Ron Paul to TSA: Stop Irradiating Our Bodies!


Click here for the abbreviated version (with background music)

Ron Paul introduced legislation to protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse by federal Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees conducting screenings at the nation’s airports:

A BILL – HR 6416

To ensure that certain Federal employees cannot hide behind immunity.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO IMMUNITY FOR CERTAIN AIRPORT SCREENING METHODS.

No law of the United States shall be construed to confer any immunity for a Federal employee or agency or any individual or entity that receives Federal funds, who subjects an individual to any physical contact (including contact with any clothing the individual is wearing), x-rays, or millimeter waves, or aids in the creation of or views a representation of any part of a individual’s body covered by clothing as a condition for such individual to be in an airport or to fly in an aircraft. The preceding sentence shall apply even if the individual or the individual’s parent, guardian, or any other individual gives consent.

Ron Paul introduced the “American Traveler Dignity Act” (HR 6416) with the following words. (This is a transcript of his actual speech.)

Ron Paul: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise this evening to announce that I introduced some legislation today dealing with the calamity that we have found at our airports with TSA. Something has to be done. Everybody is fed up. The people are fed up, the pilots are fed up, I’m fed up.

You know, I’ve come to this floor many times over the past many years and complained about the terrible foreign policy we’ve had, the terrible monetary policy we’ve had, the excessive spending and the debt and also the tax policy. But what we’re doing and what we’re accepting in putting up with at this airport is so symbolic of us just not standing up and saying, “Enough is enough”.

I know the American people are starting to wake up, but our government, those in charge – Congress as well as the executive branch – are doing nothing. Yes, they’re talking about maybe backing off and allowing the pilots to go through. But can you think how silly the whole thing is? The pilot has a gun in the cockpit, and he’s managing this aircraft, which is a missile, and we make him go through this groping x-ray exercise, having people feeling their underwear. It’s absurd, and it’s time we wake up.

The bill I’ve introduced will take care of this. But we have to realize that the real problem is that the American people have been too submissive, we have been too submissive. It’s been going on for a long time, and this was to be expected even from the beginning of the TSA and it’s deeply flawed. Private property should be protected by private individuals, not bureaucrats.

But the bill that I’ve introduced will take care of it. It’s very simple, it’s one paragraph long. It removes the immunity from anybody in the federal government that does anything that you or I can’t do. If you can’t grope another person and if you can’t x-ray people and endanger them with possible x-rays, you can’t take nude photographs of individuals, why do we allow the government to do it? We would go to jail. He’d be immediately arrested if an individual citizen went out and did these things, and yet we just sit there calmly and say, “Oh, they’re making us safe”.

And, besides, the argument from the executive branch is that when you buy a ticket, you have sacrificed your rights, and it is the duty of the government to make us safe. That isn’t the case. You never have to sacrifice your rights. The duty of the government is to protect our rights, not to abuse them and do what they have been doing to us. The pilots hopefully will be exempted from this.

But another suggestion I have that might help us: let’s make sure that every member of Congress goes through this. Get the x-ray and make them look at the pictures, and then go through one of those groping pat downs. And then I think there will be a difference. Have everybody in the executive branch, anybody who is a cabinet member, make them go through it and look at it. Maybe they would pay more attention.

But this doesn’t work, this is not what makes us safer, this is preposterous to think that the TSA has made us safer.

You know, when you think about it, if you look at what’s happened over the past 10 years, during this last decade, we lost 3000 on a terrible, terrible day for America. But since that time in this last decade, we have also lost 6,000 of our military personnel going over there and trying to rectify this problem. We have lost 400,000 people on our government-run highways. We have lost 150,000 individuals from homicides. So I think there’s reason to be concerned, reason to deal with this problem. We’re not dealing with it the right way, we’re doing the wrong thing, and groping people at the airport doesn’t solve our problems.

What has solved our problems, basically, has been that they put a good lock on the door and they put a gun inside the cockpit. That’s been the greatest boon to our safety. Safety should be the responsibility of the individual and the private property owner. But right now, we assume the government’s always going to take care of us and we’re supposed to sacrifice our liberties. I say that is wrong, we are not safer and we also know there are individuals who are making money of this. Michael Chertoff; I mean, here’s a guy who was the head of the TSA – selling the equipment. And the equipment is questionable; we don’t even know if it works, and it may well be dangerous to our health.

