Videos

4199 Responses




Here are Ron Paul’s latest media appearances, speeches and video updates in reverse chronological order. For videos that are older than a few weeks please check out the Ron Paul Video Archives below.

Embed this YouTube channel on your website!

Also check out RonPaulFlix.com for the latest videos.

Ron Paul Video Archives

For classic Ron Paul videos go to Who is Ron Paul?

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

4,199 responses to “Videos”

  1. Stan McClain

    The latest Ron Paul Videos are coming up as "No Longer Available" Is this happening for everyone, or is it because I'm on a cruise ship with satelite access? Let me know if he's being censored!

    Stan McClain
    Pasadena CA

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Nag

    In my opinion there are only two great statesmen, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. Now I have three, Ron Paul. You sir, are a great man. Unfortunately, the machinations of our enemies have been around longer than our beloved "divine inspiration".

    -Nag-

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Marco

    Hi, I just wanted to let everyone know that I have started making a series of Ron Paul videos called "RON PAUL 101". Each video deals with only one specific issue to inform those who may not know who Ron Paul is and his stance on the issues. Each video contains not only Congressman Paul's words on the topic but pertinent voting records as well.

    Check it out:

    http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F0261DB03E98730D

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Boilerroom Ed

    John,
    That's where I heard that! Thanks for the reminder. Didn't mean to rip him off.

    You're right, he's really good.

    Ed
    CORRECTION:
    "At least the blacks knew when they were slaves. None of you seem to have a clue." Doug Stanhope

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. John Towery

    I like that comment Ed. As a side note, and not to diminish its validity, you should give credit to the comedian who said it: Doug Stanhope. If you haven't seen his show and get mired down in all this stuff after a while, you should check it out. Life isn't all about politics. Same some time to laugh once in a while.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Boilerroom Ed

    Enough about slavery already. We are all debt slaves right now.

    At least the blacks knew when they were slaves. None of you seem to have a clue.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. citizen

    About that 3/5 thing... it does NOT mean that a slave is only worth 3/5 of a human. It says that a slave is worth 3/5 of a human to his OWNER. SLAVES DID NOT VOTE. This rule gave the South more power in Congress BECAUSE they enslaved people. It should have said that slaves are worth ZERO and free men are worth ONE to give the slave states INCENTIVE to FREE SLAVES.

    Jefferson wrote in the original declaration of independence that the slave trade was a "cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended [the King]."

    What happens when people comprimise for One Law Over All is always going to be a comprimise towards something bad.

    What would have been wrong with 13 Nations? Would not the one who followed the best path succeed and show the way for the others? Would not those with slavery have ended and been erased from the map? Would we not be following the 9th and 10th Amendments? Would we not be free?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. citizen

    lincoln was horrible - he had political enemies intimidated and jailed. bush looks like a saint in comparison (and someone actually attacked our country under his watch).

    slavery was on the way out before the war. lincoln made sure only the south got the blame, and the seeds of hatred were sown.

    all he had to do was let the slave states leave, tariff any goods from slave territories to the point where it is no longer economical (which many slave owners were already realizing after witnessing northern plantations of free men worked better than their forced-labor camps), and spread the idea.

    freedom is the natural way of man if left alone by his government.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Fady

    hi my name is Fady...I care about my life and I care about the future and this country's futute. We need to start a network...a physical network of people against this political agenda of the 2 parties to save our country, because clearly they don't care about us. I am willing to share my contact info if you all are, so we can build a network and save our country and our future.
    thanks

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. U.S.S.A. I Miss ya Liberty!

    We as a Nation had one last chance to save a sinking ship, that chance has been lost in the active supression of ron pauls candidacy. I fear we now are sunk and our options will very soon be limited to unpleasantries....

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Drew

    CALL YOUR CONGRESSMEN TO NOT EXCEPT:

    Republicans - you are a capitalist aren't you?

    Democrats - do you think we'll he able to get health care now?

    I'M GOING TO - WRITE IN RON PAUL - FOR PRESIDENT

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Boilerroom Ed

    Here's the whole press conference:

    http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=281024-1&showVid=true

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. Confused???

