For Ron Paul's temporary official website go to The-FREE-Foundation.org
Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-American foreign policy. Read more...
Ronald Reagan and Ron Paul
Ronald Reagan: "Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."
Ron Paul in the Air Force
Ron Paul is a proud Air Force veteran. He served as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force from 1963 to 1965 and then in the U.S. Air National Guard from 1965 to 1968. During his military service Ron Paul spent time on the ground in Iran, Pakistan, South Korea, Turkey, Ethiopia and other countries.
Ron Paul has been married to his wife Carol Wells since 1957. They have five children: Ronald, Lori, Rand, Robert, and Joy. Paul's son Rand is the junior senator from the state of Kentucky.
Recent Comments
7:22 pm: "You’re right! The first money wasn’t “money”..it was a bartering system...." - LaMaestra2102
7:15 pm: "I think it’s because they can give you 40 dollars for an 18 karat gold necklace, melt it..." - LaMaestra2102
7:13 pm: "Well, enlighten us as to his hesitaton (Bernanke). I really don’t get all of this...." - LaMaestra2102
10:05 am: "Dude, as an economist, its not worth it to fight against these people, they don´t understand that..." - steren700
7:04 pm: "Question, if there is economic freedom, wont there be a HUGE difference of wealth?" - Jordan Rich
6:12 pm: "Rand Paul 2016!" - Kyong Kim
6:09 pm: "wRONg Paul isn’t such a big deal, he’s just a faggoty-ass cum guzzling sideshow geek." - IAMHEWHOAM
5:53 pm: "OUR AMERICA INITIATIVE DOT YOU KNOW WHAT" - John Connor
5:52 pm: "Was totally screwed by GOP" - John Connor
3:00 pm: "He denies evolution, modern medicine is built off it. He has also not advanced medicine in anyway. Free..." - mecher3k
1:19 pm: "dude read the constitution its say to be determined by the people your happiness if the people want..." - onlythewise1
12:51 pm: "There is nothing in the constitution that address labor rights. Personally, I think people..." - bootleg42
12:49 pm: "so true these news people make millions they don’t care there puppets, there paid to shut up..." - onlythewise1
12:47 pm: "end immigration and remove illegal immigration will solve most of usa problems" - onlythewise1
10:06 am: "Most likely his lawyers told him WIPO was a better choice professionally rather than politically,..." - David Z
9:50 am: "real hope. real change." - max13327
3:46 am: "The slaves weren’t being freed, they were escaping and could be returned at any time to..." - SemperFidelis0229
2:47 am: "watch?v=3c5odNzKVbk “officially finally dropped out of the race”" - aetayar
2:44 am: "Lie, he supported him after he dropped out." - aetayar
2:44 am: "Imagine if Ron had become President. Do you honestly think that dent would have not been much larger?..." - aetayar