You know, the way I see this; if this doesn’t change, I see what has happened to the American people is we have accepted the notion that we should be treated like cattle. “Make us safe, make us secure, put us into barbed wire, feed us, fatten us up”, and then they’ll eat us. And we’re a bunch of cattle if we have to wait and say, “We’ve had it”. I think this whole idea of an opt-out day is just great. We ought to opt-out and make the point, get somebody to watch it and take a camera, it’s time for the American people to stand up, shrug off the shackles of our government and TSA at the airport.

These are Ron Paul’s prepared remarks:

Ron Paul: Mr. Speaker, today I introduce legislation to protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse by federal Transportation Security Administration employees conducting screenings at the nation’s airports. We have seen the videos of terrified children being grabbed and probed by airport screeners. We have read the stories of Americans being subjected to humiliating body imaging machines and/or forced to have the most intimate parts of their bodies poked and fondled. We do not know the potentially harmful effects of the radiation emitted by the new millimeter wave machines.

In one recent well-publicized case, a TSA official is recorded during an attempted body search saying, “By buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights.” I strongly disagree and am sure I am not alone in believing that we Americans should never give up our rights in order to travel. As our Declaration of Independence states, our rights are inalienable. This TSA version of our rights looks more like the “rights” granted in the old Soviet Constitutions, where freedoms were granted to Soviet citizens — right up to the moment the state decided to remove those freedoms.

The incident of the so-called “underwear bomber” last Christmas is given as justification for the billions of dollars the federal government is spending on the new full-body imaging machines, but a Government Accountability Office study earlier this year concluded that had these scanners been in use they may not have detected the explosive material that was allegedly brought onto the airplane. Additionally, there have been recent press reports calling into question the accuracy and adequacy of these potentially dangerous machines.

My legislation is simple. It establishes that airport security screeners are not immune from any US law regarding physical contact with another person, making images of another person, or causing physical harm through the use of radiation-emitting machinery on another person. It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us.

Imagine if the political elites in our country were forced to endure the same conditions at the airport as business travelers, families, senior citizens, and the rest of us. Perhaps this problem could be quickly resolved if every cabinet secretary, every member of Congress, and every department head in the Obama administration were forced to submit to the same degrading screening process as the people who pay their salaries.

I warned at the time of the creation of the TSA that an unaccountable government entity in control of airport security would provide neither security nor defend our basic freedom to travel. Yet the vast majority of both Republicans and Democrats then in Congress willingly voted to create another unaccountable, bullying agency– in a simple-minded and unprincipled attempt to appease public passion in the wake of 9-11. Sadly, as we see with the steady TSA encroachment on our freedom and dignity, my fears in 2001 were justified.

The solution to the need for security at US airports is not a government bureaucracy. The solution is to allow the private sector, preferably the airlines themselves, to provide for the security of their property. As a recent article in Forbes magazine eloquently stated, “The airlines have enormous sums of money riding on passenger safety, and the notion that a government bureaucracy has better incentives to provide safe travels than airlines with billions of dollars worth of capital and goodwill on the line strains credibility.” In the meantime, I hope we can pass this legislation and protect Americans from harm and humiliation when they choose to travel.

»crosslinked«

  • Sp3ckledJim

    I wonder how many jews died fighting in iraq and afghanistan,i wonder,i bet you there was none.You better wake TF up my american cousins,your just cannon fodder for the jewish agenda of wiping all none jews of the face of the earth.All media(96%) is jewish controlled,they are killing you through stealth and fake wars to change us to a minority status so that they can then release their final solution.Who the hell brought on the prescent depression?the jew controlled bankers.Wake TF up bitches

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 3: “With Lincoln out of the way they were able to proceed with that plan, and did proceed with it in the United States. Within eight years after Lincoln’s assassination silver was demonetized and the Gold Standard money system set up in the United States.” -The Vancouver Sun, May 2, 1934

    TSA, groping and scanners is about control and usurping the US Constitution and the rights of US citizens through the Patriot Act.

    911 was an inside job, it was a set up for the Patriot Act.

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 2: “…and who had any reason to desire the death of Lincoln. They were the men opposed to his national currency program, and who had fought him throughout the whole of the Civil War on his policy of greenback currency. They were the men who were interested in the establishment of the Gold Standard money system and the right of the bankers to manage the currency and credit of every nation in the world.” -The Vancouver Sun, May 2, 1934

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 1: “Abraham Lincoln, the martyred Emancipator of the Slaves, was assassinated through the machinations of a group representative of the international bankers who feared the United States President’s national credit ambitions–and the plot was hatched in Toronto and Montreal. There was only one group in the world at that time who could finance anything they cared to attempt without regard to cost,…” -The Vancouver Sun, May 2, 1934

  • hplaserjet2001

    “Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers – but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here and it controls all of our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” -Louis McFadden, 1934, Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 2: …They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders.” -Louis McFadden, 1932, Chairman, House Committee on Banking and Currency

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 1: “We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank, hereinafter called the FED. They are not government institutions… -Louis McFadden, 1932, Chairman, House Committee on Banking and Currency

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 3: These “loans” are simply Congress allowing the Reserve to “create” money for the gov’t to use. The bankers print notes (fiat currency), with no value behind them, then send taxpayers the bill for the interest.