    I forgot to mention that pending the reply message...the green party could pick up three votes in IL (me, wife, mother)...I will do more research until then...

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Confused???

    Hello...I do not know if any person still reads this but I would like to know why I should vote for Bob Barr or Baldwin...I have spent countless hours researching Obama and voted for him in the Primary...I have a hard time finding solid information with Barr and Baldwin answering questions like Obama has...I hear Ron Paul and agree with Paul...but...he is not running...
    I support what Paul said on Wednesday, September 10th with the whole "we agree" principles statement (every line) that is on the front page of the Ron Paul website but not one of the four (Baldwin, Barr, McKinney, or Nader) explain how they are to reach their principles...I want to vote green...I do...but they don't explain how they are to get there...Obama does...Perhaps Paul and the campaignforliberty movement will be stronger in 2012.
    Check it out:
    www.campaignforliberty.com

    Keep in mind I am in a DEM safe state where Obama is almost a winner today (IL)...so I have nothing to lose for voting Green.

    SIDE NOTE: I wanted to vote green party in 2004 but when I got in the voting booth only two names were on the ballot for President...Kerry and Bush...I was so mad...

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. civilian

    Here is a Ron Paul Video to post!

    ALEX JONES - INFOWARS CENSORSHIP
    http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0tvWGAJyGS4

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. Gene

    Since everyone seems to want to talk about Lincoln here, I thought I’d add some things.

    1st – Lincoln slavery wasn’t abolished in the entire US after the war. It was only abolished in those states that attempted to leave the Union. "That on the 1st day of January, A.D. 1863, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free;” In fact, he didn’t even include Washington D.C. If he really felt so strongly about ending slavery, then he would have included the entire Union at that time.

    2nd – I have read the Constitution many times. In all this time, never have I found the clause that states once you join, you can never leave. Sounds like gang mentality to me.

    3rd – I find it interesting that so many educated persons believe that the Constitution is against slavery. I mean, most of the “Founders” had slaves. It even states how slaves should be counted for purposes of determining how many Rep a state can have in Congress. If I recall correctly, Native Americans (yes, they enslaved them too) counted as not at all and black people counted as 3/5 a human being.

    In truth, I couldn’t care less about Lincoln at the moment. All this crap is a big distraction that really doesn’t matter at the moment. What matters is stopping the BS that’s taking place now. I hope everyone wakes the hell up, before it’s too late.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. Donald Barsell

    For a little, nostalgic look back on where we've been,
    and a glimpse into the near future of the Rally in Minneapolis,
    I've put together a couple videos entitled: Paul's Revered Patriots:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sF5Tt5FksHA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T0SosAsvRw

    For Freedom, Prosperity, and Peace

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. John

    Abraham Lincoln was a threat to the Republic. During the Civil War, Lincoln appropriated powers no previous President had wielded: he used his war powers to proclaim a blockade, suspended the writ of habeas corpus, spent money without congressional authorization, and imprisoned 18,000 suspected Confederate sympathizers without trial.

    Ron Paul is right.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. sean liebel

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=chHoie4phVk
    "The Gold standard"

    Ron Paul would approve of this message

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. Ponder This

    Thank you Ron Paul and all the Patriots that Cured our Apathy!! Let's continue this march towards Liberty and get involved in our own local government.
    We must continue to have a PEACE R3VOLUTION and educate without anger.
    I am honored to have been associated with Dr. Paul and the many many many wonderful new friends - new Republicans, Independents, Democrats and other Americans that will hopefully join together and make real changes.

    See you in September! March On!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. scott

    All this talk about slavery not being an issue in the Civil War.
    Did slavery end after the war? Did it?
    Then, CERTAINLY, abolition was one of the motivations for the war.

