Former Air Force Sergeant Lancia Stewart and Former Army Specialist Nathan Cox discuss why they and the military overwhelmingly support Ron Paul and his non-interventionist foreign policy.
Transcript
This is a rush transcript. If you notice any errors please report them using the “Help improve this post” link at the bottom of this post.
Judge Napolitano: As we were discussing, this weekend’s Republican presidential debate gave Congressman Ron Paul a mere 89 seconds to speak out of a one hour broadcast. Foreign policy was the debate’s key issue, and with a topic so important to every American’s security, why was his fiscally conservative message kept quite? This is the GOP hopeful who raised almost 1 million dollars on Veterans Day last Thursday towards his presidential campaign. Here to discuss this, are two United States veterans, former Air force intelligence officer, Lancia Stewart, and former army specialist, Nathan Cox. Veterans, welcome to Freedom Watch, it’s a pleasure to have you.
Lancia, to you first. Is there a feeling amongst members of the military that the government is over-extended, does too much, spends too much, is in too many countries, and it might be time to pull back?
Lancia Stewart: Your honor, I can’t really speak for the entire military, because inside of the military itself there are so many different political views. But even inside of the military, sometimes we see that the government is spending money on things that could be spent on quality of life, could be spent on better war-making techniques, improving bases, and things of that nature.
Processing your request, Please wait....
Loading ...