    “What we’ve had for the last 10 to 15 years is unlimited attitude, we can make money, we can do anything we like, we just have tons of time to do what we want without regarding regulation or regarding the basics of how you run your business.” -Evelyn De Rothschild, CNBC interview

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 2: Income tax revenues amount to around 20-25% of the revenue collected by the gov’t. Other funds come from corporate income taxes, imports, cigarettes, gas and a slew of excise and other taxes. Further corruption of your tax dollar occurs when the Federal Reserve “loans” money to the gov’t.

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 1: The Grace Report: When Ronald Reagan took office, he commissioned a blue ribbon panel of businessmen to assess various functions of the government, headed by Peter Grace. That report stated that, “100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by the interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.

  • hplaserjet2001

    The US gov’t overspends by $4.38+ billion per day.

    Since 1913, the Federal Reserve has devalued the US dollar by 98+%.

    In 2009, the Federal Reserve engineered 20+ trillion dollar bailouts equaled 40% of the private wealth created in the US since 1776.

    The US Office of Management and Budget reports that for the next 70 years the US will experience deficits of tens of trillions of dollars and will not have one year with a budget surplus.

  • hplaserjet2001

    “Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book credit which we create from nothing to all local banks…thus we bring industry, management and labour into our debt…and pit management against labour so they will never unite and attack us and usher in a debt-free industrial utopia.” -Harold Rosenthal

    The Federal Reserve reports the private net worth in the US is $53.4 trillion. US debt and unfunded liabilities are $120 trillion or $389,610 for each US citizen.

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 7: …within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?” At least one answer to McCarthy’s questions is clear. A coup is underway in the USA, the goal of which is to establish complete, unquestioned authority over citizens–a ‘fundamental change’ where US citizens have no legal recourse against an authoritarian central government.

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 6: …on US soil, without oversight from law enforcement agencies? Citizens who are arrested have no legal authority to demand full documentation from INTERPOL concerning charges brought against them. Andy McCarthy at National Review asks, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have,…

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 5: …of international organizations shall be inviolable. Inviolable archives means INTERPOL records are beyond US citizens’ FOIA requests and from American legal or investigative discovery ‘unless such immunity be expressly waived.’ Property and assets being immune from search and confiscation means precisely that. Wherever they may be in the USA. This could conceivably include human assets – Americans arrested on US soil by INTERPOL officers. Why would INTERPOL be arresting citizens…

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 4: …actions. Barack Obama revoked those exceptions in a change to EO 12425 on December 17, 2009. Thus, INTERPOL now can conduct operations on US soil with no accountability in the US. From ThreatsWatch: Section 2c of the US International Organizations Immunities Act is the crucial piece. Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives…

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 3: …law and law enforcement agencies. During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted INTERPOL the status of diplomatic personnel in order to engage more constructively on international law enforcement. In EO 12425, Reagan made two exceptions to that status. The first had to do with taxation, the second was to ensure INTERPOL had the same accountability for its actions as American law enforcement and they had to produce records when demanded by courts and did not have immunity for their…

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 2: Executive Order (EO) 13524 gives INTERPOL the power to operate on American soil. It is beyond the reach of the FBI and immune from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. INTERPOL now has full authority to conduct investigations and law enforcement activities in the USA, with full immunity from laws such as the FOIA and with complete independence from oversight from the FBI. INTERPOL now has full law enforcement authority in the USA without any check on its power afforded by US…

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 1: On December 17, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13524 giving INTERPOL the power to operate on American soil with full immunity from laws such as the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and with complete independence from oversight from the FBI. It is beyond the reach of the FBI and immune from FOIA requests. INTERPOL has full authority to conduct investigations and other law enforcement activities on US soil.

  • hplaserjet2001

    Part 2: In support of this program, Battelle partnered with Farber Speciality Vehicles and Drapier Laboratory to design and develop portable research facilities in trailers for screening technologies that can be used at airports, sporting events, etc.