    In what imaginary country is The Civil War called The War Of Northern Agression? Oh, that's right...The South.
    The south...a disaster to this very day.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. kevin walsh

    Excessive tarrifs were purpously enacted against southern states' textiles and raw agriculural products such as cotton by a handful of northern industrialists whom vied for centralized government and eventually a Federal Reserve Bank in 1913. To these "men of money" it was necessary to keep slavery as the "strawman issue" so conspicuous and dogmatic that the idea of raising a Union (Industrialist) army could be raised to kill fellow countrymen without critical opposition or negotiation for compromise between the states. Lincoln became dictator. The War of Northern Aggression was intentional mass murder to eliminate effective State Rights, hence, true representation and individual liberty. Patriot Act ll?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. Brandon Echols

    I'm a Ron Paul supporter, i'm not here to bash anyone, but I do want to say that this issue is quite deep. Abe couldn't control the south from seceding, could he? The rule of law and the constitution couldn't have stopped the south half from rebelling and wanting independence...so i don't see how this is truly Abe's fault.

    If he followed the constitution/bill of rights and freed the slaves, it would have started a war. i'm from the south and i believe that they would have rebelled on the spot and went to war.

    I think we all need to agree that none of us were there and that Abe was in a very tight spot where it was a lose-lose situation from the start. Because the Confederacy very clearly wanted their independence at a certain point. They weren't going to rein themselves in when Lincoln read them the constitution would they??

    God Bless, and Godspeed to Ron Paul.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Betty L Hohensee

    Yes, again...and again...and again Ron Paul comes up with the most accurate of assessments and without bashing rhetoric as we know it today with the other candidates. Ron Paul was correct...senseless war to free slaves when other countries did the same thing without war. Dudy Clair, unfortunately many don't like the truth pushed back in their faces, too bad we can't change the people.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. John Podlasek

    One other option Lincoln had was to buy the freedom of the slaves. But other forces prevented him from doing so, plus he was not sure if he had the right to do so. He did, since the Bill or Rights protects all people. Most agree to that today, but not so many in those days. Ron Paul is right on this issue. The Supreme Court and the Constitution should of prevented the War from happening, but many people were against freeing slaves.
    It was another needless war. If people had just followed the rule of Law and the Constitution, it could of all been avoided. Ron Paul is correct on this.
    Fred Talbott is wrong.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. mike

    Disregarding the constitution which he pledged to protect. sound familiar? Can you say patriot act?

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. Chris

    and lincoln may have disregarded the constitution but you must understand he was trying to save the united states.....i respect the man....but i do not think he was the greatest president in history..

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. Chris

    your wrong when you say "Slavery was just an official reason to make the war palatable to the masses." Abe Lincoln hated slavery he long opposed it..the war was not over slavery it was over secession....he ended slavery in the south as a strategic move to weaken the south he had no intention of abolishing it in the union because the constitution did not allow it....he changed the war from secession to secession and slavery Abe Lincoln was a genius and if you knew anything about him and the civil war you would know that.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. sean moor

    BLESS ALL of YOU!!! that has been busting their humps to get this man to be president.I have been doing my part.BLESS YA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. bob

    I for one don't think Fred is a propagandist. If someone really believes that Abraham Lincoln was America's greatest president then I understand why they would defend him. But there's so much more to Lincoln than what we learn in school... actually, there's a lot more to just about anything taught in school. Schools aren't meant to educate but to control the people and to prevent them from making up their own minds. I'm so glad we have Youtube these days... you could spend years educating yourself about a wide variety of topics that are all presented from different viewpoints.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. Ton

    Well Fred Talbott... looks like you just got hand your hindparts in a hand basket. It's okay brother, you can always come home... ALWAYS.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. Tom

    It's funny how if you speak the truth about Lincoln's complete disregard for the Constitution, you are branded as a racist. I suppose imprisoning a US congressman because he publicly disagrees with the agenda of the President, and denying him habeas corpus is a great thing? Shutting down newspapers that disagree and jailing editors is a good thing? Breaking international law in placing an embargo on your own port is a good thing?

    Lincoln completely disregarded the Constitution... ignoring that only screams ignorance.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. Thomas

    Not surprisingly, we get a visit from a propagandist who has never had an independent thought in his life, and can't believe anyone would ever suspect that what his fourth-grade teacher taught him might not be the entire truth. Banish such thoughts, comrade! The regime has given you the Truth!

    People like this are exactly -- EXACTLY -- what this regime thrives on.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. Mark

    Where does he say that he considers Lincoln one of history's "worst war criminals"?

    I love that video and I agree you should put it up because it shows that Ron Paul can think for himself and doesn't hesitate to question widely accepted half truths.

    If you read up on history you'll find that the Civil War was NOT fought over slavery. Ron Paul is absolutely right. Slavery was just an official reason to make the war palatable to the masses. Without a beautiful and romantic "cause" the population wouldn't have supported a war that killed 600,000 Americans.

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Eoers

      Rightly said!

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. Fred Talbott

    Why don't you play one of the videos where he sides with people who consider Abraham Lincoln to be one of history's worst war criminals? Here's the mildest example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbOE4Ip7In0

    Good luck with the revolution, whackos!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    1. Peter Schiff

      December 17, 2008

      In Madoff We Trust

      As the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Wall Street insider Bernard Madoff unravels in the media spotlight, the nation is being presented with a rare opportunity to understand the true nature of many of our most cherished financial structures. Hopefully we have the wisdom to connect the dots.

      Although the $50 billion loss engineered by Madoff is truly a staggering accomplishment (and was done using old-fashioned fraud rather than the mathematical wizardry that has characterized Wall Street’s recent larcenies) the size of the scheme pales in comparison to the multi-trillion dollar Ponzi structures run by the United States government. In fact, rather than looking to jail Madoff, President-elect Obama should consider making him our new Treasury secretary. If not that, at least make him the czar of something!

      Madoff’s inspiration came from Charles Ponzi, the Italian-born American immigrant who promoted an investment plan in the early 1900s’ that traded postal coupons. Rather than paying investors from legitimate investment returns, Ponzi hit upon the innovative idea of paying out early investors with money collected from new investors. By creating an illusion of success, interest in his investment plan ballooned. Over time the schemes have become known by many other names, such as chain letters or pyramid schemes. They are united by the fact that they always fail in the end.

      When the influx of new investors inevitably slows to the point where distributions to current investors can no longer be maintained, investors look to withdraw funds. When this happens, the entire structure falls apart. The profits received by those who “invested” early as well so any funds skimmed off by the promoter, are offset by all the losses of those who came late to the party.

      To a large extent, the same concept has driven the major asset bubbles of the last decade. Given the ridiculously high valuations that were assigned to tech stocks and real estate during their respective booms, the only way the bubbles could be perpetuated was if newer “investors” could be found to pay even more outrageous prices (the greater fool). But when these new buyers balked, the whole structure crumbled. Although there was no Ponzi or Madoff to orchestrate these manias, the entire financial and economic apparatus of the country had successfully convinced the public that “investments” in tech stocks and condominiums were bullet proof and that the supply of new buyers was endless.

      Unfortunately, the Ponzi economy doesn’t stop there. A chain letter is no more viable when run by governments than when run by private citizens. However, government orchestrated pyramids have the advantage of required participation. As a result, they can maintain the illusion of viability for several generations. But the longer such schemes operate the larger will be the losses when they ultimately collapse.

      The Social Security Administration runs its “trust funds” with precisely the same methods used by Madoff and Ponzi. As money is collected by from current workers, the funds are then dispersed to those already receiving benefits. None of the funds collected are actually invested, so no investment returns are ever generated. Those currently paying into the system are expected to receive their returns based on the “contribution” made by future workers. This is the classic definition of a Ponzi scheme. The only difference is that Ponzi didn’t own a printing press.

      The United States Government runs its own balance sheet based on the Ponzi principal as well. Our national debt always grows and never shrinks. As existing debt matures, proceeds are repaid by issuing new debt. Interest payments on existing debt are also made by selling new debt to investors. The whole scheme depends on an ever growing supply of new lenders, or the willingness of existing lenders, to continue to roll over maturing notes. Of course, as was the case with Madoff, if enough of our creditors want their money back, the music stops playing.

      In Madoff’s case, the rug pulling was provided by the huge financial losses suffered by some of his clients in other non-Madoff investments. When enough of these clients looked to sell some of their apparently well-performing Madoff assets to help offset such losses, the scam collapsed. The same thing could befall the United States Government. Now that China and our other creditors are looking to spend some of their U.S. Treasury holdings to stimulate their own economies, look for a similar outcome with even more dire implications.

      The main difference is that while Madoff took elaborate steps to conceal his scheme, the U.S. government operates in broad daylight. It truly is amazing how faith in government is so pervasive that many can believe that politicians will succeed where private individuals fail, and that governments are somehow immune to the economic laws that govern the rest of society. Like those unfortunate to have been duped by Madoff and Ponzi, the world is in for a rude awakening.

      For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      1. Charles

        In January of 2008, I came across a "home made" Ron Paul poster. I considered this man to be a local of my hometown that had put his name on the ballot as to possibly stir some local interest. I later went on yahoo and typed "Ron Paul", immediately I viewed multiple youttube feeds. I watched for about an hour and to my disbelief, I saw a man presenting truth straight from the hip and to beat it all.....he was not reading from a prompter! His competence in free markets, limited government, and the debt we obtain from the war had me sold and confident that there was at least one man in Washington (not of) that cared for the american people.
        In the same light, I found out about you through a Ron Paul video on youtube. Your "debate" with Art Laffer was the first video I watched, and subsequently I have become a a die-hard fan, educating my friends in dental school on the common sense approach to Austrian economics and the idea that history is the most valuable resource Washington has, but apparently the most shunned.
        Please keep the message going, and please keep the “Experts” on Fox, MSNBC, and the like on their toes. Every time you speak, it's as they are listening to someone speaking a dead language...discerning the truth you expose to them. These inevitable truths cannot be digested to those with agenda's and pre-conditioned ideologies.
        Also, if you personally talk to Ron Paul in the future...please tell him that we need Rand to step up in politics like Ron has.

        Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

        Report this comment

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    2. Eoers

      And he was damn right saying that! If you have listened carefully he explained why. Why worship a simple politician like a God. Lincoln was just another corrupt man, largely responsible for the death of 600000 and for major destruction. If you do read your history books carefully, you might find out that he was not even interested in freeing the slaves. The idea was to promise, promise and promise and make them rebel and so weaken the South, that's it!
      Basically the slaves were not freed for another 100 years, what do you think why came Martin Luther or Malcolm X if everything was sooo peachy?

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    3. Tim Beck

      Whackos? I just watched that video, and to me the person that thinks the civil war was a good thing is the Whacko. Come on now, the most violent and bloody war this country has ever had, and you are saying that people who think it could have and should have been avoided are Whackos? I won't sit by and let someone call me a whacko because I believe in freedom and peace. Sorry.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    4. Peter Ashley

      He wasn't freeing the slaves, if I remember correctly he only wanted to unify the nation under one republic, that's about it. Ron Paul only disagreed with the way Lincoln went about doing it. Not to say lincoln didn't care about the slaves, but he knew a unified America would ultimately phase out slavery anyway. That's the problem you think just because one person disagreed with the greatest president in history he's calling him a war criminal, when in all actuality the right to have the option to disagree and come to an alternate solution is one of our greatest rights, and that's what's being phased out in the USA right now because most people in this country are sheep.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    5. JC Marti

      Ok listen fool, you will one day wake up and realize that you are no longer free. It does not take a genious to notice what is going on here. Ron Paul may not have all of the answers but atleast he is trying to stop our government from destroying the constitution. It appears you may not like freedom as much as the rest of us. Keep living in your little bubble. Also try reading and educating yourself before you say stupid shit.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    6. Band Together

      You're a fool! Come up with something better than crap. Who care's. That's just his way of saying how he would of done it another way. Leave this website if you don't like him.Stop taking up our time with your non-since.

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    7. greenback

      Vote Yes! Audit the Fed (friendly info video)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vwHZRr-knM

      Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

      Report this comment

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

1 2 3 7

Leave a Reply